"Shema peis" - He reconciled - He appeased his wife during their argument, and then he had sexual relations with her, making the get (divorce document) invalid due to their renewed intimacy.

"Kala it leya lemilta" - There is room for him regarding the matter - The neighbors, both men and women, hear the conflict and discord between the husband and wife. When they see that their dispute has been resolved and they are peaceful, everyone feels relieved.

Rabbi Yochanan said: "Two [witnesses] - they intend to sign [the document] as witnesses."

"And all [other people] - they only sign it out of public embarrassment, and a complete condition is imposed in this get, that it should not be a valid divorce document unless all sign it."

"All [other people sign] as witnesses" - it is intended for their signatures to be [considered as] witnesses.

And two (witnesses) sign - and it is difficult for both statements, as they both say that everyone needs to sign:

Rather, (the resolution is) that when they say "all of you" - it means that the divorce document is not valid until all of them sign.

What is the difference between them? Whether due to a condition or due to witnesses, all of them need to sign. As we learned in the latter part, that "All of you write a bill of divorce for my wife, one writes and all sign." ...

And within ten days, before they give it to her, all must sign.

...And according to the one who says that due to witnesses it is invalid - because it is not considered complete testimony until they all sign, and since they all did not sign on the day of its writing, it is considered early.

If one of them is found to be a relative or invalid - and it is established in the Sanhedrin (page 9) that even if there are a hundred witnesses and one of them is found to be a relative or invalid, their testimony is nullified.

If they signed initially, whether a relative or invalid - in the earlier times, the relative would sign first, and then they all would sign on the same day.

It is said that it is valid - according to the one who says it is due to a condition, even though the relative or invalid signed initially, the testimony will still be valid and considered appropriate for testimony, and the relative will be considered as a condition.

It applies to the exchange of documents in general - since once it is signed initially, it can be said with certainty that the relative signed for the purpose of testimony, and the document will be valid, and the relative will validate all the documents.

The one who said to ten - "All of you write a get for my wife."