Sforno on Deuteronomy Chapter 16
Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.
שָׁמוֹר אֶת חֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב. שְׁמוֹר בְּהִתְמַדַּת הַשְׁגָּחָה שֶׁיִּהְיֶה נִיסָן חֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב, עַל יְדֵי עִבּוּרֵי הַחֳדָשִׁים וְהַשָּׁנִים, שֶׁיְּכַוְּנוּ בָהֶם שְׁנֵי הַלְּבָנָה עִם שְׁנֵי הַחַמָּה.
שמור את חודש האביב, make sure that the month of Nissan always occurs in the spring, by manipulating the calendar, if necessary and inserting an extra month of Adar. By doing this the solar orbit (year) and the lunar orbits, (12 moons equaling a year) can be brought into line with each other.
וְעָשִׂיתָ פֶּסַח. בְּעֶרֶב חַג הַמַּצּוֹת.
ועשית פסח, on the first evening of the festival of matzot
כִּי בְּחֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב הוֹצִיאֲךָ. כִּוֵּן וְרָצָה שֶׁתִּהְיֶה יְצִיאָתְךָ בְּעֵת שֶׁנִּשְׁלַם הַחֹדֶשׁ שֶׁל אָבִיב, וְהוּא הַנִּגּוּד בִּהְיוֹת טָלֶה אֱלֹהֵי מִצְרַיִם עִם הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ בִּגְבוּרָתוֹ וְהַיָּרֵחַ בְּנִגּוּדוֹ.
כי בחודש האביב הוציאך, because it was G’d’s will that your departure from Egypt should be at the time when the month signaling the beginning of spring should occur, astrologically a time when the zodiac sign of the lamb ascends in tandem with the sun, and is opposite the moon, the latter symbolising the Jewish people, as opposed to the Egyptians who worship the sun as a major deity.
לָיְלָה. כִּי אוֹתוֹ הַנִּגּוּד הָיָה אָז בַּלַּיְלָה, וּבֶהֱיוֹת שֶׁאֵין קָרְבָּן בַּלַּיְלָה, הֻצְרַךְ לְהַקְדִּים הַקְרָבָתוֹ בַּיּוֹם הַקּוֹדֵם לְאוֹתוֹ הַנִּגּוּד, וּלְזִכָּרוֹן זֶה קָבַע כֵּן לְדוֹרוֹת.
לילה, on that occasion, the sun/lamb being opposite the moon occurred at night. Seeing that one cannot offer a sacrifice at night, the Torah arranged for the Passover to be offered on the afternoon preceding that night. As a commemoration of that event, it was decided not to change the time of offering the Passover even though the astrological/astronomical data change from year to year.
וּבָקָר. לְקָרְבַּן חֲגִיגָה. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא נַעֲשָׂה זֶה עִם פֶּסַח מִצְרַיִם.
ובקר, the cattle, of course, only as the festival offering, known as חגיגה. This was an offering that did not accompany the Passover on the original occasion in Egypt.
לֹא תֹאכַל עָלָיו חָמֵץ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁפֶּסַח מִצְרַיִם הָיָה אִסּוּר חִמּוּצוֹ יוֹם אֶחָד בִּלְבַד, כְּמוֹ שֶׁהִזְכִּירוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (פסחים צ״ו).
לא תאכל עליו חמץ שבעת ימים, even though in Egypt the prohibition of eating chametz was in effect for only one day, as our sages pointed out in Pessachim 96.
תֹּאכַל עָלָיו מַצּוֹת. שֶׁבִּהְיוֹתוֹ קָרְבַּן זִכָּרוֹן הַגְּאֻלָּה שֶׁהָיְתָה בְּרֶגַע קָטָן, אֵין רָאוּי לֶאֱכֹל עִמּוֹ חָמֵץ שֶׁהוּא צָרִיךְ עִכּוּב בַּעֲשִׂיָּתוֹ מִלּוּשׁ בָּצֵק עַד חַמַּצְתּוֹ (הושע ז:ד).
תאכל עליו מצות, seeing it was an offering commemorating the redemption, something that took place in a short moment in time, it is not appropriate to eat chametz, something which by definition requires time in order to become leavened. (compare Hoseah 7,4, “from kneading the dough until it has been baked”).
לֶחֶם עֹנִי. לֶחֶם שֶׁהָיוּ אוֹכְלִים בְּעֹנִי וְשֶׁלֹּא הָיָה לָהֶם פְּנַאי לְהַשְׁהוֹת עִסָּתָם עַד שֶׁתֶּחְמַץ מִפְּנֵי נוֹגְשִׂים אָצִים.
לחם עוני, bread which they ate while in a state of ענים, external pressure, not having time to wait until the dough had risen so that it became leavened. The taskmasters had always been rushing them, during their entire stay in Egypt as slave labourers.
כִּי בְחִפָּזוֹן יָצָאתָ. וְהַטַּעַם לְהַזְכִּיר חִפָּזוֹן הַלֶּחֶם הוּא, כִּי תְּמוּרַת אוֹתוֹ חִפָּזוֹן הָעֹנִי הָיָה לְךָ אַחַר כָּךְ חִפָּזוֹן הַגְּאוּלָּה, כְּעִנְיַן ״וְהָפַכְתִּי אֶבְלָם לְשָׂשׂוֹן״ (ירמיהו לא:יב).
כי בחפזון יצאת, the reason why we have to remember this state of haste is because haste is a form of pressure. It was because you always had to rush while being slaves that the redemption when it came also came in the guise of extreme haste. Jeremiah 31,12 describes such an experience in the words והפכתי אבלם לששון, “I will turn their mourning into joy.”
לְמַעַן תִּזְכֹּר אֶת יוֹם צֵאתְךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם כֹּל יְמֵי חַיֶּיךָ. וְהַטַּעַם שֶׁצִּוִּיתִי לְהִתְמִיד הַהַשְׁגָּחָה עַד שֶׁיִּהְיוּ שְׁנוֹת הַלְּבָנָה מְכֻוָּנוֹת עִם שְׁנוֹת הַחַמָּה עַל יְדֵי הָעִבּוּרִים, כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּהְיֶה נִיסָן חֹדֶשׁ אָבִיב, וְלֹא צִוִּיתִי לִמְנוֹת לְחָדְשֵׁי חַמָּה שֶׁהֵם בִּלְתִּי צְרִיכִין לְעַבֵּר, הוּא כְּדֵי שֶׁתִּזְכֹּר יְצִיאַת מִצְרַיִם כֹּל יְמֵי חַיֶּיךָ, שֶׁבְּכָל עִבּוּר חֹדֶשׁ וְעִבּוּר שָׁנָה שֶׁתַּעֲשֶׂה בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁיִּהְיֶה נִיסָן חֹדֶשׁ הָאָבִיב, תִּזְכֹּר שֶׁזֶּה הוּא בִּשְׁבִיל יְצִיאַת מִצְרָיִם.
למען תזכור את יום צאתך מארץ מצרים כל ימי חייך, the reason why I have commanded to eternalize this manifestation of G’d’s direct guidance of your fate, השגחה, is so that the compensation of the shorter lunar year with the seasonal orbits of the solar year be effected through the addition of extra days or an extra month, so that this month will always occur partially after the equinox of spring. I did not legislate anything similar for the solar year as there is no need for it, and that would have little to do with the Exodus. There is no reason why the gentile nations should commemorate the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt. כל ימי חייך, every time the calendar is adjusted, be it to add a day or to add a month, you will be reminded of the reason for this being a reminder of the Exodus from Egypt.
וְלֹא יֵרָאֶה לְךָ שְׂאֹר בְּכָל גְּבֻלְךָ שִׁבְעַת יָמִים. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁזֶּה לֹא הֻצְרַךְ בְּפֶסַח מִצְרַיִם.
ולא יראה לך שאור בכל גבולך שבעת ימים, even though this was not a requirement on the original Passover in Egypt.
וְלֹא יָלִין מִן הַבָּשָׂר. שֶׁלֹּא תַחְשׁוֹב שֶׁנֶּאֱסַר הַמּוֹתָר בְּפֶסַח מִצְרַיִם בִּלְבַד, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהָיוּ יוֹצְאִים אָז מִשָּׁם בְּחִפָּזוֹן, כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִשָּׁאֵר מִמֶּנּוּ בְּיַד מִצְרַיִם.
ולא ילין מן הבשר, so that you should not think that leftovers of the Passover sacrifice were forbidden only on the original occasion, seeing that on that occasion the people were in such a state of haste, that the Torah did not want leftover sacred meat to be at the disposal of the Egyptians.
לֹא תוּכַל לִזְבֹּחַ אֶת הַפָּסַח. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁפֶּסַח מִצְרַיִם נַעֲשָׂה בְּזוּלַת מִזְבֵּחַ וּבְזוּלַת מִקְדָּשׁ, לֹא יֵעָשֶׂה כֵן לְדוֹרוֹת.
לא תוכל לזבוח את הפסח, even though in Egypt there was no need to slaughter the Passover either on an altar or in a Temple (precincts), this is not the way it is to be observed in the future.
וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי עֲצֶרֶת. נֶעֶצְרוּ בוֹ יִשְׂרָאֵל יַחְדָּיו לַעֲבוֹדַת הָאֵל יִתְבָּרַךְ, וְשָׁרוּ לוֹ שִׁירָה בַּשְּׁבִיעִי שֶׁל חַג הַמַּצּוֹת, לְפִיכָךְ נִקְדַּשׁ אוֹתוֹ הַיּוֹם.
וביום השביעי עצרת, on that day the Israelites are to be assembled together in communal worship of the Lord. They will sing the song sung by the Israelites after they had crossed the Sea of Reeds on dry ground. This is why this day has been given a special sanctity.
וְלֹא תַעֲשֶׂה מְלָאכָה. כִּי לוּלֵא זֶה לֹא הָיָה הַשְּׁבִיעִי קָדוֹשׁ כְּלָל, כְּמוֹ שֶׁהוּא הָעִנְיָן בְּחַג הַסֻּכּוֹת שֶׁאֵין הַשְּׁבִיעִי שֶׁלּוֹ מִקְרָא קֹדֶשׁ.
ולא תעשה מלאכה, if not for that, the seventh day would not be recognisable as holy at all, just as the seventh day of Sukkot is not called a מקרא קודש, holy convocation.
מֵהָחֵל חֶרְמֵשׁ בַּקָּמָה. בִּקְמַת שְׂעוֹרֵי הָעֹמֶר, כִּי הַשְּׂעוֹרָה אָבִיב (שמות ט:לא), וּמִן הָאָבִיב עַד הַקָּצִיר תִּסְפֹּר שִׁבְעָה שָׁבוּעוֹת, חֻקַּת קָצִיר.
מהחל חרמש בקמה, in the standing barley, which is to serve as the Omer offering. We know already from Exodus 9,31 that the barley crop ripens in spring (in the latitudes which include Egypt and the Land of Israel. Ed]. Seven weeks elapse between the beginning of the barley harvest and that of the wheat harvest. Hence you are to count these seven weeks.
וְהַגֵּר וְהַיָּתוֹם וְהָאַלְמָנָה. יִשְׂמְחוּ בְּחַג הַקָּצִיר בְּלֶקֶט וּפֵאָה הַמְּצוּיִים בַּקָּצִיר. וְהִזְכִּירָם בְּעִנְיַן זֶה הַחַג בְּפָרָשַׁת אֱמֹר (ויקרא כג:כב).
והגר והיתום והאלמנה, they shall rejoice on the festival of cutting (the wheat). Their rejoicing will take the form of their collecting the portions of this harvest set aside for them by the Torah, i.e. the פאה, corner of the field with standing grain; the gleanings, what the farmer had overlooked, etc. These have been enumerated in connection with the festival in Leviticus 23,22.
וְזָכַרְתָּ כִּי עֶבֶד הָיִיתָ. שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה אָז שׁוּם מָמוֹן שֶׁלְּךָ, כִּי מַה שֶּׁקָּנָה עֶבֶד קָנָה רַבּוֹ.
וזכרת כי עבד היית, where you did not own any money of your own, seeing that whatever is in the hands of a slave is owned by his master. (Pessachim 88)
וְשָׁמַרְתָּ וְעָשִׂיתָ אֶת הַחֻקִּים הָאֵלֶּה. בִּנְתִינַת לֶקֶט וּפֵאָה לְרָצוֹן לִפְנֵי ה׳ שֶׁהוֹצִיאֲךָ מִשָּׁם וְנָתַן לְךָ עֹשֶׁר וּנְכָסִים.
ושמרת ועשית את החקים האלה, by leaving behind gleanings, the peyah, etc., as a goodwill gesture for your G’d Who has taken you out from there and given you wealth and landed property.
בְּאָסְפְּךָ מִגָּרְנְךָ וּמִיִּקְבֶךָ. בְּאָסְפְּךָ הַתְּבוּאָה אֶל בֵּיתְךָ מִן הַגֹּרֶן וּמִן הַיֶּקֶב.
ומיקבך ,when you gather in the harvest into your houses and your barns from the grain presses and wine presses.
וְהַגֵּר וְהַיָּתוֹם וְהָאַלְמָנָה. יִשְׂמְחוּ בִּפְרָט וְעוֹלֵלוֹת וּמַתְּנוֹת פֵּירוֹת הָאִילָן.
והגר והיתום והאלמנה, they will rejoice over finding the various gleanings of the tree fruit harvested at that period.
כִּי יְבָרֶכְךָ. שֶׁיִּהְיֶה לְךָ אָסִיף מְרֻבֶּה, וְלָעֲנִיִּים יִהְיוּ מַתָּנוֹת מְרֻבּוֹת.
כי יברכך, so that you will have a great deal of gathering in to do, and as a result, the poor will also find much to collect.
וְהָיִיתָ אַךְ שָׂמֵחַ. תִּהְיֶה שָׂמֵחַ בִּלְבַד, וּבְשִׂמְחָתְךָ לֹא יִתְעָרֵב עִצָּבוֹן.
והיית אך שמח, you will be completely joyful; no sadness will intrude on your happy frame of mind.
אִישׁ כְּמַתְּנַת יָדוֹ. לֹא שֶׁיִּתֵּן כָּל אֲשֶׁר לוֹ וְיִצְטָרֵךְ הוּא לַבְּרִיּוֹת, כְּמַחֲשָׁבוֹת פְּתָאֵי הָאֱוִילִים, כְּאָמְרָם זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (כתובות נ:) ״הַמְבַזְבֵּז אַל יְבַזְבֵּז יוֹתֵר מֵחֹמֶשׁ״.
איש כמתנת ידו, not that he has to give away all that he owns so that as a result he will become a charge on public charity; an interpretation offered by foolish gentiles. Our sages have long ago postulated that even the most generously inclined person should not give away more than one fifth of his wealth. (Ketuvot 50)
שׁוֹפְטִים וְשׁוֹטְרִים. אַחַר הַמִּצְווֹת לְהֶהָמוֹן צִוָּה עִנְיְנֵי מַנְהִיגָיו, וְהֵם הַמְּלָכִים וְהַשּׁוֹפְטִים וְהַכֹּהֲנִים וְהַנְּבִיאִים, אֲשֶׁר בְּתִקּוּנָם יְתֻקַּן עִנְיַן הֶהָמוֹן וּבְקִלְקוּלָם יְקֻלְקָל, כְּמוֹ שֶׁהֵעִיר הַנָּבִיא בְּאָמְרוֹ ״שָׂרֶיהָ בְקִרְבָּהּ אֲרָיוֹת שׁוֹאֲגִים, שֹׁפְטֶיהָ זְאֵבֵי עֶרֶב לֹא גָרְמוּ לַבֹּקֶר, נְבִיאֶיהָ פֹּחֲזִים אַנְשֵׁי בֹגְדוֹת, כֹּהֲנֶיהָ חִלְּלוּ קֹדֶשׁ חָמְסוּ תוֹרָה״ (צפניה ג:ג-ד).
שופטים ושוטרים, after Moses had addressed a number of commandments to the people at large, he now turned to instruct the leaders of the people in commandments of special concern for them. By paying especial attention to observing these laws, the leaders, especially the judges, kings and prophets, would be able to maintain the spiritual level of the people at large, and thus ensure the people’s continued tenure of the Land of Israel. In the words of the prophet: “when the lion roars who does not tremble?” (Amos 3,8) Tzefaniah phrased it somewhat differently, providing degrees of reactions to people in varying degrees of authority. (Tzefaniah 3,3 describes the princes, leading authorities as being feared like roaring lions, whereas the judges who have no executive powers are feared in the manner one is afraid of wolves.)
נוֹתֵן לְךָ לִשְׁבָטֶיךָ. בִּשְׁעָרֶיךָ שֶׁהוּא נוֹתֵן לְךָ שֶׁתְּחַלֵּק לִשְׁבָטֶיךָ, לֹא בְּמָה שֶׁתִּכְבּוֹשׁ חוּצָה לָאָרֶץ שֶׁאֵינוֹ מִתְחַלֵּק לַשְּׁבָטִים, כְּאָמְרָם זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (סנהדרין): ״בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ אֵין אַתָּה מוֹשִׁיב דַּיָּנִים בְּכָל פֶּלֶךְ וּבְכָל עִיר וָעִיר״, וְזֶה כְּמוֹ בְּסוּרְיָא וְזוּלָתָהּ.
נותן לך לשבטיך, in the gates (cities) He is about to give to you. You are to divide the judges to districts, i.e. each of your cities must have a judiciary. This restriction does not apply to land conquered outside the traditional boundaries of Israel; there, seeing the land was not divided into tribal parcels, the judiciary appointed also did not have to adhere to this pattern. Examples of such regions were Syria, etc.
מִשְׁפַּט צֶדֶק. תִּהְיֶה קַבָּלַת הַטְּעָנוֹת בְּאֹפֶן שֶׁיִּפְסְקוּ הַדִּין בְּצֶדֶק, שֶׁלֹּא יְהֵא רַךְ לָזֶה וְקָשֶׁה לָזֶה.
משפט צדק, the manner in which the complaints of the litigants were heard should be such that the resulting decisions could be expected to be fair, צדק, righteous. The judges were not to discriminate in their treatment of either of the opposing litigants.
צֶדֶק צֶדֶק תִּרְדֹּף. כְּשֶׁתִּתֵּן לְךָ שׁוֹפְטִים, אַתָּה הַמְמַנֶּה אֶת הַשּׁוֹפְטִים, בְּחַר אֶת הַיּוֹתֵר שׁוֹפְטֵי צֶדֶק, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין בָּהֶם כָּל כָּךְ שְׁאָר תַּכְסִיסִים הָרְאוּיִים לְדַיָּן, כְּמוֹ שְׁלֵמוּת הַקִּנְיָן וּשְׁלֵמוּת הַגּוּף, כָּעִנְיָן ״אַל תַּבֵּט אֶל מַרְאֵהוּ וְאֶל גֹּבַהּ קוֹמָתוֹ״ (שמואל א טז:ז).
צדק צדק תרדוף. When you are about to put this legislation into practice, the party in charge of appointing such judges is told by Moses to select only those who are already known for their sense of fair play and righteousness. He will have to look for such people all over the tribe. If potential judges do not have all the qualifications which are desirable in a judge, this qualification of fairness is the overriding quality all must possess. This is what the prophet Samuel was told by G’d when he had to look for a replacement of King Sha-ul among the sons of Yishai. (Samuel I 16,7) He was specifically told to ignore external appearances.
לְמַעַן תִּחְיֶה וְיָרַשְׁתָּ. תִּצְטָרֵךְ לָזֶה יוֹתֵר בָּאָרֶץ, כִּי חִסָּרוֹן זֶה יִמְנַע הַיְרֻשָּׁה בָּהּ, כְּאָמְרוֹ ״בַּעֲוֹן בִּצְעוֹ קָצַפְתִּי״ (ישעיהו נז:יז).
למען תחיה וירשת, such qualities are of even greater importance in the Land of Israel, as a failure to comply would result in the ancestral right to that country being denied to you. Compare Isaiah 57,17 who quotes G’d as telling him that a corrupt judiciary [getting away with sinful greed? Ed.] was a primary cause for G’d’s anger at the people.
לֹא תִטַּע לְךָ אֲשֵׁרָה. הֵבִיא שְׁלֹשָה דּוֹמִים מֵעִנְיַן דְּבָרִים שֶׁהֵם נָאִים כְּפִי הַחוּשׁ וְנִמְאָסִים מִפְּנֵי מוּמָם הָרוּחָנִי. רִאשׁוֹנָה הִיא הָאֲשֵׁרָה שֶׁהִיא לְנוֹי הֵיכָלוֹת, וּמִכָּל מָקוֹם הָיְתָה נִמְאֶסֶת לַקֹּדֶשׁ מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהָיְתָה תַּכְסִיס לַעֲבוֹדַת גִּלּוּלִים, וְכֵן נַקְדִּים הַעֲדָפַת הַצֶּדֶק הָרוּחָנִי לְשַׁלְמוּת גּוּף הַדַּיָּן שֶׁהוּא חוּשִׁי וְגַשְׁמִי. שֵׁנִית הַמַּצֵּבָה, שֶׁאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהָיְתָה לְרָצוֹן קֹדֶם מַתַּן תּוֹרָה, כְּאָמְרוֹ (שמות כד:ד) ״וּשְׁתֵּים עֶשְׂרֵה מַצֵּבָה״, וְזֶה כִּי הָיָה עִנְיָנָהּ כְּאִלּוּ הַמַּקְרִיב נִצָּב תָּמִיד לִפְנֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ, כְּעִנְיַן (תהלים טז:ח) ״שִׁוִּיתִי ה׳ לְנֶגְדִּי תָמִיד״, וְנָפְלוּ מִזֹּאת הַמַּדְרֵגָה בְּעִנְיַן הָעֵגֶל, כְּאָמְרוֹ שָׁם (שמות לג:ג) ״כִּי לֹא אֶעֱלֶה בְּקִרְבְּךָ״. וְכֵן יִקְרֶה בְּעִנְיַן זָקֵן שֶׁאֵין פְּרָקוֹ נָאֶה, שֶׁיָּצָא עָלָיו שֵׁם רַע בְּיַלְדוּתוֹ, כְּשֶׁתִּמְצָא זָקֵן וּפְרָקוֹ נָאֶה. שְׁלִישִׁית הֵבִיא עִנְיַן הַמּוּם הַנִּמְאָס, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁתִּהְיֶה הַבְּהֵמָה יָפָה כְּפִי הַחוּשׁ וּשְׁמֵנָה שָׁוָה אֶלֶף זוּז, וְעִם כָּל זֶה הִיא נִפְסֶלֶת לַקֹּדֶשׁ מִפְּנֵי מוּם בִּלְתִּי מְחַסֵּר מִדָּמִים, וְיִהְיֶה שׁוֹר שָׁוֶה סֶלַע בִּשְׁבִיל הֱיוֹתוֹ תָּמִים כָּשֵׁר לְקָרְבָּן. וְכֵן יִהְיֶה בְּזָקֵן בַּעַל מִדָּה מְגֻנָּה, כְּשֶׁתִּמְצָא שָׁלֵם מִמֶּנּוּ בַּמִּדּוֹת, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיֶה עָשִׁיר וְנָאֶה כָּמוֹהוּ.
לא תטע לך אשרה, in this verse the Torah lists three items whose common denominator is that they appeal to the senses, are desirable, but at the same time are all spiritually negative, harmful. The first one is האשרה, something beautiful and decorative for buildings, but at the same time something ugly from the vantage point of holiness as it is usually a conduit leading to idolatrous practices. Seeing that this is so, we are commanded whenever faced with such choices to give preference to that which leads to spiritual righteousness at the expense of physical perfection or beauty. By the same token, we are to prefer spiritual qualities possessed by someone chosen as a judge to external features, impressive though they may be. The second item is המצבה, even though such a kind of altar was welcomed by G’d as an outlet for someone who wanted to bring an offering to G’d, this was before the Torah had been given. Consider, for example, Exodus 24,4 where the Torah welcomed 12 such monuments erected by Moses, where these monuments symbolised the fact that the person offering a sacrifice considered himself as constantly in the presence of the divine. (compare Psalms 16,8 שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד, “I feel myself constantly in the presence of the Lord.”) The Jewish people had not been able to maintain this spiritual level after they had committed the sin of the golden calf. Even when such a מצבה is dedicated to heaven it had become hateful in the eyes of the Lord, i.e. G’d had expressed His distaste in Exodus 33,3, after having provisionally “forgiven” the people by appointing an angel to lead them to the Holy Land, but refusing to lead their ascent by His presence being among them. We encounter a similar concept described as the difference between an old man whose beard proclaims his respectability, as opposed to the old man whose beard is disheveled, i.e. reveals traces of a youth which was spent irresponsibly. We look for people whose exterior testifies to their blameless interior, character. [This metaphor is used by the Chazzan in his private introductory prayer on Yom Hakippurim. Ed.] The third item, also reminding us of the rejection of an externally basically beautiful animal as a sacrifice, is a series of blemishes, some quite minor, not affecting the value of the animal in question in the market place at all. Such a blemish in an animal worth 1000 dollars disqualifies it as an offering, whereas another similar animal worth one single dollar, but without such a blemish, is given preference over the far more expensive animal, which is rejected. The Torah gives us three examples to teach us basically the same lesson. What is true of the blemished animal for presentation on the altar, is equally true for the venerable old scholar who is afflicted with some character fault. We are to look further in order to find a less impressive individual not afflicted with such character fault.