## Bava Metzia Daf 78a

###### Bava Metzia 78a:1
[Bava Metzia 78a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:1)

מִפְּנֵי רָעָתָהּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**due to its poor** quality. In other words, he was eager to sell not due to financial pressure, but because he wanted to get rid of this low-value field. His persistent demands for every last dinar are due to his fear that the buyer will change his mind and cancel the transaction.


###### Bava Metzia 78a:2
[Bava Metzia 78a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:2)

פְּשִׁיטָא: בָּעֵי לְזַבּוֹנֵי בִּמְאָה וְלָא אַשְׁכַּח, וְזַבֵּין בְּמָאתַיִם, וְקָא עָיֵיל וְנָפֵיק אַזּוּזֵי – לָא קָנֵי. אֶלָּא אִי בָּעֵי לְזַבּוֹנֵי בִּמְאָה וְלָא אַשְׁכַּח, וְאִי טָרַח הֲוָה מַשְׁכַּח, וְלָא טְרַח וְזַבֵּין בְּמָאתַיִם, וְקָא עָיֵיל וְנָפֵיק אַזּוּזֵי – מַאי: כְּמוֹכֵר שָׂדֵהוּ מִפְּנֵי רָעָתָהּ דָּמֵי, אוֹ לָא? תֵּיקוּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara discusses a similar case. It is **obvious** that if one **wants to sell** his property **for one hundred** dinars **but does not find** a buyer, **and** in actuality he **sells** property **for two hundred, and goes in and goes out for money,** the buyer **has not acquired** the field, as it is clear that the seller performed the transaction due to financial straits. **But if he wants to sell** his property **for one hundred and does not find** a willing buyer, **and** the case was that **if he troubled** himself **he would find** one, **and** instead **he did not trouble** himself **and sells** property **for two hundred, and** then he **goes in and goes out for money, what** is the *halakha*? Is he **considered like one who sells a field due to its poor** quality **or not?** No answer was found, and therefore the Gemara states that this dilemma **shall stand** unresolved.


###### Bava Metzia 78a:3
[Bava Metzia 78a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:3)

שָׂכַר אֶת הַחַמָּר וְאֶת הַקַּדָּר וְכוּ׳ שׂוֹכֵר עֲלֵיהֶן אוֹ מַטְעָן. עַד כַּמָּה שׂוֹכֵר עֲלֵיהֶן? אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן: עַד כְּדֵי שְׂכָרָן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The mishna teaches that if **one hired a donkey driver or a potter** and they reneged, and the goods would be lost, **he may hire** other workers at a higher price **at** the former’s expense, **or deceive them** to make them agree to return to work. The Gemara asks: **Up to what** amount **may he hire at their** expense? **Rav Naḥman said: Up to their wages,** i.e., if the first workers did part of the work and the employer had not yet paid them, he may add the amount he owes the original workers to the new workers’ wage.


###### Bava Metzia 78a:4
[Bava Metzia 78a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:4)

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ רָבָא לְרַב נַחְמָן: עַד אַרְבָּעִים וַחֲמִשִּׁים זוּז! אָמַר לֵיהּ: כִּי תַּנְיָא הָהִיא – שֶׁבָּאתָה חֲבִילָה לְיָדוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava raised an objection to Rav Naḥman:** But it was taught in a *baraita* that he can hire at their expense for **up to forty or fifty dinars.** Rav Naḥman **said to him: When that** *baraita* **is taught** it is with regard to a case **where the bundle has come into his possession,** i.e., the original worker left his tool kit with the employer. In this situation, the employer has more financial leverage, as he can sell the contents of the bundle to cover even higher costs.


###### Bava Metzia 78a:5
[Bava Metzia 78a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:5)

**מַתְנִי׳** הַשּׂוֹכֵר אֶת הַחֲמוֹר לְהוֹלִיכוֹ בָּהָר וְהוֹלִיכוֹ בַּבִּקְעָה, בַּבִּקְעָה וְהוֹלִיכוֹ בָּהָר, אֲפִילּוּ זוֹ עֶשֶׂר מִילִין וְזוֹ עֶשֶׂר מִילִין, וּמֵתָה – חַיָּיב. הַשּׂוֹכֵר אֶת הַחֲמוֹר לְהוֹלִיכָהּ בָּהָר וְהוֹלִיכָה בַּבִּקְעָה, אִם הֶחְלִיקָה – פָּטוּר, וְאִם הוּחֲמָה – חַיָּיב. לְהוֹלִיכָהּ בַּבִּקְעָה וְהוֹלִיכָה בָּהָר, אִם הֶחְלִיקָה – חַיָּיב, וְאִם הוּחַמָּה – פָּטוּר, אִם מֵחֲמַת הַמַּעֲלָה – חַיָּיב.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** With regard to **one who rents a donkey to lead it on a mountain but he led it in a valley,** or one who rents a donkey to lead it **in a valley but he led it on a mountain, even** if **this** path **is ten *mil* and that one is** also **ten *mil*, and** the animal **dies,** he is **liable.** With regard to **one who rents a donkey to lead it on a mountain but he led it in a valley, if it slipped** and injured itself he is **exempt, but if it** died of **heatstroke** he is **liable,** as it was the walk in the hotter valley that caused its death. With regard to one who rents a donkey **to lead it in a valley but he led it on a mountain, if it slipped** he is **liable,** because this was caused by the mountainous terrain, **but if it** died of **heatstroke** he is **exempt. If** it suffered from heatstroke **due to the ascent,** he is **liable.**


###### Bava Metzia 78a:6
[Bava Metzia 78a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:6)

הַשּׂוֹכֵר אֶת הַחֲמוֹר וְהִבְרִיקָה אוֹ שֶׁנַּעֲשֵׂית אַנְגַּרְיָא – אוֹמֵר לוֹ: הֲרֵי שֶׁלְּךָ לְפָנֶיךָ. מֵתָה אוֹ נִשְׁבְּרָה – חַיָּיב לְהַעֲמִיד [לוֹ] חֲמוֹר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to **one who rents a donkey and it became ill or was seized for public service [*angarya*],** the owner can **say to** the renter: **That which is yours is before you,** and he is not required to reimburse the renter or to supply him with another donkey. If the animal **died or** its leg **broke,** the owner **is obligated to provide** the renter with another **donkey.**


###### Bava Metzia 78a:7
[Bava Metzia 78a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:7)

**גְּמָ׳** מַאי שְׁנָא רֵישָׁא דְּלָא קָא מְפַלֵּיג, וּמַאי שְׁנָא סֵיפָא דְּקָא מְפַלֵּיג?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** The Gemara asks: **What is different** about **the first clause, where** the *tanna* **does not distinguish** between the various ways in which the animal might have died, as he rules that the renter is always liable, **and what is different** about the **latter clause, where he does distinguish** between whether the animal was injured through slipping or heatstroke?


###### Bava Metzia 78a:8
[Bava Metzia 78a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:8)

אָמְרִי דְּבֵי רַבִּי יַנַּאי: רֵישָׁא שֶׁמֵּתָה מֵחֲמַת אֲוִיר, דְּאָמְרִינַן אַוֵּירָא דְהַר קַטְלַהּ, וְאָמְרִינַן אַוֵּירָא דְבִקְעָה קַטְלַהּ. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲנִינָא אָמַר: כְּגוֹן שֶׁמֵּתָה מֵחֲמַת אוּבְצָנָא. רַבָּה אָמַר: כְּגוֹן שֶׁהִכִּישָׁהּ נָחָשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: A Sage **from the school of Rabbi Yannai said: The first clause** is referring to a case **where it died on account of the air, as we say** that **the air of the mountains killed it and we** can equally **say** that **the air of the valley killed it.** A change in weather such that the animal is exposed to weather conditions he is unaccustomed to can be lethal. **Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥanina said:** The mishna is referring to a case **where it died on account of exhaustion [*uvtzena*],** as it can be assumed that this was caused by the weather. **Rabba said:** The mishna is speaking of a case **where a snake bit it,** as this is just as likely to happen in one place as it is in the other.


###### Bava Metzia 78a:9
[Bava Metzia 78a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Bava%20Metzia/r/78a:9)

רַבִּי חִיָּיא בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: הָא מַנִּי רַבִּי מֵאִיר הִיא, דְּאָמַר: כׇּל הַמַּעֲבִיר עַל דַּעַת שֶׁל בַּעַל הַבַּיִת,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Conversely, **Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba** said that **Rabbi Yoḥanan said:** In accordance with **whose** opinion **is this** statement of the first clause of the mishna? **It is** in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Meir, who says: Anyone who diverges from the intention of the employer** by acting against their agreement