## Zevachim Daf 101a

###### Zevachim 101a:1
[Zevachim 101a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:1)

וַחֲכָמִים עָשׂוּ חִיזּוּק לְדִבְרֵיהֶם יוֹתֵר מִשֶּׁל תּוֹרָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And** the same holds for the night after the day of burial, even though the acute mourning of that day itself is by rabbinic law, because **the Sages reinforced their pronouncements with greater** severity **than Torah** law.


###### Zevachim 101a:2
[Zevachim 101a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:2)

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״כִּי כֵן צֻוֵּיתִי״, ״כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוֵּיתִי״, ״כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה ה׳״; ״כִּי כֵן צֻוֵּיתִי״ – בַּאֲנִינוּת יֹאכְלוּהָ, ״כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוֵּיתִי״ – בִּשְׁעַת מַעֲשֶׂה אָמַר לָהֶן, ״כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה ה׳״ – לֹא מֵאֵלַיי אֲנִי אוֹמֵר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **The Sages taught** in a *baraita*: On the eighth day of the inauguration of the Tabernacle, on which two of Aaron’s sons died, Moses spoke to Aaron and his sons using three different forms of the word command: **“For so I am commanded [*tzuveiti*]”** (Leviticus 10:13), **“as I commanded [*tziveiti*]”** (Leviticus 10:18), and **“as the Lord has commanded [*tziva*]”** (Leviticus 10:15). Moses said to Aaron: “And you shall eat it…**for so I am commanded,”** to teach that Aaron and his remaining sons **shall partake of** the offerings even **in acute mourning.** The statement: “You should certainly have eaten it…**as I commanded,”** Moses **said to them at the time of** the **incident,** when Aaron and his sons burned the sin offering for the New Moon. Moses said: **“As the Lord has commanded,”** to emphasize that it is **not of my own** initiative that **I say** this, but it is from the word of God.


###### Zevachim 101a:3
[Zevachim 101a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:3)

וּרְמִינְהִי: מִפְּנֵי אֲנִינוּת נִשְׂרְפָה, לְכָךְ נֶאֱמַר: ״כָּאֵלֶּה״!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**And** the Sages **raise a contradiction** from another *baraita*: The sin offering **was burned due to** the **acute mourning** of Aaron and his sons, since they felt they could not partake of it. **Therefore,** it **is stated** in Aaron’s explanation: “There have befallen me such things **as these;** and if I had consumed the sin offering today, would it have been good in the eyes of the Lord?” (Leviticus 10:19). Moses conceded to Aaron that he was correct (see Leviticus 10:20), indicating that it was not permitted for Aaron to partake of the sin offering in acute mourning.


###### Zevachim 101a:4
[Zevachim 101a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:4)

אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: לָא קַשְׁיָא; הָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה, הָא רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Shmuel said:** This is **not difficult. This** first *baraita*, according to which Moses commanded Aaron and his sons to consume the sacrificial meat in acute mourning, is in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Yehuda;** and **that** *baraita*, according to which they acted properly in refraining from eating it, is in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Neḥemya.**


###### Zevachim 101a:5
[Zevachim 101a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:5)

דְּתַנְיָא: מִפְּנֵי אֲנִינוּת שְׂרָפוּהָ, לְכָךְ נֶאֱמַר: ״כָּאֵלֶּה״. דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמְרִים: מִפְּנֵי טוּמְאָה נִשְׂרְפָה. שֶׁאִם אַתָּה אוֹמֵר מִפְּנֵי אֲנִינוּת נִשְׂרְפָה – (הָיוּ) [הָיָה] לִשְׁלׇשְׁתָּן שֶׁיִּשָּׂרְפוּ. דָּבָר אַחֵר: (הָיוּ) [הָיָה] רָאוּי לְאוֹכְלָן לָעֶרֶב. דָּבָר אַחֵר: וַהֲלֹא פִּינְחָס הָיָה עִמָּהֶן!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
This is **as it is taught** in a *baraita*: Aaron and his sons **burned** the sin offering **due to** their **acute mourning. Therefore,** it **is stated: “As these”;** this is **the statement of Rabbi Neḥemya. Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Shimon say:** The sin offering **was burned due to ritual impurity. As, if you say** that it **was burned due to acute mourning,** they **should have burned** all **three of** the sin offerings offered that day. **Alternatively,** if it was burned due to acute mourning, **they would have been fit to partake of** the sin offerings **in the evening,** and there would have been no need to burn them. **Alternatively,** if it was burned due to acute mourning, **wasn’t Pinehas,** son of Elazar the priest, **with them?** He was not in mourning, and he could have partaken of the sin offering.


###### Zevachim 101a:6
[Zevachim 101a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:6)

רָבָא אָמַר: אִידֵּי וְאִידֵּי רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה, וְלָא קַשְׁיָא; כָּאן בְּקׇדְשֵׁי שָׁעָה, כָּאן בְּקׇדְשֵׁי דוֹרוֹת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rava said:** Both **this** *baraita* **and that** *baraita* are in accordance with the opinion of **Rabbi Neḥemya,** who holds that the sin offering was burned due to acute mourning. **And** this is **not difficult. Here,** the *baraita* according to which Moses commanded that Aaron and his sons partake of the offering as acute mourners is referring **to the offerings of** a particular **time,** i.e., the meal offering, which was unique to the inauguration ceremony. **There,** the *baraita* according to which they rightly burned the sin offering, due to acute mourning, is referring **to the offerings of** all future **generations.** That sin offering was brought for the New Moon of Nisan, and such an offering would be brought at every New Moon from that day onward. Moses conceded that such offerings should not be consumed by acute mourners.


###### Zevachim 101a:7
[Zevachim 101a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:7)

רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה הֵיכִי מְתָרֵיץ לְהָנֵי קְרָאֵי, וְרַבָּנַן הֵיכִי מְתָרְצִי לְהוּ לְהָנֵי קְרָאֵי?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **How** would **Rabbi Neḥemya reconcile these** apparently contradictory **verses** about the sin offering, **and how** would **the Sages reconcile these verses** (see Leviticus 10:17–20)?


###### Zevachim 101a:8
[Zevachim 101a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:8)

רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה מְתָרֵיץ לְהוּ הָכִי: ״מַדּוּעַ לֹא אֲכַלְתֶּם״ – אָמַר לוֹ מֹשֶׁה לְאַהֲרֹן: שֶׁמָּא נִכְנַס דָּמָהּ לִפְנַי וְלִפְנִים? אָמַר לוֹ: ״הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ״. שֶׁמָּא חוּץ לִמְחִיצָתָהּ יָצָאת? אָמַר לוֹ: בַּקֹּדֶשׁ הָיְתָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Neḥemya** would **reconcile them like this:** When Moses asked: **“Why have you not eaten** the sin offering?” (Leviticus 10:17), this is what **Moses said to Aaron: Perhaps the blood of** this sin offering **entered the innermost sanctum,** thereby disqualifying it (see Leviticus 6:23). Is this why you burned it? Aaron **said to him: “Behold, the blood of it was not brought** into the Sanctuary within” (Leviticus 10:18). Moses then asked: **Perhaps it went outside its partition,** i.e., it exited the courtyard of the Tabernacle, and was thereby disqualified? Aaron **said to him: It was inside the sacred** area at all times.


###### Zevachim 101a:9
[Zevachim 101a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:9)

וְדִלְמָא בַּאֲנִינוּת אַקְרֵיבְתּוּהָ וּפְסַלְתּוּהָ? אָמַר לוֹ: מֹשֶׁה, וְכִי הֵם הִקְרִיבוּ?! אֲנִי הִקְרַבְתִּי! וְאָמַר לוֹ: ״הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ״ וּבַקֹּדֶשׁ הָיָתָה – ״אָכוֹל תֹּאכְלוּ אוֹתָהּ כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוֵּיתִי״, בַּאֲנִינוּת יֹאכְלוּהָ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses then suggested: **But perhaps you sacrificed it in acute mourning,** which is prohibited for ordinary priests, **and disqualified it.** Aaron **said to him: Moses, was it they,** i.e., my sons, **who sacrificed** the offering? **I sacrificed** the offering, and as High Priest, I may serve even as an acute mourner (see Leviticus 21:10–12). **And** Moses **said to him: “Behold, the blood of it was not brought** into the Sanctuary within,” **and it was inside the sacred** area at all times; therefore: **“You should certainly have consumed it** in the sacred area, **as I commanded”** (Leviticus 10:18), i.e., just as I commanded that the priests should **consume** today’s meal offering **in acute mourning.**


###### Zevachim 101a:10
[Zevachim 101a:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:10)

אָמַר לוֹ: ״וַתִּקְרֶאנָה אֹתִי כָּאֵלֶּה וְאָכַלְתִּי חַטָּאת הַיּוֹם, הַיִּיטַב בְּעֵינֵי ה׳״ – שֶׁמָּא לֹא שָׁמַעְתָּ אֶלָּא בְּקׇדְשֵׁי שָׁעָה?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Aaron **said to him:** “Behold, today have they sacrificed their sin offering and their burnt offering before the Lord, **and there have befallen me such things as these; and if I had consumed the sin offering today, would it have been good in the eyes of the Lord?”** (Leviticus 10:19). **Perhaps you heard** the command to consume the offering **only with regard to offerings of** a particular **time,** i.e., the meal offering, which was unique to that day.


###### Zevachim 101a:11
[Zevachim 101a:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:11)

דְּאִי בְּקׇדְשֵׁי דוֹרוֹת, קַל וְחוֹמֶר מִמַּעֲשֵׂר הַקַּל: וּמָה מַעֲשֵׂר הַקַּל, אָמְרָה תּוֹרָה: ״לֹא אָכַלְתִּי בְאֹנִי מִמֶּנּוּ״; בְּקׇדְשֵׁי דוֹרוֹת לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**As, if** you claim that it also applies **to the offerings of** all **generations,** then one can prove this is not so via **an *a fortiori*** inference **from** the second **tithe,** for **which** the *halakha* **is** more **lenient** than for sacrificial meat: **Just as** with regard to the second **tithe,** for **which** the *halakha* **is** more **lenient, the Torah stated: “I have not eaten thereof in my mourning [*ve’oni*]”** (Deuteronomy 26:14), teaching that an acute mourner [*onen*] is prohibited from partaking of it, **all the more so** is it **not** clear that **with regard to the offerings of** all **generations,** an acute mourner is prohibited from partaking of them?


###### Zevachim 101a:12
[Zevachim 101a:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:12)

מִיָּד ״וַיִּשְׁמַע מֹשֶׁה וַיִּיטַב בְּעֵינָיו״ – הוֹדָה וְלֹא בּוֹשׁ מֹשֶׁה לוֹמַר ״לֹא שָׁמַעְתִּי״, אֶלָּא אָמַר: ״שָׁמַעְתִּי וְשָׁכַחְתִּי״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses **immediately conceded** to Aaron, as the verse states: **“And Moses heard, and it was good in his eyes”** (Leviticus 10:20). **And Moses was not embarrassed** and did not attempt to justify himself **by saying: I did not hear** of this *halakha* until now. **Rather, he said: I heard** it, **and I forgot** it, as the verse indicates by stating: “Moses heard.”


###### Zevachim 101a:13
[Zevachim 101a:13](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:13)

וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן הֵיכִי מְתָרְצִי לְהוּ? הָכִי מְתָרְצִי לְהוּ: ״מַדּוּעַ לֹא אֲכַלְתֶּם אֶת הַחַטָּאת בִּמְקוֹם [הַקֹּדֶשׁ]״ – שֶׁמָּא נִכְנַס דָּמָהּ לִפְנַי וְלִפְנִים? אָמַר לוֹ: ״הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ אֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ פְּנִימָה״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara continues: **And how** would **Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Shimon,** who hold that the sin offering was burned due to ritual impurity, **reconcile those** verses? **They** would **reconcile them like this:** When Moses said to Aaron and his sons: **“Why have you not eaten the sin offering in the place of the Sanctuary?”** (Leviticus 10:17), he meant: **Perhaps its blood entered the innermost sanctum,** disqualifying the offering. Aaron **said to him** in response: **“Behold, the blood of it was not brought into the Sanctuary within”** (Leviticus 10:18).


###### Zevachim 101a:14
[Zevachim 101a:14](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:14)

שֶׁמָּא חוּץ לִמְחִיצָתָהּ יָצָאת? אָמַר לוֹ: הֵן בַּקּוֹדֶשׁ הָיְתָה. וְדִילְמָא בַּאֲנִינוּת אַקְרֵיבְתּוּהָ וּפְסַלְתּוּהָ? אָמַר לוֹ: מֹשֶׁה, הֵן הִקְרִיבוּהָ – דְּפָסְלָה בְּהוּ אֲנִינוּת?! אֲנִי הִקְרַבְתִּיהָ!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses then asked: **Perhaps it went outside its partition,** i.e., the courtyard of the Tabernacle, and was thereby disqualified? Aaron **said to him: It was inside the sacred** area at all times. Moses then asked: **But perhaps you sacrificed it in acute mourning and disqualified it?** Aaron **said to him: Moses,** was it my sons who **sacrificed** the offering, **that** their **acute mourning** would **disqualify** the offering? **I,** the High Priest, **sacrificed** the offering, and I may serve even in acute mourning.


###### Zevachim 101a:15
[Zevachim 101a:15](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:15)

וְדִילְמָא אַגַּב מְרָרַיְיכוּ פְּשַׁעְתּוּ בַּהּ וְאִיטַּמַּאי? אָמַר לוֹ: מֹשֶׁה, כָּךְ אֲנִי בְּעֵינֶיךָ, שֶׁאֲנִי מְבַזֶּה קׇדְשֵׁי שָׁמַיִם?! ״וַתִּקְרֶאנָה אֹתִי כָּאֵלֶּה״; וַאֲפִילּוּ אֵלֶּה וְכָאֵלֶּה – אֵין אֲנִי מְבַזֶּה קׇדְשֵׁי שָׁמַיִם!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses then asked: **Or perhaps, due to your bitterness** in mourning, **were you neglectful of** the offering **and it became impure?** Aaron **said to him: Moses, am I in your eyes such** a person, **that I** would **treat** an offering **consecrated to Heaven with contempt? “There have befallen me such things as these”** (Leviticus 10:19), i.e., **even** if **these** tragedies **and** more **such as them** should befall me, **I** would **not treat** an offering **consecrated to Heaven with contempt.**


###### Zevachim 101a:16
[Zevachim 101a:16](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:16)

אָמַר לוֹ: וְאִי ״הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ״, וּבַקּוֹדֶשׁ הָיְתָה – ״אָכוֹל תֹּאכְלוּ אֹתָהּ בַּקּוֹדֶשׁ כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוֵּיתִי״, בַּאֲנִינוּת יֹאכְלוּהָ!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses **said to him:** If so, **and if,** as you say: **“Behold, the blood of it was not brought** into the Sanctuary within,” **and** it **was inside the sacred** area at all times, then: **“You should certainly have eaten it in the sacred area, as I commanded,”** i.e., as I commanded that the priests should **consume** the meal offering even **in acute mourning.**


###### Zevachim 101a:17
[Zevachim 101a:17](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:17)

אָמַר לוֹ: שֶׁמָּא לֹא שָׁמַעְתָּ אֶלָּא בַּלַּיְלָה; דְּאִי בַּיּוֹם – קַל וָחוֹמֶר מִמַּעֲשֵׂר הַקַּל: וּמָה מַעֲשֵׂר הַקַּל, אָמְרָה תּוֹרָה: ״לֹא אָכַלְתִּי בְאֹנִי מִמֶּנּוּ״; קוֹדֶשׁ חָמוּר – לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Aaron **said to him: Perhaps you heard** the command to consume the offering **only with regard to the night** following the day of acute mourning, but during the day itself the prohibition stands. **As, if** you claim that it may be consumed **during the day** itself, I can prove that this is not so via **an *a fortiori*** inference **from** the second **tithe,** for **which** the *halakha* **is** more **lenient** than for sacrificial meat: **Just as** with regard to the second **tithe,** for **which** the *halakha* **is** more **lenient, the Torah stated: I have not eaten thereof in my mourning, all the more so** is it **not** clear that in the **stringent** case of **sacrificial** meat, an acute mourner is prohibited from partaking of it?


###### Zevachim 101a:18
[Zevachim 101a:18](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/101a:18)

מִיָּד ״וַיִּשְׁמַע מֹשֶׁה

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
Moses **immediately** conceded to Aaron, as the verse states: **“And Moses heard,**