## Horayot Daf 9a

###### Horayot 9a:1
[Horayot 9a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:1)

״לֹא תַגִּיעַ יָדוֹ״, וְנֶאֱמַר ״לֹא תַשִּׂיג יָדוֹ״ – מִי שֶׁבָּא לִידֵי עֲנִיּוּת וַעֲשִׁירוּת. יָצָא נָשִׂיא וּמָשִׁיחַ, שֶׁאֵין בָּאִין לִידֵי עֲנִיּוּת,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**“And if his means suffice not”** (Leviticus 5:7), **and it is stated: “And if his means not suffice”** (Leviticus 5:11), indicating that the sliding-scale offering applies only to **one who can come to** a state of **poverty and wealth.** This serves to **exclude a king and an anointed** priest, **who cannot come to** a state of **poverty.**


###### Horayot 9a:2
[Horayot 9a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:2)

נָשִׂיא – דִּכְתִיב: ״וְעָשָׂה אַחַת מִכׇּל מִצְוֹת ה׳ אֱלֹהָיו״. מִי שֶׁאֵין עַל גַּבָּיו אֶלָּא ה׳ אֱלֹהָיו. מָשִׁיחַ – דִּכְתִיב: ״וְהַכֹּהֵן הַגָּדוֹל מֵאֶחָיו״, שֶׁהוּא גָּדוֹל מֵאֶחָיו בְּנוֹי, בְּכֹחַ, בְּחָכְמָה וּבְעוֹשֶׁר. אֲחֵרִים אוֹמְרִים: מִנַּיִן שֶׁאִם אֵין לוֹ גַּדְּלֵהוּ מִשֶּׁל אֶחָיו? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״וְהַכֹּהֵן הַגָּדוֹל מֵאֶחָיו אֲשֶׁר יוּצַק עַל רֹאשׁוֹ״ – גַּדְּלֵהוּ מֵאֶחָיו.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The **king** cannot become poor, **as it is written** concerning him: **“And he performed one of all the mitzvot of the Lord his God”** (Leviticus 4:22), referring to the king as **one who has only the Lord his God upon him.** He is greater than the entire nation and is not a poor person dependent on others. **An anointed** priest cannot become poor, **as it is written: “And the priest that is greatest among his brethren”** (Leviticus 21:10), meaning **that he is greater than his brethren in beauty, in power, in wisdom, and in wealth,** not a poor person. **Others say: From where** is it derived **that if** the High Priest **does not have** personal wealth, one should **make him great from** the property **of his brethren? The verse states: “And the priest that is greatest among his brethren upon whose head the anointing oil is poured”** (Leviticus 21:10), from which it is derived: **Make him great from** the property **of his brethren,** who will provide him with enough property to render him wealthy.


###### Horayot 9a:3
[Horayot 9a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:3)

בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ רָבִינָא מֵרַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק: נָשִׂיא שֶׁנִּצְטָרַע, מַהוּ? מִידְחָא דְּחֵי, אוֹ מִיפְטָר פְּטִיר? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: דִּילָךְ, אוֹ דְּגַזָּא?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Ravina raised a dilemma before Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak:** In the case of **a king who was afflicted with leprosy** and unfit to serve as king during his affliction, **what is** his status with regard to the sliding-scale offering? Previously, during his reign, was **he** completely **eliminated** from the obligation to bring a sliding-scale offering to the extent that even now, when he is no longer king, he remains exempt? **Or** was he merely **exempted,** so that now that he is no longer king he is obligated to bring the offering? Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak **said to** Ravina: Does he bring the offering from **your** property, i.e., public property, **or** does he bring the offering **from** his personal **treasure [*degazza*]?** Since he obviously would bring the offering from his own personal treasure, he remains exempt from bringing the offering.


###### Horayot 9a:4
[Horayot 9a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:4)

תַּנְיָא, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר: מָשִׁיחַ פָּטוּר מִכּוּלָּן. אָמַר רָבָא: מַאי טַעְמָא דְּרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא? אָמַר קְרָא: ״זֶה קׇרְבַּן אַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו״. זוֹ בָּאָה חוֹבָה לוֹ, וְאֵין אַחֶרֶת בָּאָה חוֹבָה לוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **It is taught** in a *baraita* that **Rabbi Akiva says: An anointed** priest **is exempt from** bringing an offering in **all** the cases where one is liable to bring a sliding-scale offering. **Rava said: What is the reason** for the opinion **of Rabbi Akiva?** It is as **the verse states: “This is the offering of Aaron and of his sons** that they shall offer unto the Lord on the day that he is anointed: One-tenth part of an ephah of fine flour as a meal-offering” (Leviticus 6:13). One can infer: It is **this** tenth of an ephah that **comes** as **an obligation for him, and no other** such offering **comes** as **an obligation for him.**


###### Horayot 9a:5
[Horayot 9a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:5)

וְאֵימָא: כִּי מְמַעֵט לֵיהּ רַחֲמָנָא – מִדַּלֵּי דַלּוּת, וּמַאי נִיהוּ? עֲשִׂירִית הָאֵיפָה. אֲבָל עֲנִיּוּת וַעֲשִׁירוּת, לָא מַעֲטֵיהּ רַחֲמָנָא! לָא סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ, דִּכְתִיב: ״וְכִפֶּר עָלָיו הַכֹּהֵן עַל חַטָּאתוֹ אֲשֶׁר חָטָא מֵאַחַת מֵאֵלֶּה״. הַמִּתְכַּפֵּר בְּאַחַת – מִתְכַּפֵּר בְּכוּלָּן, וְשֶׁאֵין מִתְכַּפֵּר בְּאַחַת – אֵין מִתְכַּפֵּר בְּכוּלָּן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **But** why not **say** that **when the Merciful One excludes** an anointed priest, it is particularly **from** the type of sliding-scale offering brought due to **extreme poverty? And what is it?** The **one-tenth of an ephah** meal-offering mentioned in the verse. **But the Merciful One did not exclude him** from the dove brought as a sliding-scale offering due to **poverty** and the sheep brought as a sliding-scale offering by one with **wealth.** The Gemara rejects this: That **should not enter your mind, as it is written** with regard to the sliding-scale offering: **“And the priest shall atone for him for his sin that he has committed from one of these”** (Leviticus 5:13), from which it is derived: **One who gains atonement with** every **one** of the types of a sliding-scale offering **gains atonement with any of** the types of the sliding-scale offering, **and one who** does **not gain atonement with** every **one** of the types of a sliding-scale offering does **not gain atonement with any of** the types of the sliding-scale offering.


###### Horayot 9a:6
[Horayot 9a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:6)

אֶלָּא מֵעַתָּה, דִּכְתִיב: ״וְהָיָה כִּי יֶאְשַׁם לְאַחַת מֵאֵלֶּה״, הָכִי נָמֵי: דְּכׇל הַמִּתְחַיֵּיב בְּאַחַת – מִתְחַיֵּיב בְּכוּלָּן, וְשֶׁאֵין מִתְחַיֵּיב בְּאַחַת – אֵין מִתְחַיֵּיב בְּכוּלָּן. אַלְּמָה תְּנַן, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר: נָשִׂיא חַיָּיב חוּץ מִשְּׁמִיעַת קוֹל!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **But if that is so,** and the verse is interpreted in that manner, then that **which is written** there: **“And it shall be when he shall be guilty of one of these matters”** (Leviticus 5:5), **so too** shall be interpreted: **Anyone who becomes liable in** every **one** of the instances for which one brings a sliding-scale offering **can become liable in any of** those instances, **and** anyone **who does not become liable in** every **one** of the instances to bring a sliding-scale offering **cannot become liable in any of** those instances. **Why,** then, did **we learn** in the mishna that **Rabbi Akiva says:** The **king is liable** in all of these cases **except for** the case of **hearing of a voice,** indicating that he can become liable in the rest of the instances even if he is exempt in one?


###### Horayot 9a:7
[Horayot 9a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:7)

אַבָּיֵי וְרָבָא דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: ״מֵאַחַת״ מַשְׁמַע לֵיהּ, ״לְאַחַת״ לָא מַשְׁמַע לֵיהּ. וּמַאי שְׁנָא ״מֵאַחַת״ דְּמַשְׁמַע לֵיהּ?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Abaye and Rava both say** to resolve this difficulty: Rabbi Akiva **learns** this inference from the term: **“From one”** (Leviticus 5:13). **He does not learn** anything from the term: **“Of one”** (Leviticus 5:5). The Gemara asks: **And what is different** about the term **“from one” that he learns** a *halakha* from it?


###### Horayot 9a:8
[Horayot 9a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:8)

דְּכַתְבֵיהּ רַחֲמָנָא לְבַסּוֹף גַּבֵּי עֲשִׂירִית הָאֵיפָה, לְמֵימְרָא דְּכֹל דְּמִחַיַּיב בַּעֲשִׂירִית הָאֵיפָה – מִחַיַּיב בְּכוּלָּן, דְּאִי סָלְקָא דַעְתָּךְ מִתְחַיֵּיב בְּאַחַת אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין מִתְחַיֵּיב בְּכוּלָּן, נִכְתְּבֵיהּ לְהַאי ״מֵאַחַת מֵאֵלֶּה״ בְּדַלּוּת, אִי נָמֵי בַּעֲשִׁירוּת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: The difference is **that the Merciful One wrote it at the end** of the passage discussing the sliding-scale offering, **with regard to the one-tenth of an ephah** meal-offering, **to say that anyone who can become liable to bring the one-tenth of an ephah can become liable to** bring **any of them. As, if it enters your mind** to say that **one can become liable to** bring **one even though he cannot become liable to** bring **any** one **of them, let** the Torah **write this** phrase: **From one of these, with regard to** the offering brought due to **poverty,** or **alternatively, with regard to** the offering brought by one with **wealth.** Since this term does not appear with regard to one of the other offerings, apparently, it is specifically with regard to the offering brought due to extreme poverty that one who cannot become liable for that offering is exempt from the entire matter.


###### Horayot 9a:9
[Horayot 9a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:9)

**מַתְנִי׳** כׇּל הַמִּצְוֹת שֶׁבְּתוֹרָה שֶׁחַיָּיבִין עַל זְדוֹנָן כָּרֵת וְעַל שִׁגְגָתָן חַטָּאת – הַיָּחִיד מֵבִיא כִּשְׂבָּה וּשְׂעִירָה, וְהַנָּשִׂיא שָׂעִיר, וּמָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין מְבִיאִין פַּר. וּבַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה – הַיָּחִיד וְהַנָּשִׂיא וְהַמָּשִׁיחַ מְבִיאִין שְׂעִירָה, וּבֵית דִּין פַּר וְשָׂעִיר; פַּר לְעוֹלָה וְשָׂעִיר לְחַטָּאת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** In summation: **For all mitzvot that are in the Torah for whose intentional** violation one is **liable** to receive ***karet* and for whose unwitting** violation one is liable to bring **a sin-offering, the individual brings a ewe or female goat** for their unwitting transgression, **and the king** brings **a male goat** for their unwitting transgression, **and an anointed** priest **and a court** who issued an erroneous ruling **bring a bull. And for** unwittingly engaging in **idol worship, the individual, and the king, and the anointed** priest **bring a female goat, and the court** brings **a bull and a goat: A bull for a burnt-offering and a goat for a sin-offering.**


###### Horayot 9a:10
[Horayot 9a:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:10)

אָשָׁם תָּלוּי – הַיָּחִיד וְהַנָּשִׂיא חַיָּיבִין, וּמָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין. אָשָׁם וַדַּאי – הַיָּחִיד וְהַנָּשִׂיא וְהַמָּשִׁיחַ חַיָּיבִין, וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to **a provisional guilt-offering, the individual and the king are liable, and an anointed** priest **and a court are exempt.** With regard to **a definite guilt-offering, the individual, the king, and the anointed** priest **are liable, and a court is exempt.**


###### Horayot 9a:11
[Horayot 9a:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:11)

עַל שְׁמִיעַת הַקּוֹל, וְעַל בִּטּוּי שְׂפָתַיִם, וְעַל טוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו – בֵּית דִּין פְּטוּרִין, וְהַיָּחִיד וְהַנָּשִׂיא וְהַמָּשִׁיחַ חַיָּיבִין, אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין כֹּהֵן גָּדוֹל מָשִׁיחַ חַיָּיב עַל טוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן. וּמָה הֵן מְבִיאִין? קׇרְבַּן עוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר: הַנָּשִׂיא מֵבִיא שָׂעִיר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**For hearing of a voice,** i.e., a false oath of testimony, **and for** a false oath on **an utterance of the lips, and for the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods, **a court is exempt, and the individual, the king, and the anointed** priest **are liable. But an anointed High Priest** is **not liable for the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods; this is **the statement of Rabbi Shimon. And what** offering are **they** liable to **bring?** It is **a sliding-scale offering** based on their financial circumstances, as delineated in the Torah (see Leviticus 5:1–13). **Rabbi Eliezer says: The king brings a goat.**


###### Horayot 9a:12
[Horayot 9a:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:12)

**גְּמָ׳** תַּנְיָא, רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן הָיָה נוֹתֵן כְּלָל: כֹּל שֶׁהַיָּחִיד בְּאָשָׁם תָּלוּי – הַנָּשִׂיא כַּיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ, מָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין. וְכֹל שֶׁהוּא בְּאָשָׁם וַדַּאי – נָשִׂיא וּמָשִׁיחַ כַּיּוֹצֵא בָּהֶן, וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** **It is taught** in a *baraita* that **Rabbi Shimon would posit a principle:** For **any** case in **which the individual** is liable **to** bring **a provisional guilt-offering,** the status of **the king** is **like** that of the individual, **and an anointed** priest **and a court are exempt. And** for **any** case in **which** an individual is liable **to** bring **a definite guilt-offering,** the status of **a king and an anointed** priest is **like** that of the individual, **and** the **court is exempt.**


###### Horayot 9a:13
[Horayot 9a:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:13)

שְׁמִיעַת הַקּוֹל, וּבִטּוּי שְׂפָתַיִם, וְטוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו – בֵּית דִּין פְּטוּרִין, נָשִׂיא וּמָשִׁיחַ חַיָּיבִין, אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין הַנָּשִׂיא חַיָּיב בִּשְׁמִיעַת הַקּוֹל, וְלֹא מָשִׁיחַ בְּטוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו. כׇּל שֶׁהוּא בְּעוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד – נָשִׂיא כַּיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ, מָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
He continues: For **hearing of a voice,** i.e., a false oath of testimony, **and** for a false oath on **an utterance of the lips, and** for **the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods, **a court is exempt, and a king and an anointed** priest **are liable. But the king is not liable in** a case of **hearing of a voice, and an anointed** priest is not liable **for the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods. In general, for **any** case for **which** an individual is liable **to** bring **a sliding-scale** offering, the status of **a king is like** that of the individual, **and an anointed** priest **and a court are exempt.**


###### Horayot 9a:14
[Horayot 9a:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Horayot/r/9a:14)

הָא גּוּפַהּ קַשְׁיָא, אָמְרַתְּ: שֶׁאֵין מָשִׁיחַ חַיָּיב בְּטוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו, בְּטוּמְאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו – הוּא דְּפָטוּר, אֲבָל בִּשְׁמִיעַת הַקּוֹל וּבִטּוּי שְׂפָתַיִם – חַיָּיב. אֵימָא סֵיפָא: כֹּל שֶׁהוּא בְּעוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד – נָשִׂיא כַּיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ, מָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין, קָתָנֵי: מָשִׁיחַ וּבֵית דִּין פְּטוּרִין, מָה בֵּית דִּין פְּטוּרִין מִכּוּלְּהוֹן – אַף מָשִׁיחַ פָּטוּר מִכּוּלְּהוֹן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara expresses surprise: **This** *baraita* **itself** is **difficult. You said that an anointed** priest is **not liable for the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods, and by inference: **It is for the defiling of** the **Temple or its sacrificial** foods **that he is exempt, but** he is **liable for hearing of a voice and** for **a statement of the lips. Say the latter clause** of the *baraita*: For **any** case for **which** an individual is liable **to** bring **a sliding-scale** offering, the status of **a king** is **like** that of the individual, **and an anointed** priest **and a court are exempt. He teaches: An anointed priest and a court are exempt; just as a court is exempt from all of** the sliding-scale offerings, **so too, an anointed priest is exempt from all of them,** not only from the offering for the defiling of the Temple or its sacrificial foods.