Just as signs, which change the body - and if you say, from all of these it's possible to make a kal vachomer. 'Just as signs, that change the body, don't bring a Jewish slavegirl out of a father's dominion, and even so they bring her out of a master's dominion, death, which doesn't change the body and even so brings her out of a father's dominion - isn't it logical that it should bring her out of a master's dominion?!' And it's possible to say that certainly regarding a master it's appropriate to say that a bodily change causes [her] departure, since this is not the body that he purchased. But regarding a father this reasoning of bodily change isn't appropriate, since he is always her father, after the change just as before. And if you say, let's make a kal vachomer. Years and yovel, which don't bring out from a master's domain, the death of a father, which does bring out from a father's domain... etc.?! [sic.] And if you say, just as years and yovel, which bring out a Jewish male slave, say of the death of a father...etc?! [sic.] Signs prove you wrong. And it's possible to say that it's possible to object: just as signs, which change the body... [sic.] And if you say, bring from among them, for what did you say - just as signs, which change the body, years and yovel prove you wrong. Just as years and yovel, which bring out a Jewish male slave, signs prove you wrong. And the ruling returns and does not see this, etc... [sic.] The shared property of these cases is that they generally bring out - years and yovel with a Jewish male slave, signs also generally bring out, for behold they bring out a man from childhood, and they bring out here - so too I say, etc. [sic.] And it's possible to say that it's possible to object, the shared property of these cases is that they bring out from slavery - say of the death of the father, that we have not found that it brings her out from slavery, and even though it itself requires derivation, in any case, since we don't derive it, this is an objection. And if you say, let's make a kal vachomer from death of the master, which does not bring her out from her father's dominion (since if the master died whilst she was still a minor she would return to her father's dominion until her majority), and brings her out from the master's dominion - death of a father, which brings her out from a father's domain, isn't it logical... etc.?! [sic.] And it's possible to say, just as the death of a master, which brings her out, regarding a slave whose ear is pierced, say of the death of a father... etc. [sic.]