## Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot Chapter 4

###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:1:1)

**סָפֵק אָכַל חֵלֶב סָפֵק לֹא אָכַל.** וְהֵיכִי דָּמֵי, כְּגוֹן חֵלֶב וְשֻׁמָּן לְפָנָיו וְאָכַל אֶת אַחַד מֵהֶן, כִּדְתָנֵי בְּסֵיפָא. וּפָרוֹשֵׁי קָמְפָרֵשׁ, סָפֵק אָכַל חֵלֶב סָפֵק לֹא אָכַל כֵּיצַד, כְּגוֹן שֶׁהָיָה חֵלֶב וְשֻׁמָּן לְפָנָיו וְיֵשׁ כָּאן אִסּוּר קָבוּעַ. אֲבָל אִם הָיְתָה לְפָנָיו חֲתִיכָה אַחַת, סָפֵק שֶׁהִיא חֵלֶב סָפֵק שֶׁהִיא שֻׁמָּן, וַאֲכָלָהּ, פָּטוּר, דְּלֹא אִקְּבַע אִסּוּרָא:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ספק אכל חלב ספק לא אכל – and how is this to be understood? As, for example, forbidden fat and permitted were before him and he ate one of them, as is taught in the ending clause. And it is specified as it explains: It is doubtful whether he at forbidden fat and it is doubtful that he did not eat it. How so? As, for example, that the forbidden fat and permitted fat were before him and there is a fixed prohibition. But if there was before him one piece, it is doubtful whether it is forbidden fat and doubtful that it is permitted fat and he ate it, he is exempt. For the prohibition was not fixed.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:1:2)

**וַאֲפִלּוּ אָכַל.** וַדַּאי חֵלֶב, סָפֵק יֵשׁ בּוֹ כַּזַּיִת. וּכְגוֹן שֶׁבְּשָׁעָה שֶׁאֲכָלוֹ סָבוּר שֻׁמָּן הוּא וְאַחַר כָּךְ נוֹדַע לוֹ שֶׁהוּא חֵלֶב, וְסָפֵק יֵשׁ בּוֹ כַּזַּיִת סָפֵק אֵין בּוֹ:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ואפילו אכל – that it was definitely forbidden fat, but doubtful that had an olive’s bulk, as for example at the time that he ate it, he thought that it was permitted fat, and afterwards it became known to him that it is forbidden fat, but it is doubtful that it has or does not have an olive’s bulk.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:1:3)

**אָכַל אֶת אַחַד מֵהֶן.** וּכְסָבוּר שֻׁמָּן הוּא, וְאַחַר כָּךְ נוֹדַע שֶׁהָאֶחָד הָיָה חֵלֶב, וְזֶה אֵינוֹ יוֹדֵעַ אֵיזוֹ אָכַל, מֵבִיא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי. אֲבָל אִם בִּשְׁעַת אֲכִילָה הָיְתָה לוֹ סָפֵק וְהֵזִיד וַאֲכָלָהּ מִסָּפֵק, הָוֵי מֵזִיד וּפָטוּר:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אכל א אאחד מהן – but he thought that it was permitted fat, and afterwards it became known that the one was forbidden fat, but this one doesn’t know which he ate, he brings an uncertain guilt-offering (i.e., a sacrifice brought by someone who is uncertain as to whether he committed a sin that requires a sin offering). But, if at the time of eating he had a doubt, and he willfully acted and ate from doubt, this is willful behavior and he is exempt.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:1:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:1:4)

**שָׁגַג בְּאַחַת מֵהֶן.** כְּסָבוּר זוֹ אִשְׁתּוֹ, וְאַחַר כָּךְ נִסְתַּפֵּק אֵיזוֹ מֵהֶן הָיְתָה, מֵבִיא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
שגג באחת מהן – in thinking that this is wife, and afterwards he was in doubt which of them was, he brings the uncertain guilt-offering.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:1)

**כָּךְ עַל לֹא הוֹדַע שֶׁלָּהֶן.** כְּגוֹן אָכַל שְׁתֵּי חֲתִיכוֹת כְּסָבוּר שֶׁשְּׁתֵּיהֶן שֻׁמָּן הֵן וְאַחַר כָּךְ נוֹדַע שֶׁכָּל אַחַת מֵהֶן סָפֵק, אֵינוֹ מֵבִיא אֶלָּא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי אֶחָד, הוֹאִיל וְלֹא נוֹדַע לוֹ בֵּין אֲכִילָה לַאֲכִילָה שֶׁסְּפֵק חֵלֶב אָכַל:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
כך על לא הודע שלהן – as for example, he ae two pieces [of meat] thinking that both of them were permitted fat, and afterwards became informed/conscious that each one of them was doubtful [as to whether it was permitted fat or prohibited fat], he doesn’t bring anything other than one suspended guilt-offering, since he was not informed of it between each consuming that he ate doubtful forbidden fat.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:2)

**וְאִם הָיְתָה יְדִיעָה בֵינְתַיִם.** יְדִיעַת סָפֵק:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ואם היתה ידיעה בינתים – the awareness of the doubt.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:3)

**כְּשֵׁם שֶׁהוּא מֵבִיא חַטָּאת עַל כָּל אַחַת וְאַחַת.** אִם הָיְתָה יְדִיעַת וַדַּאי בֵּינְתַיִם, כָּךְ בִּידִיעַת סָפֵק מֵבִיא שְׁנֵי אֲשָׁמוֹת תְּלוּיִין:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
כשם שהוא מביא חטאת על כל אחת ואחת – if there was certain knowledge/awareness in-between, so too, with awareness/knowledge of doubtful consumption [of forbidden fat], he brings two suspended guilt-offerings.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:4)

**חֵלֶב וְנוֹתָר לְפָנָיו.** וְסָבַר דִּשְׁנֵיהֶן שֻׁמָּן שֶׁל הֶתֵּר:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
חלב ונותר לפניו – and he thought that both of them were permitted fat that is acceptable.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:5
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:5)

**אִשְׁתּוֹ נִדָּה וַאֲחוֹתוֹ עִמּוֹ בַבַּיִת.** בָּא עַל אַחַת מֵהֶן, כְּסָבוּר לָבֹא עַל אִשְׁתּוֹ טְהוֹרָה, וְנִמְצָא שֶׁאִשְׁתּוֹ הָיְתָה נִדָּה, וְעוֹד סָפֵק עַל אֵיזוֹ מֵהֶן בָּא:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אשתו נדה ואחותו עמו בבית – he had sexual intercourse with one of them, while thinking to have sex with his ritually pure wife, and it was found that his wife was a menstruating woman, and another doubt, as to which of them (i.e., his sister or his menstruating wife) he had sexual relations with.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:6
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:6)

**וְעָשָׂה מְלָאכָה בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת.** כְּסָבוּר חֹל הוּא:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ועשה מלאכה בהן בין השמשות – thinking that it was a weekday.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:7
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:7)

**רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מְחַיֵּב חַטָּאת.** מִמַּה נַּפְשָׁךְ, אִם חֵלֶב אָכַל חַיָּב, אִם נוֹתָר אָכַל חַיָּב, וְכֵן כֻּלָּם:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ר' אליעזר מחייב חטאת – whichever way you turn , if he ate forbidden fat, he is liable, if he ate left-over, he is liable, and similarly for all of them.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:8
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:8)

**וְרַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ פּוֹטֵר.** דְּגַבֵּי חַטָּאת כְּתִיב (ויקרא ד) אֲשֶׁר חָטָא בָּהּ, עַד שֶׁיִּוָּדַע לוֹ בַּמֶּה חָטָא. וְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר, הַאי אֲשֶׁר חָטָא בָּהּ מִבָּעֵי לֵיהּ פְּרָט לְמִתְעַסֵּק בִּמְלֶאכֶת שַׁבָּת, כְּגוֹן נִתְכַּוֵּן לַחְתֹּךְ אֶת הַתָּלוּשׁ וְחָתַךְ אֶת הַמְחֻבָּר, שֶׁהוּא פָּטוּר, כֵּיוָן דְּלֹא נִתְכַּוֵּן לַחֲתִיכָה דְּאִסּוּרָא. וְדַוְקָא מִתְעַסֵּק בִּמְלֶאכֶת שַׁבָּת הוּא דְּפָטוּר, דִּמְלֶאכֶת מַחְשֶׁבֶת אָסְרָה תּוֹרָה. אֲבָל מִתְעַסֵּק בַּחֲלָבִים וּבַעֲרָיוֹת, כְּגוֹן שֶׁאָכַל חֵלֶב אוֹ בָּא עַל הָעֶרְוָה שֶׁלֹּא בְּמִתְכַּוֵּן, חַיָּב לְכֻלֵּי עָלְמָא, שֶׁהֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ורבי יהושע פוטר – for regarding the sin-offering, it is written (Leviticus 4:13): “or the sin of which he is guilty [is brought to his knowledge – he shall bring as his offering a male goat without blemish],” until he would be made known to him in how he sinned. And Rabbi Eliezer [states] that this “of the sin of which he is guilty” is needed except for someone acting unawares (i.e., having n intention of doing so) the labors on the Sabbath, as for example, he had intended to cut off what was detached but cut what was attached, that he is exempt, for since he didn’t intend to make a forbidden cutting, and especially when acting unawares with work on Shabbat that he is exempt, because the Torah forbade planned, thoughtful, creative labor, but acting unawares regarding fats and illicit sexual relationships, as, for example, that he ate fat or he had sexual relations with someone forbidden to him on account of consanguinity that he didn’t intend, he is liable, according to everyone, for he benefitted [from it].


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:9
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:9)

**לֹא נֶחְלְקוּ.** רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר דְּאָמַר לֹא בָּעִינַן שֶׁיֵּדַע בַּמֶּה חָטָא לֹא נֶחֱלַק עַל רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, וּמוֹדֶה לוֹ בְּעוֹשֶׂה מְלָאכָה בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת שֶׁבֵּין שַׁבָּת וְיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים שֶׁהוּא פָּטוּר:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
לא נחלקו – Rabbi Eliezer who stated that we don’t require that he knew in what he had sinned, he did not dispute on Rabbi Yehoshua, and he agrees with him that a person who does creative work at twilight whether on Shabbat or on Yom Kippur, he is exempt.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:10
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:10)

**שֶׁאֲנִי אוֹמֵר.** חֲצִי שִׁעוּר הַמְּלָאכָה נַעֲשֵׂית בְּשַׁבָּת וַחֲצִי שִׁעוּר בְּיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים, וְאֵין כָּאן חִיּוּב חַטָּאת:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
שאני אומר – half the measure of creative work was done on Shabbat and half the measurement on Yom Kippur, and there isn’t here the liability of a sin-offering.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:11
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:11)

**מֵעֵין אֵיזוֹ מְלָאכָה עָשָׂה.** אִם חָרַשׁ אוֹ זָרַע:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
מעין איזה מלאכה עשה – if he ploughed or sowed.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:12
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:2:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:2:12)

**פּוֹטְרוֹ הָיָה רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אַף מֵאָשָׁם תָּלוּי.** דְּגַבֵּי אָשָׁם תָּלוּי כְּתִיב (ויקרא ה) כִּי תֶחֱטָא וְלֹא יָדַע, פְּרָט לָזֶה שֶׁיָּדַע שֶׁחָטָא אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין הַחֵטְא מְסֻיָּם. וְחַטָּאת נַמִּי לֹא מִחַיַּב, שֶׁאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁיָּדַע שֶׁחָטָא מִמַּה נַּפְשָׁךְ, מִכָּל מָקוֹם לֹא הֻבְרַר לוֹ בַּמֶּה חָטָא. וּפְסַק הַהֲלָכָה, שֶׁהוּא חַיָּב בְּאָשָׁם תָּלוּי בֵּין בְּחֵלֶב וְנוֹתָר לְפָנָיו שֶׁאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁיֻּבְרַר הַדָּבָר, בֵּין בְּעוֹשֶׂה מְלָאכָה בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת שֶׁבֵּין שַׁבָּת וְיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים שֶׁאִי אֶפְשָׁר שֶׁיֻּבְרַר הַדָּבָר, וְכֵן בְּאִשְׁתּוֹ נִדָּה וַאֲחוֹתוֹ עִמּוֹ בַּבַּיִת וְשָׁגַג בְּאַחַת מֵהֶן, בְּכָל אֵלּוּ מֵבִיא אָשָׁם תָּלוּי:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
פוטרו היה רבי יהושע אף מאשם תלוי – for regarding the suspended guilt offering, it is written (Leviticus 5:17): “And when a person, without knowing it, [sins in regard to any of the LORD’s commandments about things not to be done, and then realizes his guilt],” excluding this one who knows that he sinned, but rather, that the sin is not something specific, and the sin-offering he is also not liable for, for even though he knew that he sinned, whichever way you turn, anyway, it was not made clear to him in what he way he had sinned. But the Halakhic decision is that he is liable for a suspended guilt-offering, whether regarding fat and left-over before him, where it is possible to have the matter verified, whether with regarding to performing creative labor at twilight, whether on Shabbat or on Yom Kippur, where it is impossible to have the matter verified, and similarly with his wife who is a menstruating woman and his sister in the house, and he acted inadvertently with one of them, in all of these, he brings a suspended guilt-offering.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:1
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:1)

**מִשּׁוּם שֵׁם אֶחָד.** כְּגוֹן שְׁתֵּי נָשִׁים נִדּוֹת עִמּוֹ בַּבַּיִת וְשָׁגַג בְּאַחַת מֵהֶן:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
משום שם אחד (subject to a single category) – as, for example, two menstruating women with him in the house, and he acted inadvertently with one of them.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:2
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:2)

**שֶׁהוּא חַיָּב.** שֶׁהֲרֵי יָדַע בַּמֶּה חָטָא:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
שהוא חייב – for behold he knew in how he sinned.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:3
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:3)

**עַל דָּבָר שֶׁהוּא מִשּׁוּם שְׁנֵי שֵׁמוֹת.** כְּגוֹן סָפֵק קָצַר סָפֵק טָחַן:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
על דבר שהוא משום שני שמות (concerning something subject to two distinct categories) – as, for example, it is doubtful if he had reaped or doubtful if he had milled/ground up.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:4
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:4)

**אֲפִלּוּ נִתְכַּוֵּן לְלַקֵּט תְּאֵנִים וְלִקֵּט עֲנָבִים.** בַּגְּמָרָא מְפָרֵשׁ מִלְּתֵיהּ דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה בְּמִתְכַּוֵּן לְלַקֵּט תְּאֵנִים תְּחִלָּה וְאַחַר כָּךְ עֲנָבִים, וְהָלְכָה יָדוֹ עַל הָאַחֲרוֹנִים וְלִקֵּט עֲנָבִים תְּחִלָּה וְאַחַר כָּךְ תְּאֵנִים. וְכֵן אִם הָיָה מִתְכַּוֵּן לִלְקֹט שְׁחֹרוֹת וְאַחַר כָּךְ לְבָנוֹת וְנֶהֱפַךְ הַדָּבָר וְלִקֵּט לְבָנוֹת תְּחִלָּה וְאַחַר כָּךְ שְׁחֹרוֹת:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אפילו נתכוין ללקט תאנים וליקט ענבים – in the Gemara (Tractate Keritot 19b-20a) it explains the matter of of Rabbi Yehudah who intended to harvest figs first and afterwards grapes, and his hand went to the latter [first], and he harvested the grapes first and afterwards the figs. And similarly, if he had the intention of harvesting the black ones first and afterwards the white ones, and the matter was changed and he harvested the white ones first and afterwards the black ones,


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:5
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:5)

**רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מְחַיֵּב חַטָּאת.** דְּהוֹאִיל וְלִשְׁנֵיהֶם נִתְכַּוֵּן לֹא אִכְפַּת לָן בְּמֻקְדָּם וּמְאֻחָר:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ר' אליעזר מחייב חטאת – for since he had intended for both of them, and it doesn’t matter to us which was earlier and which came later.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:6
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:6)

**וְרַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ פּוֹטֵר.** הוֹאִיל וּבִשְׁעַת לְקִיטַת כָּל אֶחָד וְאֶחָד לֹא לָזֶה נִתְכַּוֵּן, הָוֵי לֵיהּ כְּמִתְעַסֵּק וּפָטוּר:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
ור' יהושע פוטר – since at the time of the harvesting, each and every one did not intend for that one, specifically, it was to him like he acted unawares and is exempt. This is the reading.


###### Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:7
[Bartenura on Mishnah Keritot 4:3:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bartenura%20on%20Mishnah%20Keritot/r/4:3:7)

**הָכִי גָּרְסִינַן אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן תְּמֵהַנִּי אִם פָּטַר בָּזֶה רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ.** אִם כֵּן לָמָּה נֶאֱמַר אֲשֶׁר חָטָא בָּהּ. סְתָם מַתְנִיתִין קָא מִתַּמַה עַל תְּמִיהָתוֹ שֶׁל רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן, אִם כֵּן דְּלֹא פָּטַר בָּזֶה רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, לָמָּה נֶאֱמַר אֲשֶׁר חָטָא בָּהּ. וּמְשָׁנֵי, פְּרָט לְמִתְעַסֵּק, לַאֲפוֹקֵי מִי שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה מִתְכַּוֵּן לִלְקֹט כְּלָל, אוֹ שֶׁהָיָה מִתְכַּוֵּן לִלְקֹט תְּאֵנִים לְבַד וְלִקֵּט עֲנָבִים לְבַד, שֶׁלֹּא נַעֲשֵׂית מַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ כָּל עִקָּר. וַהֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, וּכְמוֹ שֶׁפֵּרְשָׁהּ לְמִלְּתֵיהּ רַבִּי יְהוּדָה:

**Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2020:**
אמר ר' שמעון תמיהני אם פטר בזה ר' יהושע. אם כן למה נאמר אשר חטה בה – the anonymous teacher of our Mishnah is amazed/surprised on the surprise of Rabbi Shimon, if so, that Rabbi Yehoshua did not exempt him, what does it (i.e., the Torah (Leviticus 4:23) stated: “or the sin of which he is guilty [is brought to his knowledge – he shall bring as his offering a male goat without blemish].” And he answers, except for someone engaged in doing the thing which he had not intended to do, excluding the person who did not have the intention to harvest at all, or that he had the intention to harvest figs alone, and [ended up] harvesting grapes alone, that he didn’t act on his thoughts in any way at all. But the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yehoshua, and like the way Rabbi Yehuda explained his words.