## Chullin Daf 103b

###### Chullin 103b:1
[Chullin 103b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:1)

מִכְּלָלוֹ, אֲבָל אֵבֶר דְּלֹא הוּתַּר מִכְּלָלוֹ – לָא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**to its general prohibition,** as the fat of an undomesticated animal is permitted. **But** with regard to **a limb** from a living animal, **where** there are **no permitted** circumstances to **its general prohibition,** the prohibition of consuming a *tereifa* does **not** take effect.


###### Chullin 103b:2
[Chullin 103b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:2)

כִּי אֲתָא רַב דִּימִי אָמַר: בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ מֵרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: חִלְּקוֹ מִבַּחוּץ, מַהוּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: פָּטוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara continues its discussion of the prohibition against eating a limb from a living animal. **When Rav Dimi came** from Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, **he said: Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish inquired of Rabbi Yoḥanan:** If one took from a living animal a limb that was an olive-bulk and **divided it** into two pieces **when it was outside** his mouth and ate each piece separately, **what is** the *halakha*? Rabbi Yoḥanan **said to him:** He is **exempt.**


###### Chullin 103b:3
[Chullin 103b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:3)

מִבִּפְנִים, מַאי? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חַיָּיב.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Reish Lakish then asked Rabbi Yoḥanan: If he placed an olive-bulk of a limb from a living animal **inside** his mouth and then divided it and swallowed the two parts separately, **what** is the *halakha*? Rabbi Yoḥanan **said to him:** He is **liable** to receive lashes.


###### Chullin 103b:4
[Chullin 103b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:4)

כִּי אֲתָא רָבִין אָמַר: חִלְּקוֹ מִבַּחוּץ – פָּטוּר, מִבְּפָנִים – רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר חַיָּיב, וְרֵישׁ לָקִישׁ אָמַר פָּטוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**When Ravin came** from Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia he **said** an alternative version of this discussion. If one took from a living animal a limb that was an olive-bulk and **divided it** into two pieces **when it was outside** his mouth, and he then ate each piece separately, he is **exempt.** If he divided the limb into two parts **inside** his mouth, **Rabbi Yoḥanan says** that he is **liable, and Reish Lakish says** that he is **exempt.**


###### Chullin 103b:5
[Chullin 103b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:5)

רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר: חַיָּיב, הֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה גְּרוֹנוֹ בִּכְזַיִת. וְרֵישׁ לָקִישׁ אָמַר: פָּטוּר, אֲכִילָה בְּמֵעָיו בָּעֵינַן וְלֵיכָּא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Yoḥanan says** he is **liable** because his **throat derives pleasure from an olive-bulk** of a limb from a living animal. **And Reish Lakish says** that he is **exempt** because in order to be liable **we require** an act of **eating** that contains the requisite amount, i.e., an olive-bulk, when it enters **his stomach, and** in this case **there is not** a full olive-bulk that enters his stomach at one time.


###### Chullin 103b:6
[Chullin 103b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:6)

אֶלָּא לְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ, הֵיכִי מַשְׁכַּחַתְּ לַהּ דִּמְחַיֵּיב? אָמַר רַב כָּהֲנָא: בִּגְרוֹמִיתָא זְעֵירְתָּא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: According to the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan it is clear how one can be liable for eating an olive-bulk of a limb from a living animal. **But according to Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish, how can you find** a case **where** one will **be liable** for eating a limb from a living animal, since the food is generally broken up before he swallows it? **Rav Kahana said:** One would be liable **in** a case where he eats **a small bone** that contains an olive-bulk of meat, bone and sinew all together, and that he can swallow whole.


###### Chullin 103b:7
[Chullin 103b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:7)

וְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אָמַר: אֲפִילּוּ חִלְּקוֹ מִבַּחוּץ נָמֵי חַיָּיב, מְחוּסַּר קְרִיבָה לָאו כִּמְחוּסַּר מַעֲשֶׂה דָּמֵי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
As quoted above, Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish agree that if one divides a limb from a living animal before placing it in his mouth, he is not liable for eating it. The Gemara adds: **But Rabbi Elazar says: Even** if one **divided** the limb **outside** his mouth he is **liable.** This is because the fact that the two pieces are **lacking** in **proximity** to each other as they are placed in one’s mouth is **not comparable to lacking an action,** i.e., it is not comparable to a case where he ate only half an olive-bulk. Since he ate an entire olive-bulk, he is liable.


###### Chullin 103b:8
[Chullin 103b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:8)

אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ: כְּזַיִת שֶׁאָמְרוּ – חוּץ מִשֶּׁל בֵּין הַשִּׁינַּיִם, וְרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר: אַף עִם בֵּין הַשִּׁינַּיִם.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara cites another dispute between Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish pertaining to the measure of an olive-bulk with regard to prohibitions involving eating. **Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish says:** The **olive-bulk** of **which** the Sages **spoke** with regard to prohibitions involving eating is measured by the food one actually swallows, **aside from** the food that remains stuck **between the teeth. And Rabbi Yoḥanan says** that it includes **even** the food that remains stuck **between the teeth.**


###### Chullin 103b:9
[Chullin 103b:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:9)

אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: בְּשֶׁל בֵּין שִׁינַּיִם – דְּכוּלֵּי עָלְמָא לָא פְּלִיגִי, כִּי פְּלִיגִי – בֵּין הַחֲנִיכַיִים. מָר סָבַר: הֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה גְּרוֹנוֹ בִּכְזַיִת, וּמָר סָבַר: אֲכִילָה בְּמֵעָיו בָּעֵינַן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
In explanation of this dispute, **Rav Pappa says:** With regard to food **that** remains stuck **between** the **teeth, everyone agrees** that it is not included in measuring an olive-bulk that would render one liable to receive lashes. **When they disagree** it is with regard to food that remains **on the palate,** which one tastes but does not swallow. One **Sage,** Rabbi Yoḥanan, **holds** that since **his throat derives pleasure from an olive-bulk,** i.e., he tastes the full olive-bulk, he is liable. **And** one **Sage,** Reish Lakish, **holds** that in order to be liable, **we require** an act of **eating** that contains the requisite amount, i.e., an olive-bulk, when it enters **his stomach.**


###### Chullin 103b:10
[Chullin 103b:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:10)

אָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: אָכַל חֲצִי זַיִת וֶהֱקִיאוֹ, וְחָזַר וְאָכַל חֲצִי זַיִת אַחֵר – חַיָּיב. מַאי טַעְמָא? הֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה גְּרוֹנוֹ בִּכְזַיִת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara quotes another related ruling of Rabbi Yoḥanan: **Rabbi Asi says** that **Rabbi Yoḥanan says:** If one **ate half an olive-bulk** of a forbidden food **and vomited it, and then ate another half an olive-bulk,** he is **liable. What is the reason?** It is **because his throat derives pleasure from an olive-bulk** of the forbidden food, even though the full olive-bulk did not actually enter his stomach.


###### Chullin 103b:11
[Chullin 103b:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:11)

בְּעָא רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר מֵרַבִּי אַסִּי: אָכַל חֲצִי זַיִת וֶהֱקִיאוֹ וְחָזַר וַאֲכָלוֹ, מַהוּ? מַאי קָא מִיבַּעְיָא לֵיהּ? אִי הָוֵי עִיכּוּל אִי לָא הָוֵי עִיכּוּל, וְתִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ כְּזַיִת!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Elazar raised a dilemma before Rabbi Asi:** If one **ate half an olive-bulk** of forbidden food **and vomited it, and then ate it** again, **what is** the *halakha*? The Gemara clarifies: **What is the dilemma he is raising? If** it is about whether the half-olive-bulk that he ate and vomited up **is** considered to have been **digested,** in which case it is no longer considered food, **or whether it is not** considered to have been **digested, let him raise the dilemma** with regard to an entire **olive-bulk.** If one eats an entire olive-bulk and vomits it and then eats it again, if the food is considered not to have been digested the first time, he is liable to be flogged twice.


###### Chullin 103b:12
[Chullin 103b:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:12)

אֶלָּא, אִי בָּתַר גְּרוֹנוֹ אָזְלִינַן, אִי בָּתַר מֵעָיו אָזְלִינַן. וְתִפְשׁוֹט לֵיהּ מִדְּרַבִּי אַסִּי!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rather,** his dilemma must be about **whether we follow the throat or whether we follow the stomach** in measuring how much forbidden food one has swallowed. That being the case, **let him resolve** the dilemma **from** that **which Rabbi Asi** said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said, which indicates that we follow the throat.


###### Chullin 103b:13
[Chullin 103b:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:13)

רַבִּי אַסִּי גְּמָרֵיהּ אִיעֲקַר לֵיהּ, וַאֲתָא רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר לְאַדְכּוֹרֵיהּ, וְהָכִי קָאָמַר לֵיהּ: לְמָה לִי חֲצִי זַיִת אַחֵר? לֵימָא מָר בְּדִידֵיהּ, דְּאִיכָּא לְמִשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ תַּרְתֵּי: שָׁמְעִינַן מִינַּהּ דְּלָא הָוֵי עִיכּוּל, וְשָׁמְעִינַן מִינַּהּ דַּהֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה גְּרוֹנוֹ בִּכְזַיִת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara explains that Rabbi Elazar knew the answer to his question, but **Rabbi Asi forgot the statement** that he had learned from Rabbi Yoḥanan, **and Rabbi Elazar came to remind him** of what he had known previously. **And this is what** Rabbi Elazar was **saying to him: Why do I** need the case where he swallows **another half an olive-bulk? Let the Master** teach this ruling **in** a case where he swallows **the same** half-olive-bulk he had swallowed previously and vomited, **as two** principles **can be derived from** the ruling in **that** case: **We** can **learn from it that** the food **was not** considered to have been **digested** the first time he swallowed it, **and we** can **learn from it that** since **his throat derives pleasure from** a full **olive-bulk,** he is liable.


###### Chullin 103b:14
[Chullin 103b:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:14)

אִישְׁתִּיק וְלָא אֲמַר לֵיהּ וְלָא מִידֵּי, אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מוֹפֵת הַדּוֹר, לָא זִימְנִין סַגִּיאִין אָמְרַתְּ קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן, וְאָמַר לָךְ: הֲרֵי נֶהֱנָה גְּרוֹנוֹ בִּכְזַיִת?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rabbi Asi **was silent and did not say anything.** Rabbi Elazar **said to him: Wonder of the generation, did you not say** this case **many times before Rabbi Yoḥanan, and he said to you:** This person is liable **because his throat derives pleasure from** a full **olive-bulk?**


###### Chullin 103b:15
[Chullin 103b:15](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:15)

**הֲדַרַן עֲלָךְ גִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה.**


###### Chullin 103b:16
[Chullin 103b:16](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/103b:16)

מַתְנִי׳ **כׇּל הַבָּשָׂר** אָסוּר לְבַשֵּׁל בְּחָלָב, חוּץ מִבְּשַׂר דָּגִים וַחֲגָבִים, וְאָסוּר לְהַעֲלוֹת עִם הַגְּבִינָה עַל הַשֻּׁלְחָן, חוּץ מִבְּשַׂר דָּגִים וַחֲגָבִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** It is **prohibited to cook any meat** of domesticated and undomesticated animals and birds **in milk, except for the meat of fish and grasshoppers,** whose halakhic status is not that of meat. **And** likewise, the Sages issued a decree that it is **prohibited to place** any meat together **with** milk products, e.g., **cheese, on** one **table.** The reason for this prohibition is that one might come to eat them after they absorb substances from each other. This prohibition applies to all types of meat, **except for the meat of fish and grasshoppers.**