## Chullin Daf 115a

###### Chullin 115a:1
[Chullin 115a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:1)

מַעֲשֵׂה שַׁבָּת לִיתַּסְרוּ, דְּהָא ״תִּיעַבְתִּי לְךָ״ הוּא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
then **let** the product of **an action** that desecrates **Shabbat,** e.g., food cooked on Shabbat, **be prohibited** for consumption, **as** desecration of Shabbat **is** a practice of which God states: **I have made** it **abominable to you,** in that it is prohibited to cook on Shabbat. How can this food be prohibited only to the one who cooked it as a penalty by rabbinic law, but be permitted to others (see 15a)?


###### Chullin 115a:2
[Chullin 115a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:2)

אָמַר קְרָא: ״כִּי קֹדֶשׁ הִיא לָכֶם״ – הִיא קֹדֶשׁ, וְאֵין מַעֲשֶׂיהָ קֹדֶשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: A product of the desecration of Shabbat is an exception to the rule, as **the verse states** with regard to Shabbat: **“For it is sacred to you”** (Exodus 31:14). One may infer: **It,** Shabbat itself, **is sacred, but** the products of **actions** that desecrate **it are not sacred,** i.e., not prohibited.


###### Chullin 115a:3
[Chullin 115a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:3)

חוֹרֵשׁ בְּשׁוֹר וּבַחֲמוֹר, וְחוֹסֵם פִּי פָרָה וְדָשׁ בָּהּ, לִיתַּסְרוּ, דְּהָא ״תִּיעַבְתִּי לְךָ״ הוּא!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara raises another difficulty: If **one plows with an ox and with a donkey** together, thereby violating the prohibition in Deuteronomy 22:10, **or** if **one muzzles the mouth of a cow and threshes with it,** thereby violating the prohibition in Deuteronomy 25:4, the seeds or threshed grain **should be prohibited** for consumption according to the above principle, **as** these are both practices **I have made abominable to you.**


###### Chullin 115a:4
[Chullin 115a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:4)

הַשְׁתָּא, וּמָה שַׁבָּת דַּחֲמִירָא, מַעֲשֶׂיהָ מוּתָּרִים; הָנֵי, לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara responds: **Now** that it has been established that products of desecration of Shabbat are permitted, one can derive the following using an *a fortiori* inference: **Just as** with regard to **Shabbat, which is** treated more **stringently,** the products of prohibited **actions are permitted;** is it **not all the more so** with regard to **these** prohibitions of plowing with an ox and a donkey and threshing with a muzzled animal, which are treated less stringently, that the products of prohibited actions should be permitted?


###### Chullin 115a:5
[Chullin 115a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:5)

כִּלְאֵי זְרָעִים לִיתַּסְרוּ, דְּהָא ״תִּיעַבְתִּי לְךָ״ הוּא! מִדְּגַלִּי רַחֲמָנָא גַּבֵּי כִּלְאֵי הַכֶּרֶם ״פֶּן תִּקְדַּשׁ״ – ״פֶּן תּוּקַד אֵשׁ״, מִכְּלָל דְּכִלְאֵי זְרָעִים שְׁרוּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara challenges: **Diverse kinds of seeds** sown together **should be prohibited** for consumption, **as** this **is** a matter whose practice **I have made abominable to you.** The Gemara explains: One learns otherwise **from** the fact **that the Merciful One revealed with regard to diverse kinds in a vineyard:** “You shall not sow your vineyard with two kinds of seed; **lest** the growth of the seed that you will sow **be forfeited [*pen tikdash*]”** (Deuteronomy 22:9). The Sages read the phrase “be forfeited [*pen tikdash*]” as though it states: **Lest it be burned [*pen tukad esh*],** indicating that diverse kinds in a vineyard must be destroyed so that no benefit is derived from them. Since this is stated specifically with regard to a vineyard, one can conclude **by inference that** other **diverse kinds of seeds are permitted.**


###### Chullin 115a:6
[Chullin 115a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:6)

וְאֵימָא: כִּלְאֵי כֶרֶם אֲסוּרִין בֵּין בַּאֲכִילָה בֵּין בַּהֲנָאָה, כִּלְאֵי זְרָעִים בַּאֲכִילָה אֲסִירִי, בַּהֲנָאָה שְׁרוּ. אִיתַּקּוּשׁ לְכִלְאֵי בְהֵמָה, דִּכְתִיב: ״בְּהֶמְתְּךָ לֹא תַרְבִּיעַ כִּלְאַיִם שָׂדְךָ לֹא תִזְרַע כִּלְאָיִם״, מָה בְּהֶמְתְּךָ – הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנָּה מוּתֶּרֶת, אַף שָׂדְךָ – הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ מוּתָּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara objects: **But say** instead that the uniqueness of **diverse kinds in a vineyard** is that they **are prohibited both for consumption and for benefit,** whereas **diverse kinds of seeds are prohibited for consumption** but **are permitted for benefit.** The Gemara responds: One cannot say that diverse kinds of seeds are prohibited for consumption, as **they are juxtaposed** in the Torah **to diverse kinds of animals,** whose offspring are permitted. **As it is written: “You shall not let your cattle mate with a diverse kind; you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed”** (Leviticus 19:19). The juxtaposition teaches that **just as** with regard to **your cattle,** the animal **that comes from** diverse species **is permitted, so too,** with regard to **your field, that** produce **that comes from** diverse seeds **is permitted.**


###### Chullin 115a:7
[Chullin 115a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:7)

וְכִלְאֵי בְהֵמָה גּוּפַיְיהוּ מְנָא לַן? מִדַּאֲסַר רַחֲמָנָא כִּלְאַיִם לַגָּבוֹהַּ, מִכְּלָל דִּלְהֶדְיוֹט שְׁרֵי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And** with regard to **diverse kinds of animals themselves, from where do we** derive that their offspring is permitted? The Gemara answers: **From** the fact **that the Merciful One prohibits** the offspring of **diverse kinds** of animals for sacrifice **to the Most High** upon the altar (see 38b), learn **by inference that they are permitted to ordinary** people for consumption.


###### Chullin 115a:8
[Chullin 115a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:8)

אוֹתוֹ וְאֶת בְּנוֹ לִיתְּסַר! מִדַּאֲסַר רַחֲמָנָא מְחוּסַּר זְמַן לַגָּבוֹהַּ, מִכְּלָל דִּלְהֶדְיוֹט שְׁרֵי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara raises another difficulty: **A mother and its offspring** slaughtered on the same day **should be prohibited** for consumption, as this too is a practice made abominable. The Gemara answers: **From** the fact **that the Merciful One prohibits** an animal **whose time has not yet** arrived, i.e., that is less than eight days old, as an offering **to the Most High** (Leviticus 22:27), learn **by inference that** such animals are **permitted to ordinary** people for consumption. The offspring of a mother slaughtered that day is also considered an animal whose time has not yet arrived, since the prohibition against slaughtering it is limited to that day.


###### Chullin 115a:9
[Chullin 115a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:9)

שִׁילּוּחַ הַקֵּן לִיתְּסַר! לֹא אָמְרָה תּוֹרָה ״שַׁלַּח״ לְתַקָּלָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara raises a final difficulty: If one violated the mitzva that mandates **sending** away the mother bird from **the nest,** as it is stated: “You shall not take the mother with the young. You shall in any way let the mother go” (Deuteronomy 22:6–7), and the court instructed him to set the mother bird free, that mother bird **should be prohibited** to all, as this practice is also abominable. The Gemara responds: **The Torah did not say: Send** it away, if doing so could lead **to a mishap.** If the bird were prohibited, the Torah would not have commanded one to send it away, as others might eat it unwittingly.


###### Chullin 115a:10
[Chullin 115a:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:10)

אָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ: מִנַּיִן לְבָשָׂר בְּחָלָב שֶׁאָסוּר? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״אַל תֹּאכְלוּ מִמֶּנּוּ נָא וּבָשֵׁל מְבֻשָּׁל״, שֶׁאֵין תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״מְבֻשָּׁל״. מָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״מְבֻשָּׁל״? לוֹמַר לְךָ יֵשׁ לְךָ בִּשּׁוּל אַחֵר שֶׁהוּא כָּזֶה, וְאֵי זֶה – זֶה בָּשָׂר בְּחָלָב.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Reish Lakish says: From where** is it derived **that meat** cooked **in milk is prohibited** for consumption? **The verse states** with regard to the Paschal offering: **“You shall not eat it partially roasted, nor boiled in any way”** (Exodus 12:9). **As** there is **no** need for **the verse to state:** “Boiled **in any way,”** since it could simply have stated: “Boiled.” **What** is the meaning when **the verse states:** “Boiled **in any way?”** It is included **to tell you** that **there is another** manner of **cooking,** the product of **which is** prohibited **like this one. And which** cooking **is this? This is meat** cooked **in milk.**


###### Chullin 115a:11
[Chullin 115a:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/115a:11)

אָמַר לוֹ רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Yoḥanan said to** Reish Lakish: