Text

Or HaChaim on Genesis Chapter 39

Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.

וַיְהִי בְּבֵית אֲדוֹנָיו וְגוֹ׳. הִנֵּה יְסַדֵּר הַכָּתוּב הַדְּרָגוֹת הַמַּעֲלוֹת אֲשֶׁר הֶעֱלָה ה׳ אוֹתוֹ, כִּי מִקּוֹדֶם כְּשֶׁקְּנָאוֹ נְתָנוֹ לַעֲבוֹד עֲבוֹדַת עֲבָדִים הָעוֹבְדִים עֲבוֹדַת חוּץ, כִּי הַגְּדוֹלִים לֹא יַעֲמִידוּ לְשָׁרֵת בְּבָתֵּיהֶם אֶלָּא אֲשֶׁר יִהְיֶה אִישׁ רָאוּי וּמַצְלִיחַ, וְלָזֶה צִוָּה ה׳ אִתּוֹ אֶת הַהַצְלָחָה וּבָזֶה הָיָה בְּבֵית אֲדוֹנָיו הַמִּצְרִי מִשּׁוֹמְרֵי הַבַּיִת, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ וַיְהִי בְּבֵית אֲדוֹנָיו וְלֹא בִּשְׁאָר עֲבוֹדוֹת, וְעוֹד לוֹ מַדְרֵגָה אַחֶרֶת כְּשֶׁרָאָה אֲדוֹנָיו וְגוֹ׳ וַיְשָׁרֶת אוֹתוֹ פֵּרוּשׁ יִחֲדוֹ לְשָׁרֵת אוֹתוֹ בְּיִחוּד, שֶׁבָּזֶה יִהְיֶה חָשׁוּב וְלֹא יִחְיֶה חַיֵּי צַעַר כְּחַיֵּי הָעֲבָדִים הַשְּׁפָלִים. וְעוֹד לוֹ וַיַּפְקִידֵהוּ עַל בֵּיתוֹ הֲרֵי זֶה קָנָה מַעֲלָה עַל כָּל קִנְיַן אֲדוֹנוֹ. וְעוֹד לוֹ וַיַּעֲזֹב כָּל אֲשֶׁר לוֹ וְגוֹ׳, וְעוֹד לוֹ שֶׁלֹּא יָדַע אִתּוֹ וְגוֹ׳ שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה יוֹדֵעַ הַנִּכְנָסִים וְהַיּוֹצְאִים וְנַעֲשָׂה הוּא שַׁלִּיט, פֵּרוּשׁ מיירדומ״ו בְּלַעַ״ז, בְּכָל קִנְיַן הַמִּצְרִי:

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ויהי בבית אדוניו, He stayed in the house of his master, etc. The Torah described how G'd arranged for a variety of promotions Joseph experienced while in the service of Potiphar. At the beginning Joseph performed menial labour outside the home of Potiphar. When he did so successfully he was promoted to work inside the home. He then became a guard in the home. Eventually, he performed all his duties only indoors, i,e. בבית אדוניו. Still later he became Potiphar's personal valet, i.e. וישרת אותו. This made Joseph's life comfortable. Still later Potiphar appointed Joseph as the general manager over his entire household, i.e. ויעזוב כל אשר לו ביד יוסף. Eventually, Potiphar left every initiative to Joseph, not even bothering to ask him to account for what he was doing.

בַּאֲשֶׁר אַתְּ אִשְׁתּוֹ. פֵּרוּשׁ, לֹא שֶׁחָשַׂךְ אוֹתָךְ מִמֶּנִּי בְּצַו לָצָו, אֶלָּא לְצַד שֶׁאַתְּ אִשְׁתּוֹ הוּא הַדָּבָר הַמַּחְשִׂיךְ אוֹתָךְ מִמֶּנִּי. אוֹ לִשְׁלוֹל צַד הַמַּעֲלָה.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

באשר את אשתו, "inasmuch as you are his wife." Joseph meant that Potiphar had not placed his wife out of bounds to Joseph in so many words; the matter was understood because of her status.

וְאֵיךְ אֶעֱשֶׂה וְגוֹ׳. פֵּרוּשׁ, כִּי בָּזֶה אֲנִי מַפְסִיד כָּל הַטּוֹב הַמּוּשָּׂג אֶצְלִי.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ואיך אעשה הרעה הגדולה, "how could I possibly commit such a great evil?" By doing so I would lose everything I have achieved.

וְעוֹד אֲנִי מַחְסִיר עַצְמִי מִמְּקוֹר הַנְּשָׁמוֹת, כִּי דָּבָר זֶה הוּא אָסוּר גַּם לִבְנֵי נֹחַ, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ ״וְחָטָאתִי לֵאלֹהִים״.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

Furthermore, I would create an unbridegable gap to the holy roots of my soul seeing that adultery is forbidden to Gentiles as well as to Jews. This is what Joseph meant when he said "I would sin against G'd."

וְעוֹד יִרְצֶה, כִּי אֵין לָהּ לִטְעֹן כִּי תַּסְתִּיר הַדָּבָר וְלֹא יֵדַע אֲדוֹנוֹ, וְנִמְצָא עוֹמֵד בְּמַצָּבוֹ בְּאֵין מַחְסוֹר. לָזֶה אָמַר ״וְחָטָאתִי לֵאלֹהִים״, וְהוּא שֶׁעֲשָׂאֲנִי בְּמַצָּב זֶה, וּמִמֶּנּוּ לֹא יִסָּתֵר דָּבָר, וְנִמְצָא מַפְסִיד מַצָּבוֹ הַטּוֹב.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

Furthermore, by mentioning that he would commit a sin vis-a-vis G'd Joseph already countered Mrs Potiphar's argument that her husband did not need to know about their liaison and that therefore Joseph did not stand to lose anything. Joseph attributed his present status to the help of G'd. He would certainly forfeit G'd's help if he became guilty of adultery.

וַתִּתְפְּשֵׂהוּ וְגוֹ׳ לֵאמֹר וְגוֹ׳. פֵּרוּשׁ: הַתּוֹרָה מַגֶּדֶת כַּוָּנָתָהּ בִּתְפִיסַת הַבֶּגֶד שֶׁכַּוָּנָתָהּ ״לֵאמֹר״ וְגוֹ׳, אֲבָל הִיא לֹא אָמְרָה כְּלוּם, אֶלָּא שָׁלְחָה יָדָהּ לְתָפְסוֹ לְהַכְרִיחוֹ ״קוּם עֲשֵׂה״.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ותתפשהו בבגדו, She grabbed hold of his garment, etc. The Torah reveals Mrs Potiphar's intention when she grabbed Joseph's garment by stating לאמור. This word needs to be translated here: "as if to say." She did not say a word. Her actions spoke louder than any words.

וַתִּקְרָא לְאַנְשֵׁי וְגוֹ׳. לְצַד שֶׁיָּדְעָה צֶדֶק יוֹסֵף בְּעֵינֵי אֲדוֹנוֹ וְלֹא יַאֲמִין לִדְבָרֶיהָ, לָזֶה נִתְכַּוְּנָה וַתִּקְרָא לָהֶם שֶׁהֵם יֹאמְרוּ בְּבוֹא אֲדוֹנֵי יוֹסֵף, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ לֵאמֹר, וּבָעֲרָה בָּם אֵשׁ הַקִּנְאָה לְהָעִיד, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ רְאוּ הֵבִיא לָנוּ וְגוֹ׳ לְצַחֶק בָּנוּ, שִׁתַּפְתָם בְּצָרָתָהּ כִּי גַם עֲלֵיהֶם גִּדְּלוֹ וְהוּא אִישׁ נָכְרִי.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ותקרא לאנשי ביתה, she called the members of her household, etc. She was well aware that her husband put great faith in Joseph's righteousness and might not believe her accusation against him. Therefore she called the members of her household asking them, i.e. לאמור to tell her husband what had happened (according to her version). The members of her household who were jealous of Joseph who had risen above them would be happy to testify against him, saying: "look what happened as a result of your bringing this Hebrew man into the house." When she said לצחק בנו, "to make sport of us," she used the word us deliberately to indicate that they had all suffered from Joseph's elevated status, especially since Joseph was an alien.

אוֹ יִרְצֶה בְּאָמְרוֹ רְאוּ כִּי יָעִידוּ עַל הַדְּבָרִים כִּי כֵּן רָאוּ, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ ״לֵאמֹר רְאוּ״, גַּם נִתְחַכְּמָה לְהִתְרַעֵם נֶגֶד הַבַּעַל, שֶׁבָּזֶה אִם יָלִיץ טוֹבָה עָלָיו תֹּאמַר: ״אַף זוֹ מִן הַתּוֹכָחוֹת עָלֶיךָ תְּלוּנָּתִי״.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

It is also possible that when Mrs Potiphar said ראו, look! that she invited the members of the household to testify only to what they had seen; the Torah describes this as לאמור ראו, "say what you have seen." She included her husband in her accusation in the event he would find excuses for Joseph's alleged behaviour.

וַתְּדַבֵּר אֵלָיו וְגוֹ׳ לֵאמֹר. פֵּרוּשׁ אָמְרוֹ לֵאמֹר כִּי כֵן יֹאמְרוּ אַנְשֵׁי הַבַּיִת עֵדִים בַּדָּבָר, וְלָזֶה תִּמְצָא שֶׁלֹּא חָרָה אַפּוֹ עַל יוֹסֵף אֶלָּא עַל מַה שֶׁנָּתְנָה חוֹזֶק לִדְבָרֶיהָ מֵהוֹדָעוֹת הַזּוּלַת, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ כִּשְׁמֹעַ אֲדֹנָיו וְגוֹ׳ לֵאמֹר כַּדְּבָרִים וְגוֹ׳, כִּי לֹא הָיָה צָרִיךְ הַכָּתוּב לוֹמַר אֶלָּא ״כִּשְׁמֹעַ אֲדֹנָיו דִּבְרֵי אִשְׁתּוֹ״, אֶלָּא נִתְכַּוֵּן לוֹמַר שֶׁלֹּא חָרָה אַפּוֹ אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁשָּׁמַע שֶׁיֵּשׁ מַגִּידִים עַל הַדְּבָרִים, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ ״לֵאמֹר כַּדְּבָרִים״ וְגוֹ׳. עוֹד יִתְבָּאֵר בְּסָמוּךְ:

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ותדבר אליו..לאמור, She spoke to him…saying. The word לאמור here is meant as a reference to the testimony which the members of the household would be willing to supply. Potiphar's anger was not so much directed at Joseph but at the fact that his wife was able to reinforce her accusations by calling the members of the household as witnesses. This is why the Torah writes: "when his master heard the words of his wife which she spoke to him לאמור כדברים האלה." The Torah did not need to write more than: "when his master heard the words of his wife." We are meant to realise that Potiphar only became angry after לאמור, i.e. that there were independent witnesses supporting his wife's tale.

לֵאמֹר כַּדְּבָרִים וְגוֹ׳. פֵּרוּשׁ, לֹא שֶׁהֶאֱמִין בָּהּ כִּי כִּדְבָרֶיהָ כֵּן הָיָה, אֶלָּא לְצַד שֶׁאָמְרָה אִשְׁתּוֹ כֵּן עָשָׂה תְּנוּעָה קְטַנָּה, וְלָזֶה לֹא יִסְּרוֹ וְלֹא עָשָׂה לוֹ דָּבָר כַּמִּשְׁפָּט הַנַּעֲשֶׂה לְעֶבֶד הַנּוֹתֵן עֵינָיו בְּאֵשֶׁת אֲדוֹנוֹ.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

לאמור כדברים האלה, to corroborate such words. Potiphar did not believe his wife. Since the accuser was his own wife, however, he had to make some gesture otherwise his wife would have been publicly discredited. This is why Potiphar did not discipline Joseph nor had him executed, the normal penalty for a slave who dared to aspire to the wife of his master.

וַיְהִי ה׳ אֶת יוֹסֵף וַיֵּט וְגוֹ׳. פֵּרוּשׁ, כִּי בְּהַשְׁרָאַת שְׁכִינָה עַל הָאָדָם יוּשְׁפַּע הַנִּסְמָךְ מֵהַמַּשְׁרֶה שְׁכִינָתוֹ מִמַּה שֶׁבּוֹ, וְיָדוּעַ הוּא חֵן הַמָּקוֹם בָּרוּךְ הוּא כִּי הוּא מְקוֹר הַחֵן, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ ״וַיְהִי ה׳ אֶת יוֹסֵף״ וּבָזֶה ״וַיֵּט אֵלָיו חָסֶד״ פֵּרוּשׁ, מִמֵּילָא, וְאָמְרוֹ וַיִּתֵּן חִנּוֹ לֶהֱיוֹת כִּי לֹא תַרְגִּישׁ בְּחִינַת הָרַע בְּמֶתֶק הַחֵן, לָזֶה הוּצְרַךְ ה׳ לְהַרְכִּיב בְּעֵין שַׂר בֵּית הַסֹּהַר אֶמְצָעִי לְעָרֵב אֵלָיו חֵן צַדִּיק, וְהוּא אָמְרוֹ ״וַיִּתֵּן חִנּוֹ בְּעֵינֵי״ וְגוֹ׳, וְהָבֵן:

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

ויהי ה׳ את יוסף. G'd was with Joseph. The meaning of this verse is that when a human being enjoys divine protection people around him are also influenced by the fact that such a person enjoys G'd's help. It was natural then that Joseph should find favour in the eyes of those who came into contact with him. G'd had to especially influence the warden of the prison to take a liking to Joseph as a righteous person [and therefore innocent, the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Ed.]

הוּא הָיָה עוֹשֶׂה. תַּרְגּוּם פֵּרֵשׁ ״עַל מֵימְרֵיהּ״. וְלִדְבָרָיו לָמָּה לֹא יְדַבֵּר הַכָּתוּב צַחוֹת וְיֹאמַר בְּפֵרוּשׁ ״עַל פִּיו הָיוּ עוֹשִׂים״? וְאוּלַי שֶׁנִּתְכַּוֵּן הַכָּתוּב בְּשַׁנּוֹתוֹ אֶת טַעְמוֹ לְהוֹדִיעַ גַּם כֵּן שֶׁהֲגַם שֶׁהָיָה הוּא הַמַּנְהִיג, לֹא הָיָה מִתְנַהֵג בִּשְׂרָרָה וּמוֹנֵעַ עַצְמוֹ מִתַּשְׁמִישׁ דָּבָר אֲשֶׁר הָיוּ עוֹשִׂים שָׁם הָאֲסוּרִים, אֶלָּא יָדוֹ כְּיַד כֻּלָּן שָׁוָה, וְזֶה יַגִּיד מֶזֶג טִבְעוֹ כִּי טוֹב הוּא וּמָצָא חֵן וְשֵׂכֶל טוֹב בְּעֵינֵי ה׳ וְאָדָם.

Yalkut, Sifsei Chachomim Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009

הוא היה עושה, which he was doing. Onkelos translates: על מימריה הוה מתעבד, that what was done inside the jail was done at Joseph's instructions. If that was so, why does the Torah not say so outright, i.e. ועל פיו היו עושים? Perhaps the Torah wanted to hint that though Joseph enjoyed great authority within the jail, he did not use it to make the other inmates feel as if he dictated to them. He did not claim any special privileges for himself either. All this was evidence of his good character.

Next →