## Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma Chapter 7

###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:1:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:1:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:1:1)

**מְרֻבָּה.** בְּדָבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ רוּחַ חַיִּים וּבְדָבָר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ רוּחַ חַיִּים. דִּכְתִיב (שמות כב) עַל שֶׂה עַל שַׂלְמָה עַל כָּל אֲבֵדָה וְגוֹ'‏ יְשַׁלֵּם שְׁנַיִם:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
מרובה. דבר שיש בו רוח חיים ובדבר שאין בו רוח חיים – as it is written (Exodus 22:8): “[In all charges of misappropriation – pertaining to an ox, an ass,] a sheep, a garment, or any other loss, [whereof one party alleges, ‘This is it’ – the case of both parties shall come before God: he whom God declares guilty] shall pay double to the other.”


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:1:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:1:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:1:2)

**אֵין הַגּוֹנֵב אַחַר הַגַּנָּב וְכוּ'.** דִּכְתִיב (שם) וְגֻנַּב מִבֵּית הָאִישׁ, וְלֹא מִבֵּית הַגַּנָּב:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אין הגונב אחר הגנב – as it is written (Exodus 22:6): “and they are stolen from the man’s house,” and not “from the house of the thief.”


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:2:1)

**גָּנַב עַל פִּי שְׁנַיִם.** כְּלוֹמַר שְׁנַיִם מְעִידִין אוֹתוֹ שֶׁגָּנַב:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
גנב על פי שנים – meaning to say that two testify against him that he stole.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:2:2)

**גָּנַב וּמָכַר בְּשַׁבָּת.** אֲבָל טָבַח שֶׁהוּא עָנוּשׁ סְקִילָה, קָם לֵיהּ בִּדְרַבָּה מִנֵּיהּ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
גנב ומכר בשבת – but he slaughtered which is punishable by stoning, he who has committed two offenses simultaneously, must be held answerable for the severer only.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:2:3)

**וְטָבַח בְּיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים.** שֶׁאֵין זְדוֹנוֹ אֶלָּא כָּרֵת. וּכְגוֹן דְּלֹא אַתְּרוּ בֵּיהּ וְלֹא לָקֵי, דְּקָיְמָא לָן כָּל חַיָּבֵי מַלְקִיּוֹת שׁוֹגְגִים חַיָּבִים בְּתַשְׁלוּמִין. אֲבָל חַיָּבֵי מִיתוֹת בֵּית דִּין, אֲפִלּוּ שׁוֹגְגִים, פְּטוּרִים מִן הַתַּשְׁלוּמִין:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
וטבח ביום הכפורים – for his wanton violation is not punishable other than through extirpation, and such as the case where they (i.e., the witnesses) didn’t warn him and they ae not whipped for we hold that all who are liable for flogging are those who act inadvertently, but are liable for payment, but those who are liable for the death penalty at the hands of the Jewish court , even inadvertently, are exempt from payment.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:2:4)

**וְטָבַח וּמָכַר וְאַחַר כָּךְ מֵת אָבִיו.** אֲבָל מֵת אָבִיו וְאַחַר כָּךְ טָבַח, תָּנָא סֵיפָא דְּפָטוּר, דְּשֶׁלּוֹ הוּא טוֹבֵחַ וְשֶׁלּוֹ הוּא מוֹכֵר, שֶׁהֲרֵי יָרַשׁ אֶת אָבִיו:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
וטבח ומכר ואחר כך מת אביו – but if his father died and afterwards, he slaughtered [the animal], it (i.e., the Mishnah] taught at the conclusion that he is exempt, because he is slaughtering what is his and selling what is his, for he inherited his father.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:5
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:2:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:2:5)

**בִּשְׁנֵי אֵלּוּ.** בִּטְרֵפָה וּבְחֻלִּין בָּעֲזָרָה. דְּקָסָבַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן שְׁחִיטָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ רְאוּיָה לָאו שְׁמָהּ שְׁחִיטָה. אֲבָל לִרְפוּאָה וְלִכְלָבִים, שְׁחִיטָה רְאוּיָה הִיא, דְּאִי בָּעֵי מָצֵי אָכֵיל מִנַּהּ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
בשני אלו – with an animal torn by wild beasts and with non-holy produce eaten in the Temple courtyard, for Rabbi Shimon holds that slaughter that is not worthy is not called slaughtering, but for medicinal purposes and for dogs, it is an appropriate slaughter, and if he wants he can eat from it.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:3:1)

**הָאַחֲרוֹנִים מְשַׁלְּמִים שְׁלֹשָׁה.** לְשׁוֹר. וּכְגוֹן שֶׁהוּזְמוּ אַחֲרוֹנִים תְּחִלָּה. דְּאִי עֵדֵי גְּנֵבָה הוּזְמוּ תְּחִלָּה, בָּטְלָה לָהּ עֵדוּת טְבִיחָה, דְּדִלְמָא בְּעָלִים מְכָרוּהוּ לוֹ, וְכִי מִתַּזְּמֵי אַמַּאי מְשַׁלְּמֵי:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
האחרונים משלמים שלשה – for an ox, and for example, the latter witnesses were found to be scheming witnesses first ,for if the witnesses for the theft had been found to be scheming first, the testimony of the slaughter is voided , for perhaps the owners had sold it to him, and if they are refuted why do they pay?


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:3:2)

**בָּטְלָה עֵדוּת שְׁנִיָּה.** וְהוּא מְשַׁלֵּם כֶּפֶל מִשּׁוּם עֵדוּת רִאשׁוֹנִים. וְהֵן פְּטוּרִין, דְּאֵין עֵדִים מְשַׁלְּמִין מָמוֹן עַד שֶׁיּוּזְמוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
בטלה עדות שניה – and he pays double because of the first testimony (i.e., that he is a thief), and they are exempt, for the witnesses do not pay money until both sets are found to be scheming witnesses.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:3:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:3:3)

**בָּטְלָה כָּל הָעֵדוּת.** וְהוּא פָּטוּר וְהֵם פְּטוּרִים. וַאֲפִלּוּ חָזְרוּ וְהוּזְמוּ אַחֲרוֹנִים אַחַר כָּךְ, אֵין מְשַׁלְּמִין, שֶׁהֲרֵי בָּטְלָה עֵדוּתָן כְּבָר וְהֻכְחֲשׁוּ, כֵּיוָן דְּלֹא גָּנַב לֹא טָבַח, וְאַהָכִי לֹא מִחַיְּבוּ אֶלָּא אַעִמָּנוּ הֱיִיתֶם שֶׁהוּסְרָה גּוּפָה שֶׁל עֵדוּת. וְכָל שֶׁכֵּן אִם הוּזְמוּ שְׁנַיִם הָרִאשׁוֹנִים תְּחִלָּה, שֶׁעֵדוּת שְׁנִיָּה בָּטְלָה. אֶלָּא שֶׁבִּזְמַן שֶׁלֹּא הוּזְמוּ אֶלָּא אֶחָד, בָּטְלוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם. אֲבָל כְּשֶׁהוּזְמוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם, לֹא בָּטְלָה עֵדוּת רִאשׁוֹנָה אֶלָּא מְשַׁלְּמִין כֶּפֶל:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
בטלה כל העדות – and he is exempt and they are exempt [from payment] and even if they retracted and the latter witnesses were found to be scheming afterwards, they do not pay as their testimony was voided already and they were contradicted. Since he did not steal, he did not slaughter [in the meanwhile] they are not liable. But regarding “you were with us” that the whole body of their testimony was removed and all the more so, if the first wo witnesses were found to be scheming witnesses, the testimony of the second [set of witnesses] is voided. But at the time that they had not been found to be scheming other than one [of them], the testimony of both is voided but when both of them had been proven to be scheming witnesses, the testimony of the first set, other than paying of double indemnity.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:4:1)

**עַל פִּי עֵד אֶחָד.** אַף עַל גַּב דְּמִלְּתָא דִּפְשִׁיטָא הִיא דְּאֵין מְשַׁלֵּם אַרְבָּעָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה עַל פִּי עֵד אֶחָד, הָא קָמַשְׁמַע לָן דְּעַל פִּי עַצְמוֹ דּוּמְיָא דְּעַל פִּי עֵד אֶחָד, מָה עֵד אֶחָד אִי אָתֵי עֵד אֶחָד בָּתַר הָכִי מִצְטָרֵף בַּהֲדֵיהּ וּמִחַיַּב, עַל פִּי עַצְמוֹ נַמִּי אִי אָתוּ עֵדִים בָּתַר הוֹדָאָתוֹ מְחַיְּבֵי לֵיהּ, דְּמוֹדֶה בִּקְנָס וְאַחַר כָּךְ בָּאוּ עֵדִים חַיָּב. וְהָנֵי מִלֵּי בְּאוֹמֵר לֹא גָּנַבְתִּי, וּבָאוּ עֵדִים שֶׁגָּנַב, וְחָזַר וְאָמַר טָבַחְתִּי וּמָכַרְתִּי, וּבָאוּ עֵדִים אַחַר כָּךְ שֶׁטָּבַח וּמָכַר, חַיָּב, שֶׁהֲרֵי כְּשֶׁאוֹמֵר טָבַחְתִּי וּמָכַרְתִּי אֵינוֹ מְחַיֵּב עַצְמוֹ בִּכְלוּם, שֶׁיּוֹדֵעַ הוּא שֶׁמּוֹדֶה בִּקְנָס פָּטוּר, וְאֵין כָּאן הוֹדָאָה שֶׁל כְּלוּם. אֲבָל בְּאָמַר גָּנַבְתִּי וּבָאוּ עֵדִים שֶׁגָּנַב, פָּטוּר. דְּחִיֵּב עַצְמוֹ לְשַׁלֵּם קֶרֶן מִיהָא בְּהוֹדָאָתוֹ, הִלְכָּךְ הוֹדָאָה גְּמוּרָה הִיא וּפָטוּר מִכֶּפֶל, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאַחַר כָּךְ בָּאוּ עֵדִים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
על פי עד אחד – even though it is a simple mater, for one does not pay four or five times the amount (i.e., if he not only stole, but also sold the animal or slaughtered it – see Exodus 21:37) on the testimony of one witness. Sure this comes to teach us that testifying by one’s own admission is similar to testimony by one witness. Just as one witnesses, if he brings another witness after wars, they combine in public to make liable. By his own testimony also, if he brings witnesses after his admission, they make him liable, for admitting to a fine and afterwards witnesses came, he is liable. And these words [concern] someone who says: “ I didn’t steal,” and witnesses came and said that he stole and afterwards he retracted and said: “I slaughtered or I sold,” and witnesses came afterwards that he slaughtered or sold, he is liable, for when he says, “I slaughtered or I sold,” he does not make himself liable for anything for he knows that a person who admits to a fine is exempt. We we don’t have here an admission of nothing. But when he says: “I sole” and witnesses came [and testified} that he stole, he obligated himself to pay the principle, however, through his admission, therefore, it is a complete admission and he is exempt from double indemnity, even though afterwards witnesses came [and testified].


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:4:2)

**וּמֵת אָבִיו.** וְהוּא יוֹרְשׁוֹ, וְלֹא הַוְיָא טְבִיחָה כֻּלָּהּ בְּאִסּוּרָא:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ומת אביו – and he inherited him and would not be a slaughter completely illicit.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:4:3)

**גָּנַב וְהִקְדִּישׁ.** כִּי קָא טָבַח דְּהֶקְדֵּשׁ קָא טָבַח וְלֹא דִּבְעָלִים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
גנב והקדיש – when he slaughtered it was for the Temple that he slaughtered and not for the owners.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:4:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:4:4)

**רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר קָדָשִׁים שֶׁחַיָּב בְּאַחֲרָיוּתָם וְכוּ'.** רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן לָאו אַמִּלְּתֵיהּ דְּתַנָּא קַמָּא קָאֵי וְלֹא פָּלֵיג עֲלֵיהּ בְּגָנַב וְהִקְדִּישׁ וְאַחַר כָּךְ טָבַח וּמָכַר. אֶלָּא שַׁמְעִינְהוּ רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן לְרַבָּנָן בְּדוּכְתָּא אַחֲרִיתִי דְּאָמְרֵי הַגּוֹנֵב הֶקְדֵּשׁ מִבֵּית בְּעָלִים פָּטוּר, דִּכְתִיב (שמות כב) וְגֻנַּב מִבֵּית הָאִישׁ, וְלֹא מִבֵּית הֶקְדֵּשׁ, וַעֲלַהּ קָאֵי רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן וְאוֹמֵר קָדָשִׁים שֶׁחַיָּב בְּאַחֲרָיוּתָן חַיָּב, דְּקָרִינַן בֵּיהּ וְגֻנַּב מִבֵּית הָאִישׁ, דְּכֵיוָן דְּהַבַּעַל חַיָּב בְּאַחֲרָיוּתָם כִּי קָא טָבַח דְּמָרֵיהּ קָא טָבַח. וּבְקָדָשִׁים שֶׁחַיָּב בְּאַחֲרָיוּתָן נַמִּי לֹא מְחַיֵּב רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן תַּשְׁלוּמֵי אַרְבָּעָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁשְּׁחָטָן תְּמִימִים בִּפְנִים לְשֵׁם בְּעָלִים אֶלָּא שֶׁנִּשְׁפַּךְ הַדָּם, אוֹ שֶׁשְּׁחָטָן בַּעֲלֵי מוּמִין בַּחוּץ. וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא נִפְדּוּ, סָבַר כָּל הָעוֹמֵד לִפָּדוֹת כְּפָדוּי דָּמֵי וְהַוְיָא שְׁחִיטָה רְאוּיָה. אֲבָל אִם שְׁחָטָן תְּמִימִים בַּחוּץ הַוְיָא שְׁחִיטָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ רְאוּיָה. וְשָׁמְעִינַן לֵיהּ לְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן דְּאָמַר שְׁחִיטָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ רְאוּיָה לָאו שְׁמָהּ שְׁחִיטָה וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב עָלֶיהָ תַּשְׁלוּמֵי אַרְבָּעָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ר"ש אומר קדשים שחייב באחריותם (See Tractate Megillah, Chapter 1, Mishnah 6 and Tracate Kinnim, Chapter 1, Mishnah 1 – both at the end of the respective Mishnayot.) Rabbi Shimon is not referring to the matter of the first Tanna/teacher, nor does he dispute him regarding someone who stole and dedicated the animal to the Temple and afterwards slaughtered and/or sold it. But we understand Rabbi Shimon teaching the Rabbis in another place and saying that a person who seals something dedicated to the Temple from the house of its owners is exempt, as it is written (Exodus 22:6): “if they are stolen from the man’s house” and not “from the house of something dedicated to the Temple.” And on this, Rabbi Shimon refers and states “that a person if he stole consecrated animals for which he [who had consecrated them] is responsible is liable,” for we call him, “if they are stolen from the man’s house”, and since the owner is responsible for them, he is liable. But when he slaughters, it the master’s that he slaughters, and in consecrated animals where he is responsible for the, Rabbi Shimon also does not obligate him for the payment of four times (for a sheep) the amount or five times (for an ox) the amount other than when he slaughtered them innocently inside for the sake of the owners, but when the blood is spilled, if those who have bodily defects slaughtered them outside, even though they had not been redeemed, he held that anything about to be redeemed is considered as fully redeemed. And it is an appropriate slaughter, but if pure people had slaughtered them outside [the Temple] it is considered an unworthy slaughtering, and we understand that according to Rabbi Shimon who said that a slaughter that is not fit is not called a slaughtering, and he is not liable for the payment of four and five times the amount either. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Shimon.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:5:1)

**מְכָרוֹ חוּץ מֵאֶחָד מִמֵּאָה שֶׁבּוֹ.** גַּנָּב שֶׁמָּכַר כָּל הַשּׁוֹר חוּץ מִדָּבָר מֻעָט שֶׁבּוֹ, מִן הַדְּבָרִים הַנִּתָּרִים עִמּוֹ בַּשְּׁחִיטָה, פָּטוּר, דִּכְתִיב (שמות כא) וּטְבָחוֹ אוֹ מְכָרוֹ, עַד שֶׁיִּמְכֹּר כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הַנִּתָּרִים בַּטְּבִיחָה. לַאֲפוֹקֵי שֶׁאִם הִשְׁאִיר גִּזּוֹתֶיהָ אוֹ קַרְנֶיהָ, דְּלֹא הָוֵי שִׁיּוּר, וְלֹא מִפְטַר בְּהָכִי:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
מכרו חוץ מאחד ממאה שבו – a thief who sold the entire ox except for a small amount of it, from the things that remain with him in the slaughter he is exempt, as it is written (Exodus 21:37): “[When a man steals an ox or a sheep,] and slaughters it or sells it “ -until he sells all of the things that remain from the slaughter, excluding if some of its shorn wool/fleece, etc. and he is not exempted from this.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:5:2)

**הַנּוֹחֵר.** קוֹרְעוֹ מִנְּחִירָיו עַד לִבּוֹ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
הנוחר – tears it open from its nostrils until its heart.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:5:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:5:3)

**וְהַמְעַקֵּר.** עוֹקֵר סִימָנִים, פָּטוּר. וַאֲפִלּוּ לְרַבָּנָן דְּאָמְרֵי שְׁחִיטָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ רְאוּיָה שְׁמָהּ שְׁחִיטָה, דְּהָא לָאו שְׁחִיטָה הִיא כְּלָל:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
והמעקר – uproots the windpipe and gullet is exempt, and even according to the Rabbis who state that a ritual slaughtering ha is not appropriate is called a ritual slaughtering, but this is not a ritual slaughtering at all.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:6:1)

**הָיָה מוֹשְׁכוֹ וְיוֹצֵא.** פָּטוּר מִכֶּפֶל:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
היה מושכו ויוצא – he is exempt from the twofold restitution.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:6:2)

**הִגְבִּיהוֹ.** אֲפִלּוּ בִּרְשׁוּת בְּעָלִים. שֶׁהֲרֵי הַגְבָּהָה קוֹנָה בְּכָל מָקוֹם:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
הגביהו – even in the domain of its owners for lifting up acquires in every place (see also, Tractate Kiddushin, Chapter 1, Mishnah 4).


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:6:3)

**נְתָנוֹ.** גַּנָּב לַכֹּהֵן, בְּחָמֵשׁ סְלָעִים שֶׁל פִּדְיוֹן בְּנוֹ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
נתנו – he stole it for a Kohen for five Selah of the Redemption of his First-Born son.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:6:4)

**הָיָה מוֹשְׁכוֹ.** הַכֹּהֵן אוֹ בַּעַל חוֹב אוֹ הַשּׁוֹמֵר. וּמֵת בִּרְשׁוּת בְּעָלִים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
היה מושכו – the Kohen or the creditor or the guard and it died in the domain of the owners.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:5
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:6:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:6:5)

**פָּטוּר.** הַגַּנָּב מִכְּלוּם:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
פטור – the thief [is exempt] from none of it.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:1)

**אֵין מְגַדְּלִין בְּהֵמָה דַּקָּה בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל.** מִשּׁוּם יִשּׁוּב אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁמַּפְסִידִין אֶת הַזְּרָעִים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אין מגדלין בהמה דקה בארץ ישראל – because the settling of the land of Israel which causes the loss of the seeds.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:2)

**אֲבָל מְגַדְּלִין בְּסוּרְיָא.** אֲרָצוֹת שֶׁכָּבַשׁ דָּוִד. דְּלָאו שְׁמֵיהּ כִּבּוּשׁ, וְלֹא חָיְשִׁינַן בָּהּ לְיִשּׁוּב. וְאִם יַפְסִידוּ שְׂדוֹת אֲחֵרִים, יְשַׁלְּמֶנָּה:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אבל מגדלין בסוריא – lands that [King] David conquered but are not called conquest, and we don’t take into consideration of it for settlement, but if they causes loss to other fields, he has to pay it back.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:3)

**אֵין מְגַדְּלִין תַּרְנְגוֹלִים בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם מִפְּנֵי הַקָּדָשִׁים.** שֶׁאוֹכְלִין שָׁם. וְדֶרֶךְ תַּרְנְגוֹלִים לְנַקֵּר בָּאַשְׁפָּה, וְשֶׁמָּא יָבִיאוּ עֶצֶם [כִּשְׂעֹרָה] מִן הַשֶּׁרֶץ וִיטַמְּאוּ אֶת הַקָּדָשִׁים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אין מגדלין תרנגולין בירושלים מפני קדשים – for they eat there, and it is the manner of chickens to gnaw at the trash, and perhaps would bring a bone [like the size of a piece of barley] from the unclean reptile and would ritually defile that holy things.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:4)

**וְלֹא.** יְגַדְּלוּ כֹּהֲנִים תַּרְנְגוֹלִים בְּכָל אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ולא – Kohanim should not raise chickens throughout all of the Land of Israel.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:5
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:5)

**מִפְּנֵי הַטָּהֳרוֹת.** שֶׁהַכֹּהֲנִים אוֹכְלִים תְּרוּמָה וּצְרִיכִים לְשָׁמְרָהּ בְּטָהֳרָה:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
מפני הטהרות – for he Kohanim eat priest’s due and need to preserve it in ritual purity.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:6
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:6)

**חֲזִירִים.** מְפָרֵשׁ טַעֲמָא בַּגְּמָרָא, כְּשֶׁצָּרוּ מַלְכֵי חַשְׁמוֹנַאי זֶה עַל זֶה הָיוּ רְגִילִים בְּכָל יוֹם שֶׁהָיוּ אֵלּוּ שֶׁבַּחוּץ מַעֲלִים לָהֶם תְּמִידִים לְאֵלּוּ שֶׁבִּפְנִים. יוֹם אֶחָד הֶעֱלוּ לָהֶם חֲזִיר, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעַ לַחֲצִי חוֹמָה נָעַץ צִפָּרְנָיו בַּחוֹמָה וְנִזְדַּעְזְעָה אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת פַּרְסָה עַל אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת פַּרְסָה. בְּאוֹתָהּ שָׁעָה אָמְרוּ אָרוּר הַמְגַדֵּל חֲזִירִים:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
חזירים – the reason is explained in the Gemara (Tractate Bava Kamma 81b) when the Kings of the Hasmoneans split with each other, it was customary each day that those who were outside would bring up to them daily [burnt] offerings to those who were inside. One day, they brought up to them a swine, and since it reached o the half-way point of the wall, the swine pressed its nails against the wall and all of the Land of Israel shook four hundred parasang by four hundred parasang. At that hour, they said: cursed be the tower of the swine.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:7
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:7)

**אֶת הַכֶּלֶב.** מִפְּנֵי שֶׁנּוֹשֵׁךְ וּמְנַבֵּחַ וּמַפֶּלֶת אִשָּׁה מִיִּרְאָתוֹ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
את הכלב – because it bites and it barks and causes a woman to abort [her fetus] from her fear of it.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:8
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:8)

**נִשְׁבִּים.** פַּחִים. שֶׁלֹּא יִלָּכְדוּ בָּהֶם יוֹנֵי בְּנֵי הַיִּשּׁוּב:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
נשבים – traps so that doves who are part of the settlement will not be seized.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:9
[Bartenura on Mishnah Bava Kamma 7:7:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Bava%20Kamma/r/7:7:9)

**שְׁלֹשִׁים רִיס.** אַרְבָּעָה מִילִין:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
שלשים ריס – four miles.