## Mishnah Menachot Chapter 2

###### Mishnah Menachot 2:1
[Mishnah Menachot 2:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishnah%20Menachot/r/2:1)

הַקּוֹמֵץ אֶת הַמִּנְחָה לֶאֱכֹל שְׁיָרֶיהָ אוֹ לְהַקְטִיר קֻמְצָהּ לְמָחָר, מוֹדֶה רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בָּזֶה, שֶׁהוּא פִגּוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת. לְהַקְטִיר לְבוֹנָתָהּ לְמָחָר, רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, פָּסוּל וְאֵין בּוֹ כָרֵת, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, פִּגוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, מַה שָּׁנָה זוֹ מִן הַזָּבַח. אָמַר לָהֶם, שֶׁהַזֶּבַח דָּמוֹ וּבְשָׂרוֹ וְאֵמוּרָיו אֶחָד, וּלְבוֹנָה אֵינָהּ מִן הַמִּנְחָה:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
In the case of a priest **who removes a handful from the meal offering** with the intent **to partake of its remainder or to burn its handful** on **the next day, Rabbi Yosei concedes in this** instance **that it is** a case of ***piggul* and he is liable** to receive ***karet* for** partaking of **it.** But if the priest’s intent was **to burn its frankincense the next day, Rabbi Yosei says:** The meal offering is **unfit but** partaking of it **does not include** liability to receive ***karet*. And the Rabbis say:** It is a case of ***piggul* and he is liable** to receive ***karet* for** partaking of the meal offering. The Rabbis **said to** Rabbi Yosei: In **what** manner does **this differ from** an animal **offering,** where if one slaughtered it with the intent to sacrifice the portions consumed on the altar the next day, it is *piggul*? Rabbi Yosei **said to** the Rabbis: There is a difference, **as** in **the** case of an animal **offering, its blood, and its flesh, and its portions** consumed on the altar are all **one** entity. Consequently, intent with regard to any one of them renders the entire offering *piggul*. **But** the **frankincense is not** part **of the meal offering.**


###### Mishnah Menachot 2:2
[Mishnah Menachot 2:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishnah%20Menachot/r/2:2)

שָׁחַט שְׁנֵי כְבָשִׂים לֶאֱכֹל אַחַת מִן הַחַלּוֹת לְמָחָר, הִקְטִיר שְׁנֵי בְזִיכִין לֶאֱכֹל אַחַד מִן הַסְּדָרִים לְמָחָר, רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, אוֹתָהּ הַחַלָּה וְאוֹתוֹ הַסֵּדֶר שֶׁחִשַּׁב עָלָיו, פִּגּוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת, וְהַשֵּׁנִי פָּסוּל וְאֵין בּוֹ כָרֵת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, זֶה וָזֶה פִּגּוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת. נִטְמֵאת אַחַת מִן הַחַלּוֹת אוֹ אַחַד מִן הַסְּדָרִים, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, שְׁנֵיהֶם יֵצְאוּ לְבֵית הַשְּׂרֵפָה, שֶׁאֵין קָרְבַּן צִבּוּר חָלוּק. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, הַטָּמֵא בְטֻמְאָתוֹ, וְהַטָּהוֹר יֵאָכֵל:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
If **one slaughtered** the **two lambs** that accompany the two meal offering loaves sacrificed on *Shavuot* with the intent **to partake of one of the** two **loaves the next day,** or if **one burned** the **two bowls** of frankincense accompanying the shewbread with the intent **to partake of one of the arrangements** of the shewbread **the next day, Rabbi Yosei says: That loaf and that arrangement of which he intended** to partake the next day are ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet* for** their consumption, **and the second** loaf and arrangement are **unfit, but there is no** liability to receive ***karet* for** their consumption. **And the Rabbis say: This** loaf and arrangement **and that** loaf and arrangement are both ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet* for** their consumption. If **one of the** two **loaves** of *Shavuot* **or one of the** two **arrangements** of the shewbread **became ritually impure, Rabbi Yehuda says: Both must be taken to the place of burning** like any other disqualified offering, **as no communal offering is divided.** That is, it is either fit in its entirety or unfit in its entirety. **And the Rabbis say: The impure one** remains **in its** state of **impurity and the pure one shall be eaten.**


###### Mishnah Menachot 2:3
[Mishnah Menachot 2:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishnah%20Menachot/r/2:3)

הַתּוֹדָה מְפַגֶּלֶת אֶת הַלֶּחֶם, וְהַלֶּחֶם אֵינוֹ מְפַגֵּל אֶת הַתּוֹדָה. כֵּיצַד. הַשּׁוֹחֵט אֶת הַתּוֹדָה לֶאֱכֹל מִמֶּנָּה לְמָחָר, הִיא וְהַלֶּחֶם מְפֻגָּלִין. לֶאֱכֹל מִן הַלֶּחֶם לְמָחָר, הַלֶּחֶם מְפֻגָּל וְהַתּוֹדָה אֵינָהּ מְפֻגָּלֶת. הַכְּבָשִׂים מְפַגְּלִין אֶת הַלֶּחֶם, וְהַלֶּחֶם אֵינוֹ מְפַגֵּל אֶת הַכְּבָשִׂים. כֵּיצַד. הַשּׁוֹחֵט אֶת הַכְּבָשִׂים לֶאֱכֹל מֵהֶם לְמָחָר, הֵם וְהַלֶּחֶם מְפֻגָּלִים. לֶאֱכֹל מִן הַלֶּחֶם לְמָחָר, הַלֶּחֶם מְפֻגָּל, וְהַכְּבָשִׂים אֵינָן מְפֻגָּלִין:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**The thanks offering renders the** accompanying **loaves *piggul* but the loaves do not render the thanks offering *piggul*. How so?** If **one slaughtered the thanks offering,** which may be consumed only during the day it is slaughtered and the night thereafter, with the intent **to partake of it the next day,** the offering **and the** accompanying **loaves are rendered *piggul*.** If he slaughtered it with the intent **to partake of the loaves the next day, the loaves are rendered *piggul* and the thanks offering is not *piggul*.** Likewise, **the lambs** sacrificed with the two loaves meal offering on *Shavuot* **render the** accompanying **loaves *piggul*, but the loaves do not render the lambs *piggul*. How so?** If **one slaughtered the lambs,** which may be consumed only during the day they are slaughtered and the night thereafter, with the intent **to partake of them the next day,** the lambs **and the** accompanying **loaves are rendered *piggul*.** If he did so with the intent **to partake of the loaves the next day, the loaves are rendered *piggul* and the lambs are not *piggul*.**


###### Mishnah Menachot 2:4
[Mishnah Menachot 2:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishnah%20Menachot/r/2:4)

הַזֶּבַח מְפַגֵּל אֶת הַנְּסָכִין מִשֶּׁקָּדְשׁוּ בִכְלִי, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וְהַנְּסָכִין אֵינָן מְפַגְּלִין אֶת הַזָּבַח. כֵּיצַד. הַשּׁוֹחֵט אֶת הַזֶּבַח לֶאֱכֹל מִמֶּנּוּ לְמָחָר, הוּא וּנְסָכָיו מְפֻגָּלִין. לְהַקְרִיב מִן הַנְּסָכִין לְמָחָר, הַנְּסָכִין מְפֻגָּלִין, וְהַזֶּבַח אֵינוֹ מְפֻגָּל:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**The** animal **offering renders the** accompanying **libations** and meal offerings ***piggul* from** the moment **that they were consecrated in the vessel,** but not before; this is **the statement of Rabbi Meir. The libations do not render the** animal **offering *piggul*. How so?** In the case of **one who slaughters the offering** with the intent **to partake of it the next day,** the offering **and its libations are rendered *piggul*.** But if one slaughters the offering with the intent **to sacrifice its libations the next day, the libations are rendered *piggul*,** while **the offering is not *piggul*.**


###### Mishnah Menachot 2:5
[Mishnah Menachot 2:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishnah%20Menachot/r/2:5)

פִּגֵּל בַּקֹּמֶץ וְלֹא בַלְּבוֹנָה, בַּלְּבוֹנָה וְלֹא בַקֹּמֶץ, רַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר, פִּגּוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין בּוֹ כָרֵת, עַד שֶׁיְּפַגֵּל אֶת כָּל הַמַּתִּיר. מוֹדִים חֲכָמִים לְרַבִּי מֵאִיר בְּמִנְחַת חוֹטֵא וּבְמִנְחַת קְנָאוֹת, שֶׁאִם פִּגֵּל בַּקֹּמֶץ, שֶׁהוּא פִגּוּל וְחַיָּבִין עָלָיו כָּרֵת, שֶׁהַקֹּמֶץ הוּא הַמַּתִּיר. שָׁחַט אַחַד מִן הַכְּבָשִׂים לֶאֱכֹל שְׁתֵּי חַלּוֹת לְמָחָר, הִקְטִיר אַחַד מִן הַבְּזִיכִים לֶאֱכֹל שְׁנֵי סְדָרִים לְמָחָר, רַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר, פִּגּוּל וְחַיָּבִים עָלָיו כָּרֵת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין פִּגּוּל, עַד שֶׁיְּפַגֵּל אֶת כָּל הַמַּתִּיר. שָׁחַט אַחַד מִן הַכְּבָשִׂים לֶאֱכֹל מִמֶּנּוּ לְמָחָר, הוּא פִגּוּל, וַחֲבֵרוֹ כָשֵׁר. לֶאֱכֹל מֵחֲבֵרוֹ לְמָחָר, שְׁנֵיהֶם כְּשֵׁרִים:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to the burning of the handful of a meal offering and the frankincense, both of which render the meal offering permitted for consumption: If the priest had an intention that can **render** the offering ***piggul* during** the burning of **the handful but not during** the burning of **the frankincense,** or **during** the burning of **the frankincense but not during** the burning of **the handful,** i.e., he burned one of them with the intention to eat the remainder of the offering beyond its designated time, **Rabbi Meir says:** The offering is ***piggul* and one** who eats it is **liable** to receive ***karet*** for its consumption. **And the Rabbis say: There is no** liability to receive ***karet* in this** case **unless he renders** the offering ***piggul* during** the sacrifice of **the entire permitting factor,** i.e., the burning of both the handful and the frankincense. **And the Rabbis concede to Rabbi Meir in** the case of **a meal offering of a sinner and in** the case of **a meal offering of jealousy** of a *sota* **that if one had intent of *piggul* during** the burning of **the handful, that** the meal offering is ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet*** for its consumption, **as** here **the handful is the** sole **permitting factor.** If **one slaughtered one of the** two **lambs** sacrificed with the two loaves on *Shavuot* with the intent **to partake of** the **two loaves the next day,** or if **one burned one of the bowls** of frankincense with the intent **to partake of two arrangements** of shewbread **the next day, Rabbi Meir says:** The meal offering is ***piggul* and one is liable** to receive ***karet*** for its consumption, **and the Rabbis say: There is no** liability to receive ***karet* unless he has intent of *piggul* during** the sacrifice of **the entire permitting factor.** If **one slaughtered one of the lambs** with the intent **to partake of it the next day, that** lamb is ***piggul* and the other is a fit** offering. If he slaughtered one lamb with the intent **to partake of the other the next day, both** lambs **are fit** offerings, as one permitting factor does not render another permitting factor *piggul*.