Malbim Ayelet HaShachar Klal 39
Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.
ולפעמים בא המקור לפני הפעל להראות החיוב במאמר; שיש לטעות שהוא רשות. כמו בציוי הנגבל נגד אזהרה (כמו שיתבאר לקמן כלל רכח, שמיני ס' נז)
And sometimes an infinitive comes before a verb to indicate an obligation in a statement, that it is a mistake to think that it only means it is optional. For instance, when imperatives are restricted against a warning (as will be explained later in Rule 228).
Leviticus 6:23 says,וכל חטאת אשר יובא מדמה אל אהל מועד לכפר בקדש לא תאכל באש תשרף(And no sin-offering, whereof any of the blood is brought into the tent of meeting to make atonement in the holy place, shall be eaten; it shall be burnt with fire).
And Leviticus 10:18 says,הן לא הובא את דמה אל הקדש פנימה אכול תאכלו אתה בקדש כאשר צויתי(Behold, the blood of it was not brought into the sanctuary within; you should certainly have eaten it in the sanctuary, as I commanded).
This is an example of an imperative that is restricted against a warning. The warningלא תאכל*, in Leviticus 6:23, is not to eat the sin offering when the blood of it was brought into the holy place. The imperativeאכול תאכלו, in Leviticus 10:18, is that one must eat the sin offering when the blood of it was not brought into the holy place⁸⁷.*
footnotes: ⁸⁷ Malbim, HaTorah v’HaMitzvah Shemini 57.