Are sold etc. - From here we see they are (considered) capital, for if they were considered produce, the Rabbis instituted that produce (belongs) to the husband:

And they grew old - Old age advanced (lit. jumped) on them before their time:

Did we not already establish - in Tractate Ketubot Chapter 'A women who inherited assets' (79b):...

In another field - The land did not belong to her, the palm trees were in another persons field, her capital would be entirely destroyed, if the husband would be allowed to take them:

That document - A document with a Syrian mortgage, (that states) 'with the completion of these years' and it does not specify the number of years:

This is the (correct) text. The creditor went ahead and consumed the produce - of the third year, before he was subpoena to court:

Land remains in in its owners' possession - Even though, he (the original owner) did not claim until after the consumption of the produce, we determine based on (ownership) of the land, and when we have a doubt, as to who (has rights) this year, we establish the land (rights) to the (original) owner of the land and (judge) that the produce was illegally consumed:

In the possession of the one who consumed it - Since he went ahead and consumed them, and he (the original owner) comes to extract (the produce) from him, bring a proof that (the contract) was not for three years, as we follow (award, based on) the consumption of the produce:

Do we not establish the law is in accordance with Rav Nahman in (financial) legal matters - And Rav Nahman had said the the land is established to be in the possession of the original owner, regarding one who rented a bath house for twelve gold coins per annum, one dinar per month in (chapter) 'The borrower' (above 102b) and even if the renter came (to claim) at the end of the (13th) month, he says (Rav Nahman) the full rent (i.e. 13 gold dinar) is given to the renter in a leap year:

This applies to a matter that will not be revealed - That means to say, we certainly follow ownership of the land, however this only applies to situation that will never (ever) be clarified, like that case [of rental in a leap year] where we are in doubt whether the first statement [12 gold coins for a year] is the applicable one, or whether the latter expression [1 dinar per month] is the applicable one:

But here the matter will be revealed - Ultimately when they bring the witness on the document to testify:

And we do not trouble the Court to (convene) twice - Perhaps the law will determine it belongs to the lender, and if we (now) extract from his possession, we will be required to retract and (re)claim from the borrower in the future:

The lender says five years etc. - This is another case. A lender and borrower who come to court, the lender claims (says) [the land] is mortgaged to me for five years, and the document is not before us, the borrower claims (says) three years and you (the lender) have finished (consumed) your three years:

Since he could have claimed (said) it is in my hands as a result of a purchase - Outright (purchase for evermore), and I have occupied (consumed) the [three] years of (required), that establish [ownership for which thereafter no documentary proof is required] and I have lost my document:

They do not hold of that which was stated by Rav Yehuda - And we do not say Migu [one is believed due to not making an advantageous claim], because the situation implies that he [the creditor[ is a liar, [by the fact] that he said the document was lost, as this document is not comparable to a document of sale.[The prime purpose[ of a document of sale is evidence that the land was sold to him, do we expect (to say to) a person for evermore to keep (be careful) with it [the document], the Rabbis say with regard to this, up to three years a person can be careful, beyond that they are not, [because a man will say] no (further) contention has arisen, but in this [case] he acknowledges that it is a mortgage document, the [purpose of which] is to evidence the number of years of consumption of produce, and to claim the rights to [actually] consume the produce during those (for a number of) years, and [a person] would be very careful that it should not get lost until the years are completed and [in this case] the claim it was lost is not believed, for [all] he has done is [just] suppress [the document]:

Only now - The question is directed to Rav Yehuda, who stated 'if he wanted he could have claimed (said) I purchased it [that is why] it is is in my possession (hand)':

Here also [is it possible] that he is believed - Do the Rabbis enact a matter that will lead to such deceit:

The Rabbis instituted that the landowner pays (gives) the taxes - to the king:

And digs the trenches - Digs the ditch around the borders: