## Shabbat Daf 43b

###### Shabbat 43b:1
[Shabbat 43b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:1)

דְּאִיכָּא דְּבַשׁ. בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים דְּלֵיכָּא דְּבַשׁ, מַאי אִיכָּא לְמֵימַר? לֹא נִצְרְכָא אֶלָּא לְאוֹתָן שְׁתֵּי חַלּוֹת. וְהָא מוּקְצוֹת נִינְהוּ! — דְּחַשֵּׁיב עֲלַיְיהוּ. הָא לָא חַשֵּׁיב עֲלַיְיהוּ מַאי — אָסוּר?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**as there is honey** in the beehive during the summer. However, **during the rainy season in which there is not honey** in the beehive, **what can be said** according to Rabbi Yitzḥak to explain why it is permitted to cover the beehive at that time? The Gemara answers: This *halakha* **is only applicable** in order to permit covering the beehive for **those two honeycombs** that remain in the hive even during the rainy season so that the bees can feed off of them. The Gemara asks: **Aren’t** these honeycombs **set aside** for the bees alone? The Gemara responds: This is a case **where one thought of them** before Shabbat and, in his mind, prepared them to be eaten. The Gemara asks: By inference, if **one did not think about them, what** would be the ruling? It would be **prohibited** to cover the beehive.


###### Shabbat 43b:2
[Shabbat 43b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:2)

אִי הָכִי, הָא דְתָנֵי: ״וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יִתְכַּוֵּין לָצוּד״ — לִפְלוֹג וְלִתְנֵי בְּדִידַהּ: בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים — כְּשֶׁחִישֵּׁב עֲלֵיהֶן, אֲבָל לֹא חִישֵּׁב עֲלֵיהֶן — אָסוּר! הָא קָמַשְׁמַע לַן: אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁחִישֵּׁב עֲלֵיהֶן, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יִתְכַּוֵּין לָצוּד.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**If so, this** *tanna* **who taught** in that same *baraita*: **As long as he does not intend to trap** the bees, **let him distinguish and teach with regard to** that same *halakha* **itself: In what case are these matters stated,** that one is permitted to cover the hive? It is in a case **where he thought of them** before Shabbat. **However, if he did not think of them,** it is **prohibited.** The Gemara answers: **This teaches us** a novel understanding. **Even though he thought of them** before Shabbat, it is only permitted **as long as he did not intend to trap** them.


###### Shabbat 43b:3
[Shabbat 43b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:3)

מַנִּי? אִי רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן — לֵית לֵיהּ מוּקְצֶה. אִי רַבִּי יְהוּדָה — כִּי לֹא מִתְכַּוֵּין מַאי הָוֵי? הָא דָּבָר שֶׁאֵין מִתְכַּוֵּין — אָסוּר! לְעוֹלָם רַבִּי יְהוּדָה. מַאי ״וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יִתְכַּוֵּין לָצוּד״ — שֶׁלֹּא יַעֲשֶׂנָּה כִּמְצוּדָה, דְּלִישְׁבּוֹק לְהוּ רַוְוחָא כִּי הֵיכִי דְּלָא לִיתַּצְדוּ מִמֵּילָא.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to the matter itself, the Gemara asks: In accordance with **whose** opinion **is this** *baraita*? **If** it is in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Shimon, he does not hold** that there is a prohibition of **set-aside.** Consequently, there is no distinction between the different beehives. **If** it is in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Yehuda, when** he **does not have intention** to trap the bees, **what** of it? **Doesn’t** Rabbi Yehuda hold that even an **unintentional act is prohibited?** The Gemara replies: **Actually,** this *baraita* is in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Yehuda. What** does: **And as long as one does not intend to trap** the bees, mean? It means **that one should not make** the mat **like a trap.** He must **leave space so that** the bees **will not get trapped on their own.**


###### Shabbat 43b:4
[Shabbat 43b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:4)

רַב אָשֵׁי אָמַר: מִי קָתָנֵי ״בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה וּבִימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים״? ״בַּחַמָּה מִפְּנֵי הַחַמָּה וּבַגְּשָׁמִים מִפְּנֵי הַגְּשָׁמִים״ קָתָנֵי, בְּיוֹמֵי נִיסָן וּבְיוֹמֵי תִּשְׁרֵי, דְּאִיכָּא חַמָּה וְאִיכָּא צִינָּה וְאִיכָּא גְּשָׁמִים וְאִיכָּא דְּבַשׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Ashi said** that it can be resolved differently: **Did** the *baraita* **teach: In the summer and in the rainy season?** Actually, **it taught: In the sun due to the sun and in the rain due to the rain.** That can be interpreted as follows: **In the days of Nisan and in the days of Tishrei, as** then **there is sun** shining **and there is** also **cold** weather; **and there is rain and there is honey** in the beehives.


###### Shabbat 43b:5
[Shabbat 43b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:5)

אֲמַר לְהוּ רַב שֵׁשֶׁת: פּוּקוּ וֶאֱמַרוּ לֵיהּ לְרַבִּי יִצְחָק: כְּבָר תַּרְגְּמַהּ רַב הוּנָא לִשְׁמַעְתָּיךְ בְּבָבֶל. דְּאָמַר רַב הוּנָא: עוֹשִׂין מְחִיצָה לְמֵת בִּשְׁבִיל חַי, וְאֵין עוֹשִׂין מְחִיצָה לְמֵת בִּשְׁבִיל מֵת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Sheshet said to** the Sages: **Go out and tell Rabbi Yitzḥak** in Eretz Yisrael: **Rav Huna already explained your *halakha* in Babylonia.** There is nothing novel in the principle that you established that a vessel may only be moved for the sake of something that may be moved, **as Rav Huna said: One may make a partition for the dead for** the benefit of **a living person, and one may not make a partition for the dead for** the benefit of the **dead person.** It is prohibited to move objects for the sake of a corpse because it is prohibited to move the corpse itself on Shabbat.


###### Shabbat 43b:6
[Shabbat 43b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:6)

מַאי הִיא? — דְּאָמַר רַב שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר יְהוּדָה, וְכֵן תָּנָא שֵׁילָא מָרִי: מֵת הַמּוּטָּל בַּחַמָּה, בָּאִים שְׁנֵי בְּנֵי אָדָם וְיוֹשְׁבִין בְּצִדּוֹ. חַם לָהֶם מִלְּמַטָּה, זֶה מֵבִיא מִטָּה וְיוֹשֵׁב עָלֶיהָ וְזֶה מֵבִיא מִטָּה וְיוֹשֵׁב עָלֶיהָ. חַם לָהֶם מִלְּמַעְלָה, מְבִיאִים מַחְצֶלֶת וּפוֹרְסִין עֲלֵיהֶן. זֶה זוֹקֵף מִטָּתוֹ וְנִשְׁמָט וְהוֹלֵךְ לוֹ, וְזֶה זוֹקֵף מִטָּתוֹ וְנִשְׁמָט וְהוֹלֵךְ לוֹ, וְנִמְצֵאת מְחִיצָה עֲשׂוּיָה מֵאֵלֶיהָ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **What is** the practical application of this *halakha*? As **Rav Shmuel bar Yehuda said, and likewise** the Sage, **Sheila Mari taught** in a *baraita*: **A corpse that is laid out in the sun** and there is concern that it will putrefy and smell, what can be done? **Two people come and sit beside it.** After a while, when **they** feel **hot from beneath** them, **this** one **brings a bed and sits on it and that** one **brings a bed and sits on it** on either side of the corpse, as they are permitted to carry the beds for their own use. When **they** feel **hot from above** them, **they bring a mat and spread it over their** heads. Then, **this** one **stands his bed up** so the mat will remain resting atop it **and slips away and leaves, and that** one **stands his bed up and slips away and leaves, and a partition is then created** over the corpse as if **on its own** without erecting it directly for the sake of the corpse. Apparently, the Sages did not permit carrying a mat to cover a corpse for the sake of the corpse. They only permitted doing so in an indirect manner for the benefit of the living.


###### Shabbat 43b:7
[Shabbat 43b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:7)

אִיתְּמַר, מֵת הַמּוּטָּל בַּחַמָּה. רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: הוֹפְכוֹ מִמִּטָּה לְמִטָּה. רַב חֲנִינָא בַּר שֶׁלֶמְיָא מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּרַב אָמַר: מַנִּיחַ עָלָיו כִּכָּר אוֹ תִּינוֹק וּמְטַלְטְלוֹ. הֵיכָא דְּאִיכָּא כִּכָּר אוֹ תִּינוֹק כּוּלֵּי עָלְמָא לָא פְּלִיגִי דִּשְׁרֵי. כִּי פְּלִיגִי דְּלֵית לֵיהּ: מָר סָבַר טִלְטוּל מִן הַצַּד שְׁמֵיהּ טִלְטוּל, וּמָר סָבַר לָא שְׁמֵיהּ טִלְטוּל.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Incidental to the mention of *halakhot* related to a corpse on Shabbat, the Gemara cites an amoraic dispute in which **it was stated: A corpse that was laid out in the sun, Rav Yehuda said** that **Shmuel said: One turns it over from bed to bed** until it reaches the shade. **Rav Hanina bar Shelamiyya said in the name** of **Rav: One places a loaf** of bread **or an infant on** the corpse **and moves it.** The corpse becomes a base for an object that one is permitted to move on Shabbat and, consequently, one may move the corpse due to the permitted object. The Gemara adds: In a case **where there is a loaf or an infant, everyone agrees that it is permitted** to use that method to move the corpse. **Where they argue** is in a case **where he does not have** a loaf or an infant. **One Sage,** Rav, **holds: Moving** an object **in an atypical manner is considered** a bona fide act of **moving.** Therefore, one may not move the corpse by passing it from bed to bed. **And the** other **Sage,** Shmuel, **holds** that moving an object in an atypical manner **is not considered moving.** Therefore, it is permitted to move a corpse by passing it from bed to bed.


###### Shabbat 43b:8
[Shabbat 43b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/43b:8)

לֵימָא כְתַנָּאֵי: אֵין מַצִּילִין אֶת הַמֵּת מִפְּנֵי הַדְּלֵיקָה. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן לָקִישׁ: שָׁמַעְתִּי שֶׁמַּצִּילִין אֶת הַמֵּת מִפְּנֵי הַדְּלֵיקָה. הֵיכִי דָמֵי: אִי דְּאִיכָּא כִּכָּר אוֹ תִּינוֹק, מַאי טַעְמָא דְּתַנָּא קַמָּא? אִי דְּלֵיכָּא, מַאי טַעְמָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן לָקִישׁ? אֶלָּא לָאו בְּטִלְטוּל מִן הַצַּד פְּלִיגִי. דְּמָר סָבַר טִלְטוּל מִן הַצַּד שְׁמֵיהּ טִלְטוּל, וּמָר סָבַר לָא שְׁמֵיהּ טִלְטוּל! לָא, דְּכוּלֵּי עָלְמָא טִלְטוּל מִן הַצַּד שְׁמֵיהּ טִלְטוּל, וְהַיְינוּ טַעְמָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן לָקִישׁ: דְּמִתּוֹךְ שֶׁאָדָם בָּהוּל עַל מֵתוֹ

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to this dispute between Rav and Shmuel, the Gemara remarks: **Let us say** that this dispute is **parallel** to a dispute between ***tanna’im*** in the *Tosefta*. The Rabbis said: **One may not rescue a corpse from a fire** on Shabbat. **Rabbi Yehuda ben Lakish said: I heard that one may rescue a corpse from a fire.** The Gemara seeks to clarify the matter: **What are the circumstances? If there is a loaf or an infant** available, **what is the rationale** for the opinion **of the first *tanna,*** who prohibited rescuing the corpse from the fire? **If there is not** a loaf or an infant, **what is the reason** of **Rabbi Yehuda ben Lakish** who permits rescuing the corpse from the fire? **Rather, is it not** that **they disagree over moving** an object **in an atypical manner? As** this **Sage,** the first *tanna*, **holds** that **moving** an object **in an atypical manner is considered moving.** Therefore, it is prohibited to rescue the corpse in that manner. **And this Sage,** Rabbi Yehuda ben Lakish, **holds** that **moving** an object **in an atypical manner is not considered moving.** Therefore, it is permitted to rescue the corpse in this manner. The amoraic dispute deals with an issue already disputed by the *tanna’im*. The Gemara rejects this: **No, everyone,** both *tanna’im*, **agrees that moving** an object **in an atypical manner is considered moving. Rather, this is the rationale** for the opinion **of Rabbi Yehuda ben Lakish: Since a person is agitated about his deceased** relative and is concerned about maintaining the dignity of the dead,