## Menachot Daf 77b

###### Menachot 77b:1
[Menachot 77b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:1)

**מַתְנִי׳** מִכּוּלָּם הָיָה נוֹטֵל אֶחָד מֵעֲשָׂרָה תְּרוּמָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְהִקְרִיב מִמֶּנּוּ אֶחָד מִכׇּל קׇרְבָּן תְּרוּמָה לַה׳״, ״אֶחָד״ – שֶׁלֹּא יִטּוֹל פָּרוּס, ״מִכׇּל קׇרְבָּן״ – שֶׁיְּהוּ כׇּל הַקָּרְבָּנוֹת שָׁוִין, שֶׁלֹּא יִטּוֹל מִקׇּרְבָּן עַל חֲבֵירוֹ. ״לַכֹּהֵן הַזֹּרֵק אֶת דַּם הַשְּׁלָמִים לוֹ יִהְיֶה״, וְהַשְּׁאָר נֶאֱכָל לַבְּעָלִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** **From all** of the four types of loaves accompanying the thanks offering, **one takes one** loaf **from** each set of **ten as *teruma*,** to be given to a priest, **as it is stated: “And he shall present from it one of each offering as a *teruma* unto the Lord;** to the priest that sprinkles the blood of the peace offerings against the altar it shall be given” (Leviticus 7:14). The verse is analyzed: **“One”** indicates **that one should not take a sliced** loaf; **“of each offering”** indicates **that all the offerings should be equal,** i.e., **that one should not take** a loaf **from** one type of **offering for another** type; **“to the priest that sprinkles the blood of the peace offerings against the altar it shall be given,” and the rest** of the loaves are **eaten by the owner.**


###### Menachot 77b:2
[Menachot 77b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:2)

**גְּמָ׳** תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״וְהִקְרִיב מִמֶּנּוּ״ – מִן הַמְחוּבָּר, ״אֶחָד״ – שֶׁלֹּא יִטּוֹל פָּרוּס, ״מִכׇּל קׇרְבָּן״ – שֶׁיְּהוּ כׇּל הַקָּרְבָּנוֹת (שָׁווֹת) [שָׁוִוין], שֶׁלֹּא יִטּוֹל מִן הַקׇּרְבָּן עַל חֲבֵירוֹ, ״תְּרוּמָה לַה׳״ – אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ מִכַּמָּה הִיא,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** The mishna teaches some of the *halakhot* of *teruma* to be taken from the loaves of the thanks offering that are derived from the verse: “And he shall present from it one of each offering as a *teruma* unto the Lord.” The Gemara cites a *baraita* that interprets the same verse: **The Sages taught** in a *baraita*: The phrase **“And he shall present from it”** indicates that the loaves must all be as one, i.e., *teruma* may be taken **from** the loaves only when they are joined **together** in one place. **“One”** indicates **that one should not take a sliced** loaf. **“Of each offering”** indicates **that all the offerings should be equal,** i.e., **that one should not take** a loaf **from one** type of **offering for another** type. When the verse states: **“As a *teruma* unto the Lord,” I do not know from how many** loaves the *teruma* **is** taken.


###### Menachot 77b:3
[Menachot 77b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:3)

הֲרֵינִי דָּן: נֶאֱמַר כָּאן ״תְּרוּמָה״, וְנֶאֱמַר בִּתְרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר ״תְּרוּמָה״, מָה לְהַלָּן אֶחָד מֵעֲשָׂרָה, אַף כָּאן אֶחָד מֵעֲשָׂרָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**I** therefore **derive** this from a verbal analogy: It **is stated here,** in the passage of the loaves describing the thanks offering: **“*Teruma*,” and** it **is stated with regard to *teruma* of the tithe:** “Then you shall set apart from it **a *teruma*** for the Lord, even a tithe of the tithe” (Numbers 18:26). **Just as below,** with regard to *teruma* of the tithe, **one** out of every **ten** is separated as *teruma*, **so too here,** with regard to the loaves of the thanks offering, **one** out **of** every **ten** loaves is separated as *teruma*.


###### Menachot 77b:4
[Menachot 77b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:4)

אוֹ כְּלָךְ לְדֶרֶךְ זוֹ: נֶאֱמַר כָּאן ״תְּרוּמָה״, וְנֶאֱמַר בְּבִכּוּרִים ״תְּרוּמָה״, מָה לְהַלָּן אֵין לָהּ שִׁיעוּר, אַף כָּאן אֵין לָהּ שִׁיעוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Or** perhaps, **go this way** and derive the measure from a different verbal analogy: It **is stated here: “*Teruma*,” and** it **is stated with regard to first fruits: “*Teruma*”** (Deuteronomy 12:17). **Just as below,** with regard to first fruits, **it has no measure, so too here,** say that **it has no measure.**


###### Menachot 77b:5
[Menachot 77b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:5)

נִרְאֶה לְמִי דּוֹמֶה: דָּנִין תְּרוּמָה שֶׁאֵין אַחֲרֶיהָ תְּרוּמָה, מִתְּרוּמָה שֶׁאֵין אַחֲרֶיהָ תְּרוּמָה, וְאַל יוֹכִיחַ בִּכּוּרִים, שֶׁיֵּשׁ אַחֲרֵיהֶן תְּרוּמָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The *baraita* continues: **Let us consider to which** of the two cases, *teruma* of the tithe or the first fruits, the case of *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering is more **similar.** It is logical that **one derives** the *halakha* of **a *teruma* that is not followed by** another ***teruma*,** such as *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering, **from a *teruma* that is not followed by** another ***teruma*,** such as *teruma* of the tithe. **And** the case of the **first fruits will not** serve as **proof, since they are followed by** another ***teruma*,** as *teruma* and tithes are taken after the first fruits are separated.


###### Menachot 77b:6
[Menachot 77b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:6)

אוֹ כְּלָךְ לְדֶרֶךְ זוֹ: דָּנִין תְּרוּמָה הַנֶּאֱכֶלֶת בְּמָקוֹם קָדוֹשׁ, מִתְּרוּמָה הַנֶּאֱכֶלֶת בְּמָקוֹם קָדוֹשׁ, וְאַל תּוֹכִיחַ תְּרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר, שֶׁנֶּאֱכֶלֶת בְּכׇל מָקוֹם.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Or** perhaps, **go this way** and reason that **one derives** the *halakha* of ***teruma*** of the loaves of the thanks offering, **which is eaten in a sacred place,** in Jerusalem, **from *teruma*** of the first fruits, **which is eaten in a sacred place,** in Jerusalem. **And** the case of ***teruma* of the tithe will not** serve as **proof, as it may be eaten anywhere.**


###### Menachot 77b:7
[Menachot 77b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:7)

תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״מִמֶּנּוּ תְּרוּמָה לַה׳״, וּכְתִיב בִּתְרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר ״מִמֶּנּוּ תְּרוּמָה״ – לִגְזֵירָה שָׁוָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Since both of these comparisons are equally plausible, **the verse states** with regard to the loaves of the thanks offering: **“From it…a *teruma* unto the Lord,” and,** similarly, **it is written with regard to *teruma* of the tithe: “From it a *teruma*,” to** indicate that there is **a verbal analogy** between the two, from which it can be derived that one separates one out of every ten loaves of the thanks offering as *teruma*.


###### Menachot 77b:8
[Menachot 77b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:8)

לָמַדְנוּ לִתְרוּמָה שֶׁהִיא אֶחָד מֵעֲשָׂרָה, אֲבָל אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ מִכַּמָּה הִיא חַלָּה. הֲרֵינִי דָּן: נֶאֱמַר כָּאן ״לֶחֶם״, וְנֶאֱמַר לְהַלָּן בִּשְׁתֵּי הַלֶּחֶם ״לֶחֶם״, מָה לְהַלָּן עִשָּׂרוֹן לְחַלָּה, אַף כָּאן עִשָּׂרוֹן לְחַלָּה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The *baraita* continues: **We have learned with regard to *teruma*** of the loaves of the thanks offering **that its** measure is **one** out **of** every **ten. But I do not know** from this verbal analogy **from how much** flour each leavened **loaf** is to be prepared. **I** therefore **derive** this from a verbal analogy: It **is stated here,** in the passage concerning the loaves of the thanks offering: **“Bread”** (Leviticus 7:13), **and** it **is stated there, with regard to the two loaves,** i.e., the public offering on *Shavuot* of two loaves from the new wheat: **“Bread”** (Leviticus 23:17). **Just as there,** with regard to the two loaves, one prepares the loaves with **a tenth** of an ephah **per loaf, so too here,** with regard to the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering, one prepares the loaves with **a tenth** of an ephah **per loaf.**


###### Menachot 77b:9
[Menachot 77b:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:9)

אוֹ כְּלָךְ לְדֶרֶךְ זוֹ, נֶאֱמַר כָּאן ״לֶחֶם״, וְנֶאֱמַר בְּלֶחֶם הַפָּנִים ״לֶחֶם״, מָה לְהַלָּן שְׁנֵי עֶשְׂרוֹנוֹת, אַף כָּאן שְׁנֵי עֶשְׂרוֹנוֹת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Or** perhaps, **go this way** and derive the *halakha* from a different verbal analogy: It **is stated here,** with regard to the loaves of the thanks offering: **“Bread,” and it is stated** there, **with regard to the shewbread: “Bread”** (Leviticus 24:7). One can conclude that **just as there,** with regard to the shewbread, each of the twelve loaves is baked from **two-tenths** of an ephah of flour, **so too here,** each of the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering should be baked from **two-tenths** of an ephah of flour.


###### Menachot 77b:10
[Menachot 77b:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:10)

נִרְאֶה לְמִי דּוֹמֶה? דָּנִין מִנְחָה הַבָּאָה חָמֵץ עִם הַזֶּבַח, מִמִּנְחָה הַבָּאָה חָמֵץ עִם הַזֶּבַח, וְאַל יוֹכִיחַ לֶחֶם הַפָּנִים, שֶׁאֵינוֹ בָּא חָמֵץ עִם הַזֶּבַח.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The *baraita* continues: **Let us consider to which** of the two cases, the two loaves or the shewbread, the case of the leavened loaves of the thanks offering is more **similar.** It is logical that **one derives** the *halakha* of the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering, which is **a meal offering that comes** as **leavened bread** along **with an animal offering, from** another **meal offering that comes** as **leavened bread** along **with an animal offering,** such as the two loaves, which are also leavened, and which come with animal offerings (see Leviticus 23:17–19). **And the shewbread will not** serve as **proof, since it does not come** as **leavened bread,** nor does it come **with** an animal **offering.**


###### Menachot 77b:11
[Menachot 77b:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:11)

אוֹ כְּלָךְ לְדֶרֶךְ זוֹ, דָּנִין מִנְחָה הַבָּאָה מֵאָרֶץ וְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ, מִן הֶחָדָשׁ וּמִן הַיָּשָׁן, מִמִּנְחָה הַבָּאָה מֵאָרֶץ וְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ, מִן הֶחָדָשׁ וּמִן הַיָּשָׁן, וְאַל יוֹכִיחוּ שְׁתֵּי הַלֶּחֶם, שֶׁאֵין בָּאוֹת אֶלָּא מִן הֶחָדָשׁ וּמִן הָאָרֶץ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Or** perhaps, **go this way** and reason that **one derives** the *halakha* of the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering, which is **a meal offering that** can **come from** the grain of **Eretz** Yisrael **or** of **outside of Eretz** Yisrael, **from new** grain **or from old** grain; **from** the *halakha* of the shewbread, which is also **a meal offering that can come from** the grain of **Eretz** Yisrael **or from outside of Eretz** Yisrael, **from new** grain **or from old** grain. **And the two loaves will not** serve as **proof, since they** can **come only from new** grain **and from Eretz** Yisrael.


###### Menachot 77b:12
[Menachot 77b:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:12)

תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״מִמּוֹשְׁבֹתֵיכֶם תָּבִיאּוּ לֶחֶם תְּנוּפָה שְׁתַּיִם״, שֶׁאֵין תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״תָּבִיאוּ״, וּמָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״תָּבִיאוּ״? שֶׁכׇּל מַה שֶּׁאַתָּה מֵבִיא מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר הֲרֵי הוּא כָּזֶה, מַה לְּהַלָּן עִשָּׂרוֹן לְחַלָּה אַף כָּאן עִשָּׂרוֹן לְחַלָּה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Since both of these comparisons are equally plausible, **the verse states** concerning the two loaves: **“You shall bring out of your dwellings two loaves of waving”** (Leviticus 23:17). **As** there is **no** need for **the verse to state: “You shall bring,” what,** then, is the meaning when **the verse states: “You shall bring”?** This indicates **that whatever,** i.e., any meal offering, **you bring from a different place,** it must **be like this,** i.e., the two loaves. Therefore, **just as there,** in the case of the two loaves, the measure is **a tenth** of an ephah **per loaf, so too here,** in the case of the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering, the measure is **a tenth** of an ephah **per loaf.**


###### Menachot 77b:13
[Menachot 77b:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:13)

אִי מָה לְהַלָּן שְׁנֵי עֶשְׂרוֹנוֹת, אַף כָּאן שְׁנֵי עֶשְׂרוֹנוֹת? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״תִּהְיֶינָה״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
But **if** so, perhaps one can derive that **just as there,** in the case of the two loaves, the entire measure for the two loaves is **two-tenths** of an ephah, **so too here,** in the case of the loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering, the entire measure for all ten loaves of leavened bread is **two-tenths.** To exclude this possibility, **the** same **verse states: “They shall be,”** to indicate that each leavened loaf is prepared from a tenth of an ephah. Accordingly, the ten loaves of leavened bread of the thanks offering are prepared with a total of ten tenths of an ephah.


###### Menachot 77b:14
[Menachot 77b:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:14)

לָמַדְנוּ עֲשָׂרָה לְחָמֵץ, עֲשָׂרָה לְמַצָּה מִנַּיִן? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״עַל חַלֹּת לֶחֶם חָמֵץ״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The *baraita* continues: **We have learned** that there are **ten** tenths of an ephah of flour **for the** loaves of **leavened bread** accompanying the thanks offering. **From where** is it derived that there are **ten** tenths of an ephah **for the** thirty loaves of ***matza*? The verse states:** “If he brings it for a thanks offering, then he shall bring with the thanks offering unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers spread with oil, and cakes mingled with oil, of fine flour poached. **With cakes of leavened bread** he shall present his offering, with the sacrifice of his peace offerings for thanks” (Leviticus 7:12–13).


###### Menachot 77b:15
[Menachot 77b:15](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:15)

נֶגֶד חָמֵץ, הָבֵא מַצָּה. נִמְצְאוּ עֶשְׂרִים עֶשְׂרוֹנוֹת לַחְמֵי תוֹדָה, עֲשָׂרָה לְחָמֵץ, וַעֲשָׂרָה לְמַצָּה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
By mentioning all the loaves of unleavened bread in one verse and the loaves of leavened bread in the subsequent verse, it is indicated that one must **bring** the ***matza*** in a measure **corresponding to** the measure of the loaves of **leavened bread. Consequently,** there are **twenty tenths** of flour for the **loaves of the thanks offering, ten for the** loaves of **leavened bread, and ten for the *matza*.**


###### Menachot 77b:16
[Menachot 77b:16](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:16)

יָכוֹל עֲשָׂרָה שֶׁבְּמַצָּה לֹא יְהוּ כּוּלָּן אֶלָּא מִמִּין אֶחָד? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״אִם עַל תּוֹדָה יַקְרִיבֶנּוּ וְהִקְרִיב עַל זֶבַח הַתּוֹדָה חַלּוֹת מַצּוֹת בְּלוּלֹת בַּשֶּׁמֶן וּרְקִיקֵי מַצּוֹת מְשֻׁחִים בַּשָּׁמֶן סֹלֶת מֻרְבֶּכֶת וְגוֹ׳״. נִמְצְאוּ שְׁלֹשָׁה עֶשְׂרוֹנִים וּשְׁלִישׁ לְכׇל מִין וּמִין, וְשָׁלֹשׁ חַלּוֹת לְעִשָּׂרוֹן, וְנִמְצְאוּ לַחְמֵי תוֹדָה אַרְבָּעִים. נוֹטֵל מֵהֶן אַרְבַּע וְנוֹתֵן לְכֹהֵן, וְהַשְּׁאָר נֶאֱכָלִים לַבְּעָלִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
One **might** have thought that one brings **ten** loaves of ***matza*,** and that **all of them shall be of only one type.** Therefore, **the verse states: “If he brings it for a thanks offering, then he shall bring with the thanks offering unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers spread with oil, and cakes mingled with oil, of fine flour poached.** With cakes of leavened bread he shall present his offering.” The verse indicates that one must bring three types of *matza*. **Consequently,** there are **three-and-one-third** of a tenth of an ephah of flour **for each and every type, and three loaves to a tenth** of an ephah. **And consequently,** there are a total of **forty loaves of the thanks offering.** The owner of the offering **takes four of them,** one loaf of each type, **and gives** them **to the priest, and the remaining** loaves **are eaten by the owner** and any ritually pure Jew to whom he wishes to give the loaves. This concludes the *baraita*.


###### Menachot 77b:17
[Menachot 77b:17](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:17)

אָמַר מָר: ״וְהִקְרִיב מִמֶּנּוּ״ – מִן הַמְחוּבָּר. אֶלָּא מֵעַתָּה, דִּכְתִיב ״וְאֶת כׇּל חֶלְבּוֹ יָרִים מִמֶּנּוּ״ – הָתָם מַאי מְחוּבָּר אִיכָּא?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara analyzes the *baraita*: **The Master said: “And he shall present from it,”** indicates that the *teruma* may be taken **from** the loaves only when they are joined **together** in one place. The Gemara asks: **If that is so,** then concerning that **which is written** in the verse with regard to the sacrificial portions of the sin offering consumed on the altar: **“And all the fat thereof he shall take off from it** and make it smoke upon the altar” (Leviticus 4:19), **there, what is there** to be joined **together?**


###### Menachot 77b:18
[Menachot 77b:18](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:18)

כִּדְרַב חִסְדָּא אָמַר אֲבִימִי, דְּאָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא אָמַר אֲבִימִי: שֶׁלֹּא יְנַתֵּחַ בָּשָׂר קוֹדֶם שֶׁיִּטּוֹל אֵימוּרִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara responds: The sacrificial portions of the sin offering must be sacrificed from that which is joined together, **in accordance with** that **which Rav Ḥisda** says that **Avimi says, as Rav Ḥisda says** that **Avimi says:** The priest **may not cut up the meat** of the offering **before taking** from it **the sacrificial portions** that are to be burned upon the altar.


###### Menachot 77b:19
[Menachot 77b:19](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:19)

אָמַר מָר: נֶאֱמַר כָּאן ״תְּרוּמָה״, וְנֶאֱמַר בִּתְרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר ״תְּרוּמָה״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **The Master said:** It **is stated here,** in the passage of the loaves of the thanks offering: **“*Teruma*,” and** it **is stated with regard to *teruma* of the tithe: “*Teruma*.”** Just as one-tenth of the tithe is separated as *teruma* of the tithe, so too one out of every ten loaves of the thanks offering is separated as *teruma*.


###### Menachot 77b:20
[Menachot 77b:20](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:20)

וְנֵילַף מִתְּרוּמַת מִדְיָן? דָּנִין תְּרוּמָה הַנּוֹהֶגֶת לְדוֹרוֹת מִתְּרוּמָה הַנּוֹהֶגֶת לְדוֹרוֹת, וְאַל תּוֹכִיחַ תְּרוּמַת מִדְיָן שֶׁאֵינָהּ נוֹהֶגֶת לְדוֹרוֹת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara challenges: **And let us derive** the *halakha* of *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering **from *teruma*** that was taken following the war **of** the Jewish people against **Midian,** where the word *teruma* also appears (see Numbers 31:28–30). The measure of the *teruma* there was not one of ten. The Gemara responds: **One derives** the *halakha* with regard to ***teruma*** of the loaves of the thanks offering, **which is practiced for** all **generations, from *teruma*** of the tithe, **which is** also **practiced for** all **generations. And *teruma* of Midian shall not** serve as **proof, as it is not practiced for** all **generations.**


###### Menachot 77b:21
[Menachot 77b:21](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:21)

וְנֵילַף מִתְּרוּמַת חַלָּה? תָּנָא דְּבֵי רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל: דָּנִין דָּבָר שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בּוֹ ״מִמֶּנּוּ תְּרוּמַת ה׳״ מִדָּבָר שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בּוֹ ״תְּרוּמָה לַה׳״, לְאַפּוֹקֵי תְּרוּמַת חַלָּה דְּלֹא נֶאֱמַר בּוֹ ״מִמֶּנּוּ תְּרוּמָה לַה׳״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara challenges: **And let us derive** the *halakha* of *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering **from *teruma* of *ḥalla*,** i.e., the portion of dough given to the priest, as the verse refers to it as a *teruma* (see Numbers 15:19–20). That measure is one in twenty-four. The Gemara responds: **The school of Rabbi Yishmael taught** that **one derives a matter,** i.e., *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering, **of which it is stated: “From it a *teruma* unto the Lord”** (Leviticus 7:14), **from a matter,** i.e., *teruma* of the tithe, **of which it is stated:** “From it **a *teruma* for the Lord”** (Numbers 18:26). This serves **to exclude *teruma* of *ḥalla*, of which it is not stated: From it a *teruma* for the Lord.**


###### Menachot 77b:22
[Menachot 77b:22](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:22)

בָּעֵי רָבָא: תְּרוּמַת לַחְמֵי תוֹדָה, חַיָּיבִין עֲלֵיהֶן מִיתָה וָחוֹמֶשׁ, אוֹ אֵין חַיָּיבִין עֲלֵיהֶן מִיתָה וָחוֹמֶשׁ?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Rava raises a dilemma:** With regard to ***teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering,** is a non-priest who intentionally partakes **of it liable** to receive **death** at the hand of Heaven, as is the *halakha* concerning a non-priest who intentionally consumes *teruma* of the tithe? **And** similarly, is a non-priest who unwittingly partakes of *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering liable to pay the value of what he consumed as well as an additional **one-fifth** of that value, as is the *halakha* concerning a non-priest who partakes of *teruma* of the tithe unwittingly (see Leviticus 22:9, 14)? **Or is one not** liable to receive **death** at the hand of Heaven **or** to pay an additional **one-fifth for their** consumption?


###### Menachot 77b:23
[Menachot 77b:23](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:23)

כֵּיוָן דְּאִיתַּקַּשׁ לִתְרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר, כִּתְרוּמַת מַעֲשֵׂר דָּמֵי, אוֹ דִלְמָא ״בּוֹ״ וַ״חֲמִשִּׁיתוֹ״ מִיעֵט רַחֲמָנָא?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rava elaborates: **Since** *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering **is compared to *teruma* of the tithe,** perhaps **it is considered like *teruma* of the tithe,** and the same penalties are incurred. **Or perhaps,** since the verse uses restrictive terms with regard to *teruma* of the tithe, as the verse states of one who intentionally partakes of it: “They shall die **due to it”** (Leviticus 22:9), and the verse states with regard to one who unwittingly partakes of it: “Then he shall put **its fifth-part** unto it” (Leviticus 22:14), **the Merciful One restricted** this *halakha* specifically to the case of *teruma* of the tithe.


###### Menachot 77b:24
[Menachot 77b:24](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:24)

מְדַמַּעַת, אוֹ אֵינָהּ מְדַמַּעַת? תֵּיקוּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rava raises another dilemma based on the comparison of *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering and *teruma* of the tithe: Does *teruma* of the loaves of the thanks offering that fell into non-sacred produce **render the mixture** forbidden, as is the *halakha* concerning *teruma* of the tithe? **Or** does the comparison of *teruma* of the loaves to *teruma* of the tithe apply only with regard to the proper measure, and it **does not render the mixture** forbidden? The Gemara comments: These dilemmas **shall stand** unresolved.


###### Menachot 77b:25
[Menachot 77b:25](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Menachot/r/77b:25)

אָמַר מָר: תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״תִּהְיֶינָה״. מַאי תַּלְמוּדָא?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **The Master said** in the *baraita*: **The verse states: “They shall be,”** indicating that each leavened loaf must come from a tenth of an ephah, so that the loaves of *matza* of the thanks offering are prepared from ten tenths of an ephah. The Gemara asks: **What is the** biblical **derivation** for this? How is this derived from “they shall be”?