מלבנות – a square garden-bed, and because they were made like the white frames, they are called garden-beds/plots.

שבין הזיתים – and the same law applies for all other kinds of trees, and he (i.e., the anonymous Tanna/teacher of the Mishnah) took [the word] “olives,” to teach us, that even olives are liable in Peah/the corner of the field [to be left for the poor], are not from the legal decisions of the School of Hillel, and all the more so, the rest of the trees which are not liable for Peah/the corner of the field, for it is obvious that they did not make this legal decision.

ב"ש אומרים פאה מכל אחד ואחד – from each small garden-bed/plot and garden-bed/plot, since the small garden-beds/plots stand each piece detached and they do combine with one another, as the School of Shammai holds that the olives are detached. But where the beginnings of the rows are combined with each other, they admit that they are not separate. And at the time when the trees are distant from each other until in the ground, there is a field requiring one Se’ah of seed (a square measure), fifty cubits by fifty cubits and there aren’t ten trees in it, the School of Hillel admits that we give Peah for each and every garden-bed, since the trees are far apart, things appear that it is not for the trees that these small garden-beds were made. And when the trees are joined closely and there are ten trees in less than a field requiring one Se’ah of seed, the School of Shammai admits that we give one Peah for everything, they only disputed when there are ten trees in a field requiring one Se’ah of seed.

המנמר – he harvests his field place by place, that would speckled, from the [Biblical] language (Jeremiah 13:23): “[Can the Cushite change his skin,] Or the leopard his spots?..,” for he reaped the grain that ripened first, the first of the field.

ושייר קלחים לחים – those that had not ripened.

נותן פאה לכל אחד ואחד – and when he returns to harvest the moist stalks that he left, those that are speckled interrupts and it is not considered the beginning of the harvest.

בזרוע שבת – vegetation that we call in the foreign language ANITAV.

שהוא נותן פאה לכל אחת ואחת – because it is not their manner to sow from them one field; therefore, all of these garden-beds are considered as if each one of them are one field, and dill and mustard are liable for Peah, even though we don’t give a corner of the field for vegetation, because it is used for seeding and it is considered for kinds of seeds, and the Halakha is according to the Sages.

המחליק בצלים – there are those who interpret the language [in Biblical terms] (Genesis 27:11): “[Jacob answered his mother Rebekah, ‘But my brother Esau is a hairy man] and I am smooth-skinned,’” for when they were detached/plucked, the place remained smooth/empty. And there are those who interpret it as when he levels [a field by taking out crops], when he takes part of the moist/fresh onions to sell them in the market place and another part he leaves the dry ones for the granary for storage.

נותן פאה לאלו לעצמן – they are like two different kinds of wheat.

וכן בכרם – and similarly one who clears the vineyard, its law is like one who clears out the onions.

המדל נותן מן המשוייר על מה ששייר – at the time that the onions are sown close together, he takes from one from among them in order that the remainder will grow with open space and become large. That is what is called to thin out the vineyard by lifting up and loosening them from their place and our Mishnah (Tractate Shevi’it, Chapter 4, Mishnah 4) teaches: “Who is one who levels his field? He takes one and leaves two,” and those which he uproots to give space to the rest are not liable for Peah because it is for the repair of the remainder, therefore, he gives Peah from the remainder alone and what has been uprooted is exempt from anything and it is not considered reaping.

המחליק מאחת יד – that is to say, from one matter, or all of it for the granary or all of it to the market. And Maimonides explains “with a unity of hand” (i.e., all of them for one purpose), that the part which he takes to sell in the marketplace he does take from here and there, but all of it is from one side.

האמהות של בצלים – large onions that we leave them to grow seeds, and as a result that they remain in the ground and are not worthy for eating other than in the case of an emergency, therefore, Rabbi Yosi exempted them, but the Halakha is not according to him.

מלבנות הבצלים שבין הירק – Rabbi Yosi holds that the vegetable is considered like a different seed, for it is not the manner for people to bring in onions among the vegetables, nd it is taught in the Mishna above in Chapter two (Mishna one) that a different seed interrupts, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yosi.

שלקחו את האילן – from those trees that are considered in the first chapter [of our Tractate, Mishnah 5] that are liable for Peah.

המוכר קלחי אילן – the roots of the plants that are liable for Peah, but he did not sell him the actual ground, the purchaser gives Peah/corner of the field [for the poor] for each one of them.

בזמן שלא שייר – that is to say, if the owner of the field had not begun to reap or harvest the fruit, then the purchaser is liable to give Peah, but if the owner of the field had begun to reap his field before he sold these, what remains from the field that was not reaped or harvested , the owner of the field is the one who gives the Peah on everything, for since he had begun in reaping or the harvesting of the fruit, he becomes liable for Peah on all of the field. But Rabbi Yehuda comes to explain the words of the First Tanna/teacher, and such is the Halakha.

קרקע בית רובע – a place where it is appropriate to sow in it one-quarter of a Kab, and they explained it as ten and one-half cubits by ten cubits by proportion.

העושה סאתים – Rabbi Yehoshua does not follow after sowing, but rather the ground that produces two Se’ah which is twelve Kabs.

לקצור ולשנות – it is the manner of reapers that he grasps a palm’s worth from the flour and reaps, as it is written (Psalms 129:7): “that affords no handful for the reaper, [no armful for the gatherer of sheaves],” that the reaper did not have a handful. And if there is among the standing corn in order to fill his hand twice, he is liable for Peah.

קרקע כל שהוא חייבת בפאה – as he holds, “the corner of your field” (Leviticus 19:9) is implied, and he is in dispute with everyone.

ובכורים – as it is written regarding them “your land” (Exodus 23:19, 24:36). And these words concern the first-fruits of wheat and barley, but the first-fruits of trees – he is not liable other than if he has land sixteen cubits around the tree which is the measure of its absorption.

ולכתוב עליה פרוזבול – Hillel instituted the Prosbul, when he saw that people were prevented from making loans to the poor because the [upcoming] seventh year cancels the debt, he instituted that one should transfer their documents to the Jewish court and write: “I transfer to you, so-and-so and so-and-so the judges every liable that I have that I will collect at the time when I desire,” and when they have written for him this document the seventh year does not cancel his debt (see Mishnah Shevi’it, Chapter 10, Mishnayot 3-4), and specifically when the borrower has a parcel of land, even a bit, and it is then considered as if the debt is collected already in the hand of the Jewish court, and further, we don’t call it (Deuteronomy 15:2): “he shall not dun,” and we consider the land, however small, as if it is worth the entire debt as there is no overreaching for land.

ולקנות עמה נכסים שאין להם אחריות – for movables are acquired with the land, by money, by documentation, or by claim of undisturbed possession (during a legally fixed period).

שכיב מרע – he who lies on his bed on account of illness.

שייר קרקע כל שהוא – all these he left a bit of land, as is taught in our Mishnah, from here until the end of our chapter, not exactly land as the same law applies with a bit of movables, but since the first part of the Mishnah teaches regarding the corner and First Fruits and Prosbul/a declaration made in court before the execution of a loan to the effect that the law of limitation by the entrance of the Sabbatical year shall not apply to the loan to be transacted – a bit of land is taught in all of these are also a bit of land.

מתנתו קיימת – if they purchased from his hand on the gift even though he rose from his illness, he cannot retract, since he left for himself a bit, he revealed his thinking that it was not on account of death that he wrote the gift.

לא שייר קרקע כל שהוא – for himself, from something undefined, a person does not leave himself poorly dressed, and if he had not thought that he would certainly die, he would not give all his possessions, therefore if he stood, he retracts and even if they purchased it from his hand.

וכתב לאשתו קרקע כל שהוא אבדה כתובתה – we are speaking of someone near death who distributes his possessions to his children and writes to his wife a portion among the children, and she herself heard and was silent and didn’t say, “I am collecting my Ketubah” or something similar, she loses her Ketubah.

רבי יוסי אומר אם קבלה עליה – that she would be a partner among the children, and even if they did not purchase from her hand, and he did not command that they should write such in her presence, she lost her Ketubah and furthermore she is not able to retract, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yosi.

הכותב כל נכסיו לעבדו – that he wrote, “all my property to so-and-so my slave,” for the slave is include in the property and he (the owner) gave him his selfhood and that which when it states, “my slave” that is my slave that was already.

שייר קרקע כל שהוא לא יצא בן חורין – all where he puts down a measurement, we say that he also left to himself, and when he said: “all my property is yours,” he is speaking of the rest of his property, but he deceived him that he came and not to free him. Since he (i.e., the owner) did not say to him “yourself and my property, and even if he doesn’t have any property other than the slave and the land that he left, nevertheless, he (i.e., the slave) does not go out to freedom, for since the word “all my property” is not fulfilled, for it comes as “except for” and he annuls it and we don’t argue his words and they are completely annulled, and he (i.e., the slave) did not acquire his self-food nor the property.

ר"ש אומר לעולם הו בן חורין – whether he has no property other than the slave and the land that he left, or whether he has other property, he (i.e., the slave) is always a free man, and we establish the word, “all my property” with the slave alone, when he doesn’t have other property, and we don’t say when he said, “except for,” this nullifies his word that he said, “all my property,” for we separate his word, and we fulfill him regarding his slave and he goes out as a free man.

חוץ מאחד מרבוא – and he didn’t explain what he leaves aside, but there we said that one-ten-thousandth part that he said, is the servant, and he is not considered other than one of one-ten-thousandth of his property and even though he is worth more, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Shimon.