## Nedarim Daf 58b

###### Nedarim 58b:1
[Nedarim 58b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/58b:1)

הַמְנַכֵּשׁ עִם הַכּוּתִי בַּחֲסִיּוֹת — אוֹכֵל מֵהֶן אֲכִילַת עֲרַאי, וּמְעַשְּׂרָן וַדַּאי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**One who weeds *ḥasayot* with a Samaritan may eat a casual meal from them** without tithing, as any untithed produce may be eaten in the framework of a casual meal. **And** when he completes the labor on the *ḥasayot*, places them into a pile, and they require tithing, **he tithes them** as produce that is **definitely** obligated in tithing, not as doubtfully tithed produce, as the assumption is that the Samaritan did not tithe the *ḥasayot*.


###### Nedarim 58b:2
[Nedarim 58b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/58b:2)

רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: אִם יִשְׂרָאֵל חָשׁוּד עַל הַשְּׁבִיעִית, לְמוֹצָאֵי שְׁבִיעִית — מוּתָּר. לְמֵימְרָא דְּגִידּוּלֵי הֶיתֵּר מַעֲלִין אֶת הָאִיסּוּר, וְדִלְמָא בְּדָבָר שֶׁזַּרְעוֹ כָּלֶה? הָא תַּנְיָא: אֵלּוּ הֵן חֲסִיּוֹת — כְּגוֹן הַלּוּף הַשּׁוּם וְהַבְּצָלִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: If** the *ḥasayot* belong to **a Jew** who is **suspect** about observance of **the Sabbatical Year, at the conclusion of the Sabbatical Year** it **is permitted** to weed with him, as there is no concern that there might be Sabbatical-Year sanctity. The Gemara asks: **Is this to say** that **the permitted growths** of the eighth year **neutralize the prohibition,** and that is why there is no concern about Sabbatical-Year sanctity? The Gemara rejects that inference: **And perhaps** the *tanna* is speaking **with regard to an item whose seeds cease** after it is sown, whose growths neutralize the original prohibition? The Gemara rejects that possibility: **Isn’t it taught** in a *baraita*: **These are *ḥasayot*, for example, arum, garlic, and onions,** whose seeds do not cease?


###### Nedarim 58b:3
[Nedarim 58b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/58b:3)

וְדִלְמָא בִּמְדוּכָּנִין? ״חָשׁוּד עַל הַשְּׁבִיעִית״ קָתָנֵי. וְדִלְמָא בְּתַעֲרוֹבֶת? הַמְנַכֵּשׁ קָתָנֵי.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And perhaps** the *tanna* is speaking **with regard to** plants that were **crushed** before they sprouted growths? The Gemara answers: It is the case of one who is **suspect about** observance of **the Sabbatical Year,** that **is taught** in the *baraita*, and one who is suspect would not bother to eliminate the prohibition by crushing it. The Gemara asks: **And perhaps** the *tanna* is speaking **with regard to a mixture** of forbidden *ḥasayot* and permitted ones, and the reason that it is permitted is that the prohibition was neutralized by the majority of permitted *ḥasayot*? The Gemara answers: **One who weeds, is taught** in the *baraita*, indicating that he is eating the leaves as he weeds them, leaving no opportunity for the *ḥasayot* to be mixed with others.


###### Nedarim 58b:4
[Nedarim 58b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/58b:4)

לֵימָא תֶּיהְוֵי תְּיוּבְתֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן וּדְרַבִּי יוֹנָתָן! אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק: שַׁנְיָא שְׁבִיעִית, הוֹאִיל וְאִיסּוּרָהּ עַל יְדֵי קַרְקַע — בְּטִילָתָהּ נָמֵי עַל יְדֵי קַרְקַע.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara suggests: **Let us say that this is a conclusive refutation** of the opinions **of Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Yonatan,** who stated regarding *orla* and food crops in a vineyard that their permitted growth does not neutralize the prohibition of the original fruit or food crops respectively. **Rabbi Yitzḥak said:** The **Sabbatical-Year** produce **is different. Since its prohibition** is engendered **by means of the ground, its nullification is** effected **by means of the ground as well.** The prohibition can be neutralized by means of the growth that results from replanting the forbidden plant in a permitted manner.


###### Nedarim 58b:5
[Nedarim 58b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/58b:5)

הֲרֵי מַעֲשֵׂר, דְּאִיסּוּרוֹ עַל יְדֵי קַרְקַע, וְאֵין בְּטִילָתוֹ עַל יְדֵי קַרְקַע. דְּתַנְיָא: לִיטְרָא מַעֲשֵׂר טֶבֶל שֶׁזְּרָעָהּ בַּקַּרְקַע וְהִשְׁבִּיחָה, וַהֲרֵי הִיא כְּעֶשֶׂר לִיטְרִין — חַיֶּיבֶת בְּמַעֲשֵׂר וּבִשְׁבִיעִית. וְאוֹתָהּ לִיטְרָא, מְעַשֵּׂר עָלֶיהָ מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר לְפִי חֶשְׁבּוֹן!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: Isn’t there the case of **tithe, whose prohibition is** engendered **by means of the ground, but its nullification is not** effected **by means of the ground? As it is taught** in a *baraita*: With regard to **a *litra* of untithed** first **tithe** from which the *teruma* of the tithe was not taken, **which one sowed in the ground, and it grew and it is** now **approximately ten *litra*,** that additional growth **is obligated** to have **tithe** taken **and** is subject to the *halakhot* **of Sabbatical-Year** produce. **And** with regard to **that** original ***litra*** of untithed first tithe that he sowed, one **tithes for it from** produce in **a different place,** and not from the *litra* itself, **based on a calculation** of how much *teruma* of the tithe needed to be taken from that litra. Apparently, the growth that results from sowing the first tithe in the ground does not neutralize its prohibition.