## Menachot Daf 12a

###### Menachot 12a:1
[Menachot 12a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:1)

פִּיגּוּל, וְחַיָּיבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
the offering is ***piggul*, and one is liable** to receive ***karet* for** partaking of the remainder of that meal offering.


###### Menachot 12a:2
[Menachot 12a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:2)

זֶה הַכְּלָל: כׇּל הַקּוֹמֵץ [אוֹ] נוֹתֵן בִּכְלִי, הַמּוֹלִיךְ, הַמַּקְטִיר, לֶאֱכוֹל דָּבָר שֶׁדַּרְכּוֹ לֶאֱכוֹל, וּלְהַקְטִיר דָּבָר שֶׁדַּרְכּוֹ לְהַקְטִיר, חוּץ לִמְקוֹמוֹ – פָּסוּל וְאֵין בּוֹ כָּרֵת, חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ – פִּיגּוּל וְחַיָּיבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁיַּקְרִיב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**This is the principle:** In the case of **anyone who removes the handful, or places** the handful **in the vessel,** or **who conveys** the vessel with the handful to the altar, or **who burns** the handful on the altar, with the intent **to partake of an item whose** typical **manner** is such that one **partakes** of it, e.g., the remainder, **or to burn an item whose** typical **manner** is such that one **burns** it on the altar, e.g., the handful or the frankincense, **outside its** designated **area,** the meal offering is **unfit but there is no** liability for ***karet*.** If his intent was to do so **beyond its** designated **time,** the offering is ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet* on account of it, provided that the permitting** factor, i.e., the handful, **was sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva.** If the permitting factor was not sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva, although the meal offering is unfit, the prohibition of *piggul* does not apply to it.


###### Menachot 12a:3
[Menachot 12a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:3)

כֵּיצַד קָרֵב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ? קָמַץ בִּשְׁתִיקָה, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ; אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר בִּשְׁתִיקָה; אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ וְנָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ – זֶהוּ שֶׁקָּרֵב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**How** is **the permitting factor** considered to have been **sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva?** If one **removed the handful in silence,** i.e., with no specific intent, and **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder **beyond its** designated **time; or** if one **removed the handful** with the intent to partake of the remainder or burn the handful or frankincense **beyond its** designated **time,** and **placed** it **in the vessel, and conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar **in silence,** with no specific intent; **or** if one **removed the handful** and **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder **beyond its** designated **time, that is** the case of an offering **whose permitting factor was sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva,** and one is liable to receive *karet* for partaking of it due to *piggul*.


###### Menachot 12a:4
[Menachot 12a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:4)

כֵּיצַד לֹא קָרַב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ? קָמַץ חוּץ לִמְקוֹמוֹ, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ, אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִמְקוֹמוֹ, אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִמְקוֹמוֹ – זֶהוּ שֶׁלֹּא קָרַב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**How** is **the permitting factor not sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva?** If one **removed the handful** with the intent to partake of the remainder or burn the handful or frankincense **outside its** designated **area,** or **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder **beyond its** designated **time; or** if one **removed the handful** with the intent to partake of the remainder or burn the handful or frankincense **beyond its** designated **time,** and **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder **outside its** designated **area; or** if one **removed the handful** and **placed** it **in the vessel, and conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder **outside its** designated **area, that is** the case of an offering **whose permitting factor was not sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva.**


###### Menachot 12a:5
[Menachot 12a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:5)

מִנְחַת חוֹטֵא וּמִנְחַת קְנָאוֹת שֶׁקְּמָצָן שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָן, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ; אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ, נָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָן; אוֹ שֶׁקָּמַץ וְנָתַן בִּכְלִי וְהוֹלִיךְ וְהִקְטִיר שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָן – זֶהוּ שֶׁלֹּא קָרַב הַמַּתִּיר כְּמִצְוָתוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**The meal offering of a sinner and the meal offering of jealousy** brought by a *sota* **that one removed their handful not for their sake** and **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, with the intent to partake of the remainder or burn the handful **beyond its** designated **time; or that one removed the handful** with the intent to partake of the remainder or burn the handful **beyond its** designated **time** or **placed** it **in the vessel, conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, **not for their sake; or that one removed the handful, and placed** it **in the vessel, and conveyed** it, **and burned** the handful on the altar, **not for their sake, that is** the case of an offering **whose permitting factor was not sacrificed in accordance with its mitzva.**


###### Menachot 12a:6
[Menachot 12a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:6)

לֶאֱכוֹל כְּזַיִת בַּחוּץ כְּזַיִת לְמָחָר, כְּזַיִת לְמָחָר כְּזַיִת בַּחוּץ, כַּחֲצִי זַיִת בַּחוּץ כַּחֲצִי זַיִת לְמָחָר, כַּחֲצִי זַיִת לְמָחָר כַּחֲצִי זַיִת בַּחוּץ – פָּסוּל וְאֵין בּוֹ כָּרֵת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
If one performed one of these rites with the intent **to partake of an olive-bulk outside** its designated area and **an olive-bulk the next day,** or **an olive-bulk the next day** and **an olive-bulk outside** its designated area, or **half an olive-bulk outside** its designated area and **half an olive-bulk the next day,** or **half an olive-bulk the next day** and **half an olive-bulk outside** its designated area, the offering is **unfit but there is no** liability for ***karet*.**


###### Menachot 12a:7
[Menachot 12a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:7)

אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה, זֶה הַכְּלָל: אִם מַחְשֶׁבֶת הַזְּמַן קָדְמָה לְמַחְשֶׁבֶת הַמָּקוֹם – פִּיגּוּל, וְחַיָּיבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת. אִם מַחְשֶׁבֶת הַמָּקוֹם קָדְמָה לְמַחְשֶׁבֶת הַזְּמַן – פָּסוּל, וְאֵין בּוֹ כָּרֵת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: זֶה וָזֶה פָּסוּל וְאֵין בּוֹ כָּרֵת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Yehuda says** that **this is the principle: If the intent** with regard to **the time preceded the intent** with regard to **the area,** the offering is ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet* on account of it. If the intent** with regard to **the area preceded the intent** with regard to **the time,** the offering is **unfit but there is no** liability for ***karet*. And the Rabbis say:** In both **this** case, where the intent with regard to time was first, **and that** case, where the intent with regard to area came first, the offering is **unfit but there is no** liability for ***karet*.**


###### Menachot 12a:8
[Menachot 12a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:8)

**גְּמָ׳** אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ, לְדִבְרֵי הָאוֹמֵר: שִׁירַיִם שֶׁחָסְרוּ בֵּין קְמִיצָה לְהַקְטָרָה מַקְטִיר קוֹמֶץ עֲלֵיהֶן, וְקַיְימָא לַן דְּאוֹתָן שִׁירַיִם אֲסוּרִים בַּאֲכִילָה, מַהוּ דְּתִיהַנֵּי לְהוּ הַקְטָרָה לְמִיקְבְּעִינְהוּ בְּפִיגּוּל?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** **A dilemma was raised before** the Sages: **According to the statement of the one who says** that if the **remainder** of a meal offering became **lacking between the removal of the handful and the burning** of the handful on the altar the priest nevertheless **burns the handful on** account of such a meal offering, **and** as **we maintain that** despite the fact that the handful is burned on account of it **that remainder is prohibited for consumption, what is** the *halakha* with regard to *piggul*? **Should** the **burning** of the handful **be effective in establishing** such a remainder **as *piggul*** when the handful was burned with the intent to partake of the remainder the next day?


###### Menachot 12a:9
[Menachot 12a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:9)

(ולפקינהו) [וּלְאַפֹּקִינְהוּ] מִידֵי מְעִילָה?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And** similarly, is the burning of the handful effective **in removing** such a remainder **from** being subject to **misuse** of consecrated property, just as a complete remainder is removed from being subject to this prohibition after the burning of the handful, when it becomes permitted to the priests for consumption?


###### Menachot 12a:10
[Menachot 12a:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:10)

אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: אֲפִילּוּ לְרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא דְּאָמַר ״זְרִיקָה מוֹעֶלֶת לַיּוֹצֵא״, הָנֵי מִילֵּי יוֹצֵא,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Huna said: Even according to** the opinion of **Rabbi Akiva, who says** that the **sprinkling** of the blood of an offering, which renders its meat permitted for consumption and removes it from being subject to misuse of consecrated property, **is effective in** removing the meat of an offering that **left** the Temple courtyard from being subject to misuse of consecrated property despite the fact that such meat is prohibited for consumption, **that statement** applies only when the meat was disqualified by means of **leaving.**


###### Menachot 12a:11
[Menachot 12a:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:11)

דְּאִיתֵיהּ בְּעֵינֵיהּ, וּפָסוּל מֵחֲמַת דָּבָר אַחֵר הוּא, אֲבָל חֶסְרוֹן, דִּפְסוּלָא דְּגוּפֵיהּ הוּא – לָא מַהְנְיָא לֵיהּ הַקְטָרָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rav Huna explains: The reason is **that** the meat remains **as is, and** the **disqualification** of the meat by means of leaving is **on account of something else,** i.e., a factor external to the meat itself. **But** in the case of **a lack** in the measure of the remainder of a meal offering, **which is a disqualification** on account **of itself,** the **burning** of the handful **is not effective in** removing the remainder from being subject to misuse of consecrated property, nor to establish it as *piggul*.


###### Menachot 12a:12
[Menachot 12a:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:12)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבָא: אַדְּרַבָּה, אֲפִילּוּ לְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר דְּאָמַר ״אֵין זְרִיקָה מוֹעֶלֶת לַיּוֹצֵא״ – הָנֵי מִילֵּי יוֹצֵא, דְּלֵיתֵיהּ בִּפְנִים, אֲבָל חֶסְרוֹן דְּאִיתֵיהּ בִּפְנִים – מַהְנְיָא לֵיהּ הַקְטָרָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava said to** Rav Huna: **On the contrary; even according to** the opinion of **Rabbi Eliezer, who says** that **sprinkling is not effective in** removing the meat that **left** the Temple courtyard from being subject to misuse of consecrated property, **that statement** applies only when the meat was disqualified by means of **leaving, as** the meat **is not inside** the Temple courtyard where the sprinkling could be effective for it. **But** with regard to **a lack** in the measure of the remainder of a meal offering **that is inside** the Temple courtyard, the **burning** of the handful **is effective** in removing the remainder from being subject to misuse of consecrated property as well as in establishing it as *piggul*.


###### Menachot 12a:13
[Menachot 12a:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:13)

אָמַר רָבָא: מְנָא אָמֵינָא לַהּ, דִּתְנַן: הַקּוֹמֵץ אֶת הַמִּנְחָה לֶאֱכוֹל שְׁיָרֶיהָ בַּחוּץ אוֹ כְּזַיִת מִשְּׁיָרֶיהָ בַּחוּץ, וְתָנֵי רַבִּי חִיָּיא: הַקּוֹמֵץ אֶת הַמִּנְחָה, וְלָא תָּנֵי ״אוֹ כְּזַיִת״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava said: From where do I say** that even remainders that lack a full measure can be rendered *piggul*? This can be inferred from that **which we learned** in the mishna: With regard to **one who removes a handful from the meal offering** with the intent **to partake** of **its remainder outside** the Temple courtyard **or** to partake of **an olive-bulk of its remainder outside** the Temple courtyard, the meal offering is unfit but there is no liability for *karet*, and if he removes a handful from the meal offering with the intent to partake of its remainder beyond the designated time or to partake of an olive-bulk of its remainder beyond the designated time the offering is *piggul* and one is liable to receive *karet* for partaking of the remainder of that meal offering. **And Rabbi Ḥiyya teaches** in his version of the mishna: **One who removes a handful from the meal offering** with the intent to partake of its remainder, **and he does not teach: Or an olive-bulk** of its remainder.


###### Menachot 12a:14
[Menachot 12a:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/12a:14)

מַאי טַעְמָא לָא תָּנֵי ״אוֹ כְּזַיִת״? לָאו כְּגוֹן שֶׁחָסְרוּ שִׁירַיִם וְקָמוּ לְהוּ אַכְּזַיִת, וְכֵיוָן דִּבְמַתַּן כְּלִי, בְּהִילּוּךְ, וּבְהַקְטָרָה לָא מִתְּנֵי לֵיהּ

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rava continues: **What is the reason** that Rabbi Ḥiyya diverged from the standard text of the mishna and **did not teach: Or an olive-bulk?** Is it **not** because his mishna is discussing a case **where** the **remainder** later **became lacking and** its measure **stood at an olive-bulk? And** therefore Rabbi Ḥiyya did not include the clause: Or an olive-bulk, **since** later in the mishna, **with regard to** the **placement** of the handful **in a vessel,** and **with regard to** the **conveyance** of the vessel to the altar, **and with regard to** the **burning** of the handful, **he** could **not teach** the phrase: