## Nedarim Daf 42b

###### Nedarim 42b:1
[Nedarim 42b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:1)

אִם מֵת — לֹא יִירָשֶׁנּוּ! שָׁאנֵי הָכָא דְּקָא אָמַר לֵיהּ ״בְּחַיָּיו וּבְמוֹתוֹ״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
then **if** the father **dies,** his son **does not inherit** from **him.** Apparently, one can render his property forbidden and have it remain forbidden after it is no longer in his possession. The Gemara rejects that proof: It **is different here, as he said to him** explicitly: **During his lifetime and upon his death.** There is no proof that in a case where he did not explicitly extend the prohibition to the period after it leaves his possession, the prohibition would not remain in effect.


###### Nedarim 42b:2
[Nedarim 42b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:2)

מִכׇּל מָקוֹם קַשְׁיָא? אֶלָּא: בִּ״נְכָסִים אֵלּוּ״ — כּוּלֵּי עָלְמָא לָא פְּלִיגִי. כִּי פְּלִיגִי בִּ״נְכָסַי״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The second question was answered, but **in any case** the first question remains **difficult:** Why didn’t Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish disagree in a case where he said: This property, as well? **Rather,** this is the explanation of their dispute: **In** the case of one who said: Benefit from **this property** is forbidden to you, **everyone agrees** that the prohibition remains in effect even after the item is no longer in his possession. **When they disagree,** it is **in** the case of one who said: Benefit from **my property** is forbidden to you.


###### Nedarim 42b:3
[Nedarim 42b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:3)

רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל סָבְרִי: לָא שְׁנָא ״נְכָסִים אֵלּוּ״, לָא שְׁנָא ״נְכָסַי״, אָדָם אוֹסֵר. וְרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן וְרֵישׁ לָקִישׁ סָבְרִי: ״נְכָסִים״ — אָדָם אוֹסֵר, ״נְכָסַי״ — אֵין אָדָם אוֹסֵר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav and Shmuel hold:** It **is no different** if he said: **This property,** and it **is no different** if he said: **My property;** in both cases, **a person renders** an item **forbidden** and the prohibition remains in effect even after the item is no longer in his possession. **And Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish hold:** If one said: **Property, a person renders** an item **forbidden** and the prohibition remains in effect. However, if he said: **My property, a person does not render** an item **forbidden** for the period after it is no longer in his possession, as the phrase my property means property in my possession.


###### Nedarim 42b:4
[Nedarim 42b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:4)

וּמִי אִיכָּא לְמַאן דְּאָמַר לָא שְׁנָא ״נְכָסִים אֵלּוּ״ וְלָא שְׁנָא ״נְכָסַי״? וְהָא תְּנַן: הָאוֹמֵר לַחֲבֵירוֹ ״קֻוֽנָּם לְתוֹךְ בֵּיתְךָ שֶׁאֲנִי נִכְנָס״, ״שָׂדְךָ שֶׁאֲנִי לוֹקֵחַ״, מֵת אוֹ שֶׁמְּכָרוֹ לְאַחֵר — מוּתָּר. ״לְבַיִת זֶה שֶׁאֲנִי נִכְנָס״, ״שָׂדֶה זוֹ שֶׁאֲנִי לוֹקֵחַ״, מֵת אוֹ שֶׁמְּכָרוֹ לְאַחֵר — אָסוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And is there anyone who says** that it **is no different** if he said: **This property, and** it **is no different** if he said: **My property,** and that the prohibition remains in effect even after the item is no longer in his possession? **But didn’t we learn** in a mishna (46a): **If one says to another: Entering into your house is *konam* for me,** or: **Buying your field is *konam* for me,** then if the owner **died or sold** the property **to another,** it is **permitted** for the one who vowed to enter the house or buy the field, as the prohibition is in effect only as long as it belongs to that person. However, if he said: **Entering this house** is *konam* **for me,** or: **Buying this field** is *konam* **for me,** then if the owner **died or sold** the property **to another,** it remains **forbidden.** Apparently, there is a difference between a case where he simply renders an item forbidden and a case where he renders an item belonging to a particular individual forbidden.


###### Nedarim 42b:5
[Nedarim 42b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:5)

אֶלָּא: כִּי אָמְרִי רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן וְרֵישׁ לָקִישׁ, בִּ״נְכָסַי״. וְרַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל, בִּ״נְכָסִים אֵלּוּ״, וְלָא פְּלִיגִי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rather,** this is the explanation of the statements of the *amora’im*: **When Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish said** that the prohibition is no longer in effect after the item is no longer in his possession, it was **in** a case where he said: **My property. And** when **Rav and Shmuel** said that the prohibition remains in effect after the item is no longer in his possession, it was **in** a case where he said: **This property. And they do not disagree,** as each pair of *amora’im* addressed a different situation.


###### Nedarim 42b:6
[Nedarim 42b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:6)

וּבַשְּׁבִיעִית אֵין יוֹרֵד לְתוֹךְ שָׂדֵהוּ כּוּ׳. מַאי שְׁנָא דְּאוֹכֵל מִן הַנּוֹטוֹת — דְּפֵירֵי דְהֶפְקֵירָא אִינּוּן, אַרְעָא נָמֵי אַפְקְרַהּ?!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
We learned in the mishna: **And during the Sabbatical Year he may not enter his field;** however, he eats from the produce that leans out of the field. The Gemara asks: **What is different** about the Sabbatical Year **that he** is permitted to **eat of** the produce that leans out of the field? It is **due to** the fact **that the produce is ownerless.** With regard to **land as well,** the Torah **rendered it ownerless,** as during the Sabbatical Year, it is permitted for everyone to enter the field and eat the produce.


###### Nedarim 42b:7
[Nedarim 42b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:7)

אָמַר עוּלָּא: בְּעוֹמְדִין אִילָנוֹת עַל הַגְּבוּלִים. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְיָקִים אָמַר: גְּזֵירָה שֶׁמָּא יִשְׁהֶא בַּעֲמִידָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Ulla said:** The mishna is referring to a case **where** the fruit **trees are standing on the borders** of the field. Since it is possible to eat the produce without entering the field, it is not permitted for him to enter it. **Rabbi Shimon ben Elyakim said:** Even in a case where the fruit trees are standing in the middle of the field, it is also prohibited for him to enter the field, due to a rabbinic **decree lest he remain standing** there longer than necessary for purposes of eating, which is prohibited even during the Sabbatical Year.


###### Nedarim 42b:8
[Nedarim 42b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/42b:8)

**מַתְנִי׳** הַמּוּדָּר הֲנָאָה מֵחֲבֵירוֹ — לֹא יַשְׁאִילֶנּוּ וְלֹא יִשְׁאַל מִמֶּנּוּ, לֹא יַלְוֶנּוּ וְלֹא יִלְוֶה מִמֶּנּוּ, וְלֹא יִמְכּוֹר לוֹ וְלֹא יִקַּח מִמֶּנּוּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** In the case of **one for whom benefit from another is forbidden by vow,** that other person **may neither lend** an item **to him nor borrow** an item **from him.** Similarly, **he may neither lend** money **to him nor borrow** money **from him. And he may neither sell** an item **to him nor purchase** an item **from him.**