## Chullin Daf 35a

###### Chullin 35a:1
[Chullin 35a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:1)

דְּלֵיכָּא כְּזַיִת בִּכְדֵי אֲכִילַת פְּרָס.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**as there is not an olive-bulk** of *teruma* in the amount of stew that he eats **in** the time it takes **to eat a half-loaf** of bread. Therefore, one need not treat the mixture with the level of purity required of *teruma*.


###### Chullin 35a:2
[Chullin 35a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:2)

אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹנָתָן אָמַר רַבִּי: הָאוֹכֵל שְׁלִישִׁי שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה עַצְמָהּ – אָסוּר לֶאֱכוֹל, וּמוּתָּר לִיגַּע.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Yonatan says** that **Rabbi** Yehuda HaNasi **says:** For **one who partakes of actual *teruma* that** is impure with **third-degree** impurity, it is **prohibited to partake** of other *teruma*, **but** it is **permitted to come into contact** with *teruma*.


###### Chullin 35a:3
[Chullin 35a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:3)

וְאִיצְטְרִיךְ דְּעוּלָּא, וְאִיצְטְרִיךְ דְּרַבִּי יוֹנָתָן, דְּאִי מִדְּעוּלָּא הֲוָה אָמֵינָא: הָנֵי מִילֵּי בְּחוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה, אֲבָל תְּרוּמָה – בִּנְגִיעָה נָמֵי אָסוּר, אִיצְטְרִיךְ דְּרַבִּי יוֹנָתָן. וְאִי מִדְּרַבִּי יוֹנָתָן הֲוָה אָמֵינָא: הָנֵי מִילֵּי תְּרוּמָה, אֲבָל חוּלִּין – בַּאֲכִילָה נָמֵי שְׁרֵי, צְרִיכִי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara notes that the statement **of Ulla was necessary and** the statement **of Rabbi Yonatan was necessary. As, if** the *halakha* were learned exclusively **from** the statement **of Ulla, I would say: This statement** applies **with regard to non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of *teruma*, but** with regard to ***teruma*** itself perhaps **contact is also prohibited.** Therefore, the statement **of Rabbi Yonatan was necessary. And if** the *halakha* were learned exclusively **from** the statement **of Rabbi Yonatan, I would say: This statement** applies with regard to ***teruma*, but** with regard to **non-sacred** food that was prepared with purity of *teruma*, perhaps **eating** it is **also permitted.** Therefore, both statements **are necessary.**


###### Chullin 35a:4
[Chullin 35a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:4)

יָתֵיב רַב יִצְחָק בַּר שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר מָרְתָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב נַחְמָן, וְיָתֵיב וְקָאָמַר: הָאוֹכֵל שְׁלִישִׁי שֶׁל חוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת הַקֹּדֶשׁ – טָהוֹר לֶאֱכוֹל בַּקֹּדֶשׁ, שֶׁאֵין לְךָ דָּבָר שֶׁעוֹשֶׂה רְבִיעִי בַּקֹּדֶשׁ אֶלָּא קֹדֶשׁ מִקּוֹדֶשׁ בִּלְבַד.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Rav Yitzḥak bar Shmuel bar Marta was sitting before Rav Naḥman, and he was sitting and saying:** With regard to **one who eats non-sacred** food items **that were prepared on the** level of **purity of sacrificial** food, and these items had become impure with **third-degree** impurity, he **is ritually pure** in terms of the right **to partake of sacrificial** food, **as you have nothing that confers fourth-degree** impurity **in sacrificial** food **other than consecrated sacrificial** food **alone,** but non-sacred food prepared with the purity of sacrificial food does not.


###### Chullin 35a:5
[Chullin 35a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:5)

מֵתִיב רָמֵי בַּר חָמָא: שְׁלִישִׁי – שֵׁנִי לַקֹּדֶשׁ, וְאֵין שֵׁנִי לַתְּרוּמָה. בְּחוּלִּין שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ עַל טׇהֳרַת תְּרוּמָה. אַמַּאי? הָא לָאו קֹדֶשׁ מִקּוֹדֶשׁ הוּא!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rami bar Ḥama raises an objection** from the mishna cited earlier (33b): One who eats food with **third-degree** impurity assumes **second**-**degree** impurity **vis-à-vis sacrificial** food, **and** he does **not** assume **second-degree** impurity **vis-à-vis *teruma*.** Eating an item with third-degree impurity is feasible only in the case of non-sacred items, as partaking of impure *teruma* is prohibited. It is only possible **in** the case of **non-sacred** food items **that were prepared** as if their level of purity were **on the** level of the **purity of *teruma*.** According to the statement of Rav Yitzḥak bar Shmuel bar Marta, **why** does this food assume second-degree impurity? **It is not sacrificial** food, which is **sanctified.**


###### Chullin 35a:6
[Chullin 35a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:6)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הַנַּח לִתְרוּמָה, שֶׁטׇּהֳרָתָהּ טוּמְאָה הִיא אֵצֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rav Yitzḥak bar Shmuel bar Marta **said to him: Leave *teruma*** alone; **its** state of **purity is impurity vis-à-vis sacrificial** food. Therefore, non-sacred food that was prepared with the purity of *teruma* renders sacrificial food impure.


###### Chullin 35a:7
[Chullin 35a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:7)

וּמְנָא תֵּימְרַאּ? דִּתְנַן: בִּגְדֵי עַם הָאָרֶץ מִדְרָס לִפְרוּשִׁין, בִּגְדֵי פְרוּשִׁין מִדְרָס לְאוֹכְלֵי תְרוּמָה, בִּגְדֵי אוֹכְלֵי תְרוּמָה מִדְרָס לַקֹּדֶשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And from where do you say** that the purity of *teruma* is impurity vis-à-vis sacrificial food? It is from a mishna (*Ḥagiga* 18b), **as we learned:** The halakhic status of **the garments of an *am ha’aretz*,** who does not scrupulously observe the *halakhot* of ritual purity, is like that of items rendered impure by **treading,** e.g., items designated for sitting or lying upon which a *zav* or a menstruating woman sits or lies, which are rendered a primary source of ritual impurity **for individuals who scrupulously observe** the *halakhot* of **ritual purity [*perushin*]** and eat their non-sacred food in a state of purity. In other words, it is considered a primary level of impurity for them. The halakhic status of **the garments of *perushin*** is like that of items rendered impure by **treading for** priests **who partake of *teruma*.** In addition, the halakhic status of **the garments of** priests **who partake of *teruma*** is like that of items rendered impure by **treading for** those who eat **sacrificial** food.


###### Chullin 35a:8
[Chullin 35a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Chullin/r/35a:8)

אָמַר רָבָא: מִדְרָסוֹת קָאָמְרַתְּ? שָׁאנֵי מִדְרָסוֹת,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava said: Are you saying** that one can cite proof from the *halakha* of items rendered impure by **treading** that the state of purity of *teruma* is impurity vis-à-vis sacrificial food? No proof may be cited from there, as the decree that the halakhic status of the garments of priests who partake of *teruma* is like that of items rendered impure by **treading** for those who eat sacrificial food **is different,**