## Nazir Daf 35a

###### Nazir 35a:1
[Nazir 35a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:1)

כְּדֶרֶךְ שֶׁפָּרַט לְךָ בְּנָזִיר ״מֵחַרְצַנִּים וְעַד זָג״. וּלְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן עֲזַרְיָה דְּקָא מוֹקֵים לְהַאי ״מֵחַרְצַנִּים וְעַד זָג״ לוֹמַר שֶׁאֵינוֹ חַיָּיב עַד שֶׁיֹּאכַל שְׁנֵי חַרְצַנִּים וְזַג, פְּרָטָא מְנָא לֵיהּ! סָבַר לַהּ כְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר דְּדָרֵישׁ מִיעֵט וְרִיבָּה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**in the manner that it specified with regard to a nazirite: “From pits to grape skin”** (Numbers 6:4). The Gemara asks: **And according to** the opinion of **Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, who establishes this** verse: **“From pits to grape skin”** (Numbers 6:4), as serving **to say that** a nazirite **is liable only if he eats two grape seeds and a grape skin,** if so **from where does he** derive **the detail?** It is unclear how he applies this method of a detail, a generalization, and a detail, as according to his interpretation, the phrase “from pits to grape skin” does not serve to limit the previous generalization but to state a different *halakha*. The Gemara answers: Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya **holds in accordance with** the opinion of **Rabbi Elazar, who interprets** this by saying that a verse **restricts and amplifies.**


###### Nazir 35a:2
[Nazir 35a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:2)

וְאִי בָּעֵית אֵימָא כְּרַבָּנַן, דְּאִי סָלְקָא דַעְתָּךְ כִּדְאָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן עֲזַרְיָה, לִיכְתְּבֵיהּ רַחֲמָנָא לְהַאי ״מֵחַרְצַנִּים וְעַד זָג״ גַּבֵּי פְּרָטֵי, לְמַאי הִלְכְתָא כַּתְבֵיהּ בָּתַר כְּלָל? שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ לְמֵידַּיְינֵיהּ בִּכְלָל וּפְרָט.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And if you wish, say** instead that Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya holds **in accordance with** the opinion of **the Rabbis** that this is a case of a detail, a generalization, and a detail. **As, if it should enter your mind** that the verse is merely teaching that **which was stated** by **Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, let the Merciful One write this** phrase: **“From pits to grape skin,” alongside** the other **details** of wine and vinegar. **For what *halakha* did** the Torah **write:** “From pits to grape skin,” **after the generalization? Conclude from it that** you should **derive** this *halakha* **by** means of the method of **a generalization and a detail.**


###### Nazir 35a:3
[Nazir 35a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:3)

וְאֵימָא כּוּלֵּיהּ לְהָכִי הוּא דַּאֲתָא! אִם כֵּן לִכְתּוֹב אוֹ שְׁנֵי חַרְצַנִּים, אוֹ שְׁנֵי זַגִּים, אוֹ חַרְצַן וְזָג. לְמַאי הִלְכְתָא כְּתַב רַחֲמָנָא ״מֵחַרְצַנִּים וְעַד זָג״? שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ לְמִידְרַשׁ בֵּיהּ כְּלָל וּפְרָט, וְאִיכָּא נָמֵי לְמִידְרַשׁ בֵּיהּ: עַד שֶׁיֹּאכַל שְׁנֵי חַרְצַנִּים וְזָג.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **But** if so, you can **say** that the **entire** phrase **comes** only **for this** purpose, for a generalization and a detail, and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya should not derive his *halakha*, that a nazirite is liable only if he eats two grape seeds and a grape skin, from this verse at all. The Gemara answers that Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya would say: **If so, let** the Torah **write either two grape seeds and two grape skins,** with both terms in the plural, **or a grape seed and a grape skin,** with both terms in the singular. **For what *halakha* did the Merciful One write: “From pits to grape skin”? Learn from it** that one should **interpret it** in the manner of **a generalization and a detail, and** one **can also interpret** from **it** that a nazirite is liable **only if he eats two grape seeds and a grape skin.**


###### Nazir 35a:4
[Nazir 35a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:4)

וְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר דְּדָרֵישׁ מִיעֵט וְרִיבָּה, פְּרָט וּכְלָל וּפְרָט מְנָא לֵיהּ?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And Rabbi Elazar, who interprets** by the method of **restriction and amplification** that even tendrils and the leaves of a grapevine are included in the prohibition, **from where does he** derive the method of **a detail, a generalization, and a detail?**


###### Nazir 35a:5
[Nazir 35a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:5)

אָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ, נָפְקָא לֵיהּ מֵהַאי קְרָא: ״וְכִי יִתֵּן אִישׁ אֶל רֵעֵהוּ חֲמוֹר אוֹ שׁוֹר אוֹ שֶׂה״ — פָּרַט, ״וְכׇל בְּהֵמָה״ — כָּלַל, ״לִשְׁמוֹר״ — חָזַר וּפָרַט. פְּרָט וּכְלָל וּפְרָט, אִי אַתָּה דָן אֶלָּא כְעֵין הַפְּרָט.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Abbahu says: He derives it from this verse,** which deals with a bailee: **“And if a man deliver to his neighbor a donkey, or an ox, or a sheep,** or any animal to guard, and it dies…the oath of the Lord shall be between them both” (Exodus 22:9). The phrase “a donkey, or an ox, or a sheep” is **a detail; “or any animal”** is **a generalization** that includes all animals; and in the phrase **“to guard”** the Torah **detailed again.** This is **a detail, and a generalization, and a detail.** In this case, **you may deduce** that the verse is referring **only** to items **similar to the detail;** i.e., items that can be guarded.


###### Nazir 35a:6
[Nazir 35a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:6)

רָבָא אָמַר: נָפְקָא לֵיהּ מֵהַאי קְרָא: ״וְאִם מִן״ — פָּרַט. ״הַצֹּאן״ — כָּלַל, ״כְּבָשִׁים וְעִזִּים״ — חָזַר וּפָרַט,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava said:** Rabbi Elazar **derives** the method of a detail, a generalization, and a detail **from this verse:** “And if his offering is from the flock, whether of the sheep or of the goats, for a burnt-offering, he shall offer it a male without blemish” (Leviticus 1:10). The phrase **“and if** his offering is **from”** is **a detail,** as it indicates part but not all of something, **“the flock”** is **a generalization** that includes animals that have been used sinfully, and when it stated: **“Sheep,” and: “Goats,”** the Torah has **detailed again.**


###### Nazir 35a:7
[Nazir 35a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:7)

פְּרָט וּכְלָל וּפָרַט, אִי אַתָּה דָן אֶלָּא כְעֵין הַפְּרָט.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
This is **a detail, and a generalization, and a detail,** and therefore **you may deduce** that the verse is referring **only** to items **similar to the detail.** The details teach that only animals that copulated with a person may not be brought as offerings.


###### Nazir 35a:8
[Nazir 35a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:8)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַב יְהוּדָה מִדִּיסְקַרְתָּא לְרָבָא, וְלֵילַף מִן הָדֵין קְרָא: ״מִן״ — פָּרַט, ״הַבְּהֵמָה״ — כָּלַל, ״בָּקָר וָצֹאן״ — חָזַר וּפָרַט. פְּרָט וּכְלָל וּפְרָט, אִי אַתָּה דָן אֶלָּא כְעֵין הַפְּרָט.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Yehuda of Diskarta said to Rava: And let** Rabbi Elazar **derive** the method of a detail, a generalization, and a detail **from this** earlier **verse,** which appears in the same chapter: “From animals, from the herd or from the flock, you shall bring your offering” (Leviticus 1:2), in the following manner: **“From”** is **a detail** that excludes an undomesticated animal; **“animals”** is **a generalization** which includes undomesticated animals (see Deuteronomy, chapter 14); and when it states: **“Herd,” and: “Flock,”** the Torah **has detailed again.** This is **a detail, and a generalization, and a detail,** and therefore **you may deduce** that the verse is referring **only** to items **similar to the detail,** i.e., domesticated animals.


###### Nazir 35a:9
[Nazir 35a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35a:9)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מִן הַאי לֵיכָּא לְמִשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ, דְּאִי מֵהָתָם, הֲוָה אָמֵינָא: ״הַבְּהֵמָה״ —

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rava **said to** Rav Yehuda of Diskarta: One **cannot derive** the method of a detail, a generalization, and a detail **from this** verse, **as if** the source were **from there, I would say** the phrase **“animals”**