## Sefer HaChinukh Mitzvah 167

###### Sefer HaChinukh 167:1
[Sefer HaChinukh 167:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Sefer%20HaChinukh/r/167:1)

**שֶׁלֹּא יֹאכַל טָמֵא מִן הַקֳּדָשִׁים** – שֶׁלֹּא יֹאכַל טָמֵא מִן הַקֳּדָשִׁים עַד שֶׁיִּטְבֹּל וְיַעֲרִיב שִׁמְשׁוֹ, וְאִם הוּא טָמֵא שֶׁצָּרִיךְ כַּפָּרָה עַד שֶׁיָּבִיא כַּפָּרָתוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ויקרא יב ד) בְּכָל קֹדֶשׁ לֹא תִגָּע. וּלְשׁוֹן סִפְרָא (תזריע א ח) בְּכָל קֹדֶשׁ לֹא תִגָּע וְאֶל הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לֹא תָבֹא, מָה מִקְדָּשׁ הַנִּכְנָס בּוֹ בְּטֻמְאָה עָנוּשׁ כָּרֵת, אַף הָאוֹכֵל קָדָשִׁים בְּטֻמְאָה עָנוּשׁ כָּרֵת. וְאָמְרִינַן בְּמַכּוֹת (יד ב) בְּכָל קֹדֶשׁ לֹא תִגָּע, אַזְהָרָה לָאוֹכֵל, אַתָּה אוֹמֵר לָאוֹכֵל אוֹ אֵינוֹ אֶלָּא לַנּוֹגֵעַ, וכו' כִּדְאִיתָא הָתָם.

**Sefer HaChinukh, translated by R. Francis Nataf, Sefaria 2018:**
**That one impure not eat consecrated foods:** That one impure not eat consecrated foods until he immerses and his sun sets and — if he is an impure one that requires atonement — until he brings his atonement, as it is stated (Leviticus 12:4), “every consecrated thing shall he not touch.” And the language of Sifra, Shemini Parashat Yoledet, Chapter 1:8, “‘Every consecrated thing shall he not touch and to the sanctuary shall he not come’ — just like the one who enters the sanctuary in impurity is punished [with] excision, so too one who eats consecrated foods in impurity is punished [with] excision.” And we say in Makkot 14b, “‘Every consecrated thing shall he not touch’ is a warning for the eater. You say it is for the eater or is it only for the one who touches, etc.,” as it is [found] there.


###### Sefer HaChinukh 167:2
[Sefer HaChinukh 167:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Sefer%20HaChinukh/r/167:2)

מִשָּׁרְשֵׁי הַמִּצְוָה. מָה שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ לְמַעְלָה (מצוה צה) לִקְבֹּעַ בְּנַפְשׁוֹתֵינוּ יִרְאַת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו, וְלָכֵן אֵין רָאוּי שֶׁיֹּאכְלוּם רַק הַטְּהוֹרִים, כִּי הַטָּהֳרָה מַעֲלָה וְכָבוֹד בָּאָדָם, כַּיָּדוּעַ לְכָל מֵבִין.

**Sefer HaChinukh, translated by R. Francis Nataf, Sefaria 2018:**
What we wrote above (Sefer HaChinukh 95), [that it is] to fix awe of the Temple and its holy things, is from the roots of the commandment. And hence, it is fitting that only pure ones should eat them, as purity is an embellishment and glory for a man, as is well-known to all that understand.


###### Sefer HaChinukh 167:3
[Sefer HaChinukh 167:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Sefer%20HaChinukh/r/167:3)

מִדִּינֵי הַמִּצְוָה. מָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (זבחים לג ב) שֶׁהַטֻּמְאָה שֶׁחַיָּבִין עָלֶיהָ הִיא שֶׁנִּטְמָא בְּטֻמְאָה דְּאוֹרָיְתָא שֶׁחַיָּבִין עָלֶיהָ כָּרֵת, פֵּרוּשׁ עַל בִּיאַת מִקְדָּשׁ וְקָדָשָׁיו כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ לְמַעְלָה (מצוה קכג). וּמָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה, (זבחים לד א) שֶׁאֵין חַיָּבִין עַל אֲכִילַת קֹדֶשׁ שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ מַתִּירִין עַד שֶׁיִּקְרְבוּ מַתִּירָיו כְּלוֹמַר הָאֵמוּרִין, וּכְמוֹ כֵן הוֹרוּנוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (מעילה י א) שֶׁכָּל שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ מַתִּירִין אֵין חַיָּבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּגּוּל אוֹ נוֹתָר אוֹ מִשּׁוּם טָמֵא עַד שֶׁיִּקְרְבוּ מַתִּירָיו כְּהִלְכָתָן, וְכֹל שֶׁאֵין לוֹ מַתִּירִין כֵּוָן שֶׁקָּדַשׁ בַּכְּלִי חַיָּבִין עָלָיו. וְיֶתֶר פְּרָטֶיהָ בְּפֶרֶק שְׁלֹשָׁה עָשָׂר מִזְּבָחִים [הלכות פסולי המוקדשין פי"ח]

**Sefer HaChinukh, translated by R. Francis Nataf, Sefaria 2018:**
From the laws of the commandment is that which they, may their memory be blessed, said (Zevachim 33b) that the impurity for which we are liable is when one is made impure by a Torah-level impurity, for which we are liable excision — the understanding is for approaching the Temple and its consecrated things, as we wrote above (Sefer HaChinukh 123). And that which they, may their memory be blessed, said (Zevachim 34a) that we are not liable for eating of the holy that has things that permit it, until those things that permit it have been brought — meaning to say its entrails. And likewise did they, may their memory be blessed, instruct us (Meilah 10a) that we are not liable on account of *piggul* or *notar* or on account of [being] impure, until those things that permit it have been properly brought. And [regarding] anything that does not have things that permit it, once it has been consecrated in a vessel, we are [potentially] liable for it. And the rest of its details are in the thirteenth chapter of *Zevachim*. (See Mishneh Torah, Laws of Sacrifices Rendered Unfit 18.)


###### Sefer HaChinukh 167:4
[Sefer HaChinukh 167:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Sefer%20HaChinukh/r/167:4)

וְנוֹהֶגֶת בִּזְמַן הַבַּיִת בִּזְכָרִים וּנְקֵבוֹת. וְעוֹבֵר עָלֶיהָ וְאָכַל כַּזַּיִת בְּשַׂר קֹדֶשׁ טָהוֹר, אוֹ בְּשַׂר קֹדֶשׁ טָמֵא בְּעוֹדֶנּוּ טָמֵא טֻמְאָה דְּאוֹרָיְתָא, בְּמֵזִיד קֹדֶם שֶׁיִּטְבֹּל, חַיָּב כָּרֵת. בְּשׁוֹגֵג, מֵבִיא קָרְבָּן עוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב לְמַעְלָה. וְאִם אָכַל אַחַר שֶׁטָּבַל קֹדֶם שֶׁיַּעֲרִיב שִׁמְשׁוֹ אוֹ קֹדֶם שֶׁיָּבִיא כַּפָּרָתוֹ כְּמוֹ הַיּוֹלֶדֶת שֶׁצְּרִיכָה לְהָבִיא קָרְבָּן. וְכֵן כָּל הַצָּרִיךְ לְכַפָּרָה לוֹקֶה וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב כָּרֵת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בְּעִנְיַן כָּרֵת זֶה (ויקרא ז כ) וְטֻמְאָתוֹ עָלָיו, וּפֵרְשׁוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה עַד שֶׁתִּהְיֶה כָּל טֻמְאָתוֹ עָלָיו. וְאִם הָיָה טָמֵא בְּטֻמְאָה שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם, אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה. וְאֵין צָרִיךְ לוֹמַר שֶׁאֵין חַיָּב כָּרֵת, אֶלָּא מַכִּין אוֹתוֹ מַכַּת מַרְדּוּת.

**Sefer HaChinukh, translated by R. Francis Nataf, Sefaria 2018:**
And [it] is practiced at the time of the [Temple] by males and females. And one who transgresses it and eats a *kazayit* of pure holy meat or impure holy meat while he is still impure with a Torah-level impurity volitionally is liable for excision; inadvertently, he brings a sacrifice that varies up and down, as is written above. And if he ate after he immersed [but] before his sun set or before he brought his atonement — like a woman who gave birth who needs to bring a sacrifice; and so [too,] all who need an atonement — he is lashed. But he is not liable for excision, as it is stated regarding the matter of this excision (Leviticus 7:20), “and his impurity is upon him”; and they, may their memory be blessed, explained, “until all of his impurity be upon him.” And if he was impure from a [rabbinic] impurity, he is not lashed — and there is no need to say that he is not liable excision — but rather he is struck with lashes of rebellion.