Text

Bartenura on Mishnah Tevul Yom Chapter 2

Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.

מַשְׁקֵה טְבוּל יוֹם. כְּגוֹן רֻקּוֹ, מֵימֵי רַגְלָיו, דִּמְעוֹת עֵינוֹ, וְדַם מַגַּפְתוֹ, וַחֲלֵב הָאִשָּׁה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

משקה טבול יום – the liquids which exude from the person who immersed himself that day) – as for example, his spittle, his urine, the tears of his eyes and the blood from his wounds, and the milk of a woman.

כְּמַשְׁקִים שֶׁהוּא נוֹגֵעַ בָּהֶן. כְּמַשְׁקִים שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה שֶׁהוּא נוֹגֵעַ בָּהֶן. דִּטְבוּל יוֹם פּוֹסֵל בַּתְּרוּמָה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

כמשקים שהוא נוגע בהן – like liquids of priest’s due/heave-offering that he touches/comes in contact with, for a person who has immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom invalidates heave-offering/priest’s due.

אֵלּוּ וָאֵלּוּ. מַשְׁקִים הַיּוֹצְאִים מִגּוּפוֹ וּמַשְׁקֵה תְּרוּמָה שֶׁנָּגַע בָּהֶן, אֵין מְטַמְּאִין אֶת הַקֹּדֶשׁ, אֲבָל מִיפְסָל פָּסֵיל לֵיהּ:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אלו ואלו – liquids which exude from his body and liquid heave-offering do not defile the Holy Things/make the susceptible to uncleanness , but they invalidate it (see Tractate Parah, Chapter 8, MIshnah 7).

בֵּין קַלִּין בֵּין חֲמוּרִין. קַלִּין שֶׁרֶץ, חֲמוּרִין זָב:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

בין קלין בין חמורין (whether minor or major) – minor are unclean reptiles; major are people with gonorrhea/flux (see also Tractate Hullin, folio 88a).

תְּחִלָּה. רִאשׁוֹן, וְעוֹשִׂין שֵׁנִי, וְהַשֵּׁנִי עוֹשֶׂה שְׁלִישִׁי:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

תחילה – first remove/degree of uncleanness and it makes [other things] second [degree of ritual uncleanness] and the second [degree of ritual uncleanness] makes [other things] third [degree of ritual uncleanness.

חוּץ מִן הַמַּשְׁקֶה שֶׁהוּא אַב הַטֻּמְאָה. כְּגוֹן זוֹבוֹ שֶׁל זָב וּמַעְיְנוֹתָיו:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

חוץ מן המשקה שהוא אב הטומאה – as for example the flux of a person with gonorrhea and his digestive organs/bowels.

הַמַּשְׁקִים פְּסוּלִים. דִּטְבוּל יוֹם פּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה בִּלְבַד, וְטַמּוֹיֵי לֹא מְטַמֵּא וַאֲפִלּוּ מַשְׁקִין, דְּכָל הַפּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה מְטַמֵּא מַשְׁקִין לִהְיוֹת תְּחִלָּה חוּץ מִן הַטְּבוּל יוֹם. הִלְכָּךְ, הַקְּדֵרָה טְהוֹרָה, דְּמַשְׁקִין שֶׁנָּגְעוּ בִּטְבוּל יוֹם אֲפִלּוּ אֳכָלִים לֹא מְטַמְּאֵי, וְכָל שֶׁכֵּן כֵּלִים:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

המשקים פסולים – that a person who has immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom invalidates the heave-offering/priest’s due alone, but he does not make it susceptible to ritual defilement, and even liquids, for all that invalidates the heave-offering/priest’s due defiles liquids to be first [degree of ritual uncleanness] except for the person who has immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom. Therefore, the cooking pot is ritually pure, for the liquids that touched/came in contact with the Tevul Yom, even foods do not defile, and all the more so, vessels/utensils,

וְאִם הָיָה מַשְׁקֵה חֻלִּין הַכֹּל טָהוֹר. דִּטְבוּל יוֹם טָהוֹר לְחֻלִּין וּלְמַעֲשֵׂר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

but if the liquid was non-consecrated, everything is ritually pure, for a person who has immersed himself that day is pure for non-consecrated produce and for tithes.

וְאִם הָיוּ יָדָיו מְסֹאָבוֹת הַכֹּל טָמֵא. דְּיָדַיִם פּוֹסְלוֹת אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה, וּכְשֶׁנִּטְמְאוּ הַמַּשְׁקִים מֵחֲמַת יָדַיִם חָזְרוּ לִהְיוֹת תְּחִלָּה וּמְטַמְּאִין כֵּלִים:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ואם היו ידיו מסואבות הכל טמא (but if his hands were dirty/unwashed, everything is ritually impure) – for hands make the heave-offering/priest’s due unfit, and when the liquids were ritually defiled on account of the [dirty] hands, they returned to be first [degree of ritual uncleanness] and defile vessels.

שֶׁסְּפֵק טְבוּל יוֹם פּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה. כְּגוֹן שְׁתֵּי כִּכָּרוֹת לְפָנָיו, סָפֵק נָגַע סָפֵק לֹא נָגַע, בִּכְהַאי גַוְנָא בַּיָּדַיִם טָהוֹר, וּבִטְבוּל יוֹם פָּסוּל:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

שספק טבול יום פוסל את התרומה – as for example two loaves before him, it is doubtful whether he came in contact with it/touched it or did not come in contact with it/touched it, that in that manner with ritually pure hands, but a person who had immersed himself that day invalidated them/made them unfit.

הַמִּקְפָּה. תַּבְשִׁיל קָפוּי וְעָב. כְּגוֹן דַּיְסָא אוֹ גְּרִיסִין שֶׁל פּוֹל:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

המקפה (a stiff mass of grist, oil and onions, porridge) – a cooked dish that is congealed and thick, as for example, cereal/a dish of pounded grain/grit or pounded beans.

וְהַשּׁוּם וְהַשֶּׁמֶן. נְתוּנִים בּוֹ לְתַבְלִין:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

והשום והשמן – that are placed on it as a spice (i.e., for flavor).

נָגַע טְבוּל יוֹם בְּמִקְצָתָן פָּסַל אֶת כֻּלָּם. דְּמִקְפָּה עִקָּר, וּטְבוּל יוֹם פּוֹסֵל בַּתְּרוּמָה. וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא נָגַע אֶלָּא בַּשּׁוּם שֶׁל חֻלִּין, חָשׁוּב חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

נגע טבול יום במקצתן פסל את כולם – for the essence is the stiff mass of grist, and a person who has immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom invalidates/makes unfit the priest’s due/heave offering. But even though he didn’t touch/come in contact with other than with the unconsecrated garlic, it is considered a junction/connection.

וְאִם הָיָה הַשּׁוּם מְרֻבֶּה. יוֹתֵר מִן הַמִּקְפָּה שֶׁל חֻלִּין:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ואם היה השום מרובה (but if the garlic was the greater part) – more than the unconsecrated porridge/stiff mass of grist.

הוֹלְכִין אַחַר הַמְרֻבֶּה. וְדִין הַכֹּל כְּדִין תְּרוּמָה. וְאִם נָגַע בְּמִקְצָתָם, פָּסַל אֶת הַכֹּל:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

הולכין אחר המרובה – and law of everything is like the law regarding heave-offering/priest’s due, but if he touched part of them, he invalidated/made unfit everything.

אֵימָתַי. כְּלוֹמַר בַּמֶּה אָמַרְנוּ אִם הָיָה הַשּׁוּם מְרֻבֶּה וְנָגַע בַּמִּקְצָת הוּא פּוֹסֵל אֶת הַכֹּל, בִּזְמַן שֶׁהַשּׁוּם מְכֻנָּס בַּקְּעָרָה, וְהוּא גּוּף אֶחָד כְּמִין גּוּשׁ עָפָר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אימתי – meaning to say, with that which we said if the garlic was the greater part and he (i.e., the Tevul Yom) touched part of it, he invalidates/makes unfit all of it, at the time that the garlic is collected/gathered in the dish, and it is one body, like a kind of a handful/clump of earth.

אֲבָל אִם הָיָה מְפֻזָּר בַּמְּדוֹכָה. שֶׁחֲלָקָיו מְפֹרָדִים זֶה מִזֶּה בְּתוֹךְ הַמְּדוֹכָה, וְנָגַע בּוֹ טְבוּל יוֹם, אָז טָהוֹר, כְּלוֹמַר לֹא פָּסַל אֶלָּא מְקוֹם מַגָּעוֹ בִּלְבַד, שֶׁכֵּיוָן שֶׁהוּא מִתְכַּוֵּן בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁכּוֹתֵשׁ לְהַפְרִיד חֲלָקָיו, לֹא חָשׁוּב חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אבל אם היה מפוזר במדוכה (but if it - the garlic – was scattered in the mortar) – that its parts were separated from each other within the mortar, and a person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom had touched it is then ritually pure, meaning to say, he did not invalidate it other than the place/point of his contact, for since he intended at the time that he is crushing/pounding to separate its parts, it is not considered a junction/connection.

וּשְׁאָר כָּל הַנִּדּוֹכִין שֶׁדָּכָן בְּמַשְׁקִין. כְּמוֹ שֶׁעוֹשִׂין לַחִטִּין, כְּשֶׁדָּכִין אוֹתָן בִּמְדוֹכָה מְזַלְּפִים עֲלֵיהֶם מַיִם:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ושאר כל הנידוכין שדכן במקשין (and the rest of the things that are crushed in liquids) – like they do with wheat, when they crush them in a mortar, they pour/sprinkle water over them.

אוֹ דְבָרִים שֶׁדַּרְכָּן לָדוּךְ בְּמַשְׁקִין. וְדָכָן שֶׁלֹּא בְמַשְׁקִין וְהֵן גּוּשׁ בַּקְּעָרָה, הֲרֵי הֵן כְּעִגּוּלֵי דְבֵלָה. דְּאִם נָגַע טְבוּל יוֹם בְּמִקְצָתָן, לֹא פָּסַל אֶת כֻּלָּן. כָּךְ מָצָאתִי בְּפֵרוּשׁ רַבּוֹתַי. וְרַמְבַּ"ם מְפָרֵשׁ, וּשְׁאָר כָּל הַנִּדּוֹכִין שֶׁדָּכָן בְּמַשְׁקִין [כְּלוֹמַר, וְכֵן שְׁאָר כָּל הַנִּדּוֹכִים שֶׁדָּכָן בְּמַשְׁקִין], דִּינָם כַּשּׁוּם, שֶׁאִם נָגַע טְבוּל יוֹם בְּמִקְצָתוֹ כְּשֶׁכּוֹתֵשׁ אוֹתוֹ [בַּמְּדוֹכָה], לֹא פָּסַל אֶלָּא מְקוֹם מַגָּעוֹ, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא רוֹצֶה בְּפִזּוּרוֹ. וְאִם נָגַע בּוֹ כְּשֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה גּוּשׁ בַּקְּעָרָה, הָוֵי חִבּוּר, וּכְשֶׁנָּגַע בְּמִקְצָת פָּסַל אֶת הַכֹּל:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

או דברים שדרכן לדוך במשקין ודכן שלא במשקין והן גוש בקערה הרי הן בעיגולי דבילה – that if a person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom had touched part of them, he did not invalidate all of them. Such is what I found in the commentary/explanation of my Rabbis/teachers. But Maimonides explains [the phrase]: "ושאר כל הנדוכים שדכן במשקין"/”And [so is the rule in the case of] all other things which one crushed, which one crushed together with liquids,” their law is like that of garlic. That if a person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom had touched part of what he pounds, he only made unfit/invalid the place of his contact, because the scattering (of the garlic in the mortar) is welcome to him. But if he did not touch it when it became a clod/clump in the bowl, it is connection/junction, and when he touched part of it, he invalidated/made unfit everything.

אֲבָל אֶת שֶׁדַּרְכָּן לָדוּךְ בְּמַשְׁקִין. גָּרְסִינַן לְפִי פֵּרוּשׁ רַמְבַּ"ם:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אבל את שדרכן לדוך במשקין – we have this reading according to the explanation of Maimonides.

וְדָכָן שֶׁלֹּא בְמַשְׁקִין. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁשָּׂם אוֹתוֹ גּוּשׁ בַּקְּעָרָה, הֲרֵי הֵן כְּעִגּוּלֵי דְּבֵלָה, דְּאָמְרִינַן דְּכִי נָגַע בְּמִקְצָתוֹ לֹא נִטְמְאוּ כֻּלָּן, בְּרֵישׁ פֶּרֶק ב'‏ דִּתְרוּמוֹת:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ודכן שלא במשקין – even though that he placed that lump/clod in the bowl, they are like cakes of pressed fig, that we stated that when he touched a part of it, all of them were not ritually defiled, in the beginning of the second chapter of [Tractate] Terumot (Mishnah 1).

הַמִּקְפָּה וְהַחֲמִיטָה. דַּרְכָּן הָיָה לְהַנִּיחַ הַחֲמִיטָה, שֶׁהִיא עֻגָּה דַּקָּה כְּמִין רָקִיק, בְּתוֹךְ הַמִּקְפָּה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

המקפה והחמיטה (the porridge and the batter of which flat cakes are made) – it was their manner to place the batter of which flat cakes are made, which is a thin cake like a kind of wafer, within the porridge.

חִבֵּץ. הַיְנוּ שֶׁעֵרֵב הַמִּקְפָּה וְהַחֲמִיטָה עִם הַשֶּׁמֶן, וּמִכָּל מָקוֹם הַשֶּׁמֶן נִכָּר. וְהָא דְּפָסֵיל בְּכָל מָקוֹם שֶׁהִלֵּךְ הַשֶּׁמֶן, לְפִי שֶׁאֵין יְכוֹלִין לְהַפְרִידוֹ מִן הַמִּקְפָּה וּמִן הַחֲמִיטָה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

חיבץ (he – the unclean person- stirred) – that is that he mixed/combined the porridge and the batter of which flat cakes are made with the oil, but anyway, the oil is recognized. And surely it invalidates in every place that the oil goes, because it is impossible to separate it from the porridge and from the batter of which flat cakes are made.

בְּשַׂר הַקֹּדֶשׁ שֶׁקָּרַם עָלָיו הַקִּפָּה. קָפְאוּ עָלָיו הַתַּבְלִין וְהַמָּרָק וְשֻׁמַּן הַבָּשָׂר, שֶׁנִּמּוֹחַ וְנַעֲשָׂה הַכֹּל כְּמִין קְרוּם:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

בשר הקודש שקרם עליו הקיפה (sacred flesh on the top of which a layer of jelly was formed – as a crust) – the spices and the soup and the fat of the meat congealed upon it, that it was softened and everything became like a kind of crust.

הַחֲתִיכוֹת מֻתָּרוֹת. דְּלֹא הָוֵי הַקְּרוּם חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

החתיכות מותרות – for the crust is not a connection/junction.

וְכָל הָעוֹלִים עִמָּהּ. חֲשִׁיב מְחֻבָּר לָהּ. וְהַשְּׁאָר טָהוֹר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

וכל העולים עימה – is considered connected to it, but the rest is ritually pure.

שְׁנֵיהֶם חִבּוּר. וּבֵין שֶׁנָּגַע בַּקִּפָּה בֵּין שֶׁנָּגַע בַּחֲתִיכוֹת, פָּסַל הַכֹּל. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן נוּרִי:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

שניהם חיבור – and whether he touched the jelly or whether he touched the pieces [of meat], he has invalidated everything. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yohanan ben Nuri.

עַל גַּבֵּי פְרוּסוֹת. שֶׁל לֶחֶם שֶׁמַּנִּיחִין עַל הַקִּטְנִיּוֹת:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ווכן בקטניות (and so in the case of pulse) – of bread that we place on the pulse.

מַעֲשֵׂה קְדֵרָה בַקִּטְנִיּוֹת. כְּלוֹמַר, קִטְנִיּוֹת שֶׁנִּתְבַּשְּׁלוּ בִּקְדֵרָה וְדַרְכָּן לְהִתְבַּקֵּעַ, וּכְשֶׁמִּתְבַּשְּׁלוֹת יָפֶה מִתְחַבְּרוֹת וְנַעֲשׂוֹת כְּמִין גּוּשׁ. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁגּוֹרְסִין, מַעֲשֵׂה קְדֵרָה וְקִטְנִיּוֹת:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

מעשה קדרה בקטניות (that which is cooked in the cooking pot and pulse) – that is to say, pulse that was cooked in a cooking pot, and it is their manner to be split/burst apart. And when they cook well, they attach/connect and become a kind of lump/clod. And there are those who have the reading (instead of "מעשה קדרה בקטניות" /”that which is cooked in the cooking pot in pulse,” [the reading}: "מעשה קדירה וקטניות"/”that which is cooked in the cooking pot and pulse.

הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ יִמָּנוּ. אִם נָגַע שֶׁרֶץ בְּאֶחָד מֵהֶן, הֲרֵי הוּא רִאשׁוֹן. וְהַגּוּשׁ הַסָּמוּךְ לוֹ שֵׁנִי, וְהָאַחֵר הַסָּמוּךְ לַשֵּׁנִי שְׁלִישִׁי בַּתְּרוּמָה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

הרי אלו ימנו (lo, they are counted – if there are many masses of pulse) – if the unclean reptile touched one of them, it is first [degree of ritual uncleanness], and the clod/lump that is adjacent to it is second [degree of ritual uncleanness], and the other that is adjacent/next to the second [degree of ritual uncleanness] is third-degree uncleanness of heave-offering/priest’s due.

שְׁנֵיהֶן חִבּוּר זֶה לָזֶה. וְאִם נָגַע טְבוּל יוֹם בְּאֶחָד מֵהֶן, נִפְסַל חֲבֵרוֹ. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן נוּרִי:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

שניהן חיבור זה לזה – but if the person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom touched one of them, its neighbor is invalidated. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yohanan ben Nuri.

חָבִית שֶׁשָּׁקְעָה. חָבִית שֶׁל יַיִן שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה שֶׁנָּפְלָה לְתוֹךְ הַבּוֹר, וְשָׁקְעָה בְּתוֹךְ הַיַּיִן שֶׁבַּבּוֹר, וְהַיַּיִן שֶׁבַּבּוֹר חֻלִּין, וְצָף לְמַעְלָה עַל פִּי הֶחָבִית:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

חבית ששקעה (a jar which sunk) – a wine jug of heave-offering/priest’s due that fell into a cistern and sunk into the wine that is in cistern, and the wine that is in the cistern is unconsecrated and floats above on the top of the cistern. And he (i.e., the person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom) touched/came in contact with it, etc. If he let down his hand into the mouth of the cistern...

וְנָגַע וְכוּ'. אִם שִׁלְשֵׁל יָדוֹ לְתוֹךְ פִּי הֶחָבִית מִן הַשָּׂפָה וְלִפְנִים הֲרֵי זֶה חִבּוּר, וְנִפְסַל כָּל הַיַּיִן שֶׁבֶּחָבִית, וַאֲפִלּוּ לֹא הָיְתָה הֶחָבִית מִתְּחִלָּתָהּ מְלֵאָה לְגַמְרֵי מִן הַיַּיִן שֶׁל תְּרוּמָה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

מן השפה ולפנים הרי זה חיבור (from the rim and inward it is deemed connected) – and all the wine that is in the wine jug is invalidated, and even if the wine jug from the outset was not completely full from the wine of heave-offering/priest’s due.

מִן הַשָּׂפָה וְלַחוּץ. שֶׁלֹּא הִכְנִיס יָדוֹ לְתוֹךְ פִּי הֶחָבִית, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁנָּגַע בַּיַּיִן שֶׁל בּוֹר שֶׁכְּנֶגֶד פִּי הֶחָבִית, אֲפִלּוּ הָכִי אֵינוֹ חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

מן השפה ולחוץ – that he didn’t put his hand into the mouth of the wine jus, even though he touched the wine of the cistern that is opposite the mouth of the wine jug, nevertheless if is not connected.

אֲפִלּוּ עַל גַּבָּהּ רוּם קוֹמָה. שֶׁעָלָה יַיִן שֶׁבַּבּוֹר עַל פְּנֵי הֶחָבִית רוּם קוֹמַת אָדָם, אִם נָגַע כְּנֶגֶד פִּיהָ הָוֵי חִבּוּר. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן נוּרִי:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אפילו על גבי רום קומה (even if [the level of the wine in the cistern] was a man’s height [above the sunken jar]) – that the wine that was in the cistern ascended on the face of the jug to the height of a person, if he touched corresponding to its mouth, it is connection. But the Halakha Is not according to Rabbi Yohanan ben Nuri.

מִפִּיהָ וּמִשּׁוּלֶיהָ טְמֵאָה. מִפִּיהָ טְמֵאָה, הוֹאִיל וְכָל הַיַּיִן שֶׁלְּמַטָּה נַעֲשָׂה בָּסִיס לָעֶלְיוֹן, הָוֵי חִבּוּר. וּמִשּׁוּלֶיהָ נַמִּי, הוֹאִיל וְכָל הַיַּיִן נִמְשָׁךְ אַחַר הַנֶּקֶב, הָוֵי חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

מפיה ומשוליה טמאה (whether at its rim or from its bottom) – from its mouth, it is ritually impure, for since all the wine that is below becomes the base for the upper part, it is a connection. And from its bottom also, since all the wine is conducted after the incision, it is a connection.

אֲבָל נִקְּבָה מִצִּדָּהּ מִכָּאן וּמִכָּאן טְהוֹרָה. וְאֵין פָּסוּל אֶלָּא מַה שֶּׁנָּגַע, וְיַעֲלֶה בְּאֶחָד וּמֵאָה. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

אבל נקבה מצדה מכאן ומכאן טהורה - and there is no invalidation/other than what he touched, and it is neutralized in one and one-hundred. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yehuda.

וְנָגַע טְבוּל יוֹם בַּקִּלּוּחַ. הַקִּלּוּחַ לְבַד נִפְסָל, דְּנִצּוֹק אֵינוֹ חִבּוּר, וְהַוְיָא לַהּ תְּרוּמָה טְמֵאָה שֶׁנִּתְעָרְבָה בִּטְהוֹרָה, וְתַעֲלֶה בְּאֶחָד וּמֵאָה, כִּתְרוּמָה בְּחֻלִּין. וּבְהָא אֲפִלּוּ רַבָּנָן מוֹדוּ, דְּקִלּוּחַ לָא חֲשִׁיב חִבּוּר לַכֵּלִים כְּמוֹ הַנֶּקֶב שֶׁבְּצִדָּהּ לֶחָבִית. וְאַף עַל גַּב דְּמַשְׁקִין אֵין לָהֶם טָהֳרָה מִטֻּמְאָתָן, הַיְנוּ דְּלֹא סָלְקָא לְהוּ הַשָּׁקָה בְּמִקְוֶה כְּמוֹ לְמַיִם, אֲבָל מִטַּעַם בִּטּוּל, בְּטֵלִים הֵם בְּאֶחָד וּמֵאָה. וְדַוְקָא בְּמַגַּע טְבוּל יוֹם בְּטֵלִים הַמַּשְׁקִין, מִשּׁוּם דִּטְבוּל יוֹם פּוֹסֵל וְאֵינוֹ מְטַמֵּא. אֲבָל בִּשְׁאָר טֻמְאוֹת, קָא הֲדַר מַה שֶּׁבַּקִּלּוּחַ וּמְטַמֵּא כָּל מַה שֶּׁבַּכְּלִי בְּמַגָּע:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

ונגע טבול יום בקילוח (and the person who had immersed himself that day touched the continuous flow/jet) – the continuous flow/jet alone is in validated, for the uninterrupted flow of liquid poured from vessel to vessel is not considered a connection (of the two liquids) -either for communicating uncleanness or for producing cleanness (see Tractate Taharot, Chapter 8, Mishnah 9), it is like impure priest’s due/heave offering that was mixed with pure, and is neutralized in one and one-hundred, like heave-offering/priest’s due with non-consecrated produce. And in this, even the Rabbis admit that a continuous flow/jet is not considered a connection to vessels, like the incision that is on the side of the jug/jar. And even though the liquids have no purification from their defilement, that is that it is not removed through dipping of a vessel, filled with unclean liquid, so as to make its surface level with the surface of the water into which it is dipped in a Mikveh like that for water, but for the reason of nullification, they are nullified with one in one-hundred. And specifically, when the person who had immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom had contact, the liquids are invalidated, because the person who has immersed himself that day/Tevul Yom does not defile. But with the rest of the defilements, he restores what is in the uninterrupted jet, he defiles everything that is in the vessel through contact.

בִּעְבּוּעַ שֶׁבֶּחָבִית. כְּשֶׁמְּצָרְפִין כְּלֵי חֶרֶס בְּכִבְשָׁן יוֹצְאִין בְּדָפְנוֹתֵיהֶן כְּמִין אֲבַעְבּוּעוֹת, שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהֶן שְׁתֵּי דְּפָנוֹת, אַחַת לְצַד פְּנִים שֶׁל חָבִית וְאַחַת לְצַד חוּץ, וְחָלוּל בָּאֶמְצַע, וּפְעָמִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בְּאוֹתוֹ בִּעְבּוּעַ שְׁתֵּי נְקָבִים, אֶחָד בְּדֹפֶן הַבִּעְבּוּעַ שֶׁל צַד פְּנִים שֶׁהוּא לְצַד חֲלַל הֶחָבִית, וְאֶחָד בַּדֹּפֶן שֶׁל צַד חוּץ, וּכְשֶׁהֶחָבִית מְלֵאָה מַשְׁקִים, נִכְנָס הַמַּשְׁקֶה דֶּרֶךְ הַנֶּקֶב שֶׁבַּדֹּפֶן הַפְּנִימִי וּמְבַצְבֵּץ וְיוֹצֵא דֶּרֶךְ הַנֶּקֶב שֶׁבַּדֹּפֶן הַחִיצוֹן. וְאִם הַנְּקָבִים שֶׁבִּשְׁתֵּי דָּפְנוֹת הַבִּעְבּוּעַ הֵן מְכֻוָּנִים וּמְפֻלָּשִׁים זֶה כְּנֶגֶד זֶה, אוֹ אֲפִלּוּ אֵינָן מְכֻוָּנִים אֶלָּא שֶׁהָיָה הַנֶּקֶב שֶׁבַּדֹּפֶן הַפְּנִימִי לְמַטָּה לְצַד שׁוּלֵי הַכְּלִי וְהַנֶּקֶב שֶׁבַּדֹּפֶן הַחִיצוֹן מִלְּמַעְלָה, אִם הָיְתָה אוֹתָהּ חָבִית מֻנַּחַת בְּאֹהֶל הַמֵּת וּמֻקֶּפֶת צָמִיד פָּתִיל בְּפִיהָ וְאֵינָהּ מֻקֶּפֶת בַּנְּקָבִים שֶׁל הַבִּעְבּוּעַ, אוֹ שֶׁנָּגַע אַב הַטֻּמְאָה בַּמַּשְׁקֶה שֶׁבַּנֶּקֶב הַחִיצוֹן, נִטְמְאוּ כָּל הַמַּשְׁקִים שֶׁבֶּחָבִית. אֲבָל אִם הַפְּנִימִי מִלְּמַעְלָן וְהַחִיצוֹן מִלְּמַטָּן, נְהִי דִּבְאֹהֶל הַמֵּת מִטַּמֵּא, שֶׁאֹהֶל הַטֻּמְאָה נִכְנַס לְתוֹךְ הֶחָבִית דֶּרֶךְ הַנְּקָבִים, בְּאַב הַטֻּמְאָה מִיהָא טָהוֹר, דְּאִם נָגַע אַב הַטֻּמְאָה בַּמַּשְׁקִין שֶׁבַּנֶּקֶב הַחִיצוֹן שֶׁבַּבִּעְבּוּעַ מִלְּמַטָּן, מֵאַחַר שֶׁהַפְּנִימִי מִלְּמַעְלָן, הֲוֵי לֵיהּ כְּנִצּוֹק וּקְטַפְרֵס, וְלֹא הָוֵי חִבּוּר:

Bartenura on Mishnah, trans. by Rabbi Robert Alpert, 2022

בעבוע שבחבית – when they smelt an earthenware vessel in a furnace/kiln, kinds of bubbles go out in their walls, that they have two walls – one to the inner side of the jar and one to the outer side, and an empty cavity in the middle, and sometimes, there is in a bubble of two incisions/holes, one in the wall of the bubble of the inner side which is to the side of the hollow cavity of the jar, and one in the wall of the outer side, and the jar is filled with liquids, the liquids enter through the incision that is in the inner wall and it breaks through/bursts forth and leaves through the incision that is in the outer wall from above, if it was a jar placed in the tent of a corpse, and is surrounded by a closely covered lid in its mouth and is not surrounded with incisions of bubbles, or that someone who is a primary source of ritual defilement touched/came in contact with the liquid that is in the outer incision, all the liquids are defiled that in the jug, but if the inner part from above them and the outer part from below them, assuming that in a tent of a corpse it becomes defiled, that the tent of the defilement enters into the jar through the incisions, however with a primary source of ritual defilement it is ritually pure, for if a primary source of ritual defilement came in contact with liquids that are in the outer incision that is in the bubble from below, after the inner part from above was like an uninterrupted flow of a liquid poured from vessel to vessel and like blows/lashes (i.e., downward strokes) and it is not a connection.

Next →