Bartenura on Mishnah Parah Chapter 4
Can copy this into an AI, or connect the whole library to your assistant. For deeper learning, you can directly use the original seforim, sites, and apps.
פָּרַת חַטָּאת. שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָהּ פְּסוּלָה. דְּאָמַר קְרָא חַטָּאת הִיא, וּמִדְּקַרְיַהּ רַחֲמָנָא חַטָּאת לָמַדְנוּ שֶׁהִיא טְעוּנָה שְׁחִיטָה לִשְׁמָהּ כְּחַטָּאת:
פרת חטאת שלא לשמה פסולה (the cow for purification) – as Scripture states (Numbers 19:9): "חטאת היא"/It is for purification. And since the All-Merciful calls it “a purification,” we learned that it requires slaughter for its own sake like a sin-offering (see also Tractate Zevahim, Chapter 1, Mishnayot 1 and 4) – that a sin offering that was slaughtered not for its own sake or any of the other actions concerning it were performed not for its own sake, it is invalid).
וְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מַכְשִׁיר. הוֹאִיל וְהִיא נִשְׁחֶטֶת בַּחוּץ. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר:
ורבי אליעזר מכשיר- since it is slaughtered outside the Sanctuary. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Eliezer.
וְשֶׁלֹּא רְחוּץ יָדַיִם וְרַגְלַיִם פְּסוּלָה. דְּחַטָּאת קַרְיַהּ רַחֲמָנָא. וּלְהָכִי נָקַט רְחוּץ יָדַיִם וְרַגְלַיִם וְלֹא תָנָא קִדֵּשׁ, דְּלֹא שְׁנָא קִדֵּשׁ בִּפְנִים אוֹ בַחוּץ, בֵּין בִּכְלִי שָׁרֵת בֵּין בִּכְלִי חֹל יוֹצֵא:
ושלא רחוץ ידים ורגלים פסולה – for since it is called a "חטאת"/for purification (Numbers 19:9) by the All-Merciful, and for this it (i.e., the Mishnah) takes the term "רחוץ ידים ורגלים"/whose hand and feet were washed, and it (i.e., the Mishnah) does not teach "קידש"/sanctified, for it does not teach sanctified, inside or outside, whether with vessels dedicated to the Temple service or non-sacred vessels, he fulfills his religious obligation.
וְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מַכְשִׁיר. דִּבְבֹאָם אֶל אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד וְגוֹ' אוֹ בְגִשְׁתָּם אֶל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ יִרְחֲצוּ כְּתִיב. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר:
ור' אליעזר מכשיר – for it is written (Exodus 30:20-21): that “when they enter the Tent Meeting [they shall wash with water, [that they may not die;] or when they approach the altar to serve…they shall wash their hands and feet, [that they may not die]. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Eliezer.
שֶׁלֹּא בְכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל פְּסוּלָה. דִּכְתִיב וּנְתַתֶּם אֹתָהּ אֶל אֶלְעָזָר, אוֹתָהּ אֶל אֶלְעָזָר, וְאֵין שְׁאָר הַפָּרוֹת נַעֲשׂוֹת אֶלָּא בְכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל:
שלא בכהן גדול פסולה – as it is written (Numbers 19:3): “You shall give it to Elzezar the priest,” it (the cow/heifer) to Eleazar, but the rest of the cows/heifers are not used, other than by the Kohen Gadol/High Priest.
וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה מַכְשִׁיר. דְּדָרֵישׁ, אוֹתָהּ בִּסְגָן, וּשְׁאָר כָּל הַפָּרוֹת בֵּין בְּכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל בֵּין בְּכֹהֵן הֶדְיוֹט. וַהֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה:
ור' אליעזר מכשיר- and the rest of all the cows, wither by the High Priest or whether by a common priest. But the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yehuda.
וּבְבִגְדֵי לָבָן הִיא נַעֲשֵׂית. דִּכְתִיב גַּבֵּי פָרָה וְהָיְתָה לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְלַגֵּר הַגָּר בְּתוֹכָם לְחֻקַּת עוֹלָם, וּבְיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים כְּתִיב (ויקרא טז) וְהָיְתָה זֹּאת לָכֶם לְחֻקַּת עוֹלָם, מָה עֲבוֹדַת יוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים בְּבִגְדֵי לָבָן, אַף מַעֲשֵׂה פָרָה בְּבִגְדֵי לָבָן:
ובבגדי לבן הוא נעשית- that it is written regarding the cow/heifer (Numbers 19:10): “This shall be a permanent law for the Israelites and the strangers who reside among you,” and regarding Yom Kippur it is written (Leviticus 16:34): “This shall be to you a law for all time,” just as the Divine Service of Yom Kippur is with white clothes, so also is the action of the Cow/Heifer with white clothes.
חוּץ מִגִּתָּהּ. מָקוֹם הָיוּ עוֹשִׂים לִשְׂרֵפָתָהּ כְּמִין גַּת כְּנֶגֶד פִּתְחוֹ שֶׁל הֵיכָל, וְאִם שְׁחָטָהּ שֶׁלֹּא כְנֶגֶד פִּתְחוֹ שֶׁל הֵיכָל, פְּסוּלָה:
חוץ מגיתה – the place that they make for its burning, like a species of a marked off place (i.e., selected for this purpose) which is corresponding to the opening of the hall containing the Golden Altar, but if he slaughtered it where it was not corresponding to the opening of the hall containing the Golden Altar, it is invalid.
אוֹ בִשְׁתֵּי גִתּוֹת. כְּגוֹן שֶׁחִלְּקָהּ לִשְׁתַּיִם וְשָׂרַף חֶצְיָהּ בְּגַת זוֹ וְחֶצְיָהּ בְּגַת זוֹ:
או בשתי גיתות – as for example, that he divided it into two and burned half of it in this marked off place and half of it in that marked off place.
אוֹ שֶׁשָּׂרַף שְׁתַּיִם בְּגַת אַחַת. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוֹצִיא כָל אַחַת בִּפְנֵי עַצְמָהּ מִפַּסְלָא מֵחֲמַת מְלָאכָה, שֶׁזּוֹ פּוֹסֶלֶת אֶת זוֹ. אֲבָל בְּזוֹ אַחַר זוֹ, כְּשֵׁרָה:
או ששרף שתים בגת אחת – even though he removed each one on its own/separately we invalidate them because of the labor, that this one invalidates the other one. But with that one after this one, it is fit/kosher.
וְלֹא כִוֵּן כְּנֶגֶד הַפֶּתַח פְּסוּלָה. דְּאֶל נֹכַח פְּנֵי אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד כְּתִיב:
ולא כיון כנגד הפתח פסולה (and he did not aim at the door – of the Holy of Holies – it is invalid) – for it is written (Numbers 19:4): “[Eleazar the priest shall take some of its blood with his finger] and sprinkle it [seven times] toward the front of the Tent of Meeting.”
מִשִּׁשִּׁית שְׁבִיעִית. דְּשֶׁבַע פְּעָמִים כְּתִיב, כְּסִדְרָן, וְהוּא מָנָה שְׁבִיעִית קֹדֶם שִׁשִּׁית, וְחָזַר וְהִזָּה שְׁבִיעִית, פְּסוּלָה, דְּבָעִינַן שֶׁיִּקְרָא לַשִּׁשִּׁית שִׁשִּׁית וְלַשְּׁבִיעִית שְׁבִיעִית. אֲבָל מִשְּׁבִיעִית שְׁמִינִית, כְּשֵׁרָה, דְּאֵין שְׁמִינִית בְּהַזָּאוֹת שֶׁל פָּרָה וְזֶה טָעָה בְּדִבּוּר דְּעָלְמָא:
מששית שביעית – for seven times (Numbers 19:4) is written in their natural order, but he counted the seventh prior to the sixth, and went back and sprinkled for the seventh [time], it is invalid, for we require that he would call for the sixth, “the sixth,” and for the seventh, “the seventh.” But from the seventh for the eighth, it is fit/kosher, for there isn’t an eighth [time] in sprinklings of [the blood] of the cow/heifer, and this one erred in mere speech.
וְחָזַר וְהִזָּה שְׁמִינִית. לָאו דַּוְקָא, דִּבְכָל עִנְיָן כְּשֵׁרָה, בֵּין חָזַר וְהִזָּה בֵּין לֹא חָזַר וְהִזָּה. וְאַגַּב רֵישָׁא נַקְטֵיהּ. אִי נַמִּי הָא קָמַשְׁמַע לָן דְּאַף עַל גַּב דְּהוֹסִיף בַּהַזָּאוֹת לֹא פָסַל, דְּמִכִּי גַמְרִינְהוּ לְשֶׁבַע הַזָּאוֹת נִגְמְרָה מִצְוָתָהּ, וְתוּ לֹא חָיְשִׁינַן לְמַה שֶּׁהוּא מוֹסִיף:
וחזר והזה שמינית – not exactly, for in each matter it is fit/kosher, whether he went back and sprinkled or whether he didn’t go back and sprinkle. But on account of/subsidiary to the first clause [of the Mishnah), it (i.e., the Mishnah) took it. Alternatively, it surely teaches us that even though he added in the sprinklings, he did not invalidate it, for when he completed the seven sprinklings, its Mitzvah was completed, and furthermore we don’t concern ourselves to what he adds.
שְׂרָפָהּ שֶׁלֹּא בְעֵצִים. שֶׁהִצִּית הָאוּר בְּגוּפָהּ שֶׁל פָּרָה:
שרפה שלא בעצים – that he kindled the fire with the body of the cow/heifer.
כְּשֵׁרָה. שֶׁלֹּא נִכְתַּב בַּתּוֹרָה עֵצִים, אֶלָּא וְשָׂרַף סְתָם:
כשרה – that “wood” is not written in the Torah, but [only] "ושרף"/”and he shall burn [the cow in his sight]” (Numbers 19:5) plainly/merely.
אוֹ בְכָל עֵצִים. שֶׁלֹּא שְׂרָפָהּ בַּאֲרָזִים אֳרָנִים וּבְרוֹשִׁים וַעֲצֵי תְאֵנָה הַשְּׁנוּיִים בְּפִרְקִין דִּלְעֵיל:
או בכל עצים – that he didn’t burn it (i.e., the cow) with cedar wood, pine and cypress and wood of fig trees that are taught [in the Mishnah] in the chapter above (see Tractate Parah, Chapter 3, Mishnah 8).
הִפְשִׁיטָהּ וְנִתְּחָהּ כְּשֵׁרָה. דְּאֶת עֹרָהּ וְאֶת בְּשָׂרָהּ כְּתִיב, בֵּין בְּהֶפְשֵׁט וְנִתּוּחַ בֵּין בִּמְחֻבָּר:
הפשיטה ונתחה כשרה (if he stripped/flayed it and dissected it) – it is written (Numbers 19:5): “[The cow shall be burned in its sight -] its hide, flesh [and blood shall be burned],” whether through flaying and dissecting it or whether attached.
עַל מְנָת לֶאֱכֹל מִבְּשָׂרָהּ אוֹ לִשְׁתּוֹת מִדָּמָהּ כְּשֵׁרָה. דַּוְקָא לֶאֱכֹל וְלִשְׁתּוֹת הוּא דְמַכְשִׁיר תַּנָּא קַמָּא, דִּבְכָל הַקָּרְבָּנוֹת נַמִּי כִּי הַאי גַּוְנָא כָּשֵׁר, כְּדִתְנַן בְּפֶרֶק כָּל הַפְּסוּלִים [זְבָחִים לה] חָשַׁב לֶאֱכֹל דָּבָר שֶׁאֵין דַּרְכּוֹ לֶאֱכֹל, כָּשֵׁר, כְּגוֹן מֵאֲכִילַת מִזְבֵּחַ לְאָדָם. אֲבָל חָשַׁב עַל מְנָת לְהַזּוֹת מִדָּמָהּ לְמָחָר, פָּסַל תַּנָּא קַמָּא, דְּחַטָּאת קַרְיַהּ רַחֲמָנָא. וְרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר סָבַר דְּאֵין מַחֲשָׁבָה פוֹסֶלֶת בַּפָּרָה כְּלָל, אֲפִלּוּ בַהַזָּאוֹת. וְאָזְדָא לְטַעֲמֵיהּ דִּבְשֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁמָהּ מַכְשִׁיר בְּרֵישׁ פִּרְקִין, שֶׁאֵין לָהּ דִּין מִדִּינֵי קָדָשִׁים, הוֹאִיל וְהִיא נַעֲשֵׂית בַּחוּץ. וְאֵין הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר:
על מנת לאכול מבשרה או לשתות מדמה כשרה – and specifically to eat and to drink that the first Tanna/teacher validates it, that with all of the sacrifices also in that manner it is kosher/fit, as it is taught in the Mishnah in the [Third] Chapter “All the Invalid”/כל הפסולים (Mishnah 3, [folio 35a], he thought about eating something that he generally doesn’t eat, it is kosher/fit, as for example, from the food of the Altar for a person, but if he thought on the condition to sprinkle from its blood on the morrow, the first Tanna/teacher invalidates, for the All-Merciful calls it a “sin-offering.” But Rabbi Eliezer holds that thought does not invalidate with regard to a cow at all, even with sprinklings. But he goes according to his reasoning that what is done not for its own sake he validates at the beginning of our chapter (see Chapter 4, Mishnah 1), which has no law from the laws of Holy Things, since it was performed outside [the Temple walls]. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Eliezer.
כָּל הָעֲסוּקִין בַּפָּרָה. אֲדֻמָּה, בְּאַחַת מִכָּל עֲבוֹדוֹתֶיהָ, בֵּין בַּתְּחִלָּה בֵּין בָּאֶמְצַע בֵּין בַּסּוֹף:
כל העסוקין בפרה – the red [cow] in one of its acts of Divine Service, whether at the beginning, whether at the middle whether at the end.
מְטַמְּאִין בְּגָדִים. דִּכְתִיב וְהִשְׁלִיךְ אֶל תּוֹךְ שְׂרֵפַת הַפָּרָה וּסְמִיךְ לֵיהּ וְכִבֶּס בְּגָדָיו הַכֹּהֵן, וּבִשְׂרֵפָתָהּ כְּתִיב וְהַשּׂרֵף אֹתָהּ יְכַבֵּס בְּגָדָיו, וְאִם הַמַּשְׁלִיךְ אֶת הָאֵזוֹב מְטַמֵּא בְגָדִים, הַשּׂוֹרֵף לֹא כָל שֶׁכֵּן, אֶלָּא בָא הַכָּתוּב וְלִמֶּדְךָ עַל כָּל הָעוֹסְקִים בַּפָּרָה מִתְּחִלָּה וְעַד סוֹף שֶׁיִּהְיוּ טְעוּנִים כִּבּוּס בְּגָדִים:
מטמאין בגדים – as it is written (Numbers 19:6): “[And the priest shall take cedar wood, hyssop and crimson stuff, [and throw them into the fire consuming the cow,” and near/adjacent to it (Numbers 19:7): “The priest shall wash his garments,” but in its burning, it is written (Numbers 19:8): “He who performed the burning shall also wash his garments,” but the person who person who throws the hyssop defiles clothing, doesn’t the person who does all the more so [defiles his clothing]? But rather, the verse comes and teaches us on all who engage with the cow/heifer from the beginning to the end require the washing of clothing.
וּפוֹסְלִים אוֹתָהּ בִּמְלָאכָה. דִּכְתִיב וְשָׁחַט אֹתָהּ, וְלֹא שֶׁיַּעֲשֶׂה מְלָאכָה אַחֶרֶת עִמָּהּ בִּשְׁעַת שְׁחִיטָתָהּ. וְכֵן בִּשְׂרֵפָתָהּ כְּתִיב וְשָׂרַף אֶת הַפָּרָה, וְלֹא שֶׁיַּעֲשֶׂה מְלָאכָה אַחֶרֶת עִם שְׂרֵפָתָהּ, לָמַדְנוּ שֶׁמְּלָאכָה פּוֹסֶלֶת בָּהּ מִשְּׁעַת שְׁחִיטָה עַד שֶׁתֵּעָשֶׂה אֵפֶר:
ופוסלין אותה במלאכה – as it is written (Numbers 19:3): “[It shall be taken outside the camp] and slaughtered [in his presence,” but not that another labor should be done with it at the time of is slaughtered. And similarly with regard to its slaughter it is written (Numbers 19:5): “[The cow shall be burned – in his sight], but not that another labor should be done with its burning, we learned that the labor invalidates it from the time of its slaughter until it becomes ashes.
אֵרַע בָּהּ פְּסוּל בִּשְׁחִיטָתָהּ. לֹא שֶׁנִּתְנַבְּלָה בַשְּׁחִיטָה, דְּאִם כֵּן מְטַמְּאָה בְגָדִים מִשּׁוּם נְבֵלָה, אֶלָּא פְסוּל מֵחֲמַת מְלָאכָה, דּוּמְיָא דְאֵרַע בָּהּ פְּסוּל בְּהַזָּאָתָהּ:
אירע בה פסול בשחיטתה – not that it became ritually forbidden by unskillful slaughtering, for if so, it defiles clothing because of being an animal not slaughtered according to the ritual rules, but rather it is invalid on account of the labor, similar that if an invalidation occurred to it through its sprinkling.
אֵינָהּ מְטַמְּאָה בְגָדִים. דְּכֵיוָן דִּשְׁחִיטָתָהּ בִּפְסוּל, אִם כֵּן לֹא נַעֲשָׂה בָהּ עֲדַיִן לְשֵׁם פָּרָה כְּלוּם בְּכַשְׁרוּת. אֲבָל אֵרַע בָּהּ פְּסוּל בַּהַזָּאָה, כְּבָר נַעֲשֵׂית הַשְּׁחִיטָה בְּהֶכְשֵׁר:
אינה מטמאה בגדים – for since that its slaughter was with an invalidation, if so, nothing was yet done to it for the sake of the heifer’s fitness, but if an invalidation happened to it while sprinkling, the slaughtered had already taken place in fitness/being kosher.
לְעוֹלָם מוֹעֲלִין בָּהּ. הַנֶּהֱנֶה מִמֶּנָּה בֵּין לִפְנֵי שְׂרֵפָתָהּ בֵּין לְאַחַר שְׂרֵפָתָהּ, חַיָּב קָרְבַּן מְעִילָה, עַד שֶׁתֵּעָשֶׂה אֵפֶר. אֲבָל לְאַחַר שֶׁנַּעֲשֵׂית אֵפֶר, אֵין בָּאֵפֶר מִשּׁוּם מְעִילָה, דִּכְתִיב חַטָּאת הִיא. חַטָּאת, מְלַמֵּד שֶׁמּוֹעֲלִין בָּהּ. הִיא, בָּהּ מוֹעֲלִין, בְּאֶפְרָהּ אֵין מוֹעֲלִין:
לעולם מועלין בה – a person who benefits from it whether prior to its burning whether after its burning, is liable for the sacrifice of unlawful use of sacred property, until the ashes are made, but after the ashes are made, there is nothing in the ashes coming as a result of unlawful use of sacred property, as it is written (Numbers 19:9): “it is for purification”/"חטאת היא".
וּמַרְבִּין לָהּ עֵצִים. נַמִּי דַּוְקָא עַד שֶׁתֵּעָשֶׂה אֵפֶר:
ומרבין לה עצים- also especially until the ashes are made.
וּמַעֲשֶׂיהָ בַיּוֹם. בַּתּוֹסֶפְתָּא מְפָרֵשׁ, חוּץ מֵאֲסִיפַת אֶפְרָהּ וְהַמִּלּוּי וְהַקִּדּוּשׁ. שֶׁיְּכוֹלִים לֶאֱסֹף אֵפֶר הַפָּרָה בַּלַּיְלָה, וְלִשְׁאֹב הַמַּיִם מִן הַבְּאֵר וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא מִלּוּי, וְלָשִׂים בְּתוֹכָהּ הָאֵפֶר וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא קִדּוּשׁ, כָּל זֶה מֻתָּר לַעֲשׂוֹת בַּלַּיְלָה. וְכָל מַעֲשֵׂה פָרָה, בְּכֹהֵן, חוּץ מֵאֲסִיפַת אֶפְרָהּ וְהַמִּלּוּי וְהַקִּדּוּשׁ וְהַהַזָּאָה, שֶׁהֵם כְּשֵׁרִים בְּזָר. אֲסִיפַת אֶפְרָהּ, דִּכְתִיב וְאָסַף אִישׁ טָהוֹר, מְלַמֵּד שֶׁאֲסִיפַת הָאֵפֶר כְּשֵׁרָה בְכָל אָדָם. וּבַהַזָּאָה הוּא אוֹמֵר וְהִזָּה הַטָּהֹר עַל הַטָּמֵא, בֵּין שֶׁהוּא כֹהֵן בֵּין שֶׁאֵינוֹ כֹהֵן:
ומעשיה ביום – In the Tosefta (Tractate Parah, Chapter 4, Halakha 11) it explains, except for the gathering of its ashes and drawing [of water] and the mixing [of the ashes and the water], that they are able to gather the ashes of the cow/heifer at night, and to draw the water from the well and this is called the drawing of water/מילוי, and the putting into the ashes and this is called קידוש/mixing of the ashes in the waters of lustration, and all of this is permitted to be done at night. And all the actions concerning the cow/heifer are with a Kohen [only], except for the gathering of the ashes, and the drawing of the water and the mixing of the ashes in the waters of lustration and the sprinkling, which are appropriate for a non-Kohen/foreigner. The gathering of the ashes, as it is written (Numbers 19:9): “A man who is pure [shall gather up the ashes of the cow],” teaches that the gathering of the ashes is appropriate for any man. And [regarding] sprinkling, it states (Numbers 19:19): “The pure person shall sprinkle it upon the impure person [on the third day and on the seventh day],” whether he is a Kohen or whether he is not a Kohen.
וְהַמְּלָאכָה פוֹסֶלֶת בַּמַּיִם. דִּכְתִיב וְהָיְתָה לַעֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת לְמֵי נִדָּה [חַטָּאת הִיא], מַה חַטָּאת נִפְסֶלֶת בִּמְלָאכָה כִּדְכָתְבִינַן לְעֵיל, כָּךְ הַמַּיִם נִפְסָלִים בִּמְלָאכָה מִשְּׁעַת הַמִּלּוּי:
והמלאכה פוסלת במים – as it is written (Numbers 19:9): “to be kept for water of lustration for the Israelite community. [It is for purification],” just as the sin-offering is invalidated with work [done by those involved in the ritual], as we have written above, so also the waters are invalidated through work [done by those involved in the ritual] from the time of the drawing of the water.
עַד שֶׁיַּטִּילוּ אֶת הָאֵפֶר. שֶׁמַּטִּילִים בַּמַּיִם מֵאֵפֶר הַפָּרָה כְּשִׁעוּר שֶׁתֵּרָאֶה הָאֵפֶר בַּמַּיִם וּמֵהֶם מַזִּין עַל הַטָּמֵא, וְאִם לְאַחַר שֶׁהִטִּילוּ הָאֵפֶר בַּמַּיִם עָשָׂה מְלָאכָה אַחֶרֶת עִמָּהּ בִּשְׁעַת הַזָּאָה, לֹא פָסַל:
עד שיטילו את האפר – that they cast in the water from the ashes of the cow/heifer according to the measure that the ashes will be seen in the water and from them he sprinkles upon the impure individual, but if after they cast the ashes into the water he performed another task at the time of the sprinkling, he did not invalidate it.