## Nedarim Daf 46a

###### Nedarim 46a:1
[Nedarim 46a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:1)

וּשְׁנֵיהֶם אֲסוּרִים לְהַעֲמִיד רֵיחַיִם וְתַנּוּר וּלְגַדֵּל תַּרְנְגוֹלִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And** all agree that **they are both prohibited from setting up a mill or an oven** in the jointly owned courtyard, **or to raise chickens** in it.


###### Nedarim 46a:2
[Nedarim 46a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:2)

הָיָה אֶחָד מֵהֶם מוּדָּר הֲנָאָה מֵחֲבֵירוֹ — לֹא יִכָּנֵס לֶחָצֵר. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בֶּן יַעֲקֹב אוֹמֵר, יָכוֹל הוּא לוֹמַר לוֹ: לְתוֹךְ שֶׁלִּי אֲנִי נִכְנָס, וְאֵינִי נִכְנָס לְתוֹךְ שֶׁלְּךָ. וְכוֹפִין אֶת הַנּוֹדֵר לִמְכּוֹר אֶת חֶלְקוֹ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
If only **one of the** partners **was prohibited by a vow from deriving benefit from the other, he may not enter the courtyard. Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov says: He can say to** the partner: **I am entering into my own** portion **and I am not entering into your** portion. **And** the court **forces the one who took** such **a vow to sell his portion** so that he does not cause the other to transgress.


###### Nedarim 46a:3
[Nedarim 46a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:3)

הָיָה אֶחָד מִן הַשּׁוּק מוּדָּר בְּאֶחָד מֵהֶם הֲנָאָה — לֹא יִכָּנֵס לֶחָצֵר. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בֶּן יַעֲקֹב אוֹמֵר, יָכוֹל לוֹמַר לוֹ: לְתוֹךְ שֶׁל חֲבֵירְךָ אֲנִי נִכְנָס, וְאֵינִי נִכְנָס לְתוֹךְ שֶׁלְּךָ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
If **someone from the marketplace is prohibited by a vow from deriving benefit from one of the** partners, **he may not enter a courtyard** of the partners, since it belongs partly to the one from whom he may not benefit. **Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov says: He can say to him: I am entering into the** portion **of another** resident of the courtyard **and I am not entering your** own portion since it does not belong entirely to you.


###### Nedarim 46a:4
[Nedarim 46a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:4)

הַמּוּדָּר הֲנָאָה מֵחֲבֵירוֹ וְיֵשׁ לוֹ מֶרְחָץ וּבֵית הַבַּד מוּשְׂכָּרִין בָּעִיר, אִם יֵשׁ לוֹ בָּהֶן תְּפִיסַת יָד — אָסוּר, אֵין לוֹ בָּהֶן תְּפִיסַת יָד — מוּתָּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to **one prohibited by a vow from deriving benefit from another and he has a bathhouse or an olive press in the city that is leased out** and available for public use, **if** the one who took the vow **has a right** to profits from **usage in** the property, i.e., he retains some rights in the property and has not leased them out completely, it is **forbidden** for the one who took the vow to use it. If **he has no right of usage in the** property, it is **permitted.**


###### Nedarim 46a:5
[Nedarim 46a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:5)

הָאוֹמֵר לַחֲבֵירוֹ: ״קֻוֽנָּם לְבֵיתְךָ שֶׁאֲנִי נִכְנָס, וְשָׂדְךָ שֶׁאֲנִי לוֹקֵחַ״, מֵת אוֹ שֶׁמְּכָרוֹ לְאַחֵר — מוּתָּר. ״קֻוֽנָּם בַּיִת זֶה שֶׁאֲנִי נִכְנָס״, ״שָׂדֶה זוֹ שֶׁאֲנִי לוֹקֵחַ״, מֵת אוֹ שֶׁמְּכָרוֹ לְאַחֵר — אָסוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to one **who says to another: Entering your house is *konam* for me, or: Purchasing your field** is *konam* **for me,** then if **he,** i.e., the owner of the house or field, **dies or sells** the house **to another,** it is **permitted** for the one who took the vow to enter the house or purchase the field, as it is no longer in the possession of the prior owner. But if he said: **Entering this house is *konam* for me,** or: **Purchasing this field** is *konam* **for me,** then even if the owner **dies or sells it to another,** it is **forbidden.**


###### Nedarim 46a:6
[Nedarim 46a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:6)

**גְּמָ׳** אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: בְּנָדְרוּ פְּלִיגִי, הִדִּירוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה מַאי? מִי אָמְרִינַן: בְּנָדְרוּ הוּא דִּפְלִיגִי, אֲבָל בְּהִדִּירוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה — מוֹדוּ לֵיהּ רַבָּנַן לְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בֶּן יַעֲקֹב דְּכִי אֲנוּסִין דָּמוּ. אוֹ דִילְמָא: אֲפִילּוּ בְּהִדִּירוּ זֶה אֶת זֶה פְּלִיגִי רַבָּנַן?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** **A dilemma was raised before** the Sages: In the mishna, the Rabbis and Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov **disagree** with regard to the permissibility of entering a jointly owned courtyard **where** the partners **vowed** not to derive benefit from one another. However, if they instead **vowed to prohibit one another** from deriving benefit from them and their property, **what** is the *halakha*? **Do we say that they disagree where** the partners **each vowed** not to benefit from the other, **but where they** each **vowed to prohibit one another** from deriving benefit from them, **the Rabbis concede to Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov, as they are** each **considered to be** forbidden **due to circumstances beyond their control? Or perhaps the Rabbis disagree even in** a case where **each vowed to prohibit one another** from deriving benefit?


###### Nedarim 46a:7
[Nedarim 46a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:7)

תָּא שְׁמַע: הָיָה אֶחָד מֵהֶן מוּדָּר הֲנָאָה מֵחֲבֵירוֹ, וּפְלִיגִי רַבָּנַן! תָּנֵי: נָדוּר מֵחֲבֵירוֹ הֲנָאָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Come** and **hear** a proof from the mishna: If only **one of the** partners **was prohibited by a vow from deriving benefit from the other,** he may not enter the shared courtyard. Here, the prohibitive vow was stated by the other party, **and** still **the Rabbis disagree** and forbid the use of the courtyard. Evidently, the dispute in the mishna applies equally to cases beyond the control of the one forbidden by the vow. The Gemara responds: **Teach** an emended version of the mishna: If one **had vowed to prohibit himself** from deriving **benefit from another.** According to this emended version, the mishna may be addressing only the one who brought the prohibition upon himself.


###### Nedarim 46a:8
[Nedarim 46a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:8)

הָכִי נָמֵי מִסְתַּבְּרָא, דְּקָתָנֵי סֵיפָא: וְכוֹפִין אֶת הַנּוֹדֵר לִמְכּוֹר אֶת חֶלְקוֹ. אִי אָמְרַתְּ בִּשְׁלָמָא דִּנְדַר הוּא, הַיְינוּ דְּקָתָנֵי כּוֹפִין. אֶלָּא אִי אָמְרַתְּ דְּאַדְּרֵיהּ, אַמַּאי כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ? הָא מֵינָס אֲנִיס?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**So too, it is reasonable** to assume that the mishna is referring to one who imposes the prohibition upon himself, **as it was taught in the latter clause** with regard to the same case: **And** the court **forces the one who took** such **a vow to sell his portion. Granted, if you say** that the mishna is speaking of a case where **he** himself **vowed** not to benefit from the other, **this is** consistent with **that which teaches** that the court **forces** him to sell his portion; since he created the problem, he is forced to resolve it. **But if you say that** it is referring to a case **where the other prohibited him with a vow, why does** the court **force him** to sell his property? **He is put in a situation beyond his control.** This clause offers no proof, and the Rabbis may still concede in a case where one is forbidden due to another’s vow.


###### Nedarim 46a:9
[Nedarim 46a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/46a:9)

אָמַר רַבָּה אָמַר זְעֵירִי:

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabba said** that **Ze’eiri said:**