## Nazir Daf 33a

###### Nazir 33a:1
[Nazir 33a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/33a:1)

אַבָּיֵי אָמַר, כְּגוֹן דְּאָמַר: ״אִי נָמֵי לָאו פְּלוֹנִי הוּא — אִי הָוֵי נָזִיר״. וּמַאי ״לֹא נִתְקַיְּימוּ דְּבָרָיו״ — לֹא נִתְקַיְּימוּ דְּבָרָיו הָרִאשׁוֹנִים, אֶלָּא דְּבָרָיו אַחֲרוֹנִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Abaye said:** One must correct his understanding of the mishna, so that it deals with a situation **where** in addition to his first statement **he said: Even if it is not so-and-so, I shall be a nazirite. And what is** the meaning of the phrase: Whose **statement was not fulfilled?** It means: **His first statement was not fulfilled,** as it was not that person; **rather,** he is a nazirite because **his last statement** was fulfilled.


###### Nazir 33a:2
[Nazir 33a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/33a:2)

הִרְתִּיעַ לַאֲחוֹרָיו אֵינוֹ נָזִיר כּוּ׳. טַעְמָא מִשּׁוּם דְּהִרְתִּיעַ לַאֲחוֹרָיו, הָא אָתֵי לְקַמַּן — הָוֵי נָזִיר. מַנִּי?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The mishna taught that if the individual walking toward them **turned back,** so that his identity remained unknown, **not** one of them is **a nazirite.** The Gemara clarifies: **The reason is** only **because he turned back,** from which it may be inferred that if that person **comes before us** and is identified, the one who said he would be a nazirite if it is so-and-so **is** considered to be **a nazirite.** The Gemara inquires: In accordance with **whose** opinion is this *halakha*? 
This *amud* has no Gemara text, as in the classic Vilna layout it is entirely filled with the commentary of *Tosafot*.