"In the diaspora, we only count according to the kings of Greece": From here, it is shown that we are not concerned about the peace of the kingdom [in this context, to worry that it should be adversely affected by this]. And it appears to me that they would also count with the kings of Greece in bills of divorce, even though we learned [in a mishnah] in the chapter [entitled] HaZorek (Gittin 79b), "If he wrote it in the name of a kingdom that is not legitimate, in the name of the kingdom of Medea, or in the name of the kingdom of Greece," continuing to, "she must leave both this [first husband] and that [second husband....], and the child is a son born from an adulterous relationship [mamzer] from this one and from that one." And even the rabbis that argue with Rabbi Meir and say that the child is fit, concede that she must leave [the marriage]. Nevertheless, it is the custom to write according to the kingdom of Greece, and not to concern ourselves about the peace of the kingdom, since we see that are not concerned about it. And it should not be said that it is only speaking about contracts, and not about bills of divorce. As the whole reason for the matter is because of the peace of the kingdom, as it is explained in the chapter [entitled] HaZorek. And if they were not concerned with contracts, why should they be concerned with bills of divorce? Rather, it was customary to count from the kings of Greece for everything. And since the matter depends on the custom and we do not concern ourselves with the mishnah in Gittin, also that which we count from the creation of the world, both in divorce bills and in contracts, is fit, and we should not be concerned about any kingdom. And I found like my words written in a tosefta.

.