## Zevachim Daf 43a

###### Zevachim 43a:1
[Zevachim 43a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:1)

וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֲנִים, וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֵן מָשִׁיחַ, וְהַדָּם, וְהַנְּסָכִים הַבָּאִין בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן. דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אַף הַבָּאִין עִם הַבְּהֵמָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**the meal offering of priests,** from which no handful of flour is removed and which is burned in its entirety (see Leviticus 6:16); **the meal offering of** the **anointed priest,** which is sacrificed by the High Priest each day, half in the morning and half in the evening; **the blood,** which permits all the offerings; **and the libations that are brought by themselves** as a separate offering and do not accompany an animal offering; this is **the statement of Rabbi Meir. And the Rabbis say:** The same *halakha* applies **even** with regard to libations **that are brought with an animal** offering.


###### Zevachim 43a:2
[Zevachim 43a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:2)

לוֹג שֶׁמֶן שֶׁל מְצוֹרָע – רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר: אֵין חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל, וְרַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר: חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל; שֶׁדַּם הָאָשָׁם מַתִּירוֹ, וְכׇל שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ מַתִּירִין בֵּין לָאָדָם בֵּין לַמִּזְבֵּחַ – חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
With regard to **the *log* of oil** that accompanies the guilt offering **of** a recovered **leper, Rabbi Shimon says: One is not liable for** consuming **it due to** violation of the prohibition of ***piggul*,** because it is not permitted by any other item. **And Rabbi Meir says: One is liable for** consuming **it due to** violation of the prohibition of ***piggul*, as the blood of the guilt offering** of the leper **permits its** use, as only after the blood’s sacrifice is the oil sprinkled and given to the priests. **And** the principle is: With regard to **any** item **that has permitting factors, either for** consumption by **a person or for** burning on **the altar, one is liable for** eating **it due to** violation of the prohibition of ***piggul*.**


###### Zevachim 43a:3
[Zevachim 43a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:3)

הָעוֹלָה – דָּמָהּ מַתִּיר אֶת בְּשָׂרָהּ לַמִּזְבֵּחַ וְעוֹרָהּ לַכֹּהֲנִים. עוֹלַת הָעוֹף – דָּמָהּ מַתִּיר אֶת בְּשָׂרָהּ לְמִזְבֵּחַ. חַטַּאת הָעוֹף – דָּמָהּ מַתִּיר אֶת בְּשָׂרָהּ לַכֹּהֲנִים. פָּרִים הַנִּשְׂרָפִים וּשְׂעִירִים הַנִּשְׂרָפִים – דָּמָן מַתִּיר אֶת אֵימוּרֵיהֶן לִיקָרֵב.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The mishna elaborates: **The burnt offering, its blood permits its flesh to** be burned on **the altar and its hide to** be used by **the priests. The bird burnt offering, its blood permits its flesh** and its skin **to** be burned on **the altar. The bird sin offering, its blood permits its meat for** consumption by **the priests. Bulls that are burned,** e.g., the bull for an unwitting communal sin, **and goats that are burned,** e.g., the goats sacrificed for an unwitting communal sin of idol worship, **their blood permits their sacrificial portions to be sacrificed** on the altar.


###### Zevachim 43a:4
[Zevachim 43a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:4)

רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר: כֹּל שֶׁאֵינוֹ עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ הַחִיצוֹן כִּשְׁלָמִים, אֵין חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rabbi Shimon says:** Those bulls and goats are not subject to *piggul* because their blood is presented in the Sanctuary, and in the case of **any** offering **whose** blood **is not** presented **on the external altar like** that of **a peace offering,** with regard to which the *halakha* of *piggul* was stated in the Torah, **one is not liable for** eating **it due to** violation of the prohibition of ***piggul*.**


###### Zevachim 43a:5
[Zevachim 43a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:5)

**גְּמָ׳** אָמַר עוּלָּא: קוֹמֶץ פִּיגּוּל שֶׁהֶעֱלוֹ עַל גַּבֵּי הַמִּזְבֵּחַ – פָּקַע פִּיגּוּלוֹ מִמֶּנּוּ; אִם אֲחֵרִים מֵבִיא לִידֵי פִּיגּוּל, הוּא עַצְמוֹ לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?! מַאי קָאָמַר? הָכִי קָאָמַר: אִם אֵינוֹ מִתְקַבֵּל, הֵיאַךְ מֵבִיא אֲחֵרִים לִידֵי פִּיגּוּל?

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** **Ulla says:** With regard to **a handful** of a meal offering that is ***piggul* that was offered up on the altar, its *piggul*** status **has left it.** His reasoning is as follows: **If** this handful **brings other** items **to** a status of ***piggul*,** with regard to **itself** is it **not all the more so?** The Gemara asks: **What is** Ulla **saying?** This consideration does not explain why the status of *piggul* should leave the handful. The Gemara answers that **this** is what **he is saying: If** the handful **is not accepted,** i.e., if its sacrifice is disqualified, **how can it bring other** items **to** a status of ***piggul*?** A meal offering is considered *piggul* only if its handful is properly sacrificed.


###### Zevachim 43a:6
[Zevachim 43a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:6)

מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן? אִי דְּאֵין חַיָּיבִין עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל – תְּנֵינָא, אֵלּוּ דְּבָרִים שֶׁאֵין חַיָּיבִין עֲלֵיהֶם מִשּׁוּם פִּיגּוּל: הַקּוֹמֶץ, וְהַקְּטֹרֶת, וְהַלְּבוֹנָה, וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֲנִים, וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֵן מָשִׁיחַ, וּמִנְחַת נְסָכִים, וְהַדָּם!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **What is** Ulla **teaching us? If** he is teaching us **that one is not liable for** eating the handful **due to** violation of the prohibition of ***piggul*, we learn** this in the mishna: **These are** the **items for which one is not liable due to *piggul*: The handful, the incense, the frankincense, the meal offering of priests, the meal offering of** the **anointed priest, the meal offering** brought with the **libations** that accompany animal offerings, **and the blood.** If so, one is not liable for eating the handful even if it was not offered up on the altar.


###### Zevachim 43a:7
[Zevachim 43a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:7)

אֶלָּא דְּאִם עָלוּ לֹא יֵרְדוּ – תְּנֵינָא: הַלָּן, וְהַיּוֹצֵא, וְהַטָּמֵא, וְשֶׁנִּשְׁחַט חוּץ לִזְמַנּוֹ וְחוּץ לִמְקוֹמוֹ – אִם עָלוּ לֹא יֵרְדוּ!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rather,** Ulla is teaching **that if** items with *piggul* status **ascended** the altar, **they shall not descend.** But this too, **we learn** in a mishna (84a): With regard to sacrificial flesh **that** is **left** overnight, **or that emerges** from the Temple courtyard, **or that is ritually impure, or** an offering **that was slaughtered** with the intention of eating the meat **beyond its** designated **time or outside its** designated **area,** thereby acquiring the status of *piggul*, **if** any one of these **ascended** the altar **they shall not descend.**


###### Zevachim 43a:8
[Zevachim 43a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:8)

וְאֶלָּא דְּאִם יֵרְדוּ יַעֲלוּ – הָא נָמֵי תְּנֵינָא: כְּשֵׁם שֶׁאִם עָלוּ לֹא יֵרְדוּ, כָּךְ אִם יֵרְדוּ לֹא יַעֲלוּ! לָא צְרִיכָא, שֶׁמָּשְׁלָה בָּהֶן הָאוּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Rather,** Ulla is teaching **that if** items with *piggul* status **descended** from the altar after having been brought up there, **they ascend** once again. But **we also learn** in that same mishna (84b) that **this** is not so: **Just as if they ascended** the altar, **they shall not descend, so** too, **if they descended** from the altar **they shall not ascend.** The Gemara answers: **No,** Ulla’s ruling is **necessary** in a case **where the fire has** already **taken hold of it,** i.e., the handful began to burn before it came down from the altar. Ulla teaches that in such a case the priests should return the handful to the altar, as its *piggul* status has already left it.


###### Zevachim 43a:9
[Zevachim 43a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/43a:9)

הָא נָמֵי אַמְרַהּ עוּלָּא חֲדָא זִימְנָא, דְּאָמַר עוּלָּא: לֹא שָׁנוּ אֶלָּא שֶׁלֹּא מָשְׁלָה בָּהֶן הָאוּר, אֲבָל מָשְׁלָה בָּהֶן הָאוּר – יַעֲלוּ!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara raises a difficulty: But **this** *halakha* **too, Ulla** already **said it** on **another occasion. As Ulla says:** The mishna **taught** that items that descended from the altar shall not ascend again **only where the fire has not taken hold of them, but where the fire has** already **taken hold of them, they shall ascend.** The Gemara explains: Even so, there is a novelty in Ulla’s ruling: **Lest you say** that **this matter** applies only