Text

Sforno on Leviticus Chapter 8

Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.

וְאֵת פַּר הַחַטָּאת וְאֵת שְׁנֵי הָאֵילִים. הִקְדִּים פַּר הַחַטָּאת, כְּאָמְרָם זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה כָּל חַטָּאת קוֹדֶמֶת לְעוֹלָה הַבָּאָה עִמָּהּ, כִּי עַד אַחַר שֶׁיְּכֻפַּר הַחֵטְא אֵין מָקוֹם כְּלָל לְעוֹלָה, כְּאָמְרוֹ ״עוֹלָה וְחַטָּאָה לֹא שָׁאָלְתָּ״ (תהלים מ:ז). וְהָיְתָה חַטָּאתוֹ אַחַר הִמָּשְׁחוֹ פַּר כְּמִשְׁפַּט כֹּהֵן מָשִׁיחַ, אֲבָל לֹא נִכְנַס דָּמוֹ לִפְנִים, כִּי לֹא הָיָה חֶטְאוֹ בְּמַדְרֵגַת רֹעַ שֶׁיִּצְטָרֵךְ לָזֶה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁהָיָה צָרִיךְ בְּהוֹרָאַת כֹּהֵן מָשִׁיחַ (ויקרא ד:ג) וְהוֹרָאַת בֵּית דִּין שֶׁהֶחֱטִיאוּ (ויקרא ד:יג), וּפַר וְשָׂעִיר שֶׁל יוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים שֶׁמְּכַפְּרִים עַל טֻמְאַת מִקְדָּש וְעַל חֲטָאִים עֲוֹנוֹת וּפְשָׁעִים, כְּמוֹ שֶׁמְּבֹאָר בָּעִנְיָן (ויקרא טז). וְהִקְדִּים הָעוֹלָה לַמִּלּוּאִים, כִּי גַם בָּעוֹלָה תִּהְיֶה אֵיזוֹ כַּפָּרָה, כְּאָמְרוֹ ״וְנִרְצָה לוֹ לְכַפֵּר עָלָיו״ (ויקרא א:ד), וְאַחַר שְׁלֵמוּת הַכַּפָּרָה נַעֲשׂוּ רְאוּיִם לְמַלֵּא אֶת יָדָם לְהַשְׁלִימָה לַעֲבוֹדָה.

Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash

ואת פר החטאת ואת שני האילים, the bull as a sin offering is mentioned first, in accordance with the statement of our sages that whenever both a sin offering and a burnt offering have to be brought the sin offering is brought first. (Pessachim 59) The reason is simple; how could the person offering the burnt offering expect it to be welcome in the eyes of G’d if he still required atonement for a sin in order to be in G’d’s good graces? David paraphrases this in Psalms 40,7 עולה וחטאת לא שאלת, “You do not ask for burnt offerings and sin offerings.” This bull became a “sin offering” after having been anointed, a procedure similar to the anointing of the High Priest for his office. However, in this instance the blood of this sin offering was not brought into the sanctuary, seeing that the sin of Aaron and his sons had not been of such a severity as would require this additional procedure. Severe errors by the High Priest are the ones listed in Leviticus 4,3 or 4,13 by the Supreme Court. Such errors require that the blood of their sin offerings be brought into the sanctuary itself. We explained all this at the appropriate place in chapter 16. The reason why the Torah first deals with the burnt-offering before dealing with the consecration offerings, is that there was an element of sin, i.e. need for forgiveness in connection with the burnt offering, as is evident from the Torah’s concluding remark ונרצה לו לכפר עליו, “and it shall become acceptable for him to atone for him.” (1,4). The reason why the Torah first deals with the burnt-offering before dealing with the consecration offerings, is that there was an element of sin, i.e. need for forgiveness in connection with the burnt offering, as is evident from the Torah’s concluding remark ונרצה לו לכפר עליו, “and it shall become acceptable for him to atone for him.” (1,4) whereas in all other שלמים offerings the priest receives the right thigh, in the case of the mandatory שלמים offering of the Nazir at the end of his term, the priest received both the right thigh and the foreleg, זרוע. As to the ram of the consecration offering שלמים, even the thigh is offered on the altar. When a non priest offers a שלמים, generally speaking, he will donate the thigh together with the lower leg, to the priest who enters inside the holy domain out of bounds to the owner of the sacrifice. The Nazir donates also the יד, i.e. the foreleg, symbolically handing the priest the work of his hands, which until the termination of the period of his vow as Nazir had all been dedicated to G’d. On the other hand, the rites of the consecration offerings required that the offering itself was a preparatory offering enabling the priest henceforth to enter the holy domains of the Temple. To symbolise this the thigh was presented on the altar.

וְהִנֵּה בְּכָל הַשְּׁלָמִים יִהְיֶה שׁוֹק הַיָּמִין לַכֹּהֵן, וּבְשַׁלְמֵי נָזִיר יִהְיֶה לַכֹּהֵן הַשּׁוֹק וְהַזְּרוֹעַ שֶׁהֵם הַיָּד וְהָרֶגֶל. וּבְאֵיל הַמִּלּוּאִים הָיָה הַשּׁוֹק עַל גַּבֵּי הַמִּזְבֵּחַ, כִּי אָמְנָם הַזָּר הַמַּקְרִיב עַל הָרֹב יִתֵּן הַשּׁוֹק שֶׁהוּא עִם הָרֶגֶל לַכֹּהֵן הַנִּכְנָס לִפְנִים מִמְּחִיצַת הַזָּר הַמַּקְרִיב. וְהַנָּזִיר יִתֵּן גַּם הַזְּרוֹעַ שֶׁהוּא הַיָּד, כְּמוֹסֵר לַכֹּהֵן אֶת פֹּעַל יָדָיו שֶׁהָיָה עַד הֵנָּה לְהַזִּיר לַה׳. אָמְנָם בַּמִּלּוּאִים אֲשֶׁר הָיָה קָרְבָּן מַכְשִׁיר לַכֹּהֵן לְהִכָּנֵס לִפְנִים, נָתַן הַשּׁוֹק עַל גַּבֵּי הַמִּזְבֵּחַ.

יוֹמָם וָלַיְלָה. כִּי הַיְרִיעוֹת לֹא הִתְפָּרְקוּ, כִּמְבֹאָר לְמַעְלָה (שמות מ:יח).

Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash

יומם ולילה, for the curtains (carpets) were never dismantled, as we explained in Exodus 40,18.

Next →