## Nedarim Daf 83a

###### Nedarim 83a:1
[Nedarim 83a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:1)

הֲרֵי זוֹ סוֹפֶגֶת אֶת הָאַרְבָּעִים. הֵפֵר לָהּ בַּעְלָהּ וְהִיא לֹא יָדְעָה שֶׁהֵפֵר לָהּ, וְהָיְתָה שׁוֹתָה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמְּאָהּ לְמֵתִים — אֵינָהּ סוֹפֶגֶת אֶת הָאַרְבָּעִים.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**she incurs [*sofeget*] the forty** lashes, the penalty for one who transgresses a Torah prohibition, as she violated the terms of her nazirite vow. If **her husband nullified** the vow **for her, but she did not know that he nullified it for her, and she drank wine or became impure through** contact with **the dead, she does not incur the forty** lashes. She did not commit a transgression, as her nazirite vow was nullified.


###### Nedarim 83a:2
[Nedarim 83a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:2)

וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ מֵפֵר לַמִּתְעַנָּה וְאֵין מֵפֵר לְשֶׁאֵין מִתְעַנָּה, דִּלְמָא מִן יַיִן דְּאִית לַהּ צַעֲרָא — הֵפֵר לָהּ, מִן חַרְצָן וּמִן זַג — לֹא הֵפֵר לָהּ, דְּהָא לָא אִית לַהּ צַעֲרָא. וְתִסְפּוֹג אֶת הָאַרְבָּעִים!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And if you say** that the husband **can nullify** the vow **with regard to the** loaf that would cause her to **deprive herself, but he cannot nullify** the vow **with regard to the** loaf that would **not** cause her to **deprive herself,** the same reasoning should apply to a nazirite vow: **Perhaps** the husband **nullified for her** the vow that rendered **wine** forbidden **to** her, **as she suffers pain** when she refrains from drinking it. But as for her vow that rendered grape **seeds and** grape **skins** forbidden **to** her, **he did not nullify** it **for her, as she suffers no pain** when she abstains from them. And since even grape seeds and grape skins are forbidden to a nazirite, if the woman ate of them, **she should receive the forty** lashes, even if her husband nullified her vow.


###### Nedarim 83a:3
[Nedarim 83a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:3)

אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף: אֵין נְזִירוּת לַחֲצָאִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Yosef said:** Here it is different, as **naziriteship cannot take effect partially.** Since one cannot be a nazirite and accept only some of the prohibitions of naziriteship, the husband’s nullification cancels the entire vow. In the case of an ordinary vow, on the other hand, the husband can nullify only the part that causes his wife suffering.


###### Nedarim 83a:4
[Nedarim 83a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:4)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ אַבָּיֵי: הָא קׇרְבָּן לַחֲצִי נְזִירוּת אִיכָּא?! אֶלָּא אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: אֵין נְזִירוּת לַחֲצָאִין, וְאֵין קׇרְבָּן לַחֲצָאִין.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Abaye said to him:** The wording of your statement suggests that naziriteship cannot take effect partially, **but** that **an offering is** brought **for partial** observance of **naziriteship. Rather, Abaye said** that one should say as follows: **Naziriteship cannot take effect partially, and no offering is** brought **for partial** observance of naziriteship.


###### Nedarim 83a:5
[Nedarim 83a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:5)

מֵיתִיבִי: הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁנָּדְרָה בְּנָזִיר וְהִפְרִישָׁה בְּהֶמְתָּהּ וְאַחַר כָּךְ הֵפֵר לָהּ בַּעְלָהּ — מְבִיאָה חַטַּאת הָעוֹף, וְאֵינָהּ מְבִיאָה עוֹלַת הָעוֹף. וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ אֵין קׇרְבָּן לַחֲצִי נְזִירוּת, אַמַּאי מְבִיאָה חַטָּאת הָעוֹף?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara **raises an objection** from the following statement: With regard to **a woman who vowed to be a nazirite and she designated her animal** for her nazirite offering, **and afterward her husband nullified** her vow **for her, she must bring a bird sin-offering but she does not bring a bird burnt-offering. And if you say** that **no offering is** brought **for partial** observance of **naziriteship, why must she bring a bird sin-offering?**


###### Nedarim 83a:6
[Nedarim 83a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:6)

וְאֶלָּא מַאי — יֵשׁ קׇרְבָּן לַחֲצִי נְזִירוּת? שָׁלֹשׁ בְּהֵמוֹת בָּעֵי לְאֵתוֹיֵי: חַטָּאת, עוֹלָה, וּשְׁלָמִים! אֶלָּא, לְעוֹלָם אֵין קׇרְבָּן לַחֲצִי נְזִירוּת. וְחַטַּאת הָעוֹף דְּמַתְיָא — מִשּׁוּם דְּחַטָּאת עַל הַסָּפֵק.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara rejects this argument: **But rather, what** will you say? That **an offering is** brought **for partial** observance of **naziriteship?** If so, she **should be required to bring three animals** as offerings, **a sin-offering, a burnt-offering, and a peace-offering,** in accordance with the *halakha* governing a nazirite who has completed the period of his vow. **Rather,** say as follows: **Actually, no offering is** brought **for partial** observance of **naziriteship, and** as for **the bird sin-offering that she must bring,** this is **because** a bird **sin-offering** can be brought **in** a case of **uncertainty.** She must therefore bring a sin-offering for the partial naziriteship that she observed.


###### Nedarim 83a:7
[Nedarim 83a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Nedarim/r/83a:7)

אֵיתִיבֵיהּ: הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁנָּדְרָה בְּנָזִיר וְנִטְמֵאת, וְאַחַר כָּךְ הֵפֵר לָהּ בַּעְלָהּ — מְבִיאָה חַטַּאת הָעוֹף, וְאֵין מְבִיאָה עוֹלַת הָעוֹף. וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ מֵפֵר לַמִּתְעַנָּה וְאֵין מֵפֵר לְשֶׁאֵין מִתְעַנָּה,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Rav Asi **raised an objection** against the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan from the following *baraita*: With regard to **a woman who vowed to be a nazirite and she became ritually impure** through contact with the dead, **and afterward her husband nullified** her vow **for her, she must bring a bird sin-offering but does not bring a bird burnt-offering. And if you say** that the husband **can nullify** the vow **with regard to the** loaf that would cause her to **deprive herself, but he cannot nullify** the vow **with regard to** the loaf that would **not** cause her to **deprive herself,** the same reasoning should apply here: