## Zevachim Daf 92a

###### Zevachim 92a:1
[Zevachim 92a:1](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:1)

אֲבָל לֹא גַּחֶלֶת שֶׁל עֵץ. וְאִי סָלְקָא דַעְתָּךְ כְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן סְבִירָא לֵיהּ, אֲפִילּוּ גַּחֶלֶת שֶׁל עֵץ נָמֵי!

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**but** one may **not** extinguish **a wood coal,** because extinguishing it is prohibited by Torah law? **And if it enters your mind** that Shmuel **holds in accordance with** the opinion of **Rabbi Shimon,** it should be permitted to extinguish **even a wood coal.** Rabbi Shimon maintains that extinguishing a coal is prohibited by Torah law only when one intends to use the extinguished coal. Otherwise, this constitutes a labor performed on Shabbat which is not necessary for its own sake, which is not prohibited by Torah law.


###### Zevachim 92a:2
[Zevachim 92a:2](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:2)

בְּדָבָר שֶׁאֵין מִתְכַּוֵּין – סָבַר לַהּ כְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן, בִּמְלָאכָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ צְרִיכָה לְגוּפָהּ – סָבַר לַהּ כְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara answers: Shmuel’s statements are not contradictory, as **with regard to an unintentional act,** he **holds in accordance with** the opinion of **Rabbi Shimon.** But **with regard to labor not necessary for its own sake, he holds** that it is prohibited by Torah law, **in accordance with** the opinion of **Rabbi Yehuda.**


###### Zevachim 92a:3
[Zevachim 92a:3](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:3)

אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: נְסָכִים שֶׁנִּטְמְאוּ – עוֹשֶׂה לָהֶן מַעֲרָכָה בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן וְשׂוֹרְפָן, מִשּׁוּם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״בַּקֹּדֶשׁ בָּאֵשׁ תִּשָּׂרֵף״. תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: הַדָּם וְהַשֶּׁמֶן וְהַמְּנָחוֹת וְהַנְּסָכִים שֶׁנִּטְמְאוּ – עוֹשֶׂה לָהֶן מַעֲרָכָה בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן וְשׂוֹרְפָן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
§ **Rav Huna says:** With regard to wine **libations that became ritually impure, one prepares for them an arrangement** of wood **by themselves and burns them** there, without removing them from the Temple courtyard. This is **due to** the fact **that it is stated** with regard to a disqualified sin offering: **“In the sacred place…it shall be burned with fire”** (Leviticus 6:23). This requirement of burning in the sacred place applies to all offerings that are meant to be sacrificed on an altar and became disqualified. **This is also taught** in a *baraita*: With regard to **the blood, the oil, the meal offerings, and the libations that became ritually impure, one prepares for them an arrangement** of wood **by themselves and burns them** there.


###### Zevachim 92a:4
[Zevachim 92a:4](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:4)

אֲמַר לֵיהּ שְׁמוּאֵל לְרַב חָנָא בַּגְדָּתָאָה: אַיְיתִי לִי בֵּי עַשְׂרָה, וְאֵימָא לָךְ קַמַּיְיהוּ: נְסָכִים שֶׁנִּטְמְאוּ, עוֹשֶׂה לָהֶן מַעֲרָכָה בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָן וְשׂוֹרְפָן.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara relates: **Shmuel said to Rav Ḥana of Baghdad: Bring me an assembly of ten** men **and I will tell you in their presence** this *halakha* that I wish to disseminate: With regard to **libations that became ritually impure, one prepares for them an arrangement** of wood **by themselves and burns them** there.


###### Zevachim 92a:5
[Zevachim 92a:5](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:5)

**הֲדַרַן עֲלָךְ כׇּל הַתָּדִיר**


###### Zevachim 92a:6
[Zevachim 92a:6](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:6)

מַתְנִי׳ **דַּם חַטָּאת** שֶׁנִּתַּז עַל הַבֶּגֶד – הֲרֵי זֶה טָעוּן כִּיבּוּס, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר אֶלָּא בְּנֶאֱכָלוֹת – שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״בְּמָקוֹם קָדוֹשׁ תֵּאָכֵל״. אֶחָד הַנֶּאֱכָלוֹת וְאֶחָד הַפְּנִימִיּוֹת טְעוּנוֹת כִּיבּוּס, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״תּוֹרַת הַחַטָּאת״ – תּוֹרָה אַחַת לְכׇל הַחַטָּאוֹת.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**MISHNA:** In the case of **the blood of a sin offering** designated for presentation **that was sprayed on a garment, that** garment **requires laundering,** as is stated with regard to a sin offering: “And when any of its blood shall be sprinkled on a garment, you shall launder that on which it shall be sprinkled in a sacred place” (Leviticus 6:20). **Although the verse is speaking only of** sin offerings **that are eaten** and whose blood is presented on the outer altar, **as it is stated: “In a sacred place shall it be eaten”** (Leviticus 6:19), the principle is not exclusive to eaten sin offerings. With regard to the blood of **both** the sin offerings **that are eaten and the** sin offerings that are wholly burned and not eaten and whose blood is presented on the **inner** altar, garments sprayed with blood from each of these offerings **require laundering. As it is stated** at the start of that passage: “This is **the law of the sin offering”** (Leviticus 6:18), it is understood: There is **one law for all the sin offerings.**


###### Zevachim 92a:7
[Zevachim 92a:7](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:7)

חַטָּאת פְּסוּלָה – אֵין דָּמָהּ טָעוּן כִּיבּוּס, בֵּין שֶׁהָיְתָה לָהּ שְׁעַת הַכּוֹשֶׁר וּבֵין שֶׁלֹּא הָיְתָה לָהּ שְׁעַת הַכּוֹשֶׁר. אֵיזוֹ הִיא שֶׁהָיְתָה לָהּ שְׁעַת הַכּוֹשֶׁר? שֶׁלָּנָה, וְשֶׁנִּטְמְאָה, וְשֶׁיָּצָאת. וְאֵיזוֹ הִיא שֶׁלֹּא הָיְתָה לָהּ שְׁעַת הַכּוֹשֶׁר? שֶׁנִּשְׁחֲטָה חוּץ לִזְמַנָּהּ וְחוּץ לִמְקוֹמָהּ, וְשֶׁקִּיבְּלוּ פְּסוּלִין (וְזָרְקוּ) אֶת דָּמָהּ.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
That is the *halakha* with regard to sin offerings fit for sacrifice. With regard to **a disqualified sin offering, its blood does not** cause a garment to **require laundering whether** the offering **had a period of fitness** when its blood was fit for presentation **or whether it did not have a period of fitness. Which** offering **is** the disqualified sin offering **that had a period of fitness?** It is one **that was left overnight** and then became disqualified; **or** it is one **that became ritually impure; or** it is one **that emerged** from the Temple courtyard. **Which** offering **is** the disqualified sin offering **that did not have a period of fitness?** It is one **that was slaughtered** with the intent to eat it or present its blood **beyond its** designated **time or outside its** designated **area; or** it is one whose blood was **collected** by people **disqualified** for Temple service **and** they **sprinkled its blood.**


###### Zevachim 92a:8
[Zevachim 92a:8](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:8)

**גְּמָ׳** דַּם חַטָּאת (שֶׁמֵּתָה) [שֶׁנִּתַּז] כּוּ׳. וְאִי תּוֹרָה אַחַת לְכׇל חַטָּאוֹת, אֲפִילּוּ חַטַּאת הָעוֹף נָמֵי! אַלְּמָה תַּנְיָא: יָכוֹל תְּהֵא דַּם חַטַּאת הָעוֹף טָעוּן כִּיבּוּס? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״זֹאת״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**GEMARA:** The mishna teaches: In the case of **the blood of a sin offering that was sprayed** on a garment, the garment must be laundered, and this is the *halakha* concerning the blood of sin offerings that are eaten and sin offerings that are wholly burned, as it is stated: “This is the law of the sin offering”; there is one law for all sin offerings. The Gemara asks: **And if** there is **one law for all sin offerings, even** the blood of **a bird sin offering** should **also** require laundering. If so, **why is it taught** in a *baraita*: One **might** have thought that the **blood of a bird sin offering requires laundering.** To counter this, **the verse states: “This** is the law of the sin offering.” The word “this” teaches that the *halakha* is to be restricted to the blood of an animal sin offering and it does not apply to the bird sin offering.


###### Zevachim 92a:9
[Zevachim 92a:9](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:9)

אָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ מִשּׁוּם בַּר קַפָּרָא, אָמַר קְרָא: ״תִּשָּׁחֵט״ – בְּנִשְׁחָטוֹת הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
**Reish Lakish said in the name of bar Kappara: The verse states:** “This is the law of the sin offering…**shall** the sin offering **be slaughtered”** (Leviticus 6:18). **The verse is speaking** specifically **of** sin offerings **that are slaughtered** and not of bird offerings, which are killed by pinching the nape of the neck, rather than slaughtering with a knife.


###### Zevachim 92a:10
[Zevachim 92a:10](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:10)

וְאֵימָא בְּנֶאֱכָלוֹת הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר – כְּדִכְתִיב: ״בְּמָקוֹם קָדוֹשׁ תֵּאָכֵל״, אֲבָל פְּנִימִיּוֹת לָא! רַבִּי רַחֲמָנָא ״תּוֹרַת״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara challenges: **And I** might **say** that the *halakha* is to be learned in another manner, and **the verse is speaking** specifically **of** sin offerings **that are eaten, as it is written: “In a sacred place shall it be eaten”** (Leviticus 6:19); **but internal** sin offerings, which are not eaten, should **not** be included. The Gemara explains: **The Merciful One amplifies** the *halakha* by stating: “This is **the law of** the sin offering,” which includes all sin offerings, even those that are not eaten.


###### Zevachim 92a:11
[Zevachim 92a:11](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:11)

אִי הָכִי, אֲפִילּוּ חַטַּאת הָעוֹף נָמֵי! מִיעֵט רַחֲמָנָא ״זֹאת״.

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara suggests: **If so,** then **even** the blood of **the bird sin offering** should be included. The Gemara explains: **The Merciful One restricts** the *halakha* by stating: **“This** is the law,” which excludes bird offerings.


###### Zevachim 92a:12
[Zevachim 92a:12](https://torahapp.org/share/book/Zevachim/r/92a:12)

וּמָה רָאִיתָ? מִסְתַּבְּרָא דְּחַטַּאת [בְּהֵמָה] פְּנִימִיּוֹת הֲוָה לֵיהּ לְרַבּוֹיֵי – שֶׁכֵּן בְּהֵמָה, שְׁחִיטַת צָפוֹן, וְקַבָּלַת כְּלִי,

**William Davidson Edition - English:**
The Gemara asks: **And what did you see** that indicated that the verse is to be understood as including internal sin offerings and excluding bird offerings, and not the opposite? The Gemara answers: **It stands to reason that internal animal sin offerings should have been included** by the inclusive language of the verse, **as** internal sin offerings resemble eaten animal sin offerings in several ways: Each variety is a large **animal** and not a bird; each variety is subject to **slaughter on the north** side of the Temple courtyard; **and** the blood of each requires **collection** in **a vessel;**