## Nedarim Daf 75a

###### Nedarim 75a:1
[Nedarim 75a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:1)

תַּנְיָא כְּווֹתֵיהּ דְּרַבִּי אַמֵּי? דְּקָתָנֵי: בֵּין שֶׁעָשָׂה בָּהּ מַאֲמָר וּבֵין שֶׁלֹּא עָשָׂה בָּהּ מַאֲמָר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**is it taught** in the *baraita* **in accordance with** the opinion **of Rabbi Ami?** The Gemara explains that support for Rabbi Ami’s opinion is found in **that which is taught** in the *baraita*, as Rabbi Akiva mentions the following distinction: **Whether he performed levirate betrothal or whether he did not perform levirate betrothal.** This indicates that Rabbi Eliezer’s statement is referring to a *yevama* with whom he performed levirate betrothal.


###### Nedarim 75a:2
[Nedarim 75a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:2)

אִי נָמֵי מֵרֵישָׁא דְּקָתָנֵי: מִשֶּׁנִּכְנְסָה לִרְשׁוּתוֹ נִגְמְרָה לוֹ. וְאִי דְּלָא קַדֵּישׁ, מַאי ״נִגְמְרָה לוֹ״? תִּפְשׁוֹט מִינֵּיהּ כְּשֶׁעָשָׂה בָּהּ מַאֲמָר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Alternatively,** support can be derived **from the first clause** of the *baraita*, **which teaches: Once she enters his jurisdiction, she is fully** under **his** authority. **If** the *baraita* is referring to a situation **where he did not betroth** her in levirate betrothal, in **what** sense is **she fully** under **his** authority? **Deduce from it** that the situation is one **in which he has performed levirate betrothal.**


###### Nedarim 75a:3
[Nedarim 75a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:3)

מַאי ״וְכִשְׁאָר דְּבָרִים כֵּן נְדָרִים״ דְּקָתָנֵי? אָמַר רָבָא, הָכִי קָתָנֵי: אִי אַתָּה מוֹדֶה שֶׁאֵין חַיָּיבִין סְקִילָה, כְּנַעֲרָה הַמְאוֹרָסָה?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara then asks with regard to the *baraita* itself. **What** is the meaning of the phrase: **And** just **as** in **other matters** there is no such distinction, **so** too with regard to **vows, that** Rabbi Akiva **teaches** in the *baraita*? **Rava said: This is what** Rabbi Akiva **is teaching: Do you not concede that** one is **not liable to** be punished with **stoning** for adulterous relations with a *yevama* **as** he would be if she were **a betrothed young woman?** The status of the relationship is inferior to proper marriage, as one who engages in sexual intercourse with a *yevama* does not incur the death penalty. Accordingly, the authority of the *yavam* with regard to vows is also inferior.


###### Nedarim 75a:4
[Nedarim 75a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:4)

אָמַר רַב אָשֵׁי, מַתְנִיתִין נָמֵי דַּיְקָא: אֵין יְבָמָה גְּמוּרָה לְאִישָׁהּ כְּשֵׁם שֶׁאֲרוּסָה גְּמוּרָה לְאִישָׁהּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Ashi said: The mishna** (74a) **is also precisely** formulated to indicate this, as it teaches: **A *yevama* is not her husband’s full-fledged** wife **in the same manner that a betrothed woman** is **her husband’s full-fledged** wife.


###### Nedarim 75a:5
[Nedarim 75a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:5)

**מַתְנִי׳** הָאוֹמֵר לְאִשְׁתּוֹ ״כׇּל הַנְּדָרִים שֶׁתִּדּוֹרִי מִכָּאן עַד שֶׁאָבֹא מִמָּקוֹם פְּלוֹנִי הֲרֵי הֵן קַיָּימִין״ — לֹא אָמַר כְּלוּם. ״הֲרֵי הֵן מוּפָרִין״ — רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אֹמֵר: מוּפָר, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אֵינוֹ מוּפָר. אָמַר רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר: אִם הֵפֵר נְדָרִים שֶׁבָּאוּ לִכְלַל אִיסּוּר — לֹא יָפֵר נְדָרִים שֶׁלֹּא בָּאוּ לִכְלַל אִיסּוּר?!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** **One who says to his wife: All vows that you will vow from now until I arrive from such and such a place are hereby ratified, has not said anything,** i.e., the vows are not ratified. However, if he states that all vows that she will take until then **are hereby nullified, Rabbi Eliezer said:** They are **nullified, while the Rabbis say:** They are **not nullified. Rabbi Eliezer said** in explanation: **If one can nullify vows that have reached the status of a prohibition,** i.e., that have already taken effect, **shall he not** be able to **nullify vows that have not reached the status of a prohibition?**


###### Nedarim 75a:6
[Nedarim 75a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:6)

אָמְרוּ לוֹ: הֲרֵי הוּא אוֹמֵר ״אִישָׁהּ יְקִימֶנּוּ וְאִישָׁהּ יְפֵרֶנּוּ״. אֶת שֶׁבָּא לִכְלַל הָקֵם — בָּא לִכְלַל הָפֵר, לֹא בָּא לִכְלַל הָקֵם — לֹא בָּא לִכְלַל הָפֵר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Rabbis **said to him** in response: The verse **states:** “Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, **her husband may ratify it, or her husband may nullify it”** (Numbers 30:14). This teaches: **That which has reached the status of** eligibility for **ratification,** i.e., a vow that she has already taken, **has reached the status of** eligibility for **nullification.** However, a vow that **has not reached the status of** eligibility for **ratification** has **not reached the status of** eligibility for **nullification** either, and it cannot be nullified.


###### Nedarim 75a:7
[Nedarim 75a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/75a:7)

**גְּמָ׳** אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: לְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מֵיחָל חָלִין וּבָטְלִין, אוֹ דִלְמָא לָא חָלִין כְּלָל? לְמַאי נָפְקָא מִינַּהּ,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** **A dilemma was raised before** the Sages: **According to Rabbi Eliezer,** do the vows that the husband nullifies in advance **take effect** momentarily **and are** then **canceled** immediately after? **Or perhaps they do not take effect at all.** The Gemara inquires: **In what** case is there **a difference** between these possibilities?