## Chullin Daf 34b

###### Chullin 34b:1
[Chullin 34b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:1)

טוּמְאָה הִיא אֵצֶל הֶקְדֵּשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**is impurity vis-à-vis sacrificial** food. The Sages issued a decree that even one who is vigilant to partake of his *teruma* in a state of ritual purity is considered impure vis-à-vis one partaking of sacrificial food. Therefore, one who ate a food item that was prepared on the level of purity of *teruma* that had become impure with third-degree impurity assumes second-degree impurity, and he renders sacrificial food impure.


###### Chullin 34b:2
[Chullin 34b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:2)

אָמַר רַבִּי זֵירָא אָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר רַבִּי יַנַּאי: הָאוֹכֵל שְׁלִישִׁי שֶׁל חוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת הַקֹּדֶשׁ – נַעֲשָׂה גּוּפוֹ שֵׁנִי לַקֹּדֶשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Zeira says** that **Rabbi Asi says** that **Rabbi Yoḥanan says** that **Rabbi Yannai says:** With regard to **one who eats non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of sacrificial** food, and these items had become impure with **third-degree** impurity, **his body becomes** impure with **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis sacrificial** food. He renders sacrificial food with which he comes into contact impure with third-degree impurity, and that food in turn disqualifies sacrificial food with which it comes into contact.


###### Chullin 34b:3
[Chullin 34b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:3)

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ רַבִּי זֵירָא לְרַבִּי אַסִּי: שְׁלִישִׁי שֵׁנִי לַקֹּדֶשׁ, וְאֵין שֵׁנִי לַתְּרוּמָה, בְּחוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה. עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה – אִין, עַל טׇהֳרַת הַקֹּדֶשׁ – לָא!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Zeira raised an objection to** the statement of **Rabbi Asi** from the statement of Rabbi Yehoshua: One who eats food with **third-degree** impurity assumes **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis sacrificial** food **but** does **not** assume **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis *teruma*.** This is stated **in** the case of **non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of *teruma*.** The Gemara infers: **Yes,** one is able to prepare items **on the** level of **purity of *teruma*,** but one is **not** able to prepare items **on the** level of **purity of sacrificial** food, as in the latter case the non-sacred food does not become impure at all.


###### Chullin 34b:4
[Chullin 34b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:4)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: לָא מִיבַּעְיָא קָאָמַר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rabbi Asi **said to** Rabbi Zeira: That inference is incorrect, as Rabbi Yehoshua **is speaking** utilizing the style of: **It is not necessary.** It is not necessary to say that in the case of non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of sacrificial food, which is stringent, they have the capacity of assuming third-degree impurity. Rabbi Yehoshua teaches that non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of *teruma* also have the capacity of assuming third-degree impurity.


###### Chullin 34b:5
[Chullin 34b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:5)

וְהָא ״אַף אֲנִי לֹא אָמַרְתִּי אֶלָּא בִּתְרוּמָה״ קָאָמַר, אָמוֹרָאֵי נִינְהוּ, וְאַלִּיבָּא דְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara objects: **But didn’t** Rabbi Yehoshua **say** to Rabbi Eliezer according to the explanation that Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said: **I too stated** this **only with regard to** non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of ***teruma*,** indicating that he was not referring to non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of sacrificial food. The Gemara explains: Rabba bar bar Ḥana and Rabbi Asi **are *amora’im*, and** disagree **with regard to** the opinion **of Rabbi Yoḥanan,** and they disagree about whether the statement of Rabbi Yehoshua was stated specifically with regard to non-sacred food items that were prepared on the level of purity of *teruma*, or whether it includes even those prepared on the level of purity of sacrificial food.


###### Chullin 34b:6
[Chullin 34b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:6)

אָמַר עוּלָּא: הָאוֹכֵל שְׁלִישִׁי שֶׁל חוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה – נִפְסַל גּוּפוֹ מִלֶּאֱכוֹל בִּתְרוּמָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Ulla says: One who eats non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of *teruma*** and that are impure with **third-degree** impurity, **his body is disqualified from** the right **to partake of *teruma*.**


###### Chullin 34b:7
[Chullin 34b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:7)

מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן? תְּנֵינָא: שְׁלִישִׁי שֵׁנִי לַקֹּדֶשׁ, וְאֵין שֵׁנִי לַתְּרוּמָה, בְּחוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה. שֵׁנִי הוּא דְּלָא הָוֵי, הָא שְׁלִישִׁי הָוֵי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **What is** Ulla **teaching us? We** already **learn** in the mishna cited earlier (33b) from tractate *Teharot*: One who eats food with **third-degree** impurity assumes **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis sacrificial** food, **but** does **not** assume **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis *teruma*.** This is stated **in** the case of **non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of *teruma*.** The Gemara infers: It is **second-degree** impurity **that he does not assume, but third-degree** impurity **he assumes,** and he is therefore disqualified from partaking of *teruma*.


###### Chullin 34b:8
[Chullin 34b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:8)

אִי מֵהַהִיא, הֲוָה אָמֵינָא: לָא שֵׁנִי הָוֵי וְלָא שְׁלִישִׁי הָוֵי, וְאַיְּידֵי דְּאָמַר ״שֵׁנִי בַּקֹּדֶשׁ״ – אָמַר נָמֵי ״אֵין שֵׁנִי בִּתְרוּמָה״, קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: It was necessary for Ulla to teach this *halakha*, **as if** it was learned **from that** mishna, **I would say** that vis-à-vis *teruma* **he assumes neither second-degree nor third-degree** impurity, as there is no reason to deem the status of one who eats like that of the food that he ate. **And** perhaps it was only **since** Rabbi Yehoshua **said** that he assumes **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis sacrificial** food that he **also said** that he does **not** assume **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis *teruma*.** Therefore, Ulla **teaches us** that he assumes third-degree impurity and is disqualified from partaking of *teruma*.


###### Chullin 34b:9
[Chullin 34b:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:9)

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ רַב הַמְנוּנָא לְעוּלָּא: הָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבַּחוּלִּין טָמֵא וּמְטַמֵּא, וְהַשֵּׁנִי פּוֹסֵל וְאֵינוֹ מְטַמֵּא, וְהַשְּׁלִישִׁי נֶאֱכָל בִּנְזִיד הַדֶּמַע.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Hamnuna raised an objection to** the statement of **Ulla** from a mishna (*Teharot* 2:3): **Non-sacred** food that is impure with **first-degree** impurity is **impure and renders** *teruma* **impure** in the sense that this *teruma* disqualifies other *teruma* with which it comes into contact. Non-sacred food that is impure with **second-degree** impurity **disqualifies** *teruma*, **but** it does **not** render *teruma* **impure,** meaning that it renders the *teruma* itself impure, but not to the extent that the *teruma* can render other *teruma* impure. **And** food that is impure with **third-degree** impurity may be **eaten** by a priest **in a stew** that is **a mixture** containing spices of *teruma*.


###### Chullin 34b:10
[Chullin 34b:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/34b:10)

וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ נִפְסַל גּוּפוֹ מִלֶּאֱכוֹל בִּתְרוּמָה, סָפֵינַן לֵיהּ מִידֵּי דְּפָסֵיל לֵיהּ לְגוּפֵיהּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הַנַּח לִנְזִיד הַדֶּמַע,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And if you say** that by partaking of food that is impure with third-degree impurity **his body is disqualified from** the right **to partake of *teruma*,** do **we feed him a matter that invalidates his body** from the right to partake of *teruma*? According to this, when eating the stew that contains food that is impure with third-degree impurity, he is disqualified from partaking of the spices of *teruma* that the mishna permits him to add to the stew. Ulla **said to him: Leave** the matter of **stew** that is **a mixture** containing spices of *teruma*,