Radak on Genesis Chapter 6
Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.
וַיְהִי כִּי הֵחֵל הָאָדָם. מִין הָאָדָם.
ויהי כי החל האדם, a reference to the human species.
וּבָנוֹת יֻלְּדוּ לָהֶם. אֵין צֹרֶךְ לוֹמַר זֶה כִּי אִי אֶפְשָׁר לָעוֹלָם בְּלֹא זְכָרִים וּבְלֹא נְקֵבוֹת, אֶלָּא הָיָה הַסִּפּוּר הַזֶּה עַל הַבָּנוֹת לְפִי שֶׁטָּעוּ אַחֲרֵיהֶם וְהֵן גָּרְמוּ הַשְׁחָתַת הָאָרֶץ כְּמוֹ שֶׁמְּסַפֵּר וְהוֹלֵךְ.
ובנות ילדו להם, there was not really any need to tell us this, seeing that the species cannot survived without females and males. The entire story concerns the females, seeing that the male elite made the mistake of intermarrying with physically attractive, but otherwise morally inferior females, as a result of which the entire human race became progressively more corrupt.
וַיִּרְאוּ בְנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים. בְּנֵי הַשּׁוֹפְטִים וְהַגְּדוֹלִים וּמַנְהִיגֵי הַמְּדִינוֹת, כִּי הֵם נִקְרְאוּ אֱלֹהִים, כְּמוֹ ״אֱלֹהִים לֹא תְקַלֵּל״ (שמות כב:כז) וְהַדּוֹמִים לוֹ. וְכֵן תַּרְגּוּם אֻנְקְלוֹס ״בְּנֵי רַבְרְבַיָּא״, וּדְרַשׁ עַזָּא וַעֲזָאֵל רָחוֹק. וּבְבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (כו:ה) רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַאי מְקַלֵּל לְכָל מַאן דְּקָרֵא לְהוֹן בְּנֵי אֱלֹהִים, תָּנֵי רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַאי כָּל פִּרְצָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ מִן הַגְּדוֹלִים אֵינָהּ פִּרְצָה; וְעוֹד אָמְרוּ לָמָּה קוֹרֵא אוֹתָם בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים, רַבִּי חֲנִינָא וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ תַּרְוַיְהוּ אָמְרִין שֶׁהִרְבּוּ יָמִים בְּלֹא צַעַר וּבְלֹא יִסּוּרִין; רַב הוּנָא בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אָמַר הִרְבּוּ יָמִים כְּדֵי לַעֲסֹק עַל הַתְּקוּפוֹת וְעַל הַחֶשְׁבּוֹנוֹת וְעַל הַמַּזָּלוֹת, וְהוּא הַטַּעַם שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ לְמַעְלָה בַּאֲרִיכוּת שְׁנוֹת הָאֲנָשִׁים הַנִּזְכָּרִים.
ויראו בני האלוהים, the sons of the judges, the elite of the species who are here referred to as אלוהים, just as in Exodus 22,27 אלוהים לא תקלל, “you must not curse a judge.” There are numerous similar examples in the Torah of the attribute אלוהים being applied to morally high ranking human beings. Onkelos also translates it in this vein when he speaks of בני רברביא. The explanations offered that the Torah refers to Uzza and Uzael are very far fetched. (compare Torah shleymah on this verse). [The two aforementioned are supposed to have been angels who had voted against the creation of man and who belittled man’s effort to conquer the evil urge. They were supposedly punished by being consigned to earth to experience life on earth by themselves. Instead of proving their superiority, they were the first to succumb to the allurement of physically attractive females. Their request to return to the celestial regions was denied by G’d. Ed.] According to Bereshit Rabbah 26,5 Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai cursed anyone who translated the words בני האלוהים as “the sons of G’d.” He added that when the elite of the people are themselves guilty of the sins they want the common man to refrain from, their efforts are doomed to start with. Another reason offered why these people were referred to as בני האלוהים, (according to both Rabbi Chaninah and Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish, is that these were the people enjoying carefree long lives, free from sickness and other impediments. [This may have given them the illusion of being able to get away with whatever they felt like doing. Ed.] Rav Hunna, quoting Rabbi Yossi, says that these people were granted such long lives in order to enable them to study the sky, observe the orbits of the stars and make calculations resulting in our calendar.
אֶת בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם. בְּנוֹת הֲמוֹן הָאָדָם הַחֲלוּשִׁים שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה לָהֶן כֹּחַ לַעֲמֹד כְּנֶגְדָּם, וְכַאֲשֶׁר הָיוּ רוֹאִים בְּנֵי הַגְּדוֹלִים בְּנוֹת הָעֲנִיִּים שֶׁהָיוּ טֹבֹת רוֹצַה לוֹמַר יְפוֹת תֹּאַר וּמַרְאֶה, הָיוּ עוֹשְׁקִים וְלוֹקְחִים אֵיזֶה שֶׁהֵם בּוֹחֲרִים מִכֹּל הַנָּשִׁים וְאוֹתָן שֶׁיִּשְׁרוּ בְעֵינֵיהֶם הֵן פְּנוּיוֹת אוֹ נְשׂוּאוֹת לְבַעַל, כִּי מִי שֶׁהָיָה גָּדוֹל מֵחֲבֵרוֹ עוֹשֵׁק אֶת חֲבֵרוֹ וְאֵין מַצִּיל מִיָּדָם, וְאָדָם נֶאֱמַר עַל הַפְּחוּתִים וְהַחֲלוּשִׁים שֶׁאָמַר ״גַּם בְּנֵי אָדָם גַּם בְּנֵי אִישׁ״ (תהלים מט:ג) בְּנֵי אָדָם, הַפְּחוּתִים, בְּנֵי אִישׁ, הַגְּדוֹלִים. וּבַסִּפְרֵי פֵּרְשׁוּ כֵּן אִם בְּנֵי הַדַּיָּנִים הָיוּ אוֹחֲזִים נָשִׁים מִן הַשְּׁוָקִים וּמְעַנִּים אוֹתָם קַל וָחֹמֶר לִשְׁאָר בְּנֵי אָדָם; וְהֶחָכָם רַבִּי אַבְרָהָם בֶּן עֶזְרָא פֵּרֵשׁ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים שֶׁהָיוּ יוֹדְעִים דַּעַת עֶלְיוֹן וּבָחֲרוּ לָהֶם מִי שֶׁהָיְתָה מַעֲרֶכֶת הַשָּׁמַיִם כָּל אַחַת נִמְשֶׁלֶת לְכָל אֶחָד וְהַתּוֹלָדוֹת כְּתוֹלֶדֶת עַל כֵּן יָצְאוּ מֵהֶם גִּבּוֹרִים, וְיִתָּכֵן שֶׁלָּקְחוּ גַּם הַנָּשִׁים בְּחָזְקָה.
את בנות האדם, the daughters of the weaker specimen of the human race. The women were unable to resist the physically superior specimen referred to as בני האלוהים, and as a result if fancied by the latter, they would be taken by them as wives or concubines against their will, and the will of even their husbands. [The Torah describes the first time the law of the “survival of the fittest” was practiced by the human race. The result was the deluge. Ed.] The term אדם next to the term אלוהים simply compares the weak to the strong In the Sifri¸ (Behaalotcha 86) the point is made that when ordinary individuals observed that the judges took the law into their own hands, they reasoned that they themselves would most certainly be able to get away with the same thing, seeing that the judges are supposed to set a good example. Rabbi Avraham Ibn Ezra understands the expression בני אלוהים, as referring to spiritually superior people, people who knew what G’d expected of them. They chose wives according to what they perceived was suitable for them basing themselves on their reading of astrology. As a result of such careful mating, their offspring were in many instances giants, etc., as we read about at the end of our verse. It is possible that they took women of their choice even against the will of these women.
כִּי טֹבֹת הֵנָּה. אָמַר רַבִּי יוּדָן: טֹבֹת כְּתִיב, שֶׁהָיוּ מְטַיְּבִין וּמְקַשְּׁטִין אוֹתָהּ שֶׁהִכְנִיסָה לַחֻפָּה, וְהָיָה הַגָּדוֹל נִכְנָס וּבוֹעֲלָהּ תְּחִלָּה, הַדָּא הוּא דִּכְתִיב כִּי טֹבֹת הֵנָּה, אֵלֶּה הַבְּתוּלוֹת.
כי טובות הנה, Rabbi Yudan, noting the defective spelling of the word טובות as טבת claims that this is a transitive form of the verb, and that the judges when handing over the virgin bride to her prospective husband would first sleep with her. The missing letters ו in the word טבת refer to these girls having been deprived of their hymen.
וַיִּקְחוּ לָהֶם נָשִׁים. אֵלּוּ נְשׂוּאֵי אִישִׁים.
ויקחו להם נשים, a reference to married women.
מִכֹּל אֲשֶׁר בָּחָרוּ. זֶה זָכָר וּבְהֵמָה.
מכל אשר בחרו, the word מכל, “from all,” includes homosexual unions, and mating between man and beast.
וַיֹּאמֶר לֹא יָדוֹן רוּחִי בָאָדָם לְעֹלָם. אָמַר בְּלִבּוֹ, אוֹ אָמַר לְנֹחַ, וּמִלַּת לֹא יָדוֹן פֵּרְשָׁהּ אָבִי אֲדוֹנִי זִכְרוֹנוֹ לִבְרָכָה מִן ״יְגָרֶה מָדוֹן״ (משלי טו:יח) רוֹצֶה לוֹמַר לֹא יִהְיֶה רוּחִי הָעֶלְיוֹנִי שֶׁנָּפַחְתִּי בָּאָדָם לֹא יִהְיֶה בִּמְרִיבָה עוֹד לְעוֹלָם עִם הַגּוּף, כִּי הַגּוּף נִמְשָׁךְ לְתַאֲווֹת הַבְּהֵמוֹת וְזֶה בַּאֲשֶׁר הוּא בָּשָׂר וּבְתוֹלֶדֶת הַבָּשָׂר שְׁקוּעוֹת וּקְבוּעוֹת הַתַּאֲווֹת, אַאֲרִיךְ לָהֶם מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה אִם יַחְזְרוּ בִּתְשׁוּבָה וְאִם לָאו אֲכַלֶּה אוֹתָם מִן הָעוֹלָם. וְעוֹד פֵּרְשׁוּ בּוֹ מֵעִנְיַן ״וַיָּשֶׁב חַרְבּוֹ אֶל נִדְנָהּ״ (דברי הימים א כא:כז) שֶׁפֵּרוּשׁוֹ תַּעַר הַחֶרֶב, וְהָיָה מִלַּת יָדוֹן רְאוּיָה לְהִדָּגֵשׁ לְחֶסְרוֹן הַנּוּ״ן אֶלָּא שֶׁבָּא בָּהּ הַנָּח תְּמוּרַת הַדָּגֵשׁ כְּמוֹ שֶׁבָּא בְּמִלַּת ״וַיָּזֶד יַעֲקֹב נָזִיד״ (בראשית כה:כט) וּפֵרוּשׁ לֹא יִהְיֶה הָרוּחַ בְּתוֹךְ נִדְנוֹ שֶׁהוּא הַגּוּף אֶלָּא אוֹצִיא אוֹתָהּ מִמֶּנּוּ וַאֲכַלֶּה הָרוּחַ וְהַגּוּף, וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (פרשה כו) אָמַר רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל בֶּן רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֵינִי נוֹתֵן רוּחִי בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁאֲנִי נוֹתֵן מַתַּן שְׂכָרָן שֶׁל צַדִּיקִים. רַבִּי יַנַּאי וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ תַּרְוַיְהוֹן אָמְרִין אֵין גֵּיהִנֹּם לֶעָתִיד לָבֹא אֶלָּא יוֹם הוּא שֶׁמְּלַהֵט אֶת הָרְשָׁעִים. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן רַבִּי אִלְעַאי אָמַר לֹא יוֹם וְלֹא גֵיהִנֹּם אֶלָּא אֵשׁ הִיא שֶׁתִּהְיֶה יוֹצֵאת מִגּוּפָן שֶׁל רְשָׁעִים וּמְלַהֲטָתָן שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ישעיהו לג:יא) ״תַּהֲרוּ חֲשַׁשׁ תֵּלְדוּ קַשׁ רוּחֲכֶם אֵשׁ תֹּאכַלְכֶם״ וְעוֹד כָּתַבְנוּ דָּבָר אֶחָד בְּעִנְיַן גֵּיהִנֹּם בְּפָסוּק ״וַיַּרְא אֱלֹהִים אֶת כָּל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה וְהִנֵּה טוֹב מְאֹד״ (בראשית א:לא). אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן רַבִּי אִלְעַאי לֹא יָדוֹן רוּחִי, אֵין הָרוּחוֹת הַלָּלוּ נִדּוֹנוֹת לְפָנַי לְעוֹלָם. רַבִּי הוּנָא בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי אַחָא אָמַר לֹא יָדוֹן, בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁאֲנִי מַחֲזִיר הָרוּחַ לְנִדְנָהּ אֵין אֲנִי מַחֲזִיר רוּחוֹת אֵלּוּ לְנִדְנֵיהֶם. וְעוֹד אָמְרוּ (סנהדרין קח) דּוֹר הַמַּבּוּל אֵין חַיִּין לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא, וְאֵין נִדּוֹנִין שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לֹא יָדוֹן רוּחִי בָאָדָם לְעֹלָם, לֹא רוּחַ וְלֹא דִּין.
ויאמר ה' לא ידון רוחי באדם לעולם, G’d either said this to Himself, or to Noach. My father of blessed memory (Joseph Kimchi) explained the line לא ידון in the same sense as the word מדון in Proverbs 15,18 as referring to a struggle, strife. The soul G’d had blown into Adam’s nostrils was meant as an antidote to the pull of the raw material man was made of. The body, basically is in tow of the animalistic urges of the animals, something natural, seeing that man’s own body is made of the same raw material as are the animals. G’d now decided to grant man an extension of 120 years to do תשובה, repentance, failing which He would wipe out mankind from the earth. Other commentators, including Ibn Ezra, explain the word ידון as related to נדנה in Chronicles I 21,27 וישב חרבו אל נדנה, “he returned his sword to its sheath.” Actually, if correct, the word ידון should have been spelled with a dagesh in the letterד, replacing the missing letter נ, however, in this instance, instead of such a dagesh, the Torah simply omitted the letter נ at the beginning, as it did in Genesis 25,29 ויזד יעקב נזיד where the letter נ in front of the letter ז has also been omitted. At any rate, the meaning of the expression is that G’d would not let His spirit rest until both man’s body and spirit would be wiped out. Rabbi Yishmael son of Yossi, (Bereshit Rabbah 26,6) understood this verse as G’d saying that when the time would come to share out reward to the righteous, these people would not participate in it. He was speaking of ידון in the sense of “passing judgment.” Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish as well as his colleague Rabbi Yannai, said that there is no such thing as the popular concept of a hell, gehinnom, lasting a long time, but that at the time when G’d passes out judgment the wicked will be burned by the fiery heat of a flame. They based themselves on Maleachi 3,19 הנה יום בא בוער כתנור, “here a day will come when the fire will burn as in a furnace.” The other sages said that there most certainly is such a thing as gehinnom, as we have a verse in Isaiah 31,9 נאום ה' אשר אור לו בציון ותנור לו בירושלים, “says the Lord Who has a fire in Zion and an oven in Jerusalem.” Rabbi Yehudah bar Ila-i claims there is neither a specific day, nor a specific place such as gehinnom, but fire will come forth from the very bodies of the wicked and will consume them with its heat. He based himself on Isaiah 33,11 תהרו חשש תלדו קש רוחכם אש תאכלתם, “you shall conceive hay, give birth to straw; My breath will devour you like fire.” We have also written what the sages of the Midrash wrote concerning the matter of gehinnom in connection with Genesis 1,31 וירא אלוקים את כל אשר עשה והנה טוב מאד, “G’d saw all that He had made and here it was very good;” the point made there was that the word טוב refers to Gan Eden, whereas the expression טוב מאד, refers to gehinnom. [refer to page 72 in my translation. Ed.] Rabbi Yehudah in the name of Rabbi Ila-i (also in Bereshit Rabbah 26,6) interprets the words לא ידון רוחי עוד, that “these wicked spirits of man will never be allowed to come to rest before Me.” Various sages concur that the generation destroyed during the deluge will neither be judged for an afterlife during the time that the world awaits its own rejuvenation, nor will it be judged (if any are fit) to be resurrected in the world following the interval between our present world being turned into chaos and the subsequent resurrection of the deserving from the former world. (Sanhedrin 107)
בְּשַׁגַּם. הַשִּׁי״ן פְּתוּחָה כְּמוֹ ״שַׁקַּמְתִּי דְּבוֹרָה״ (שופטים ה:ז), וּפֵרוּשׁ כַּאֲשֶׁר גַּם הוּא בָשָׂר, כְּלוֹמַר לָמָּה לֹא יָדוֹן רוּחִי בָאָדָם לְעֹלָם, לְפִי שֶׁגַּם הוּא בָשָׂר כְּמוֹ הַבְּהֵמוֹת, שֶׁאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ רוּחַ עֶלְיוֹנָה, הִנֵּה גַּם הוּא בָּשָׂר וְהַבָּשָׂר מוֹשֵׁךְ הָרוּחַ אֶל תַּאֲווֹתָיו, לְפִיכָךְ אַאֲרִיךְ לָאָדָם הַזֶּה מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה, אִם יָשׁוּב, טוֹב, אֲקַיֵּם אוֹתָם בָּעוֹלָם, וְאִם לָאו אֲכַלֶּה אוֹתָם מִן הָעוֹלָם, זֶה פֵּרוּשׁוֹ. יָמָיו. הַיָּמִים שֶׁאַאֲרִיךְ לוֹ, וְטַעַם מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים לֹא יָדַעְנוּ אֶלָּא כָּךְ הָיָה רְצוֹן הַבּוֹרֵא.
בשגם, the letter ש has the vowel patach, just as the letter ש in Judges 5,10 שקמתי דבורה. The meaning is that “seeing it too is but flesh (and no better than the beasts.).” In other words: “the reason why My spirit will not prevail within man is due to the fact that man like beasts are only flesh.” Even though G’d had implanted man with a divine soul, this soul had been unable to assert itself within him. As a result, G’d said, “I will give him another 120 years during which he has a chance to improve himself, failing which his fate is sealed.” We do not know the special significance of the number 120. This was G’d’s arbitrary decision.
הַנְּפִלִים. הַפָּסוּק הַזֶּה טַעְמוֹ דָּבוּק לְמַעְלָה שֶׁאָמַר ״מִכֹּל אֲשֶׁר בָּחָרוּ״, וְאַחַר כֵּן סִפֵּר מַה שֶּׁאָמַר הָאֵל ״לֹא אַאֲרִיךְ לָהֶם״. הַנְּפִלִים הֵם הָעֲנָקִים וְיִקָּרְאוּ נְפִלִים וְאִם הֵם גְּבוֹהִים מְאֹד מִמִּדַּת שְׁאָר בְּנֵי אָדָם, וְהַטַּעַם שֶׁיִּפֹּל הָרוֹאֶה אוֹתָם מֵרֹב תִּמָּהוֹן וּבֶהָלָה, וְכֵן ״וְאוּלָם הַר נוֹפֵל יִבּוֹל״ (איוב יד:יח). אָמַר כִּי בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם הָיוּ בָאָרֶץ אֲנָשִׁים בַּעֲלֵי קוֹמָה יְתֵרָה מְאֹד, וְהַסִּבָּה כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ בַּאֲרִיכוּת יְמֵי הַנִּזְכָּרִים שֶׁהָיוּ יְחִידִים, כֵּן הָיוּ הַנְּפִלִים יְחִידִים בְּיִתְרוֹן מִדַּת גּוּפָם, וְהֵם נִקְרָאִים נְפִלִים וַעֲנָקִים.
הנפילין, this verse must be understood as attached to the previous verse (2) in which the mating habits of the בני האלוהים had been discussed. After the Torah had criticised the manner in which the physically stronger males grabbed their women, G’d now gave them another 120 years and no more to improve their ways. The people described as נפילים were a group of giants. The reason why they are not described as such, but as “fallen,” is that people who took one look at these giants were apt to fall down ((נפל in sheer fright of such powerful potential opponents. Examples of similar use of the root נפל can be found in Job 14,18 ואולם הר נופל, “even if the mountain were to fall” a truly frightening experience. The Torah simply relates that during these latter days before the deluge there were people of gigantic size These were just a few individuals .
וְגַם אַחֲרֵי כֵן אֲשֶׁר יָבֹאוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים אֶל בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם. פֵּירוּשׁוֹ: וְגַם אַחֲרֵי כֵן שֶׁרַבּוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים וְהָיוּ בּוֹעֲלִים בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם אֲשֶׁר בָּחֲרוּ לָהֶם, כָּל שֶׁכֵּן שֶׁהָיוּ בָאָרֶץ נְפִילִים שֶׁהָיוּ רוֹאִים אוֹתָם יְפוֹת מַרְאֶה וּבַעֲלוֹת קוֹמָה; וְהַנְּפִילִים הָיוּ מִבְּנֵי הַגְּדוֹלִים וְכַאֲשֶׁר הָיוּ בּוֹעֲלִים כְּמוֹתָן הָיוּ הַנּוֹלָדִים מֵהֶן גַּם כֵּן כְּמוֹתָם בְּאֵיכוּת וְכַמּוּת. וְהֵמָּה הַגִּבֹּרִים אֲשֶׁר מֵעוֹלָם, כְּלוֹמַר שֶׁהֵם נִזְכָּרִים בְּפִי הַדּוֹרוֹת הַבָּאִים אַחֲרֵיהֶם שֶׁהָיוּ אֵלֶּה הַגִּבּוֹרִים מִזְּמַן קַדְמוֹן, זֶהוּ אֲשֶׁר מֵעוֹלָם אַנְשֵׁי הַשֵּׁם, שֶׁהָיָה לָהֶם שֵׁם בְּפִי הַדּוֹרוֹת הַבָּאִים אַחֲרֵיהֶם. וְאַחֲרֵי הַמַּבּוּל רָאוּ הַנִּשְׁאָרִים כִּי רַע בְּעֵינֵי ה׳ רְדִיפַת הַתַּאֲווֹת וְהַנְהָגוֹת הַגּוּפוֹת לְהַנָּאוֹת לְהַרְבּוֹת הַמִּשְׁגָּל וּלְהַגְדִּיל הַגּוּפוֹת בְּמִדָּתָן וּבַאֲרִיכוּת יְמֵיהֶם אִם הָיָה זֶה בְּהַנְהָגַת מִחְיָתָם, וְחָסְרוּ הַתַּאֲווֹת וְאוֹתָן הַנְהָגוֹת עַד שֶׁמִּעֲטוּ שְׁנוֹת בְּנֵי אָדָם אַחַר הַמַּבּוּל וְהָיוּ הָלוֹךְ וְחָסוֹר, לְפִי שֶׁשָּׁב לָהֶם לְמִנְהָג וּלְטֶבַע הַנְהָגוֹת הָרִאשׁוֹנִים וּמִעֲטוּ הַיָּמִים וּמִעֲטוּ הַמִּדּוֹת הַגּוּפוֹת עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִשְׁאַר מֵהֶם גּוּף בַּזְּמַן שֶׁבָּאוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל לָאָרֶץ וְלֹא נִמְצְאוּ מֵהֶם אֶלָּא יְלִידֵי הָעֲנָק בְּחֶבְרוֹן, וְאָמְרוּ (ילקוט יהושע רמז כג) וְלֹא הָיוּ אֶלָּא אַרְבָּעָה, וּבִימֵי דָּוִד יְלִידֵי הָרָפָה בְּגַת (דברי הימים א כ:ד), וְעַל עוֹג מֶלֶךְ הַבָּשָׁן נֶאֱמַר (יהושע יג:יב) ״הוּא נִשְׁאַר מִיֶּתֶר הָרְפָאִים״, וְאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁאוֹתָן שֶׁנִּמְצְאוּ נָהֲגוּ בְּגוּפָם מִנְהַג הָרִאשׁוֹנִים שֶׁלִּפְנֵי הַמַּבּוּל, וְאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁהֶאֱרִיכוּ יָמִים כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָרְכוּ גּוּפוֹתָם.
וגם אחרי כן אשר יבואו בני האלוהים אל בנות האדם, and also after the elite had made a point of mating with the physically attractive בנות האדם there were even more numerous such giants who reflected the genes of their fathers in size and the allure of their mothers in beauty. והמה הגבורים אשר מעולם, these were the ones always remembered in later times as the heroic people of their time אשר מעולם אנשי שם, people whose reputation survived their disappearance from the earth. After the deluge survivors realised that it had been displeasing in the eyes of G’d for those people to have devoted themselves to all the physical pleasures of the world and to aim at enlarging the size of their bodies as well as aiming to increase the number of years they lived on earth. [After all they had perished, and normal sized individuals, such as Noach’s family had survived. Ed.] The physical desires of the survivors of the deluge were far less powerful than that of their forebears so that gradually also their lifespan diminished, i.e. their entire hold on matters physical became a less dominant concern. People in the generations after the deluge, in spite of their other failings, gradually resumed a lifestyle that had been normal before the excesses that the בני אלוהים had indulged in. When the Israelites came to the land of Canaan there were only a very few of the former giants still surviving, mostly concentrated around Hebron (Joshua 15,14) Our sages have a tradition that there were only four such giants still alive at that time. (Joshua 14,15) In the time of David there appear to have been a few such men in Gat (Samuel II 21,15) Concerning Og, the King of Bashan, the Bible testifies that he had been a remnant of this race of these antediluvian giants (Joshua 13,12). It is possible that those survivors still practiced a lifestyle reminiscent of their antediluvian forebears.
וַיַּרְא ה׳. כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעַ הַקֵּץ שֶׁנָּתַן לָהֶם מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה רָאָה כִּי לֹא הֵיטִיבוּ מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם אֲבָל הֵרֵעוּ אוֹתָם וְכָל יוֹם הָיָה קָשֶׁה מֵחֲבֵרוֹ, זֶהוּ שֶׁאָמַר רַק רַע כָּל־הַיּוֹם. וּפֵרוּשׁ וְכָל יֵצֶר, מִשְּׁנֵי יְצָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בְּלִבּוֹ שֶׁל אָדָם אֶחָד טוֹב וְאֶחָד רַע, כֻּלּוֹ הָיָה לְרַע וְלֹא הָיָה טוֹב בָּהֶם. וְנִקְרֵאת תַּאֲוַת מַחֲשֶׁבֶת הַלֵּב, יֵצֶר, לְפִי שֶׁהַלֵּב יוֹצֵר וּפוֹעֵל בְּלִבּוֹ הָעִנְיָנִים הֵן לְטוֹב וְהֵן לְרַע לְהוֹצִיאָם לִידֵי מַעֲשֶׂה. וְטַעַם מַה שֶּׁהֶאֱרִיךְ הָאֵל לָהֶם מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים שָׁנָה אִם יָשׁוּבוּ, וְהוּא הָיָה יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁלֹּא יָשׁוּבוּ, עָשָׂה כֵּן כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּלְמַד אָדָם מִמִּדּוֹתָיו וְיַאֲרִיךְ אַפּוֹ לַחוֹטֵא וְלֹא יִנְקֹם מִמֶּנּוּ מִיָּד אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהַיְּכֹלֶת בְּיָדוֹ אוּלַי יִתְחָרֵט בּוֹ וְיָשׁוּב. וְהִנֵּה הָאֵל בָּרָא עוֹלָמוֹ לִהְיוֹת טוֹב אוֹ כֻּלּוֹ אוֹ רֻבּוֹ, וְאִם כֻּלּוֹ רַע לֹא יוּכַל לַעֲמֹד כִּי לֹא יִבְחַר הָאֵל כִּי אִם בַּטּוֹב; וְהִנֵּה רָאָה דּוֹר הַמַּבּוּל כֻּלּוֹ רַע בִּזְנוּת וְחָמָס שֶׁמַּפְסִידִין סֵדֶר הָעוֹלָם וְהָיוּ מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם כְּנֶגֶד מַעֲשָׂיו, וְאָמַר לְהַשְׁחִית אֶת הָעוֹלָם הַשָּׁפֵל וּלְהַשְׁאִיר מִמֶּנּוּ הַטּוֹב שֶׁנִּמְצָא בּוֹ וְהָיָה שֶׁמֶץ מִמֶּנּוּ כְּדֵי לְקַיְּמוֹ לֶעָתִיד, וְהִשְׁאִיר בּוֹ נֹחַ שֶׁמָּצָא אוֹתוֹ טוֹב וְכֵן בָּנָיו עִם נְשׁוֹתֵיהֶן כְּדֵי לְקַיֵּם זֶרַע וְלֶמֶךְ אָבִיו כְּבָר מֵת חָמֵשׁ שָׁנִים לִפְנֵי הַמַּבּוּל, וּמְתוּשֶׁלַח שָׁלְמוּ שְׁנוֹתָיו בְּבֹא הַמַּבּוּל וָמֵת, כִּי חָמֵשׁ שָׁנִים חַי אַחַר לֶמֶךְ בְּנוֹ, הִנֵּה לֹא נִשְׁאַר צַדִּיק בָּעוֹלָם אֶלָּא נֹחַ וּבָנָיו.
'וירא ה, seeing that the time G’d had allocated to the people to improve their ways had elapsed, G’d saw that nothing had changed. רק רע כל היום, the words וכל יצר, refer to both man’s urges, the urge to do good, and the urge to do evil. The urge to do good had succumbed to the evil urge, completely. The Torah here calls the planning of wicked deeds based on impulses יצר לב, the urge of the heart. The reason is that the heart is perceived as the origin of all impulses be they good or be they evil in nature. The reason why G’d gave them 120 years extension, although He was well aware that they would not do teshuvah, was only in order for man to learn from G’d’s attributes, and to adopt this attribute for himself. Just as G’d allowed man plenty of time to improve his ways, so man, when dealing with his fellow, should also not be impatient, but allow enough time for people to rethink their evil attitudes. When G’d created the human race He wanted it to be good completely, or at least predominantly. If mankind would turn to be completely evil it could not endure, seeing that G’d had chosen the good. When He saw that the generation preceding the deluge was thoroughly evil, especially in their inter-personal relations, their use of violence as a legitimate tool to gain their ends, their deeds threatened to undermine the foundations upon which G’d had built His universe. He therefore decided to destroy all those who were evil and to save only the few good ones, so that these survivors could form the nucleus of a better human race after the deluge. G’d had found Noach, his sons, and their wives to be good and they were chosen to provide the seed for future generations. Lemech, Noach’s father had died already 5 years prior to the deluge, and Metushelach, Noach’s grandfather, another good man, had lived his life to the full before the onset of the deluge. As a result of these two men having died, there were no righteous people left on earth other than Noach and his family.
וַיִּנָּחֶם ה׳. מַה שֶּׁאָמַר וַיִּנָּחֶם, דִּבְּרָה תוֹרָה בִּלְשׁוֹן בְּנֵי אָדָם, כִּי עַל דֶּרֶךְ הָאֱמֶת ״לֹא אָדָם הוּא לְהִנָּחֵם״ (שמואל א טו:כט), כִּי אֵין שִׁנּוּי חֵפֶץ בּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ וְיִתְעַלֶּה.
'וינחם ה, the expression, וינחם, “He was sorry, He regretted,” has been chosen by the Torah in order for human beings to have at least an inkling of what G’d’s feelings were when He faced destroying His handiwork. Clearly, such emotions as “regret” are not part of G’d’s vocabulary. We have it on the authority Samuel I 15 29 that human feelings such as regret, frustration, are not feelings which can be attributed To Him.
וַיִּתְעַצֵּב אֶל־לִבּוֹ. זֶה גַּם כֵּן דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל, כִּי אֵין לְפָנָיו עַל דֶּרֶךְ הָאֱמֶת לֹא שִׂמְחָה וְלֹא עִצָּבוֹן וְלֹא יִשְׁתַּנֶּה מִמִּדָּה לְמִדָּה, וְהֶפֶךְ מִוַּיִּתְעַצֵּב ״יִשְׂמַח ה׳ בְּמַעֲשָׂיו״ (תהלים קד:לא), וְהַכֹּל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל. כִּי כְּמוֹ שֶׁהָאָדָם שָׂמֵחַ עַל הַדָּבָר הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו, וְיִתְעַצֵּב עַל הַדָּבָר רַע בְּעֵינָיו, כֵּן הָיָה הַסִּפּוּר עַל הָאֵל יִתְבָּרַךְ וְהוּא עַל דֶּרֶךְ הַעֲבָרָה, וְהַשִּׂמְחָה וְהָעִצָּבוֹן בָּאָדָם בַּלֵּב לְפִיכָךְ אָמַר דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל עַל הָאֵל יִתְבָּרַךְ אֶל־לִבּוֹ. וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (כז:ד) גּוֹי אֶחָד שָׁאַל אֶת רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן קָרְחָה, אָמַר לוֹ אֵין אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים שֶׁהַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא רוֹאֶה אֶת הַנּוֹלָד, אָמַר לוֹ הֵן, אָמַר לוֹ וְהַכְתִיב וַיִּנָּחֶם וַיִּתְעַצֵּב אֶל־לִבּוֹ? אָמַר לוֹ נוֹלַד לְךָ בֵּן זָכָר מִיָּמֶיךָ? אָמַר לוֹ הֵן, אָמַר לוֹ מָה עָשִׂיתָ, אָמַר לוֹ שִׂמַּחְתִּי וְשִׂמַּחְתִּי אֶת הַכֹּל, אָמַר לוֹ וַהֲלֹא הָיִיתָ יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁסּוֹפוֹ לָמוּת? אָמַר לוֹ בִּשְׁעַת חֶדְוָא חֶדְוָא וּבִשְׁעַת אֲבֵלָא אֲבֵלָא. אָמַר לוֹ כָּךְ מַעֲשֶׂה לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא, דְּאָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי שִׁבְעָה יָמִים נִתְאַבֵּל הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא עַל עוֹלָמוֹ קֹדֶם שֶׁהֵבִיא מַבּוּל לָעוֹלָם שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר ״וַיְהִי לְשִׁבְעַת הַיָּמִים וּמֵי הַמַּבּוּל הָיוּ וְגוֹ׳״ (בראשית ז:י), וּמָה טַעַם וַיִּתְעַצֵּב אֶל־לִבּוֹ וְאֵין עֲצִיבָה אֶלָּא אֲבֵלוּת כְּמָה דְאַתְּ אוֹמֵר ״כִּי נֶעֱצַב הַמֶּלֶךְ עַל בְּנוֹ״ (שמואל ב יט:ג).
ויתעצב אל לבו, this too, is a figure of speech, seeing that G’d does not know such emotional ups and downs as joy and sadness. While David in Psalms 104,31 speaks of ישמח ה' במעשיו, he too uses such “emotions” of G’d only as a figure of speech. It is his way of describing G’d’s reactions to seeing that His plans had worked out. Similarly, here, the Torah describes G’d’s reaction when His plans had not worked out. [G’d’s plans not working out can only happen due to the freedom of choice with which He endowed man. Ed.] In other words, the Torah, in telling us about G’d’s reactions, here and elsewhere, reflects the impressions gained by the teller of the story. אל לבו, we are told in Bereshit Rabbah 27,4 that a gentile asked Rabbi Yehoshua ben Korchah if it is not true that the Jews claim that their G’d knows all that is going to happen in advance. Rabbi Yehoshua answered in the affirmative. Thereupon the gentile quoted this verse as proof that if G’d had known all of this in advance, how could He have been saddened by it. Rabbi Yehoshua asked the gentile if he had ever have a son born to him. The gentile said that indeed he was the father of a son. He then asked him: “what did you do when he was born?” The gentile replied that he was very happy when he heard the news. Thereupon Rabbi Yehoshua asked the gentile: “did you not know that the son would die one day, and if so why were you happy that another mortal was born?” The gentile answered that there is a time to rejoice and a time to be sad. Rabbi Yehoshua told the gentile that G’d, in spite of His foreknowledge, reacts in a similar manner. G’d was in mourning for the destruction of His handiwork, as we know from 7,10. The reason the Torah makes mention of the words ויתעצב אל לבו and these seven days, is to teach us that the words אבל and עצב can be used interchangeably, i.e. they describe a state of mourning.
וּמַה שֶּׁאָמַר בָּאָרֶץ. כִּי יָדוּעַ הוּא כִּי בָּאָרֶץ עָשָׂה אֶת הָאָדָם, אֶלָּא רוֹצֶה לוֹמַר בָּאָרֶץ מְעֹרָב בְּתוֹלְדוֹת הָאָרֶץ נוֹטֶה אַחַר בִּנְיַן גּוּפוֹ שֶׁהוּא כֻּלּוֹ אַרְצִי, וְלֹא כֵן דְּמוּת אָדָם הָעֶלְיוֹנִי שֶׁהוּא בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים, לְפִיכָךְ לֹא נִחַם עַל נֹחַ וְעַל כַּיּוֹצֵא בּוֹ.
בארץ, the reason the Torah writes this word, which does not appear to tell us something we did not know, is to remind us that the root of the problem of man becoming so corrupt in spite of his having been equipped with a divine soul, is that he was constructed from and anchored in the earth, in the “lower” universe. This is unlike the אדם העליוני, superior man. This is why G’d did not need consolation for people of Noach’s calibre.
וַיֹּאמֶר ה׳. אָמַר בְּלִבּוֹ, אוֹ אָמַר אֶל נֹחַ.
'ויאמר ה, G’d either said this to Himself, or to Noach.
אֶמְחֶה אֶת־הָאָדָם אֲשֶׁר־בָּרָאתִי. ״אֶת הָאָדָם״ וְלֹא כָּל אָדָם, שֶׁהֲרֵי נִשְׁאַר נֹחַ וּבָנָיו. וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (כח): לָמָּה בְּמַיִם? אָמַר רַבִּי בְּרַכְיָה: כְּלוּם בָּרָאתִי אֶת הָאָדָם אֶלָּא מִן הֶעָפָר? מִי מְמַחֶה אֶת הֶעָפָר? הֲלֹא הַמַּיִם. מֵאָדָם עַד־בְּהֵמָה. וּבִכְלַל בְּהֵמָה חַיָּה, וְרֶמֶשׂ הֵם קְטַנֵּי הַחַיִּים כְּמוֹ שֶׁפֵּרַשְׁנוּ. וְלָמָּה נִמְחוּ הַבְּהֵמוֹת וְהַחַיּוֹת וְהָרֶמֶשׂ וְהָעוֹפוֹת? לְפִי שֶׁכֻּלָּם נִבְרְאוּ בִּשְׁבִיל הָאָדָם, וְאִם אֵין אָדָם מַה צֹּרֶךְ לָהֶם? וְעוֹד, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהָיוּ הַמַּיִם עַל פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה לֹא הָיוּ יְכוֹלִים לְהִנָּצֵל הַבְּהֵמוֹת וְהַחַיּוֹת וְהָעוֹפוֹת אִם לֹא עַל יְדֵי מוֹפֵת, וְאֵין הַשְׁגָּחַת הָאֵל עֲלֵיהֶם אֶלָּא עַל הַמִּין, וְהַמִּין לֹא נִמְחָה, שֶׁהֲרֵי צִוָּה לְנֹחַ עַל קִיּוּמוֹ. וְאִם תֹּאמַר: לָמָּה הָיָה הַמַּבּוּל עַל פְּנֵי כָל הָאָרֶץ, יִהְיֶה בִּמְקוֹם מוֹשַׁב בְּנֵי אָדָם? אִם כֵּן הָיוּ בְּנֵי אָדָם נָסִים מִפְּנֵי הַמַּיִם לְמָקוֹם שֶׁלֹּא הָיוּ בּוֹ הַמַּיִם, לְפִיכָךְ כִּסָּה גַּם הֶהָרִים כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יַעֲלוּ בְּנֵי אָדָם עַל הֶהָרִים הָרָמִים לְהִנָּצֵל שָׁם. וְיֵשׁ מֵרַבּוֹתֵינוּ שֶׁאָמְרוּ (בראשית רבה כח) כִּי גַּם הַחַיּוֹת הַבְּהֵמוֹת וְהָעוֹפוֹת קִלְקְלוּ מִין בְּשֶׁאֵינוֹ מִינוֹ, וְהָאֵל בָּרָא אוֹתָם כָּל אֶחָד לְמִינוֹ, וְהִנֵּה עָשׂוּ כְּנֶגֶד מַעֲשֵׂה הָאֵל. וּמֵהֶם אָמְרוּ כְּטַעַם הָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ, אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא: כְּלוּם בָּרָאתִי בְּהֵמָה וְחַיָּה אֶלָּא בִּשְׁבִיל הָאָדָם, וְאִם אֵין אָדָם בְּהֵמָה לָמָּה?
אמחה את האדם אשר בראתי, the prefix ה before the word אדם is meant to tell us that G’d did not mean to wipe out the human species, אדם, but only האדם, seeing that some humans were allowed to survive. In supplying a rationale why the means used to wipe out all these people was the water, Rabbi Berechyah in Bereshit Rabbah 28,2 describes G’d as saying to Himself, that seeing He had made man out of earth, the only element (of the four that man is made of) which could neutralise earth is water. The words מאדם עד בהמה, included the free roaming beasts on earth, חיה, whereas the word רמש refers to the small creatures as we explained already on 1,25-26. Why were all these creatures wiped out also? What had they done to deserve this? They had only been created for the sake of man. If there was no purpose for man on earth, neither was there a purpose for all of these living creatures. Furthermore, seeing that the waters would cover the habitat of all these creatures they would die unless saved by a special miracle. The concern of G’d for all those creatures does not extend to each of them individually, but only to the survival of each of their species. G’d ensured that the species would survive by commanding Noach to take them into the ark with him, or at least to accept all those that came to the ark voluntarily, in pairs. If you were to ask why the deluge had to cover the entire surface of the earth and not only the areas inhabited by man, if G’d had done this, man could have escaped to uninhabited regions and survived thus foiling G’d’s plan. This is why even the highest mountains had to be covered by the waters to prevent anyone from escaping to the mountain peaks. Some of our sages (Sanhedrin 108) claim that the animals had become corrupt, copying man’s corrupt ways, so that they too deserved to die in their own right. They had become guilty of mating with species not their own, thus frustrating G’d’s plan that each species remain pure. Other sages (on the same folio) agree with the first opinion we offered, i.e. that in the absence of man on earth there was no purpose in the earth being populated by animals.
וְנֹחַ מָצָא חֵן בְּעֵינֵי ה׳. עָשָׂה מַעֲשִׂים טוֹבִים שֶׁבָּהֶם מָצָא חֵן בְּעֵינֵי ה׳, וְכֵן נֶאֱמַר בְּמֹשֶׁה רַבֵּינוּ עָלָיו הַשָּׁלוֹם (שמות לג:יז) ״כִּי מָצָאתָ חֵן בְּעֵינָי״. וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (כח:ט) אָמַר רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר כָּהֲנָא, ״כִּי נִחַמְתִּי כִּי עֲשִׂיתִים, וְנֹחַ״? אַתְמְהָא, אֶלָּא אֲפִילּוּ נֹחַ שֶׁנִּשְׁתַּיֵּר מֵהֶם לֹא הָיָה כְּדַאי, אֶלָּא שֶׁמָּצָא חֵן בְּעֵינֵי ה׳.
'ונח מצא חן בעיני ה, he found favour due to good deeds performed by him. The Torah uses the same expression in Exodus 33,17 when G’d tells Moses that he had found favour in His eyes. His deeds had been pleasing to G’d. In Bereshit Rabbah 28,9, Rabbi Acha son of Kahana expresses surprise at the words ונח מצא חן בעיני ה', saying that the wording implies that Noach, in his own right, could not have claimed the right of survival, except for the circumstance that he “found favour in the eyes of the Lord, i.e. G’d had to search for a reason to let him survive. [He bases himself on the whole verse being superfluous, as Noach’s merits are discussed in the following verses. Rabbi Einhorn’s comment on that Midrash. Ed.]
אֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת נֹחַ. תּוֹלְדֹת פֵּרוּשׁוֹ הַקּוֹרוֹת שֶׁקָּרוּהוּ בִּדְבַר הַמַּבּוּל וְאַחֲרָיו, וְכֵן ״אֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת יַעֲקֹב״ כִּי הַקּוֹרוֹת הֵם תּוֹלְדֹת הַיָּמִים, וְכֵן אָמַר ״כִּי לֹא תֵדַע מַה יֵּלֵד יוֹם״ (משלי כז:א).
אלה תולדות נח, נח איש צדיק תמים היה בדורותיו, the meaning of the word תולדות is similar to “history of,” i.e. this it what happened to Noach, etc. It concerns both the deluge and what came after. We encounter the same pattern when the Torah introduced a paragraph with the words אלה תולדות יעקב, יוסף in Genesis 37,2 where this is an introduction to history related to Yaakov’s family. In Proverbs 27,1 we have a verse concluding with the words “the day will give birth to.” The root ילד is the root of the word תולדה and תולדות, i.e. it refers to future developments. Developments are matters that are the result of days following one another.
נֹחַ. שְׁלֹשָׁה בְּפָסוּק אֶחָד, וְהָיָה מַסְפִּיק בְּאֶחָד? אָמְרוּ כִּי הוּא דֶּרֶךְ צַחוּת לְשׁוֹן הַקֹּדֶשׁ, וְכֵן ״יִשְׂרָאֵל״ חֲמִשָּׁה בְּפָסוּק אֶחָד (במדבר ח:יט).
נח, the name occurs three times in the same verse, when a single mention of his name would have sufficed. In Numbers 8,19 the name בני ישראל occurs 5 times in one verse. According to Tanchuma 5 on our parshah such apparently needless repetitions are an expression of special affection by the writer for the subject described. Such formulations are referred to by Rashi in Numbers 8,19), as well as by Ibn Ezra as צחות הלשון, “stylistic purity.” [repeating Noach’s name 3 times indicates his popularity with G’d at that time. Ed.]
צַדִּיק. שֶׁהָיוּ מַעֲשָׂיו בְּצֶדֶק, הֵפֶךְ אַנְשֵׁי דוֹרוֹ שֶׁהָיוּ אַנְשֵׁי חָמָס.
צדיק, his deeds all reflected fairness, charitable considerations, in contrast to those of his contemporaries who were men of violence.
תָּמִים. שָׁלֵם בְּלִי שׁוּם דֹּפִי; וּבַמִּדְרָשׁ שֶׁנּוֹלַד מָהוּל (תנחומא ה).
תמים, perfect, without flaw; according to Tanchuma 5, he was born circumcised.
בְּדֹרֹתָיו. בְּאַנְשֵׁי דוֹרוֹ וּבַדּוֹרוֹת הַבָּאִים אַחַר הַמַּבּוּל, כִּי נֹחַ הֶאֱרִיךְ יָמִים וְהַרְבֵּה דוֹרוֹת הִשִּׂיג בְּחַיָּיו, כִּי אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ הָיָה בֶּן חֲמִשִּׁים וּשְׁמֹנֶה כְּשֶׁמֵּת נֹחַ, וְהַסִּימָן אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ הָיָה בֶּן נ״ח כַּאֲשֶׁר מֵת נֹחַ. וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (ותנחומא) בְּדֹרֹתָיו, בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה דוֹרוֹת, בְּדוֹר אֱנוֹשׁ, בְּדוֹר הַמַּבּוּל וּבְדוֹר הַפַּלָּגָה.
בדורותיו, both in the time of his generation, and the generation following him after the deluge. [this is the reason for the plural ending יו in the word בדורותיו. Ed.] Noach lived for 350 years after the deluge, so that he was a reminder of the deluge to at least 8-9 generations after him. In fact, Avraham was already 58 years old when Noach died, and he was the 10th generation counting from Noach. An easy way to remember this is the line that אברהם בן נח, “Avraham was a son of Noach“ (family member, as all people before the Torah was given) the numerical value of the letters in the name נח have a combined value of 58. According to Bereshit Rabbah 30,9 the word בדורותיו refers to three specific generations, that of Enosh, that of the deluge, and the generation of the Tower of Babel, and the scattering of mankind and the division into many languages.
אֶת־הָאֱלֹהִים הִתְהַלֶּךְ־נֹחַ. דָּבֵק הָיָה בּוֹ וְכָל דְּרָכָיו לִשְׁמוֹ, וְזֶה הָיָה כֹּחַ גָּדוֹל מִשִּׂכְלוֹ שֶׁהִתְגַּבֵּר עַל טִבְעוֹ, כִּי הוּא הָיָה בְּדוֹר רְשָׁעִים וְחַמָּסִים וְלֹא לָמַד מִמַּעֲשֵׂיהֶם, וְלֹא הִתְבּוֹדֵד בַּעֲבוֹדַת הָאֵל אֶלָּא הוּא לְבַדּוֹ.
את האלוקים התהלך נח, a description of how Noach cleaved to his Creator. All his actions were designed to please his Creator. The reason why this is so remarkable is that it demonstrated the preponderance of his intellect over his baser urges, especially so as it would have been both more convenient for him and more socially advantageous for him to conform to the cultural mores of his time.
וַיּוֹלֶד נֹחַ. וּכְבָר הִזְכִּיר בָּנָיו שֶׁהוֹלִיד לְמַעְלָה, אֶלָּא זְכָרָם הֵנָּה אַחַר שֶׁאָמַר ״הִתְהַלֵּךְ נֹחַ״ לְהוֹרוֹת, כִּי כְּמוֹ שֶׁהִתְעַסֵּק בַּעֲבוֹדַת הָאֵל כֵּן לִמֵּד וְהִרְגִּיל אֶת בָּנָיו שֶׁהוֹלִיד לָסוּר מִדַּרְכֵי הָרְשָׁעִים וְלַעֲבֹד אֶת ה׳ וּלְדָבְקָה בּוֹ, שֶׁאִם לֹא הָיוּ כֵן לֹא הָיוּ נִצּוֹלִים מִן הַמַּבּוּל, וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא הָיָה צַדִּיק, כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר בְּסֵפֶר יְחֶזְקֵאל (יד:טז) ״וְהָיוּ שְׁלֹשֶׁת הָאֲנָשִׁים הָאֵלֶּה בְּתוֹכָהּ נֹחַ דָּנִיֵּאל וְאִיּוֹב״ וְאָמַר אִם בָּנִים וְאִם בָּנוֹת יַצִּילוּ, וְהָיָה נֹחַ נִצָּל עִם אִשְׁתּוֹ לְבַדָּהּ, וְהֵם הָיוּ מַשְׁאִירִים זֶרַע אַחַר הַמַּבּוּל.
ויולד נח, why does the Torah mention this now when it had already told us about his three sons in 5,32? The Torah wanted us to know that these sons were born after Noach had already been certified by the Torah as “walking with G’d.” Mention of these sons here indicates that he raised his sons to believe in G’d and to walk in His ways, also. Had his sons not been good people they would not have been saved at the time of the deluge, even though their father was a righteous person. We have already cited Ezekiel 14,20 in which we were told that Noach’s merits did not suffice to save others beyond himself and his wife.
וַתִּשָּׁחֵת הָאָרֶץ. אַנְשֵׁי הָאָרֶץ, וְכֵן (שמות א:ז) ״וַתִּמָּלֵא הָאָרֶץ״ וְכָמוֹהוּ רַבִּים.
ותשחת הארץ, the people on earth had become corrupted; we have a similar formulation in Exodus 1,2 where the Torah writes of the Israelites ותמלא הארץ, and the meaning cannot be that the whole earth was filled with Israelites. There are many examples of similar stylistic formulations used in the Torah.
לִפְנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים. לְהוֹדִיעַ כִּי הוּא מַשְׁגִּיחַ בַּתַּחְתּוֹנִים דֶּרֶךְ כְּלָל וּפְעָמִים דֶּרֶךְ פְּרָט, וְהִנֵּה נִשְׁחַת הַמִּין, זֶהוּ וַתִּמָּלֵא, וְרָאָה הָאֵל וְאָמַר לִמְחוֹתוֹ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר לִפְנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים.
לפני האלוקים, this expression is meant to inform us that G’d does indeed watch over the actions of His creatures in the “lower” regions of His universe not only in a general way, but sometimes even over the deeds of individuals; now He saw that the human species had become thoroughly corrupted. This is the meaning of the word ותמלא in our verse.
כִּי הִשְׁחִית. וּפֵרוּשׁ כִּי הִשְׁחִית כָּל בָּשָׂר, בְּנֵי אָדָם, וְכֵן ״וִיבָרֵךְ כָּל בָּשָׂר״ (תהלים קמה:כא), ״יָבוֹא כָל בָּשָׂר״ (ישעיה סו:כג), וְאִם כְּדִבְרֵי רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה גַּם שְׁאָר בַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים בַּכְּלָל כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ.
וירא, a continuation of the words לפני האלוקים in the last verse. כי השחית, the same as והנה נשחתה, i.e. a passive not a transitive hiphil. כל בשר, all of mankind. We find the same expression in Psalms 145,21 ויברך כל בשר, as referring not to all that lives, but to all of mankind. The same expression also appears in this sense in Isaiah 66,23 יבא כל בשר, “all of mankind will come, etc.”
אֶת דַּרְכּוֹ. דֶּרֶךְ תּוֹלַדְתּוֹ, שֶׁהוּא כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר ״וְדָבַק בְּאִשְׁתּוֹ״ (בראשית ב:כד), כְּמוֹ שֶׁפֵּרַשְׁנוּ.
את דרכו, its norms as established at the time of creation. Just as man cleaving to his wife (only) is described as a norm in Genesis 2,24, so there were other norms all of which were violated by the generation of the deluge. In retribution, G’d now violates the norms that applied to the conditions prevailing on our planet.
וְיֹאמַר קֵץ כָּל־בָּשָׂר. הִגִּיעַ קִצָּם לְכַלּוֹתָם מִן הָעוֹלָם, אוֹ הַקֵּץ שֶׁנָּתַתִּי לָהֶם כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ; וְהִנֵּה לֹא שָׁבוּ אֲבָל הִשְׁחִיתוּ מְאֹד יוֹתֵר.
ויאמר...קץ כל בשר, the time had arrived for their destruction from the world. The destruction which G’d had threatened before allowing for the 120 years grace period. Not only had they not mended their ways, but they had become ever more corrupt.
בָּא לְפָנַי. פֵּרַשְׁנוּהָ הִגִּיעַ לְפָנַי, כְּמוֹ ״כִּי עָלְתָה רָעָתָם לְפָנַי״ (יונה א:ב), כְּלוֹמַר הַקֵּץ שֶׁהוּא גְּמוּל מַעֲשֵׂה הָרָע שֶׁבָּא לְפָנַי, הִגִּיעַ, וְהִנֵּה טַעַם בָּא, לַקֵּץ וְלַמַּעֲשֶׂה הָרָע.
בא לפני, we have explained the word בא already elsewhere as meaning “that the time had arrived before Me.” The same expression is used in Jonah 1,2 when G’d describes the impending fate of the people of Nineveh in the words כי עלתה רעתם לפני, meaning that the effect of the wickedness had reached Him. The קץ described in our verse is the natural reaction to the effect the wickedness of the people had on G’d when it confronted Him.
כִּי מָלְאָה הָאָרֶץ חָמָס מִפְּנֵיהֶם. וְטַעַם מִפְּנֵיהֶם דָּבֵק עִם בָּא לְפָנַי, כְּלוֹמַר בָּא לְפָנַי מִפְּנֵי מַעֲשֵׂה הֶחָמָס שֶׁהִגְדִּיל לַעֲשׂוֹת. וְאָמְרוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (בראשית רבה לא): בֹּא וּרְאֵה כַּמָּה גָּדוֹל כֹּחַ שֶׁל חָמָס, שֶׁהֲרֵי דּוֹר הַמַּבּוּל עָבְרוּ עַל הַכֹּל וְלֹא נֶחְתַּם גְּזַר דִּינָם אֶלָּא עַל חָמָס.
כי מלאה הארץ חמס, the word מפניהם belongs next to the words בא לפני, i.e. on account of the violence they have perpetrated. Our sages (Sanhedrin 108) say behold how powerful is the sin of violence seeing that the generation of the deluge was not wiped out in spite of all their other sins until they had become guilty of indiscriminate violence. Iit was only then that the decree of their destruction was sealed.
מַשְׁחִיתָם. כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִשְׁחִיתוּ אֶת דַּרְכָּם עַל הָאָרֶץ שֶׁהִפְקַדְתִּים שֶׁיִּהְיוּ שׁוֹלְטִים עָלֶיהָ, הִנְנִי מַשְׁחִיתָם מִמֶּנָּה.
משחיתם, seeing that the people had deliberately corrupted their way of life, G’d matches the punishment to the crime by depriving them of the control they used to exert over nature inasmuch as it effected their habitat, earth.
אֶת. כְּמוֹ מִן, וְכֵן ״כְּצֵאתִי אֶת הָעִיר״ (שמות ט:כט), ״הֵם יָצְאוּ אֶת הָעִיר״ (בראשית מד:ד) וְהַדּוֹמִים לָהֶם, אוֹ פֵּרֵשׁ עִם הָאָרֶץ, כִּי כֵּיוָן שֶׁכִּסָּה הַמַּיִם הֲרֵי הִיא נִשְׁחֲתָה וְחָזְרָה לְתֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ; וְרַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה פֵּרְשׁוּ (בראשית רבה פרשה לא), כִּי שְׁלֹשָׁה טְפָחִים שֶׁל עֹמֶק הַמַּחֲרֵשָׁה נִמֹּחוּ וְנִטַּשְׁטְשָׁה.
את, in this instance it means the same as מן, “from.” A parallel verse in which the word את is used in this sense is Exodus 9,29 כצאתי את העיר, “as soon as I leave the city.” Another such example is found in Genesis 44,4 הם יצאו את העיר “they had just departed from the city.”
עֲשֵׂה לְךָ. לְצָרְכְּךָ, שֶׁתִּנָּצֵל בָּהּ מִמֵּי הַמַּבּוּל וּשְׁאָר הַחַיִּים עִמְּךָ.
עשה לך, for your needs so that you will be saved from the impending deluge, as well as the other living creatures in the ark with you.,
גֹּפֶר. הוּא עֵץ קַל עַל פְּנֵי הַמַּיִם, וְתַרְגּוּם אוּנְקְלוֹס ״קַדְרוֹם״, וְהוּא מִמִּינֵי אֲרָזִים.
גפר, a type of light wood, like balsam wood, which floats easily on the water. According to Onkelos it is a kind of cedar wood.
קִנִּים. מְדוֹרִים חֲלוּקִים כְּמוֹ קִנֵּי הָעוֹפוֹת, וְכֵן עוֹשִׂים בְּנֵי אָדָם לַיּוֹנִים קִנִּים רַבִּים חֲלוּקִים, וְכֵן צִוָּה הָאֵל לְנֹחַ שֶׁיַּעֲשֶׂה הַרְבֵּה מְדוֹרִים מְדוֹרִים שֶׁיָּדוּר כָּל מִין וּמִין בִּפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ.
קנים, divided into cabins, small rooms, such as the enclosures allocated to individual birds in a dove-cot. G’d commanded Noach to see to it that each species of animal would have separate accommodation in the ark.
וְכָפַרְתָּ. מֵעִנְיַן כֹּפֶר, וְהוּא הַזֶּפֶת, וְכֵן בְּדִבְרֵי רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (שבת סז) ״זֶפֶת כּוּפְרָא״.
וכפרת, verbalised from the word כופר, or זפת, waterproof caulking, pitch or tar. Our sages also describe it as such in Shabbat 67.
מִבַּיִת וּמִחוּץ. שֶׁאִם יִתְפָּרְקוּ מַה שֶּׁבַּחוּץ מִפְּנֵי חֹזֶק הַמַּיִם, עוֹמֵד מַה שֶּׁבִּפְנִים.
מבית ומחוץ, the reason why the caulking had to be applied both from the outside and from the inside, was so that in case the outside would spring a leak or crack due to the violent impact of the waves, the inside caulking would provide insurance against the people inside the ark getting wet.
וְזֶה אֲשֶׁר תַּעֲשֶׂה אֹתָהּ. הַמִּדָּה וְהַתְּכוּנָה שֶׁתַּעֲשֶׂה אוֹתָהּ זֶהוּ, וְ״זֶה״, לְשׁוֹן זָכָר אוֹמֵר עַל הַשִּׁעוּר, וְצִוָּהוּ לַעֲשׂוֹת אֶת הַתֵּבָה הָרֹחַב שִׁשִּׁית הָאֹרֶךְ וְהַקּוֹמָה עֲשִׂירִית הָאֹרֶךְ, וּבְשִׁעוּר זֶה תַּעֲמֹד עַל הַמַּיִם בְּמִישׁוֹר וְלֹא תֵהָפֵךְ מִצַּד אֶל צַד. וּבִבְרֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (פרשה לא) לִמְּדָה תּוֹרָה דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ שֶׁאִם יַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם סְפִינָה יַעֲשֶׂה רָחְבָּהּ אֶחָד מִשִּׁשָּׁה בְּאָרְכָּהּ וְגָבְהָהּ אֶחָד מֵעֲשָׂרָה.
וזה אשר תעשה אותה, the measurements and shape are introduced by the word זה. The reason why the Torah uses the masculine mode זה instead of the feminine mode זאת, seeing that the word תבה, ark, is feminine, is because the word זה, “this,” masculine, describes the שעור, measurement, a noun which is masculine. G’d commanded Noach to make the width of the ark one sixth of its length, and the height one tenth of its length.] According to Bereshit Rabbah 31,10 the reason that the Torah gave these dimensions is precisely that shipbuilders are advised to stick to the relative measurements of width, length and height recorded here.
צֹהַר. מִגִּזְרַת צָהֳרַיִם, רוֹצֶה לוֹמַר שֶׁיַּעֲשֶׂה עָלֶיהָ חַלּוֹן שֶׁיִּכָּנֵס מִמֶּנּוּ הָאוֹרָה לְאַחַר כְּלוֹת הַגֶּשֶׁם וְחֶסְרוֹן הַמַּיִם, כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר ״וַיִּפְתַּח נֹחַ אֶת חַלּוֹן הַתֵּבָה אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה״ (בראשית ח:ו). וְיֵשׁ מֵרַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ כִּי אֶבֶן טוֹבָה הָיְתָה לוֹ שֶׁהָיְתָה מְאִירָה כַּצָּהֳרַיִם, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁאָמַר צֹהַר תַּעֲשֶׂה, וּלְשׁוֹן תַּעֲשֶׂה הוּא כְּנֶגֶד זֶה הַפֵּרוּשׁ. וּבֶאֱמֶת הֵכִין נֹחַ שֶׁמֶן לַנֵּר בְּהָכִינוֹ כָּל צְרָכָיו, וְזֶה הַחַלּוֹן הָיָה לְמַעְלָה.
צהר, this word is derived from the word צהרים, “noon,” an instruction that Noach make a window in the ark that would let in the light after the rain would stop falling, during the long period when the water level would gradually subside. This is what is meant in 8,7 when the Torah wrote ויפתח נח את החלון, “Noach opened the window.” Some of our sages (Bereshit Rabbah 31,11 ) believe that Noach suspended a brilliant gemstone which provided light inside the ark. The words תעשה לתבה, “you shall construct for or inside the ark,” contradict such an explanation. There is no question that Noach had prepared oil for the lamps he took along into the ark. The window mentioned here in our verse is a natural source of light, affixed by Noach in the highest part of the ark.
וְאֶל־אַמָּה תְּכַלֶּנָּה. שֶׁהָיְתָה מְשֻׁפַּעַת וְעוֹלָה עַד שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה לְמַעְלָה, בָּאֹרֶךְ וּבָרֹחַב, אֶלָּא אַמָּה, כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּהְיוּ הַגְּשָׁמִים שֶׁיּוֹרְדִים עַל הַתֵּבָה יוֹרְדִים מְהֵרָה בְּלֹא עִכּוּב.
ואל אמה, to the uppermost cubit of the slanting roof of the ark. It is called thus seeing that at the top there was no more than one cubit of width between the roof sloping down on one side and that sloping down on the other side. The purpose of the slanting roof was to let the rain run off the ark.
וּפֶתַח הַתֵּבָה. שֶׁנִּכְנְסוּ בּוֹ וְיָצְאוּ, וְסָתְמוּ אוֹתוֹ הַפֶּתַח אַחַר שֶׁנִּכְנְסוּ וּפָתְחוּהוּ כְּשֶׁיָּצְאוּ.
ופתח התבה, the entrance/exit which was closed after everybody who was entitled to enter the ark had entered it.
תַּחְתִּיִּם. הַיּוֹ״ד הַכְּתוּבָה הִיא יוֹ״ד הַיַּחַס וְיוֹ״ד הָרַבִּים נָפְלָה מֵהַמִּכְתָּב כְּמוֹ ״עֲבָדִים נָכְרִים״, וְהַדּוֹמִים לָהֶם. וּבְבֵאשִׁית רַבָּה (לא): תַּחְתִּיִּים לִזְבָלִים, שְׁנִיִּים לוֹ וּלְבָנָיו וְלִטְהוֹרִים, וְהָעֶלְיוֹנִים לִטְמֵאִים. וְיֵשׁ מְחַלְּקִים: תַּחְתִּיִּים לִטְמֵאִים, שְׁנִיִּים לוֹ וּלְבָנָיו וְלִטְהוֹרִים, וְהָעֶלְיוֹנִים לִזְבָלִים. כֵּיצַד הָיָה עוֹשֶׂה? אֶלָּא כְּמִין קַטְרַקְטִין הָיָה לוֹ, וְהָיָה פּוֹתְחָן מִן הַצַּד.
תחתים, a lower deck; the letter י in this word serves a dual purpose, a) to represent the plural mode of the word, as well as 2) a letter describing a relative and not an absolute position. When speaking of the third deck, שלשים, the letter י which would reflect the relative position is unnecessary (seeing it was the top, i.e. highest deck) so that we do not find the dagesh in the י in that word. The י describing the plural mode does appear, just as it does in words such as נכרים, gentiles, or in מצרים, Egyptians. In Bereshit Rabbah 31,11 we are told that the lower deck served as the container of refuse, the middle deck as the accommodation for the family of Noach and the pure animals, [the ones fit as sacrifices], whereas the upper deck served as accommodation for the impure species of animals. Some scholars believe that the lowest deck accommodated the ritually impure species of animals, the middle deck was reserved for Noach and his family as well as for the ritually pure animals, whereas the top deck was for the refuse. Noach constructed sort of a trap door through which he shoveled the refuse.
וַאֲנִי וְגוֹ׳ הַמַּבּוּל מַיִם. חָסֵר הַנִּסְמָךְ, הַמַּבּוּל מַבּוּל מַיִם, כְּמוֹ ״הָאָרוֹן הַבְּרִית״ (יהושע ג:טו) וְהַדּוֹמִים לוֹ. וּמַבּוּל עִקָּרוֹ מִנָּבוּל, וְכֵן ״וְנִבְלֵי שָׁמַיִם מִי יַשְׁכִּיב״ (איוב לח:לז) שֶׁפֵּרְשׁוּ גִּשְׁמֵי שָׁמַיִם, וְעִקַּר הַמִּלָּה עִנְיַן נְפִילָה, כְּמוֹ ״נֹבֶלֶת עָלֶיהָ״ (ישעיהו א:ל), לְפִי שֶׁנּוֹפְלִים מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם וְנִשְׁפָּכִים לָאָרֶץ, וּמַבּוּל שֵׁם תֹּאַר לַגֶּשֶׁם, וְגֶשֶׁם שֵׁם עֶצֶם, לְפִיכָךְ יוּכַל לוֹמַר מַבּוּל עַל כָּל דָּבָר שֶׁנּוֹפֵל מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם, כְּמוֹ הַשֶּׁלֶג וְהָאֵשׁ וְהַבָּרָד אִם יֵרֵד הָרֹב, לְפִיכָךְ אָמַר מַבּוּל מַיִם וְלֹא אָמַר גֶּשֶׁם מַיִם. מִתַּחַת הַשָּׁמָיִם. וְאִם לֹא אָמַר כֹּל אֲשֶׁר בָּאָרֶץ הָיִיתִי מֵבִין אֲפִלּוּ הַדָּגִים, לְפִיכָךְ פֵּרֵשׁ וְאָמַר כֹּל אֲשֶׁר בָּאָרֶץ, וּפֵרוּשׁ בַּיַּבָּשָׁה, כִּי לֹא נִגְזְרָה גְּזֵרָה עַל הַדָּגִים שֶׁבַּיָּם, כִּי אֵינָם עִם בְּנֵי אָדָם בַּיַּבָּשָׁה, גַּם לֹא הִשְׁחִיתוּ אֶת דַּרְכָּם עַל דַּעַת רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה.
ואני...המבול מים, the word מבול after the word המבול is missing, a word which should have been written since we had not heard about a concept called מבול previously. There are some other parallels to this missing construct form when we would have expected it, as in Joshua 3,15 הארון הברית. The basic root of the word מבול is נבל, in the same sense as in Job 38,37 ונבלי מים מי ישכיב? “who can tilt the water bottles from the sky?” This is a reference to rain emanating from the celestial regions. At the same time the word also contains an allusion to “falling”, מפלה, as in Isaiah 1,30 נובלת עליה, things which fall from the sky and are poured on to earth The word מבול is an adjective describing a certain type of rain. The word גשם on the other hand, is a noun. This is why it is possible to use the word מבול concerning any matter that drops out of the sky, such as snow, fire, hail, etc. Also, this is the reason why the Torah did not need to write גשם מים מתחת השמים, if the Torah had not added the words כל אשר בארץ, I would have thought that the fish had also been meant to die. The word בארץ in our verse therefore means “on the dry land.” The decree of destruction did not include the fish because since they do not share man’s habitat they did not adopt man’s corrupt ways. (compare Zevachim 113)
וַהֲקִמֹתִי אֶת־בְּרִיתִי אִתָּךְ. בְּרִית שֶׁאֲנִי כּוֹרֵת עִמְּךָ שֶׁתִּנָּצֵל מִמֵּי הַמַּבּוּל אַתָּה וְכָל אֲשֶׁר עִמְּךָ, אֲקַיְּמֶנּוּ לְךָ.
והקימותי את בריתי אתך, the covenant that I am going to make with you as part of the deal that you and your family will be saved. I will keep this promise for you and your descendants.
וּבָאתָ אֶל הַתֵּבָה. שֶׁאָמַרְתִּי לְךָ שֶׁתִּנָּצְלוּ בָּהּ מִמֵּי הַמַּבּוּל.
ובאת אל התבה, the ark in which I told you that I would save you from the waters of the deluge.
אַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ. מִכָּאן רָמְזוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (בראשית רבה לא) שֶׁלֹּא שִׁמְּשׁוּ מִטּוֹתֵיהֶם נֹחַ וּבָנָיו בַּתֵּבָה, שֶׁהִפְרִידָם הַכָּתוּב בְּבִיאָתָם אֶל הַתֵּבָה, שֶׁאָמַר אַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ וְאִשְׁתְּךָ וּנְשֵׁי בָנֶיךָ, וְכֵן הָיָה רָאוּי לוֹ שֶׁיָּחוּשׁ וְיִדְאַג עַל הַשְׁחָתַת הָעוֹלָם וְלֹא יִתְעַסֵּק בְּתַאֲוַת הַגּוּף אֶלָּא בְּמַאֲכָל כְּדֵי לְהַחֲיוֹת.
אתה ובניך, the absence of a reference to the females, shows that copulation was forbidden in the ark, seeing that the women were to have separate quarters. (Chulin 70) G’d separated them by writing: אתה ובניך, אשתך ונשי בניך, The moral lesson in all this is that a time when the entire human species is being wiped out, it is not appropriate for the survivors to indulge in physical pleasures. All they were allowed to do was to eat enough in order to keep themselves alive and well.
וּמִכָּל־הָחַי מִכָּל־בָּשָׂר. מֵאֲשֶׁר בַּיַּבָּשָׁה.
ומכל החי מכל בשר, a reference to the living creatures on the dry land only.
שְׁנַיִם מִכֹּל. רוֹצֶה לוֹמַר שֶׁיִּהְיוּ זוּגִים, וְאַחַר כֵּן פֵּרַשׁ הַזּוּגוֹת, וְאָמַר זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה יִהְיוּ. תָּבִיא אֶל־הַתֵּבָה. אַחַר שֶׁיָּבֹאוּ מֵעַצְמָם לִפְנֵי הַתֵּבָה תַּכְנִיסֵם אַתָּה אֶל הַתֵּבָה. וְהֵיאַךְ יָבֹאוּ מֵעַצְמָם? שֶׁיָּעִיר הָאֵל אֶת רוּחָם שֶׁיָּבֹאוּ אֶל הַתֵּבָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁיָּבֹאוּ בְּכֹחַ הַדִּמְיוֹן אֶל מְקוֹם הַמִּרְעֶה שֶׁיִּרְצוּ לֶאֱכֹל וְאֶל מְקוֹם מַיִם כְּשֶׁיִּרְצוּ לִשְׁתּוֹת.
שנים מכל, Noach was told that these animals were to be admitted in pairs. G’d specified further, זכר ונקבה יהיו.. תביא אל התבה, after the animals which came of their own accord had been accommodated in the ark. What prompted some of these animals to come to Noach’s ark on their own? They were inspired by the same kind of imagination which unerringly enables them to find grazing land etc. G’d, no doubt, aided their imagination in this instance.
לְהַחֲיֹת אִתָּךְ. שֶׁתַּזְמִין לָהֶם מַאֲכָלָם יוֹם בְּיוֹם.
להחיות אתך, to keep them alive with you by feeding them on a daily basis.
מֵהָעוֹף לְמִינֵהוּ. מִכָּל מִינֵי הָעוֹף.
מהעוף למחנהו, some from each species;
וְכֵן וּמִן־הַבְּהֵמָה לְמִינָהּ. וּבִכְלָלָהּ הַחַיָּה, כִּי חַיָּה בִּכְלַל בְּהֵמָה וּבְהֵמָה בִּכְלַל חַיָּה.
ומן הבהמה למינה, this includes the free-roaming beasts.
יָבֹאוּ. מֵעַצְמָם יָבֹאוּ אֵלֶיךָ לִפְנֵי הַתֵּבָה וְאַתָּה תַּכְנִיסֵם.
יבאו, they will come on their own to the proximity of the ark, from where you will bring in the ones which qualify.
לְהַחֲיוֹת. פֵּרַשְׁנוּהוּ.
להחיות, we already explained the meaning of this word.
וְאַתָּה קַח־לְךָ. כֵּיוָן שֶׁיָּבֹאוּ אֵלֶיךָ לְהַחֲיוֹתָם, צָרִיךְ שֶׁתַּזְמִין מִכָּל־מַאֲכָל לְצָרְכְּךָ וּלְצָרְכָּם, וְהַמַּאֲכָל הוּא הַפֵּרוֹת וְהַזְּרָעִים וְהָעֲשָׂבִים, וְגַם הַחַיּוֹת הַטּוֹרְפוֹת יֹאכְלוּ גַּם כֵּן כְּמוֹ הָאֲחֵרִים, וְלֹא אָכְלוּ בָּשָׂר כְּמוֹ שֶׁלֹּא אָכְלוּ בִּתְחִלַּת הַבְּרִיאָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְנוּ בְּפָסוּק ״וַיַּעַשׂ אֱלֹהִים אֶת־חַיַּת הָאָרֶץ לְמִינָהּ״ (בראשית א:כה).
ואתה קח לך, seeing that they will come to you in order to survive, you will have to prepare food for them, each species according to the type of diet it is used to. Even the predators will not be allowed to eat flesh while in the ark but would have to subsist on a vegetarian diet. They had, after all, been used to such a diet immediately after they had been created, as we have already explained on Genesis 1,25.
וַיַּעַשׂ נֹחַ. עָשָׂה הַתֵּבָה כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה אֹתוֹ אֱלֹהִים, בְּאָרְכָּהּ בְּרָחְבָּהּ וּבְקוֹמָתָהּ, וּבַקִּנִּים, וּבַמַּאֲכָל שֶׁעָשָׂה לְתוֹכָהּ, כֵּן עָשָׂה הַכֹּל כְּמוֹ אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה אֱלֹהִים.
ויעש נח, Noach built the ark in accordance with all the instructions given to him by G’d. He built its dimensions of length, width and height exactly as he had been commanded. He built the many cabins, and collected the various types of plants and fruit to serve as food for the journey.