## Zevachim Daf 110b ###### Zevachim 110b:1 [Zevachim 110b:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:1) חַיָּיב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: אַף הַמְנַסֵּךְ מֵי הֶחָג בֶּחָג בַּחוּץ – חַיָּיב. רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה אוֹמֵר: שְׁיָרֵי הַדָּם (שֶׁהִקְרִיבוּ) [שֶׁהִקְרִיבָן] בַּחוּץ – חַיָּיב. **William Davidson Edition - English:** is **liable. Rabbi Elazar says: So too, one who pours as a libation water** consecrated for the libation **of the festival** of *Sukkot*, **during the Festival, outside** the courtyard, is **liable. Rabbi Neḥemya says:** For the **remainder of the blood** of an offering that was supposed to be poured at the base of the altar and **that** instead **one sacrificed outside** the courtyard, one is **liable.** ###### Zevachim 110b:2 [Zevachim 110b:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:2) **גְּמָ׳** אָמַר רָבָא: וּמוֹדֶה רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בְּדָמִים. **William Davidson Edition - English:** **GEMARA:** **Rava says:** Rabbi Elazar generally holds that one is liable for sacrificing outside only when he sacrifices a complete offering, **but Rabbi Elazar concedes with regard to** the sprinkling of the **blood** of an offering, that one is liable for sprinkling outside even part of the blood, e.g., one sprinkling instead of four. This is clearly the *halakha* with regard to offerings whose blood is sprinkled on the external altar, as a single sprinkling renders such an offering valid (see 36b), and it can be regarded as a complete offering. Rabbi Elazar concedes that this is the *halakha* even with regard to offerings whose blood is sprinkled on the inner altar, despite the fact that such offerings are valid only once all the sprinklings have been completed. ###### Zevachim 110b:3 [Zevachim 110b:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:3) דְּתַנְיָא, רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמְרִים: מִמָּקוֹם שֶׁפָּסַק הוּא מַתְחִיל. **William Davidson Edition - English:** The fact that Rabbi Elazar concedes this point is apparent from that **which is taught** in a mishna (*Yoma* 60a) with regard to the numerous sprinklings of blood performed in the Holy of Holies, upon the Curtain, and on the inner altar, as part of the Yom Kippur Temple service: If during the sprinklings the blood spills and it is necessary to bring the blood of a second animal in order to complete them, **Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Shimon say: From the place that** the High Priest **stopped** sprinkling the blood of the first animal, there **he begins** to sprinkle the blood of the second animal; it is unnecessary to repeat any of the sprinklings that have already been performed. From this ruling it is apparent that each sprinkling is considered an independent and complete act of service, and one will be liable for even a single act of sprinkling done outside the Temple. ###### Zevachim 110b:4 [Zevachim 110b:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:4) רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: אַף הַמְנַסֵּךְ מֵי הֶחָג [בֶּחָג] בַּחוּץ. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן מִשּׁוּם רַבִּי מְנַחֵם יוֹדְפָאָה: רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר – בְּשִׁטַּת רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא רַבּוֹ אֲמָרָהּ, דְּאָמַר: נִיסּוּךְ הַמַּיִם דְּאוֹרָיְיתָא. דְּתַנְיָא, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר: ״וּנְסָכֶיהָ״ – בִּשְׁנֵי נִיסּוּכִים הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר, אֶחָד נִיסּוּךְ הַמַּיִם וְאֶחָד נִיסּוּךְ הַיַּיִן. **William Davidson Edition - English:** § The mishna teaches: **Rabbi Elazar says: So too, one who pours as a libation water** consecrated for the libation **of the festival** of *Sukkot*, **during the Festival, outside** the courtyard, is liable. **Rabbi Yoḥanan said in the name of Rabbi Menaḥem Yodfa’a: Rabbi Elazar said that** *halakha* **in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, his teacher, who says: The water libation** on *Sukkot* is a mitzva **by Torah law. As it is taught** in a *baraita* that **Rabbi Akiva says** concerning the verse: “Beside the daily burnt offering, its meal offering, **and its libations”** (Numbers 29:31), the fact that the Torah makes reference to “libations” in the plural indicates that **the verse is speaking of two** types of **libations. One** is **the water libation,** which is unique to the festival of *Sukkot*; **and** the other **one** is **the wine libation,** which always accompanies the daily offering. If the water libation was not a mitzva by Torah law, one would not be liable for pouring it as a libation outside the Temple courtyard. ###### Zevachim 110b:5 [Zevachim 110b:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:5) אֲמַר לֵיהּ רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ לְרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: אִי – מָה לְהַלָּן שְׁלֹשֶׁת לוּגִּין, אַף כָּאן שְׁלֹשֶׁת לוּגִּין?! וְהָא רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר ״מֵי הֶחָג״ קָאָמַר! אִי – מָה לְהַלָּן בִּשְׁאָר יְמוֹת הַשָּׁנָה, אַף כָּאן בִּשְׁאָר יְמוֹת הַשָּׁנָה?! [וְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר] ״בֶּחָג״ קָאָמַר! **William Davidson Edition - English:** **Reish Lakish said to Rabbi Yoḥanan: If** Rabbi Elazar derives the mitzva of the water libation through the derivation taught by Rabbi Akiva, according to which both the wine libation and water libation are derived from the same word, then he should hold that **just as there,** with regard to wine, one is liable only if he pours **three *log*, so too here,** with regard to water, one should be liable only if he pours **three *log*. But** in the mishna, **Rabbi Elazar says** simply: **Water of the festival** of *Sukkot*, which seems to include any amount. Furthermore, he should hold that **just as** with regard to pouring a libation of wine outside the Temple, one is liable for pouring a libation **during the rest of the days of the year** and not only on *Sukkot*, **so too,** with regard to pouring a libation of water, one should be liable for pouring a libation **during the rest of the days of the year. But** in the mishna **Rabbi Elazar says** that one is liable only if he pours the water libation **during the Festival.** It is apparent that Rabbi Elazar derived the mitzva of the water libation from a different source. ###### Zevachim 110b:6 [Zevachim 110b:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:6) אִישְׁתְּמִיטְתֵּיהּ הָא דְּאָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי; דְּאָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן מִשּׁוּם רַבִּי נְחוּנְיָא אִישׁ בִּקְעַת בֵּית חוֹרְתָן: עֶשֶׂר נְטִיעוֹת, עֲרָבָה וְנִיסּוּךְ הַמַּיִם – הֲלָכָה לְמֹשֶׁה מִסִּינַי. **William Davidson Edition - English:** **That which Rabbi Asi says escaped him, as Rabbi Asi says** that **Rabbi Yoḥanan says in the name of Rabbi Neḥunya, a man of the valley of Beit Ḥortan:** The *halakha* of **ten saplings,** the practice of taking **a willow** in the Temple during *Sukkot*, **and** the obligation to perform **the water libation** during *Sukkot*, each of these is **a *halakha*** transmitted **to Moses from Sinai.** According to Rabbi Asi, the mitzva of the water libation is not derived from the same source as the wine libation, and it is possible that there will be differences in the *halakhot* that apply to them. ###### Zevachim 110b:7 [Zevachim 110b:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:7) תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַמְנַסֵּךְ שְׁלֹשֶׁת לוּגִּין מַיִם בֶּחָג בַּחוּץ – חַיָּיב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר (בְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן) אוֹמֵר: אִם מִלְּאָן לְשֵׁם חַג – חַיָּיב. **William Davidson Edition - English:** § **The Sages taught** in a *baraita*: **One who pours as a libation three *log* of water during the festival** of *Sukkot* **outside** the courtyard is **liable. Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Shimon, says: If he filled** a service vessel with the three *log* in order to consecrate **them for the sake of** the **Festival,** he is **liable.** ###### Zevachim 110b:8 [Zevachim 110b:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:8) מַאי בֵּינַיְיהוּ? אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק: בְּיֵשׁ שִׁיעוּר בְּמַיִם קָמִיפַּלְגִי. **William Davidson Edition - English:** The Gemara asks: **What** is the difference **between** these two opinions? **Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: They disagree with regard to** whether **there is** a precise **measure of water** that can be consecrated as a libation. The first *tanna* holds that even if one fills a service vessel with more than three *log*, the water is thereby consecrated. Therefore, if one then pours at least three *log* of that water outside the courtyard, he is liable. Rabbi Elazar holds that if one attempts to consecrate more than three *log*, the consecration of the water is ineffective. Therefore, if one then pours three *log* of that water as a libation outside the courtyard, he is not liable. ###### Zevachim 110b:9 [Zevachim 110b:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/110b:9) רַב פָּפָּא אָמַר: **William Davidson Edition - English:** **Rav Pappa said:**