## Shabbat Daf 94a

###### Shabbat 94a:1
[Shabbat 94a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/94a:1)

שֶׁשָּׁגַג עַל הָאוֹכָלִין וְהֵזִיד עַל הַכְּלִי. מַתְקֵיף לַהּ רַב אָשֵׁי: וְהָא ״אַף עַל הַכְּלִי״ קָתָנֵי! אֶלָּא אָמַר רַב אָשֵׁי: כְּגוֹן שֶׁשָּׁגַג בָּזֶה וּבָזֶה, וְנוֹדַע לוֹ, וְחָזַר וְנוֹדַע לוֹ, וּבִפְלוּגְתָּא דְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**one** acted **unwittingly** with regard **to the food and intentionally** with regard **to the vessel.** He is liable to bring a sin-offering for the food and to receive *karet* for the vessel. **Rav Ashi strongly objects to this. Didn’t** the *baraita* **teach:** He is liable **even for the vessel?** Apparently, the liability for the food and the liability for the vessel are identical. **Rather, Rav Ashi said:** This is referring to a case **where one** acted **unwittingly** both **with regard to this,** the food, **and with regard to that,** the vessel. **And he became aware** of one transgression, **and** then **he became aware** of the other transgression. And the ruling is dependent upon **the dispute between Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish** cited above, with regard to the question whether or not one who unwittingly performed a single transgression twice and became aware of each separately is liable to bring two sin-offerings.


###### Shabbat 94a:2
[Shabbat 94a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/94a:2)

אֶת הַחַי בַּמִּטָּה פָּטוּר אַף עַל הַמִּטָּה. לֵימָא מַתְנִיתִין רַבִּי נָתָן הִיא וְלָא רַבָּנַן, דְּתַנְיָא: הַמּוֹצִיא בְּהֵמָה חַיָּה וָעוֹף לִרְשׁוּת הָרַבִּים, בֵּין חַיִּין וּבֵין שְׁחוּטִין — חַיָּיב. רַבִּי נָתָן אוֹמֵר: עַל שְׁחוּטִין חַיָּיב וְעַל חַיִּין פָּטוּר, שֶׁהַחַי נוֹשֵׂא אֶת עַצְמוֹ. אָמַר רָבָא: אֲפִילּוּ תֵּימָא רַבָּנַן, עַד כָּאן לָא פְּלִיגִי רַבָּנַן עֲלֵיהּ דְּרַבִּי נָתָן אֶלָּא בִּבְהֵמָה חַיָּה וָעוֹף דִּמְשַׁרְבְּטִי נַפְשַׁיְיהוּ, אֲבָל אָדָם חַי דְּנוֹשֵׂא אֶת עַצְמוֹ — אֲפִילּוּ רַבָּנַן מוֹדוּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
We learned in the mishna: One who carries out a **living** person **on a bed is exempt even for** carrying out **the bed.** The Gemara suggests: **Let us say** that **the mishna is** in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Natan and not** in accordance with the opinion of **the Rabbis, as it was taught** in a *baraita*: **One who carries out a domesticated animal, an undomesticated animal, and fowl into the public domain** on Shabbat **is liable whether** they are **alive or whether** they are **slaughtered. Rabbi Natan says: For** carrying out **slaughtered** animals, he is **liable, and for** carrying out **live** animals, he is **exempt, because a living** being **carries itself.** A living being attempts to lighten the load of the person carrying it and thereby participates in the act of carrying. **Rava said:** The mishna can be understood **even** if **you say** that it is in accordance with the opinion of **the Rabbis. The Rabbis disagree with Rabbi Natan only as far as** the case of **a domesticated animal, an undomesticated animal, and fowl** is concerned **because** they deaden their weight in an attempt to **free themselves** from the one carrying them. **However,** with regard to the fact **that a live person carries himself, even the Rabbis agree.** Therefore, one who carries a live person out is exempt.


###### Shabbat 94a:3
[Shabbat 94a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/94a:3)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַב אַדָּא בַּר אַהֲבָה לְרָבָא, וְהָא דִּתְנַן: בֶּן בְּתִירָא מַתִּיר בַּסּוּס. וְתַנְיָא: בֶּן בְּתִירָא מַתִּיר בַּסּוּס מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה בּוֹ מְלָאכָה שֶׁאֵין חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו חַטָּאת, וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: בֶּן בְּתִירָא וְרַבִּי נָתָן אָמְרוּ דָּבָר אֶחָד. וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ דְּלָא פְּלִיגִי רַבָּנַן עֲלֵיהּ דְּרַבִּי נָתָן אֶלָּא בִּבְהֵמָה חַיָּה וָעוֹף מִשּׁוּם דִּמְשַׁרְבְּטִי נַפְשַׁיְיהוּ, מַאי אִירְיָא בֶּן בְּתִירָא וְרַבִּי נָתָן? וְהָאָמְרַתְּ אֲפִילּוּ רַבָּנַן מוֹדוּ! כִּי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן, בְּסוּס הַמְיוּחָד לְעוֹפוֹת. וּמִי אִיכָּא סוּס הַמְיוּחָד לְעוֹפוֹת? אִין, אִיכָּא דְּבִי זְיָיארִן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rav Adda bar Ahava said to Rava: And** with regard to that **which we learned** in a mishna that it is prohibited to sell work animals to gentiles, to prevent a situation where animals still belonging to a Jew would be lent to a gentile who would perform labor with them on Shabbat, but **ben Beteira permits** selling **a horse** to a gentile. **And it was taught** in a *baraita*: **Ben Beteira permits** selling **a horse** for riding **because** the horse **is performing an act for which one is not liable** to bring **a sin-offering,** as riding a horse is not actually a prohibited labor. **And Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Ben Beteira and Rabbi Natan said one,** the same, **thing.** They both hold that an animal with a rider on its back is not considered to be bearing a burden. **And if you say that the Rabbis only argue with Rabbi Natan** with regard to **a domesticated animal, an undomesticated animal, and fowl because they** deaden their weight in an attempt to **free themselves, why** did Rabbi Yoḥanan say **specifically** that **ben Beteira and Rabbi Natan** agree? **Didn’t you say** that in the case of a person riding a horse **even the Rabbis agree?** The Gemara answers: **When Rabbi Yoḥanan said** that ben Beteira and Rabbi Natan said the same thing, he was referring to **a horse designated** specifically **for** carrying **fowl.** The Gemara asks: **And is there a horse designated for** carrying **fowl?** The Gemara answers: **Yes, there is** the horse for carrying **a hunter’s falcons [*devei vayadan*].**


###### Shabbat 94a:4
[Shabbat 94a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/94a:4)

אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: וּמוֹדֶה רַבִּי נָתָן בְּכָפוּת. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַב אַדָּא בַּר מַתְנָה לְאַבָּיֵי: וְהָא הָנֵי פָּרְסָאֵי דִּכְמַאן דִּכְפִיתִי דָּמוּ, וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: בֶּן בְּתִירָא וְרַבִּי נָתָן אָמְרוּ דָּבָר אֶחָד! הָתָם, רָמוּת רוּחָא הוּא דְּנָקֵיט לְהוּ. דְּהָהוּא פַּרְדַּשְׁכָא דִּרְתַח מַלְכָּא עִילָּוֵיהּ, וּרְהַט תְּלָתָא פַּרְסֵי בְּכַרְעֵיהּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Yoḥanan said: And Rabbi Natan agrees in** the case of a person who is **bound** because he is unable to lighten the load of the person carrying him. **Rav Adda bar Mattana said to Abaye: And** what of **those Persians who are** considered **as** if they were **bound** because they don heavy armor and always ride horses, **and** nevertheless **Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Ben Beteira and Rabbi Natan said one thing** and permitted selling horses even to Persians? The Gemara answers: **There,** with regard to the Persians, it is not that they are unable to dismount their horses. **It is arrogance that keeps them** from dismounting their horses. As proof, the Gemara relates: There was **that** Persian **officer [*pardashka*] at whom the king was angry, and** he **ran three parasangs on foot.** Apparently, even Persian horsemen are not considered bound and are capable of walking without their horses.


###### Shabbat 94a:5
[Shabbat 94a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Shabbat/r/94a:5)

אֶת הַמֵּת בַּמִּטָּה חַיָּיב וְכֵן כְּזַיִת מִן הַמֵּת וְכוּ׳. אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר בַּר חָנָה אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן, וְאָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ: פּוֹטֵר הָיָה רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
We learned in the mishna that according to the first *tanna*: One who carries out **a corpse on a bed is liable. And similarly,** one who carries out **an olive-bulk of a corpse,** or an olive-bulk of an animal carcass, or a lentil-bulk of a creeping animal is liable. Rabbi Shimon deems him exempt. **Rabba bar bar Ḥana said** that **Rabbi Yoḥanan said, and Rav Yosef said** that **Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Rabbi Shimon would deem exempt**