## Nazir Daf 35b

###### Nazir 35b:1
[Nazir 35b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:1)

חַיָּה בִּכְלַל בְּהֵמָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
is referring even to undomesticated animals, as **an undomesticated animal is included** in the general category of **animal.**


###### Nazir 35b:2
[Nazir 35b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:2)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חַיָּה בִּכְלַל בְּהֵמָה? הָא כְּתִיב ״בָּקָר וָצֹאן״, וְהָוֵה לֵיהּ פְּרָט וּכְלָל, וְאִי אַתָּה דָן אֶלָּא כְעֵין הַפְּרָט!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rav Yehuda of Diskarta **said to** Rava: How can you suggest that in this verse **an undomesticated animal is included** in the general category of **animal?** It is **written: “Herd” and: “Flock,” and this** entire phrase **is a detail, and a generalization,** and a detail, from which **you may deduce** that the verse is referring **only** to items **similar to the detail,** which are herd and flock, not undomesticated animals.


###### Nazir 35b:3
[Nazir 35b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:3)

וּמְנָלַן דְּהָכִי הוּא? דְּתַנְיָא:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara asks: **And from where do we** derive **that it is so,** that in the methodology of generalizations and details, the generalizations are similar to the details? It is **as it is taught** in a *baraita*: The verse states with regard to the mitzva to bring money for the second tithe to Jerusalem: “And you shall bestow the money on all that your heart desires, on cattle, on sheep, on wine, and on strong drink, and on whatever your soul requests” (Deuteronomy 14:26).


###### Nazir 35b:4
[Nazir 35b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:4)

״וְנָתַתָּ הַכֶּסֶף בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תְּאַוֶּה נַפְשְׁךָ״ — כָּלַל, ״בַּבָּקָר וּבַצֹּאן וּבַיַּיִן וּבַשֵּׁכָר״ — פָּרַט, ״וּבְכֹל אֲשֶׁר תִּשְׁאָלְךָ נַפְשֶׁךָ״ — חָזַר וְכָלַל.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The *baraita* elaborates: The phrase **“And you shall bestow the money on all that your heart desires”** is **a generalization,** as no particular type of food is specified. The phrase **“on cattle, on sheep, on wine, and on strong drink”** is **a detail,** as specific foods are mentioned. And when the verse concludes: **“On whatever your soul requests,”** it **then generalized** again, as no specific type of food is stated.


###### Nazir 35b:5
[Nazir 35b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:5)

כְּלָל וּפְרָט וּכְלָל, אִי אַתָּה דָן אֶלָּא כְּעֵין הַפְּרָט: מָה הַפְּרָט מְפוֹרָשׁ פְּרִי מִפְּרִי וְגִידּוּלֵי קַרְקַע — אַף כֹּל פְּרִי מִפְּרִי וְגִידּוּלֵי קַרְקַע.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Since the verse is formulated as **a generalization, and a detail, and a generalization, you may deduce** that it is referring **only** to items **similar to the detail. Just as** the items mentioned in **the detail** are clearly **defined as the produce of produce,** i.e., not only the produce itself but also items that come from it, such as grapes from a seed, **and** they are also items **grown from the ground,** as all of these items grow from the ground or receive their main sustenance from it, **so too,** the generalization includes **all** items that are **the produce of produce and are grown from the ground.** This includes birds, but it does not include fish, water, or salt.


###### Nazir 35b:6
[Nazir 35b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:6)

מִכְּדִי כְּלָל וּפְרָט וּכְלָל כְּעֵין פְּרָטָא דָּיְינִינַן, כְּלָלָא בָּתְרָא מַאי אַהֲנִי? אַהֲנִי לְאוֹסוֹפֵי כׇּל דְּדָמֵי לֵיהּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ The Gemara discusses a series of problems with regard to these and other methods of halakhic exegesis: **Now,** in the case of **a generalization, and a detail, and a generalization, one derives** that all items which are **like the detail** are included. However, if that is so, **what purpose does the last generalization** stated in the verse serve? The same conclusion would be reached if the verse had stated merely a generalization and a detail. The Gemara answers: The **purpose** of the last generalization is **to add all that is similar to it,** i.e., even those articles or cases not explicitly listed among the details.


###### Nazir 35b:7
[Nazir 35b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:7)

וְתוּ: פְּרָט וּכְלָל וּפְרָט כְּעֵין הַפְּרָט דָּיְינִינַן, פְּרָטָא בָּתְרָאָה מַאי אַהֲנִי! אִי לָאו פְּרָטָא בָּתְרָאָה, הֲוָה אָמֵינָא: נַעֲשֶׂה כְּלָל מוּסָף עַל הַפְּרָט.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And furthermore,** in the case of **a detail, and a generalization, and a detail, one** again **derives** that all items which are **like the detail** are included. If so, **what purpose does the last detail** stated in the verse serve? The same conclusion would apply if there was simply a detail and a generalization. The Gemara answers: **If** it were **not** for **the last detail, I would say** that **the generalization becomes added to the detail,** which is broadened in all possible ways. Therefore, the last detail limits the generalization to items or cases that are similar to the detail.


###### Nazir 35b:8
[Nazir 35b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:8)

וּמִכְּדֵי, תְּרֵין כְּלָלֵי וּפְרָטָא וּתְרֵין פְּרָטֵי וּכְלָלָא — (כְּלָלָא) כְּעֵין פְּרָטָא דָּיְינִינַן, מַאי אִיכָּא בֵּינֵי וּבֵינֵי?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara continues this line of questioning. **And now** that it has been established that both with regard to **two generalizations and a detail,** i.e., a generalization, a detail, and a generalization, **and two details and a generalization,** i.e., a detail, a generalization, and a detail, **one derives** that all items that are **like the detail** are included, **what** difference **is there between this** method **and that** one? The two methods are apparently identical.


###### Nazir 35b:9
[Nazir 35b:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:9)

אִיכָּא דְּאִילּוּ תַּרְתֵּין כְּלָלֵי וּפְרָטָא, אִי אִיכָּא פְּרָטָא דְּדָמֵי לֵיהּ אֲפִילּוּ בְּחַד צַד — מְרַבִּינַן, תְּרֵי פְּרָטֵי וּכְלָלָא, אִי אִיכָּא פְּרָטָא דְּדָמֵי מִשְּׁנֵי צְדָדִין — מְרַבִּינַן, בְּחַד צַד — לָא מְרַבִּינַן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: **There is** a difference between them, **as whereas** in a case of **two generalizations and a detail, if there is** another **detail that is similar to** the detail specified in the verse **even in one aspect, one includes** it, due to the two generalizations. By contrast, in the case of **two details and a generalization, if there is** another **detail that is similar to** the one mentioned in the verse **in two aspects, one includes it.** However, if it is similar **in** only **one aspect one does not include** it, as the *halakha* is limited by two details.


###### Nazir 35b:10
[Nazir 35b:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:10)

מִכְּדִי פְּרָט וּכְלָל — נַעֲשֶׂה כְּלָל מוּסָף עַל הַפְּרָט, וְאִיתְרַבִּי כֹּל מִילֵּי. וּמִיעֵט וְרִיבָּה נָמֵי — רִיבָּה הַכֹּל, וְאִיתְרַבִּי כֹּל מִילֵּי. מַאי אִיכָּא בֵּין מִיעֵט וְרִיבָּה לִפְרָט וּכְלָל?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks another question: **Now,** in the method of **a detail and a generalization, the generalization becomes added to the detail, and all matters are included** by the generalization. **And** the method of **restriction and amplification also amplifies** and includes **everything, and** therefore **all matters are included** in both cases. If so, **what** difference **is there between** the method of **restriction and amplification and** that of **a detail and a generalization?**


###### Nazir 35b:11
[Nazir 35b:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:11)

אִיכָּא, דְּאִילּוּ פְּרָט וּכְלָל — מְרַבִּינַן אֲפִילּוּ עָלִין וְלוּלָבִין. וּמִיעֵט וְרִיבָּה, לוּלָבִין — אִין, עָלִין — לָא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: **There is** the following difference, **as whereas** in the method of **a detail and a generalization one includes** and renders forbidden to a nazirite **even leaves and tendrils** of the vine, with the method of **restriction and amplification** one includes less, as **tendrils, yes,** they are included in the prohibition, whereas **leaves, no,** they are not included.


###### Nazir 35b:12
[Nazir 35b:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nazir/r/35b:12)

אָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: כׇּל אִיסּוּרִין שֶׁבַּתּוֹרָה אֵין הֶיתֵּר מִצְטָרֵף לְאִיסּוּר, חוּץ מֵאִיסּוּרֵי נָזִיר, שֶׁהֲרֵי אָמְרָה תּוֹרָה: ״מִשְׁרַת״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Rabbi Abbahu says** that **Rabbi Yoḥanan says:** With regard to **all prohibitions that are** written **in the Torah, a permitted** substance **does not combine with a forbidden** substance. If one eats a permitted food with a forbidden food and together they constitute the minimum prohibited measure, he is exempt from punishment for this act of consumption. This principle applies to all *halakhot* **except for the prohibitions of a nazirite,** who is liable for eating a mixture of that kind, **as the Torah said** with regard to a nazirite: “Neither shall he drink anything **soaked** in grapes” (Numbers 6:3). This verse indicates that a nazirite is prohibited from consuming not only wine and vinegar, but also any food that was soaked in these liquids.