## Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit Chapter 4

###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:1
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:1)

הָרוֹצֶה לִפְדּוֹת פֵּרוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי פּוֹדֶה אוֹתָן בִּדְמֵיהֶן וְאוֹמֵר הֲרֵי הַמָּעוֹת הָאֵלּוּ תַּחַת הַפֵּרוֹת הָאֵלּוּ אוֹ הַפֵּרוֹת הָאֵלּוּ מְחֻלָּלוֹת עַל הַמָּעוֹת הָאֵלּוּ. וְאִם לֹא פֵּרֵשׁ אֶלָּא הִפְרִישׁ מָעוֹת בִּלְבַד כְּנֶגֶד הַפֵּרוֹת דַּיּוֹ וְאֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לְפָרֵשׁ וְיֵצְאוּ הַפֵּרוֹת לְחֻלִּין. וְיַעֲלוּ הַמָּעוֹת לִירוּשָׁלַיִם וְיוֹצִיאֵם שָׁם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יד כד) "וְכִי יִרְבֶּה מִמְּךָ הַדֶּרֶךְ כִּי לֹא תוּכַל שְׂאֵתוֹ":

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
A person who desires to redeem produce from the second tithe should¹ 4:7), the variance in views applies only after the fact. According to all views, the initial and preferable option is for him to make an explicit statement. redeem it according to its worth² and say: "These coins³ take the place of this produce" or "The holiness of this produce is transferred to these coins."
If he did not make such an explicit statement, but merely set aside the coins equivalent to [the value of] the produce, it is sufficient. He need not make an explicit statement.⁴ 4:7)].
In some printings of the *Mishneh Torah*, there is a note (which some ascribe to the Ra'avad) that states that for the redemption to be acceptable when he does not make an explicit statement, he must have been involved with the matter beforehand. Rav Yosef Corcus discusses this issue at length, noting that this is indeed the law with regard to the consecration and divorce of a woman (*Hilchot Ishut* 3:8, *Hilchot Gerushin* 1:11). He makes two distinctions regarding the situations:
a) in contrast to consecration and divorce, setting aside money for produce from the second tithe is a self-explanatory act; the intent is directly obvious;
b) consecration and divorce must be observed by witnesses. Hence, one must make his intent clear to them. There is no such obligation with regard to the redemption of produce. The *Shulchan Aruch* (*Yoreh De'ah* 31:136) quotes the Rambam's ruling.
The produce then is considered ordinary produce and the coins must be taken to Jerusalem and spent there,⁵ as [Deuteronomy 14:24] states: "When the journey will be too great for you, because you cannot transport it...."

footnotes:
¹ Although there is a difference of opinion concerning this matter in the Mishnah (Ma'aser Sheni
² See Halachah 18 and Chapter 2, Halachah 2.
³ The coins need not be in front of him when he makes the declaration. As long as they are within his possession, it is acceptable. See Halachot 11-13.
⁴ For the circumstances clarify the nature of his intent [the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (Ma'aser Sheni
⁵ To purchase food. See Chapter 7, Halachah 3.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:2
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:2)

וְכֵן אִם רָצָה לְחַלֵּל פֵּרוֹת הַמַּעֲשֵׂר עַל פֵּרוֹת אֲחֵרוֹת. יַעֲלוּ הַפֵּרוֹת הַשְּׁנִיּוֹת וְיֵאָכְלוּ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם. וְלֹא יְחַלֵּל מִמִּין עַל שֶׁאֵינוֹ מִינוֹ וְלֹא מִן הַיָּפֶה עַל הָרַע וַאֲפִלּוּ בְּאוֹתוֹ הַמִּין. וְאִם חִלֵּל הֲרֵי הֵן מְחֻלָּלוֹת:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
Similarly, if a person desires to transfer the holiness of produce from the second tithe to other produce, he should bring the other produce⁶ justify the Rambam's ruling. to Jerusalem and eat it there. He should not transfer the holiness of produce from one species to produce from another species,⁷ nor from high quality produce from one species to lower quality produce even if it is of the same species. If, however, he transferred the holiness of produce in these instances, the transfer is effective.

footnotes:
⁶ The original produce, by contrast, is now considered as ordinary produce and can be eaten anywhere. The Ra'avad differs and maintains that the transfer is not effective, for he maintains that the holiness of the produce from the second tithe can only be transferred to money. Nevertheless, as a stringency, he maintains that the second batch of produce must also be taken to Jerusalem. The Radbaz and the Kessef Mishneh
⁷ The Ra'avad differs with the Rambam on this issue as well and again the commentaries justify the Rambam's position.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:3
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:3)

הַפּוֹדֶה מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי מְבָרֵךְ אֲשֶׁר קִדְּשָׁנוּ בְּמִצְוֹתָיו וְצִוָּנוּ עַל פִּדְיוֹן מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי. וְאִם חִלְּלָן עַל פֵּרוֹת אֲחֵרוֹת אוֹ שֶׁחִלֵּל מָעוֹת עַל הַפֵּרוֹת מְבָרֵךְ עַל חִלּוּל מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי. וְהַפּוֹדֶה אוֹ הַמְחַלֵּל מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי שֶׁל דְּמַאי אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ בְּרָכָה:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
A person who redeems produce from the second tithe should recite a blessing:⁸ "[Blessed are You...] who sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us concerning the redemption of the second tithe." If he transferred the holiness to other produce or he transferred the holiness of money to produce,⁹ he should recite the blessing: "...concerning the transfer of the holiness of the second tithe."¹⁰ A person who redeems or transfers the holiness of *demai* need not¹¹ recite a blessing.¹²

footnotes:
⁸ Before separating the produce.
⁹ See Halachah 6.
¹⁰ In continuation of his comments on the previous halachah, the Ra'avad states that a blessing should not be recited. Since the person is not allowed to transfer the holiness of the produce in this manner, he should not recite a blessing.
¹¹ Indeed, he should not, lest he be taking God's name in vein.
¹² Because there is no definite Scriptural obligation incumbent on this produce.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:4
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:4)

כְּשֶׁפּוֹדִין אֶת הַמַּעֲשֵׂר אֵין פּוֹדִין אוֹתוֹ לְשֵׁם מַעֲשֵׂר אֶלָּא לְשֵׁם חֻלִּין. וְאוֹמְרִין כַּמָּה שָׁוִין פֵּרוֹת חֻלִּין אֵלּוּ וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַכּל יוֹדְעִין שֶׁהֵן מַעֲשֵׂר כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִתְבַּזֶּה:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When one redeems produce from the second tithe, he should not redeem it as the second tithe, but rather as ordinary produce. He should say: "How much is this ordinary produce worth." [This applies] even if everyone knows that the produce is from the second tithe, so that it will not be disgraced.¹³ questions this rationale, noting that once this produce is redeemed, there is no difference between it and ordinary produce and hence, its price should not be reduced. He explains that, nevertheless, since it originally was from the second tithe, it is still viewed less favorably.
The Ra'avad differs with the Rambam's ruling and maintains that such a ploy is not necessary. The commentaries follow the Rambam's view.

footnotes:
¹³ Produce from the second tithe is sold for a lower price than ordinary produce, because restrictions apply with regard to its consumption. Hence, if produce from the second tithe is offered for evaluation and its identity is known, people will look at it less favorably. The Kessef Mishneh


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:5
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:5)

אֵין מְחַלְּלִין מְעוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי עַל מָעוֹת אֲחֵרוֹת. בֵּין שֶׁהָיוּ אֵלּוּ וְאֵלּוּ כֶּסֶף אוֹ אֵלּוּ וְאֵלּוּ נְחשֶׁת. [אוֹ הָרִאשׁוֹנוֹת כֶּסֶף וְהַשְּׁנִיּוֹת נְחשֶׁת. אוֹ] הָרִאשׁוֹנוֹת נְחשֶׁת וְהַשְּׁנִיּוֹת כֶּסֶף. וְאִם עָבַר וְחִלֵּל הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ מְחֻלָּלִין:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
The holiness of coins [used to redeem produce from] the second tithe should not be transferred to other coins.¹⁴ state that the Rambam derives this from the fact that *Demai* 1:2 states that such a redemption may be made with coins upon which the holiness of the second tithe of *demai* had been transferred. Implied is that if we are certain that the produce is from the second tithe, no such redemption can be made. See the Rambam's Commentary to that mishnah where he states that the concept is derived from Deuteronomy 14:25 which states: "And you shall exchange it for silver and you shall bundle the silver," i.e., the silver originally used for the redemption must be the silver taken to Jerusalem.
See the conclusion of Chapter 5 and the beginning of Chapter 6 which mentions some exceptions to this general principle. [This applies] whether both sets of coins were silver or both were brass, the first set was silver and the second brass, or the first set was brass and the second silver. If one transgressed and transferred the holiness, the transfer is effective.¹⁵

footnotes:
¹⁴ The Radbaz and the Kessef Mishneh
¹⁵ See also Halachah 7 which states that redemption may be made in a pressing situation.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:6
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:6)

אֵין מְחַלְּלִין מָעוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר עַל הַפֵּרוֹת. וְאִם חִלֵּל יַעֲלוּ הַפֵּרוֹת וְיֵאָכְלוּ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם. וְלֹא יְחַלְּלֵם עַל בְּהֵמָה חַיָּה וְעוֹף חַיִּין. וְאִם חִלֵּל לֹא קָנָה מַעֲשֵׂר שֶׁמָּא יְגַדֵּל מֵהֶם עֲדָרִים עֲדָרִים. אֲבָל אִם חִלֵּל עַל שְׁחוּטִים הֲרֵי הֵן כִּשְׁאָר הַפֵּרוֹת וְיַעֲלוּ וְיֵאָכְלוּ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם וְיֵצְאוּ הַמָּעוֹת לְחֻלִּין:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
[Outside of Jerusalem,] the holiness of money of the second tithe should not be transferred to produce. If such a transfer was made, the produce should be brought to Jerusalem and eaten there.¹⁶ [Similarly, the holiness of money from the second tithe] should not be transferred to living domesticated animals, beasts, or fowl. If one [attempted to] make such a transfer, the holiness of the second tithe is not transferred. [This is a decree,]¹⁷ 40b). lest one raise them in herds. If one transferred the [holiness of such funds] to animals that were slaughtered, they are considered as produce. They must be brought to Jerusalem and eaten there and the money is considered as ordinary funds.¹⁸

footnotes:
¹⁶ I.e., if the produce was purchased intentionally with money of the second tithe. See Chapter 7, Halachot 1, 15.
¹⁷ I.e., our Sages rescinded the transfer of the holiness to the animal for the reason stated (Sukkah
¹⁸ See Chapter 7, Halachah 16.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:7
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:7)

בִּשְׁעַת הַדְּחָק מֻתָּר לְחַלֵּל מָעוֹת הַכֶּסֶף עַל שֶׁל נְחשֶׁת. לֹא שֶׁיְּקַיֵּם כֵּן אֶלָּא עַד שֶׁיִּמְצָא רֶוַח. וְיַחֲזֹר וִיחַלֵּל מָעוֹת הַנְּחשֶׁת עַל מָעוֹת הַכֶּסֶף:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
In a pressing situation,¹⁹ 2:6). it is permitted to transfer the holiness of silver coins to brass ones. One should not maintain this situation, however.²⁰). Among the reasons silver coins are preferred is that they are more prestigious and they do not corrode. Instead, [when he has] a respite he should transfer the holiness of the brass back to silver coins.

footnotes:
¹⁹ E.g., the situation described in Chapter 6, Halachah 2. This example is also discussed by the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (Ma'aser Sheni
²⁰ I.e., one should not leave the brass coins in a state of holiness (ibid.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:8
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:8)

מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי שֶׁל דְּמַאי מְחַלְּלִים אוֹתוֹ לְכַתְּחִלָּה כֶּסֶף עַל כֶּסֶף וְכֶסֶף עַל נְחשֶׁת וּנְחשֶׁת עַל נְחשֶׁת וּנְחשֶׁת עַל הַפֵּרוֹת וְיַעֲלוּ אוֹתָן הַפֵּרוֹת וְיֵאָכְלוּ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
As an initial preference,²¹ is merely a Rabbinic stringency, our Sages granted leniency in its application. one may transfer the holiness of coins of the second tithe from *demai*, transferring the holiness from silver to silver, from silver to brass, from brass to brass, and from brass to produce. That produce should be brought to Jerusalem and eaten there.²²

footnotes:
²¹ Since the separation of the second tithe from demai
²² I.e., its holiness should not be transferred back to coins.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:9
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:9)

אֵין פּוֹדִין פֵּרוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר אֶלָּא בְּכֶסֶף שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יד כה) "וְצַרְתָּ הַכֶּסֶף". וְכֵן אִם פָּדָה לְעַצְמוֹ וְהוֹסִיף חֹמֶשׁ לֹא יִהְיֶה הַחֹמֶשׁ אֶלָּא כֶּסֶף כַּקֶּרֶן. וְאֵין פּוֹדִין בְּכֶסֶף שֶׁאֵינוֹ מַטְבֵּעַ אֶלָּא בְּכֶסֶף מְפֻתָּח שֶׁיֵּשׁ עָלָיו צוּרָה אוֹ כְּתָב [שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וְצַרְתָּ הַכֶּסֶף]. וְאִם פָּדָה בְּלָשׁוֹן שֶׁל כֶּסֶף וְכַיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא אֲסִימוֹן לֹא עָשָׂה כְּלוּם. וְאֵין פּוֹדִין בְּפָחוֹת מִפְּרוּטָה מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא כְּפוֹדֶה בַּאֲסִימוֹן:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
The produce from the second tithe may only be redeemed²³, "redemption," which requires coined silver, and *chillul*, "the transfer of holiness." The latter does not require coinage at all. for silver, as [implied by Deuteronomy 14:25]: "And you shall bundle the silver." Similarly, if a person redeems the silver for himself and adds a fifth,²⁴ that fifth must be silver like the principal.²⁵ 10:15; *Hilchot Arachin* 7:2.
One should not use uncoined silver for the redemption [of the second tithe]. Instead, one must use silver imprinted with an image or with writing.²⁶, translated as "you shall bundle," relates to the word *tzurah* meaning "form" or "image." Thus the prooftext is implying that one may redeem produce from the second tithe with silver with an imprint [the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (*Ma'aser Sheni* 1:2); based on *Bava Metzia* 47b]. If one [attempted to] redeem [produce from the second tithe] with silver bullion or the like - this is referred as an *asimon* - his actions are of no consequence. We may not redeem [produce from the second tithe] with [a coin less valuable] than a *p'rutah*,²⁷ is a copper coin of minimal value. One may not use a silver coin less valuable than this copper coin. The rationale is that its minimal value causes it to be considered as uncoined silver (Radbaz; *Kessef Mishneh*). because this is considered as redeeming with an *asimon*.

footnotes:
²³ The Radbaz distinguishes between pediah
²⁴ As required by Chapter 5, Halachah 1.
²⁵ See parallels in Hilchot Terumah
²⁶ This is also derived from the above prooftext. Vitzarta
²⁷ A p'rutah


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:10
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:10)

אֵין פּוֹדִין בְּמַטְבֵּעַ שֶׁאֵינוֹ יוֹצֵא בְּאוֹתוֹ זְמַן וּבְאוֹתוֹ מָקוֹם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יד כו) "וְנָתַתָּ הַכֶּסֶף בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תְּאַוֶּה נַפְשְׁךָ" עַד שֶׁיִּהְיֶה רָאוּי לְהוֹצָאָה. וּמַטְבֵּעַ מְלָכִים הָרִאשׁוֹנִים אִם יוֹצֵא מִשְּׁמָם פּוֹדִין בּוֹ:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
We may not redeem [produce from the second tithe] with a coin that is not legal tender in that place and at that time,²⁸ as [implied by *ibid.*:26]: "And you shall exchange the silver for anything your heart desires." [Implied is that the silver] must be fit for exchange.²⁹). The commentaries have not cited a common prior Rabbinic source. See, however, *Midrash HaGadol* and *Midrash Tana'im*. A coin minted by kings of an earlier era³⁰ may be used for redemption if it is still circulated as currency.

footnotes:
²⁸ I.e., it has an imprint and was once issued by a government as currency, but is no longer accepted by the present ruling authorities.
²⁹ The Rambam mentions this interpretation of the verse in his Commentary to the Mishnah (loc. cit.
³⁰ But which is no longer being minted at present.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:11
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:11)

אֵינוֹ פּוֹדֶה בְּמָעוֹת שֶׁאֵינָן בִּרְשׁוּתוֹ שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יד כה) "וְצַרְתָּ הַכֶּסֶף בְּיָדְךָ". נָפַל כִּיסוֹ לְבוֹר וְהוּא יָכוֹל לְהוֹצִיאוֹ פּוֹדֶה בּוֹ מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא בִּרְשׁוּתוֹ:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
We may not redeem [produce from the second tithe] with coins that are not in one's possession,³¹ 98a). as [implied by] the verse: "And you shall bundle the silver in your hand."³²," translated as "your hand," can also be interpreted as "your domain." That is the intent here, because the money need not actually be in one's hand. As long as they are in one's domain, and they are accessible, it is acceptable, as evident from this and the subsequent halachot. If a person's pouch fell into a cistern, but it is possible for him to remove it from there, he may use [the coins in] it for redemption,³³ 1:2)]. for it is [still] in his domain.

footnotes:
³¹ E.g., his pouch fell into the sea, in which instance, his coins are no longer accessible to him (Bava Kama
³² The word "yadecha
³³ The cost of recovering the coins must, however, be deducted before one uses the money to redeem produce [the Jerualem Talmud (Ma'aser Sheni


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:12
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:12)

הָיָה בָּא בַּדֶּרֶךְ וּמָעוֹת בְּיָדוֹ וְאַנָּס בָּא כְּנֶגְדּוֹ אִם יָכוֹל לְהַצִּיל עַל יְדֵי הַדְּחָק פּוֹדֶה בָּהֶן פֵּרוֹת שֶׁבְּבֵיתוֹ. וְאִם לָאו וְאָמַר פֵּרוֹת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לִי בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתִי מְחֻלָּלִין עַל הַמָּעוֹת הַלָּלוּ לֹא אָמַר כְּלוּם:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
[The following rules apply when] one was traveling on the road, carrying money, and a man of force was approaching him.³⁴ If he could save [his money, even] with difficulty, he can use it to redeem produce of the second tithe in his home.³⁵ maintains that the Rambam is not stating that, a priori, he may use the money to redeem his produce. Instead, the intent is that after the fact if he redeems the produce with this money, after the fact, the redemption is effective. If he cannot, and he says: "The holiness of the produce that is in my house is transferred to this money," his statements are of no consequence.

footnotes:
³⁴ And he is certain that he will rob him.
³⁵ I.e., the person knows that he will lose his money. Hence, rather than forfeit it without receiving anything for it, he decides that it is preferable for him to use it for something - to redeem his produce. The Kessef Mishneh


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:13
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:13)

הַמֵּנִיחַ מָעוֹת לִהְיוֹת מְחַלֵּל עֲלֵיהֶן מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי הֲרֵי זֶה פּוֹדֶה בָּהֶן בְּחֶזְקַת שֶׁהֵן קַיָּמִים. מְצָאָן שֶׁאָבְדוּ חוֹשֵׁשׁ לְכָל מַה שֶּׁפָּדָה בָּהֶן לְמַפְרֵעַ:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When a person sets aside money upon which to transfer the holiness of produce from the second tithe, he may [continue to] redeem his produce under the assumption that the money exists in his possession. If he discovers that the money has been lost, he must be concerned about all the produce that he redeemed with that money.³⁶ 7:4, however, which mentions a similar situation with regard to tithing produce and rules that although the produce must be tithed again, the status of that tithing is only doubtful.

footnotes:
³⁶ I.e., he must operate under the premise that the money was lost immediately after he saw it last and all the produce that he sought to redeem from that time onward was thus not redeemed. See Hilchot Ma'aser


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:14
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:14)

מִי שֶׁהָיָה עוֹמֵד בִּטְבֶרְיָא וְיֵשׁ לוֹ מָעוֹת (בָּבֶל) בְּבָבֶל אֵינוֹ מְחַלֵּל עֲלֵיהֶם. הָיוּ לוֹ מָעוֹת מִמַּטְבֵּעַ טְבֶרְיָא בְּבָבֶל מְחַלֵּל עֲלֵיהֶם. וְכֵן כָּל כַּיּוֹצֵא בָּזֶה:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When a person located in Tiberias has money in Babylonian coinage in Babylon, he may not transfer the holiness [of the produce of the second tithe] to them.³⁷ If, by contrast, [although he is in Tiberias,] he possesses money of Tiberian coinage in Babylon, he may transfer the holiness [of the produce of the second tithe] to them.³⁸ discuss the two views at length. Similarly laws apply in all analogous situations.

footnotes:
³⁷ I.e., the Rambam's perspective is that in these instances, there are two negative factors: a) the coinage is not legal tender in the place where he is located; b) he does not have the money at hand. Hence, he cannot redeem the produce of the second tithe with it.
³⁸ Because there is only one difficulty, that the person is not located in the same place as the money, the money is not disqualified.The Ra'avad differs with the Rambam and maintains that there is only one significant factor, whether the money is legal tender in the place it is located. The Radbaz and the Kessef Mishneh


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:15
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:15](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:15)

הָאוֹמֵר מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי מְחֻלָּל עַל סֶלַע שֶׁתַּעֲלֶה בְּיָדִי מִכִּיס זֶה עַל סֶלַע שֶׁאֶפְרֹט מִדִּינָר זָהָב זֶה עַל פּוּנְדְיוֹן שֶׁאֶפְרֹט מִסֶּלַע זֶה הֲרֵי זֶה חִלֵּל. וְסֶלַע שֶׁתַּעֲלֶה בְּיָדוֹ אוֹ שֶׁיִּפְרֹט תְּהִי מַעֲשֵׂר:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When a person says: "The holiness of produce from the second tithe is transferred to the first *sela* that I will take out of this wallet," "...on the *sela* I will receive when I exchange this golden *dinar*," "...on the *pundiyon*³⁹ I will receive when I exchange this *sela*, the transfer is effective.⁴⁰ 1:21) does not accept the principle of *bereirah* with regard to questions of Scriptural Law. The Radbaz explains that this explanation is not necessary, because the Rambam rules that the obligation to separate the second tithe in the present age is Rabbinic in origin. The *sela* that he will take out or receive in exchange is money of the second tithe.

footnotes:
³⁹ All of the italicized terms are coins used in the Talmudic era.
⁴⁰ In all these instances, the transfer of holiness is effective even though the coin was not singled out at the time when the declaration was made. Nevertheless, the transfer of holiness is not effective retroactively, i.e., we do not say that once the coin is taken, the transfer of holiness takes effect from the time the declaration was made.The above follows the explanation given by Rav Yosef Corcus who notes that the Rambam (Hilchot Terumot


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:16
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:16](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:16)

אָמַר הֲרֵי מַעֲשֵׂר מְחֻלָּל עַל סֶלַע שֶׁהָיְתָה בְּיַד בְּנִי לֹא חִלֵּל. שֶׁמָּא לֹא הָיְתָה בְּיָדוֹ בְּאוֹתָהּ שָׁעָה:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When a person says: "The holiness of the produce of the second tithe is transferred to the *sela* in my son's possession, the holiness is not transferred. Perhaps the *sela* was not in his possession at that time.⁴¹

footnotes:
⁴¹ Even if the coin was later discovered in the son's possession, the transfer of holiness is not effective, because we do not know whether it was in his possession at the time the declaration was made (Rashas). One might conclude that if one knows that the coin was in the son's possession at the time of the declaration, the separation is effective.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:17
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:17](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:17)

הַפּוֹדֶה מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי קֹדֶם שֶׁיַּפְרִישֶׁנּוּ כְּגוֹן שֶׁאָמַר מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי שֶׁל פֵּרוֹת אֵלּוּ פָּדוּי בְּמָעוֹת אֵלּוּ לֹא אָמַר כְּלוּם וְלֹא קָבַע מַעֲשֵׂר. אֲבָל אִם קָבַע וְאָמַר מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי שֶׁלָּהֶן בַּצָּפוֹן אוֹ בַּדָּרוֹם מְחֻלָּל עַל הַמָּעוֹת אֵלּוּ הֲרֵי זֶה פָּדוּי:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When a person redeems the produce from the second tithe before he separates it, e.g., he says: "The second tithe of this produce⁴² is redeemed with this money," his statements are of no consequence and the tithes have not been defined. If, however, he says: "The second tithe from this produce is in its northern portion" or "...in its southern portion⁴³ 3:8. and its holiness is transferred to this money," the redemption is effective.

footnotes:
⁴² Which he has not yet separated.
⁴³ Making such a statement is equivalent to separating the second tithe. Note the parallels in Hilchot Terumah


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:18
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:18](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:18)

כְּשֶׁפּוֹדִין מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי פּוֹדִין אוֹתוֹ בְּשָׁוְיוֹ. וְיֵשׁ לוֹ לִפְדּוֹת בַּשַּׁעַר הַזּוֹל כְּמוֹת שֶׁהַחֶנְוָנִי לוֹקֵחַ וְלֹא כְּמוֹת שֶׁהוּא מוֹכֵר. וְנוֹתֵן הַמָּעוֹת כְּמוֹת שֶׁהַשֻּׁלְחָנִי פּוֹרֵט לֹא כְּמוֹת שֶׁהוּא מְצָרֵף. וְאִם עָבַר וּפָדָה שְׁוֵה מָנֶה בִּפְרוּטָה אוֹ חִלֵּל שְׁוֵה מָנֶה עַל שְׁוֵה פְּרוּטָה הֲרֵי זֶה מְחֻלָּל:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
When the produce of the second tithe is redeemed, it should be redeemed for its fair value.⁴⁴ One may, however, value it at the buying price, i.e., what the storekeeper would pay if he purchased it and not the price he would charge if he sold it.⁴⁵ Similarly, he may pay money according to the rate that a moneychanger would pay and not according to the rate he would charge.⁴⁶ 4:2), the Rambam explains that a moneychanger will take 25 *me'ah* for a *sela*, but will only give 24. If the produce is worth a *sela*, the person redeeming it need not pay more than 24. If a person transgresses and redeemed [produce] worth a *maneh*⁴⁷ with [a coin] worth a *p'rutah*, the holiness [of the produce] is transferred.⁴⁸ 57a makes such a statement with regard to consecrated property (see *Hilchot Arachin* 7:8). The Rambam draws the parallel since the laws governing consecrated property are more stringent than those governing the second tithe.

footnotes:
⁴⁴ I.e., at the time the Temple was standing; alternatively, in the present age, as an expression of piety (Chapter 2, Halachah 2).
⁴⁵ I.e., the storekeeper obviously sells the produce for a higher price than the price at which he purchases it.
⁴⁶ In his Commentary to the Mishnah (Ma'aser Sheni
⁴⁷ 100 large silver pieces.
⁴⁸ Bava Metzia


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:19
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:19](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:19)

הָיְתָה הַסֶּלַע חֲסֵרָה שְׁתוּת אוֹ פָּחוֹת מִשְּׁתוּת אִם הָיְתָה יוֹצֵאת עַל יְדֵי הַדְּחָק מְחַלֵּל עָלֶיהָ לְכַתְּחִלָּה בִּשְׁוֵה סֶלַע וְאֵינוֹ חוֹשֵׁשׁ. פָּדָה בְּסֶלַע וְנִמְצֵאת רָעָה יַחֲלִיפֶנָּה:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
[The following laws apply if] a *sela* was lacking a sixth or less [than its weight].⁴⁹ If it would be accepted [in business dealings even] with difficulty, one may transfer the holiness a *sela's* worth [of produce of the second tithe] to it without concern.⁵⁰ 10:12). If one redeemed [produce] with a *sela* and it was discovered to be unacceptable,⁵¹. he should exchange it.⁵², the transfer of holiness to it is effective as stated in the previous halachah.

footnotes:
⁴⁹ In previous eras, the minting of coins was less precise and it was possible that a coin would weigh slightly less than the standard weight for it. Alternatively, wear and tear could have reduced its weight.
⁵⁰ This is also a leniency, for in ordinary business dealings one would have to reimburse the other party for the difference in value (Hilchot Mechirah
⁵¹ I.e., its worth is more than a sixth less than the value of a sela
⁵² Transferring the holiness from it to a coin of fair value. There is no difficulty with the original transfer of holiness from the produce to the coin, for - after the fact - as long as a coin is worth a p'rutah


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:20
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:20](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:20)

אֵין פּוֹדִין מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי אַכְסָרָה אֶלָּא מְדַקְדֵּק בְּמִדָּתוֹ אוֹ בְּמִשְׁקָלוֹ וְנוֹתֵן דָּמָיו. אִם הָיוּ דָּמָיו יְדוּעִים יִפָּדֶה עַל פִּי אֶחָד. וְאִם דָּבָר שֶׁאֵין דָּמָיו יְדוּעִים כְּגוֹן יַיִן שֶׁהִתְחִיל לְהַחֲמִיץ וּפֵרוֹת שֶׁהִרְקִיבוּ אוֹ מָעוֹת שֶׁהֶחֱלִידוּ יִפָּדֶה עַל פִּי שְׁלֹשָׁה תַּגָּרִים וַאֲפִלּוּ הָיָה אֶחָד מֵהֶן עַכּוּ"ם אוֹ בַּעַל הַמַּעֲשֵׂר אֲפִלּוּ אִישׁ וּשְׁתֵּי נָשָׁיו פּוֹדִין עַל פִּיהֶם. וְכוֹפִין אֶת הַבְּעָלִים לִפְתֹּחַ רִאשׁוֹן. וְזֶה חֹמֶר בְּמַעֲשֵׂר מִן הַהֶקְדֵּשׁ:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
One should not redeem produce from the second tithe by estimation.⁵³ Instead, one should be precise concerning its volume or its weight and give their value. If the value [of the produce] was known,⁵⁴ he may redeem it in the presence of only one person.⁵⁵ If its value was not known, e.g., wine that had begun turning into vinegar,⁵⁶ 4:2)]. produce that spoiled, or coins that corroded, he should redeem them according to the appraisal of three merchants.⁵⁷ [It is acceptable] even if one of them is a gentile or the owner of the produce⁵⁸ 4:2)]. of the second tithe. It is even acceptable to redeem [produce] based on the appraisal of a man and his two wives.⁵⁹ 14b relates that Rav Papa's wife helped evaluate his produce. We compel the owner to make the first bid [to redeem the produce].⁶⁰ This is a stringency applied with regard to produce from the second tithe over consecrated property.⁶¹ 3:3. The Ra'avad maintains that the proper version of that source is: "We compel him to make the first bid. If he desires to retract he may. This is the stringency of consecrated property over the second tithes." The *Kessef Mishneh* notes that this is indeed the version of the *Tosefta* commonly followed. There is an added difficulty with the Rambam's ruling, because in all instances of consecrated property, he requires the owner to make the first bid. See *Hilchot Arachin*, ch. 5, in contrast to the statements of Radbaz here.

footnotes:
⁵³ For as stated above, the initial preference is to redeem the produce of the second tithe at its fair market price. That can only be established after its measure is known.
⁵⁴ I.e., we are speaking about ordinary produce that has a fixed market value.
⁵⁵ Because in such an instance, it is not necessary to evaluate its worth.
⁵⁶ Which is still valuable, but is not as valuable as ordinary wine and hence, must be assessed, for once the produce has started to spoil, its value is not a cut-and-dry matter [the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah Talmud (Ma'aser Sheni
⁵⁷ For they will be able to assess the true value of the produce.
⁵⁸ Two gentiles or two owners, however, are not acceptable [Jerusalem Talmud (Ma'aser Sheni
⁵⁹ Sanhedrin
⁶⁰ Because the owner must add a fifth.
⁶¹ The Rambam's ruling is based on his version of the Tosefta, Ma'aser Sheni


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:21
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:21](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:21)

אֵין מוֹלִיכִין פֵּרוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר מִמָּקוֹם לְמָקוֹם לִפְדּוֹתָם שָׁם. וְהַמּוֹלִיךְ מִמְּקוֹם הַיֹּקֶר לַמָּקוֹם הַזּוֹל אוֹ מִמָּקוֹם הַזּוֹל לִמְקוֹם הַיֹּקֶר פּוֹדֶה כְּשַׁעַר מְקוֹם הַפְּדִיָּה. וְאִם הָיוּ דְּמַאי פּוֹדִין אוֹתוֹ כַּשַּׁעַר הַזּוֹל הוֹאִיל וְנִרְאוּ לְהִמָּכֵר בְּזוֹל:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
We should not transport produce⁶² from the second tithe from one place to another to redeem it there. When a person transports produce from a place where it is expensive to a place where it is inexpensive, he should redeem it according to its value in the place he is redeeming it. If it is *demai*,⁶³ we may redeem it at the inexpensive price, since it was possible to sell it at that price.

footnotes:
⁶² By contrast, money to which the holiness of the second tithe has been transferred may of course be transported.
⁶³ In which instance, leniency is allowed, because the obligation is of Rabbinic origin.


###### Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:22
[Mishneh Torah, Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 4:22](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Mishneh%20Torah%2C%20Second%20Tithes%20and%20Fourth%20Year%27s%20Fruit/r/4:22)

הָיוּ לוֹ פֵּרוֹת מַעֲשֵׂר שֵׁנִי בַּגֹּרֶן וְהוֹצִיא עֲלֵיהֶם יְצִיאוֹת מִבֵּיתוֹ עַד שֶׁהֱבִיאָן לָעִיר וְהִשְׁבִּיחוּ. פּוֹדֶה כְּשַׁעַר הָעִיר וְהִפְסִיד יְצִיאוֹתָיו:

**Mishneh Torah, trans. by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem, Moznaim Pub. c1986-c2007:**
If a person possessed produce from the second tithe in his granary and spent money to transport them from his house to the town,⁶⁴ 2:1)]. thus causing the value of the produce to increase, he should redeem it according to the price in the city. He forfeits the expenses he undertook.⁶⁵

footnotes:
⁶⁴ The price of produce in a town is always higher than their price in the field, because someone had to undertake the transportation costs. See the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (Ma'aser Sheni
⁶⁵ I.e., they are included in the price of the produce of the second tithe. The rationale is that until the produce is redeemed, any increase in its value is considered part of the produce. Just like he is obligated to bring the produce to Jerusalem, he is obligated to do anything to facilitate its being brought to Jerusalem, including bringing it to a place where it is redeemed.