Mishnah Niddah Chapter 6
Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.
בָּא סִימָן הַתַּחְתּוֹן עַד שֶׁלֹּא בָא הָעֶלְיוֹן, אוֹ חוֹלֶצֶת אוֹ מִתְיַּבֶּמֶת. בָּא הָעֶלְיוֹן עַד שֶׁלֹּא בָא הַתַּחְתּוֹן, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאִי אֶפְשָׁר, רַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר, לֹא חוֹלֶצֶת וְלֹא מִתְיַבֶּמֶת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אוֹ חוֹלֶצֶת אוֹ מִתְיַבֶּמֶת. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאָמְרוּ, אֶפְשָׁר לַתַּחְתּוֹן לָבֹא עַד שֶׁלֹּא בָא הָעֶלְיוֹן, אֲבָל אִי אֶפְשָׁר לָעֶלְיוֹן לָבֹא עַד שֶׁלֹּא בָא הַתַּחְתּוֹן:
If the lower sign [of two hairs] appears before the upper sign [of the breasts] does, she can participate in chalitzah [the ceremony performed to release a widow of a childless man from the obligation of levirate marriage] or yibum [levirate marriage]. If the upper sign appears before the lower sign does, even though this is impossible, Rabbi Meir says: she does not participate in chalitzah or yibum. And the Sages say: she must participate in either chalitzah or yibum. For they have said: it is possible for the lower sign to appear before the upper sign has, but it is impossible for the upper sign to appear before the lower sign has.
כַּיּוֹצֵא בוֹ, כָּל כְּלִי חֶרֶס שֶׁהוּא מַכְנִיס, מוֹצִיא. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁמּוֹצִיא וְאֵינוֹ מַכְנִיס. כָּל אֵבָר שֶׁיֶּשׁ בּוֹ צִפֹּרֶן, יֶשׁ בּוֹ עֶצֶם, וְיֵשׁ שֶׁיֶּשׁ בּוֹ עֶצֶם וְאֵין בּוֹ צִפֹּרֶן:
Similarly, any earthenware vessel [with a hole] that lets [liquids] in will also let [liquids] out, but there is [such a vessel] that let [liquids] out but does not let [liquids] in. Any limb that has a nail also contains a bone [and is therefore considered a limb such that it renders the impurity of a corpse, even if it has less than the required measure of dead flesh to be able to render impurity], but there may be [a limb] that contains a bone but does not have a nail [and which would not be considered a limb for the purpose of rendering the impurity of a corpse, unless it contains the required measure of flesh to be able to render impurity].
כֹּל הַמִּטַּמֵּא מִדְרָס, מִטַּמֵּא טְמֵא מֵת. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁמִּטַּמֵּא טְמֵא מֵת וְאֵינוֹ מִטַּמֵּא מִדְרָס:
Anything that can be rendered impure with midras impurity [a type of impurity due to being sat on by certain types of impure individuals, rendering something an Origin of impurity] can be rendered impure with the impurity of a corpse. But there may be something that can be rendered impure with the impurity of a corpse but cannot be rendered impure with midras impurity.
כֹּל הָרָאוּי לָדוּן דִּינֵי נְפָשׁוֹת, רָאוּי לָדוּן דִּינֵי מָמוֹנוֹת. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁרָאוּי לָדוּן דִּינֵי מָמוֹנוֹת וְאֵינוֹ רָאוּי לָדוּן דִּינֵי נְפָשׁוֹת. כֹּל הַכָּשֵׁר לָדוּן, כָּשֵׁר לְהָעִיד. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁכָּשֵׁר לְהָעִיד וְאֵינוֹ כָשֵׁר לָדוּן:
Anyone who is fit to [be a judge who may] try capital cases is also fit to try monetary cases. But there may be one who is fit to try monetary cases but is unfit to try capital cases. Anyone who is valid to serve as a judge is valid to testify. But there may be one who is valid to testify and is not valid to serve as a judge.
כֹּל שֶׁחַיָּב בַּמַּעַשְׂרוֹת, מִטַּמֵּא טֻמְאַת אֳכָלִים. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁמִּטַּמֵּא טֻמְאַת אֳכָלִין וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב בַּמַּעַשְׂרוֹת:
Any [food] that requires tithing can be rendered impure with the impurity of foods. But there may be [food] that can be rendered impure with the impurity of foods but which does not require tithing.
כֹּל שֶׁחַיָּב בַּפֵּאָה, חַיָּב בַּמַּעַשְׂרוֹת. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁחַיָּב בַּמַּעַשְׂרוֹת וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב בַּפֵּאָה:
Any [crop] that requires pe'ah [the requirement to leave, when harvesting, a corner of the field for the poor] requires tithing. But there may be [a crop] that require tithing but which does not require pe'ah.
כֹּל שֶׁחַיָּב בְּרֵאשִׁית הַגֵּז, חַיָּב בַּמַּתָּנוֹת. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁחַיָּב בַּמַּתָּנוֹת וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב בְּרֵאשִׁית הַגֵּז:
Any [livestock] that has the requirement of the first shearing [i.e. the obligation, when one shears one's sheep, to give a portion of the fleece to a priest] also has the requirement of the [priestly] gifts [i.e. when one slaughters an animal, the requirement to give certain portions of it to a priest]. But there may be [livestock] that has the requirement of the [priestly] gifts but does not have the requirement of the first shearing.
כֹּל שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ בִעוּר, יֶשׁ לוֹ שְׁבִיעִית. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ שְׁבִיעִית וְאֵין לוֹ בִעוּר:
Any [produce] which is subject to [the obligation of] removal [i.e. the requirement to remove all of it from one's home during the sabbatical year once it is no longer available in the fields] is also subject to [the requirements of] the sabbatical year [i.e. one must give up ownership of its growing crop, and one cannot sell it for profit]. But there may be [produce] that is subject to [the requirements of] the sabbatical year but is not subject to [the obligation of] removal.
כֹּל שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ קַשְׂקֶשֶׂת, יֶשׁ לוֹ סְנַפִּיר. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ סְנַפִּיר וְאֵין לוֹ קַשְׂקֵשֶׂת. כֹּל שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ קַרְנַיִם, יֶשׁ לוֹ טְלָפַיִם. וְיֵשׁ שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ טְלָפַיִם וְאֵין לוֹ קַרְנָיִם:
Any [fish] that has scales has fins. But there may be one which has fins but does not have scales. Any [animal] that has horns has [split] hooves. But there maybe be one which has [split] hooves but does not have horns.
כֹּל הַטָּעוּן בְּרָכָה לְאַחֲרָיו, טָעוּן בְּרָכָה לְפָנָיו. וְיֵשׁ טָעוּן בְּרָכָה לְפָנָיו וְאֵין טָעוּן בְּרָכָה לְאַחֲרָיו:
Any [action] that requires a blessing after it requires a blessing before it. But there may be one that requires a blessing before it but does not require a blessing after it.
תִּינוֹקֶת שֶׁהֵבִיאָה שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת, אוֹ חוֹלֶצֶת אוֹ מִתְיַבֶּמֶת, וְחַיֶּבֶת בְּכָל מִצְוֹת הָאֲמוּרוֹת בַּתּוֹרָה. וְכֵן תִּינוֹק שֶׁהֵבִיא שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת, חַיָּב בְּכָל מִצְוֹת הָאֲמוּרוֹת בַּתּוֹרָה. וְרָאוּי לִהְיוֹת בֵּן סוֹרֵר וּמוֹרֶה, מִשֶּׁיָּבִיא שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת עַד שֶׁיַּקִּיף זָקָן, הַתַּחְתּוֹן וְלֹא הָעֶלְיוֹן, אֶלָּא שֶׁדִּבְּרוּ חֲכָמִים בְּלָשׁוֹן נְקִיָּה. תִּינוֹקֶת שֶׁהֵבִיאָה שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת, אֵינָהּ יְכוֹלָה לְמָאֵן. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, עַד שֶׁיִּרְבֶּה הַשָּׁחֹר:
A female child who produced two [pubic] hairs may participate in either in chalitzah or yibum, and she is obligated in all of the commandments stated in the Torah. And similarly, a male child who produced two [pubic] hairs is obligated in all of the commandments stated in the Torah. And he is fit to become a wayward and rebellious son from the time he produces two hairs until his beard encircles; [this refers to] the lower [beard] and not the upper one, but the Sages spoke in a euphemism. A female child who has produced two hairs cannot do mi'un [the refusal of a marriage by a fatherless child married off by her mother or brother, retroactively annulling the marriage]. Rabbi Yehuda says: [she may still do mi'un] until the black [i.e. the hair] increases.
שְׁתֵּי שְׂעָרוֹת הָאֲמוּרוֹת בַּפָּרָה וּבַנְּגָעִים, וְהָאֲמוּרוֹת בְּכָל מָקוֹם, כְּדֵי לָכֹף רֹאשָׁן לְעִקָּרָן, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר, כְּדֵי לִקְרֹץ בַּצִּפֹּרֶן. רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, כְּדֵי שֶׁיְּהוּ נִטָּלוֹת בְּזוּג:
The two hairs spoken of regarding a red heifer [i.e. that two white or black hairs invalidate it, see, Parah 2:5], and [those spoken of] regarding nega'im [diseased patches on skin, clothes, or houses that create impurity; i.e. that two hairs on a blemish are a sign of impurity, see Nega'im 4:4], and regarding those spoken of anywhere, [the hairs must be long] enough to bent their tips to [touch] their roots, according to Rabbi Yishmael. Rabbi Eliezer says: [long] enough to be pinched by a finger-nail. Rabbi Akiva says: [long] enough to be removed with scissors.
הָרוֹאָה כֶתֶם, הֲרֵי זוֹ מְקֻלְקֶלֶת, וְחוֹשֶׁשֶׁת מִשּׁוּם זוֹב, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין בַּכְּתָמִים מִשּׁוּם זוֹב:
Regarding a woman who saw a [blood] stain [on her clothing], she [with regarding to her counting of her days of impurity] is spoiled [i.e. she can no longer rely on her count], and she must take into consideration the possibility that there was a discharge [that day and the previous two days, rendering her a zavah and thereby impure for another seven days at least], according to Rabbi Meir. But the Sages say: [blood] stains do not contain discharge [and thus she need not suspect that she may be a zavah and therefore impure].
הָרוֹאָה יוֹם אַחַד עָשָׂר בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת, תְּחִלַּת נִדָּה וְסוֹף נִדָּה, תְּחִלַּת זִיבָה וְסוֹף זִיבָה, יוֹם אַרְבָּעִים לַזָּכָר וְיוֹם שְׁמוֹנִים לַנְּקֵבָה, בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת לְכֻלָּן, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ טוֹעוֹת. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, עַד שֶׁאַתֶּם מְתַקְּנִים אֶת הַשּׁוֹטוֹת, תַּקְּנוּ אֶת הַפִּקְחוֹת:
Regarding a woman who saw [a discharge of blood] on the eleventh day [i.e. her last day of counting, after which she should be pure] at twilight, or at the beginning of her being a niddah [a woman who has menstrual discharges which render her impure] and at the end of her being a niddah or at the beginning of the [subsequent] period of [potential] genital discharge and the end of that period of discharge [i.e. at twilight on what is either the first day of her being a niddah or the last day of the subsequent period of discharge during which she counts seven clean days, or at twilight on what is either the last day of her being a niddah or the first day of the subsequent period of potential discharge], or [if she saw blood] at the end of the fortieth day [after the birth] of a male, or at the end of the eightieth day [after the birth] of a female, at twilight in all these cases, they are thereby [assumed to be] mistaken [in their counting, and must therefore treat each case stringently]. Rabbi Yehoshua said: now that you have remedied [the situation for] the foolish women [who have mistaken their count], remedy [the situation for] the intelligent ones [who know how to count, as well, since they too may err in their counting].