סאה תרומה טמאה שנפלה לפחות ממאה חולין – for impure heave-offering also is neutralized with one and one-hundred.

ירקבו – for it is impossible for a Kohen to consume it because it is impure heave-offering. And surely as it is not taught in the Mishnah "ידלקו" /”that it should be burned,” tbecause we are concerned that perhaps that if he kindles them, they would come to a stumbling block/snare and that they would come to eat from it, because it is considered a mixture of heave-offering and unconsecrated produce (which is forbidden to non-priests), people would treat it lightly and they would not be careful about it all that much.

אם טהורה היתה אותה סאה – and also the unconsecrated produce should be sold to the Kohanim at the [low] cost of the Terumah/heave-offering, for its worth is less, because there aren’t many who consume it, if it is defiled, it is not fit for eating.

חוץ מדמי אותה סאה – for it is necessary to give it to the Kohen.

ואם למעשר ראשון – pure [First Tithe] whose tithe had not been taken from it, the Terumah of the tithe that fell, he should request from the Levite that he should exchange them with unconsecrated produce, and the Levite should make them the Terumah of the tithe on his eatables forbidden pending the separation of sacred gifts..

ואם למעשר שני והקדש טהורים נפלה – he should redeem them and consume the monetary worth of the tithe in Jerusalem, and that mixture of heave-offering and unconsecrated produce should be sold to the Kohanim at the monetary value of the heave-offering less the value of that Seah.

ואם טמאים היו – the unconsecrated produce and the First Tithe into which pure heave-offering fell, for now, he is not able to produce Terumah of the tithe on another place, he separates upon it Terumah of the Tithe and sells them to Kohanim, and the Kohanim can eat them in small bits, in explanation, in a dry condition, like (Joshua 9:12 – not quoted correctly by Bartenura): “[This bread of ours….and see] how dry and crumbly it has become.”

או קליות – just as that the ritually pure heave-offering was not made fit to receive Levitical uncleanness , and all food-stuffs that do not have liquid come upon them from the seven liquids (see Tractate Makhshirin, Chapter 6, Mishnah 4: dew, water, wine, oil, blood, milk, the honey of bees), it is not fitted to receive Levitical uncleanness.

או ילושו במי פירות – as, for example, mulberry juice and pomegranates that are not made fit [to receive Levitical uncleanness].

או יחלקום לעיסות – that he will give less than an egg’s bulk in each [little] lump of dough/started dough, and food-stuffs that are less than an egg’s size does not receive ritual impurities of eatables and it doesn’t defile ritual defilement of eatables, and if someone asks what is the difference from a Seah of ritually impure heave-offering that fell into ritually pure unconsecrated produce, that we state that it should rot, because it makes everything heave-offering and is considered like ritually impure and heave-offering that were mixed and would be forbidden to be eaten? But one can say that they are not similar, for above, this unconsecrated produce became like heave -offering, to be prohibited to foreigners (i.e., non-priests) on the strength of the ritually impure heave-offering, therefore, for Kohaim also, they are forbidden according to the law of ritually impure heave-offering/Terumah, but those unconsecrated produce of here, are not made into heave-offering, other than from the strength of pure heave-offering, therefore, they are permitted to Kohanim like ritually pure Terumah.

סאה תרומה טמאה שנפלה למאה חולין טהורים – and now the heave-offering is neutralized in one-and one hundred and everything is not made into a combination of heave-offering and unconsecrated produce that is prohibited to all non-priests. But the pure unconsecrated produce is not made fit to receive ritual impurity, nor does the ritually impure unconsecrated produce defile them.

תרום ותשרף – just as if the pure heave-offering was neutralized and eaten, so too, that which is ritually impure should be separated as heave-offering and burned. And that being burned is similar to that rotting, for it is prohibited to benefit from it at the time when you burn it, for if you permitted it be able to derive benefit from it, you might come to eat it, for he holds that it is permitted through renunciation.

תעלה ותאכל נקודים – as dry stuff, all of this as we have explained above (in Mishnah 1 of this chapter), and the Halakha is according to the Sages.

תעלה ותאכל – In this, Rabbi Eliezer agrees that even that Seah is eaten, because of that above of ritually impure heave-offering that fell, even though it was suspended in pure heave-offering, nevertheless, when he causes heave-offering to be collected and it returns to its first designation, but here, when the pure [heave-offering] fell, even though the heave offering was ritually impure, when he collects it, it returned to the designation fo ritually pure heave-offering as it was.

ב"ש אוסרים – who (i.e., the School of Shammai) holds that impure heave-offering that was mixed with pure [heave-offering] is not neutralized in one and one-hundred, as we explain the reason further on.

לאחר שהודו – the School of Shammai to the words of the School of Hillel. Because the School of Hillel raised a difficulty to the School of Shammai: If evfen iturally pure heave-offering [which is punishable] by death [if eaten] by foreigners (i.e., non-Kohanim) is neutralized, impure [heave-offering which is a positive-commandment regarding a Kohen, is it not obvious? And the School of Shammai retracted to teach according to the words of the School of Hillel.

תרום ותשרף – and the rest is permitted.

אבדה במעוטה – since it is all heave-offering, and there isn’t an injustice to the tribe [of Levi] even to elevate it [as a heave-offering] is unnecessary. And the Halakha is according to the Sages.

כתרומה ודאי – Rabbi Eliezer, according to his reasoning who said that I state that a Seah that fell is a Seah that was neutralized.

אינה מדמע אלא לפי חשבון – and the Seah that he lifted up, only has one part from one-hundred of heave-offering, and the rest is unconsecrated produce.

אין המדומע מדמע אלא לפי חשבון – because what that is Terumah/heave-offering in this Seah of mixed heave offering and unconsecrated produce we require one-hundred of the unconsecrated produce, but we don’t require one-hundred Seah corresponding all of that Seah of mixed heave-offering and unconsecrated produce , which is not considered completely Terumah/heave-offering to prohibit secondary unconsecrated produce.

ואין המחומץ מחמץ אלא לפי חשבון – started dough of unconsecrated produce that had leavened in leaven of heave-offering, it is all forbidden to foreigners (i.e., non-Kohanim) and if there fell from that started dough into another piece of stared dough of heave-offering and became leavened, it is not forbidden other than according to the calculation [of the quantity of true heave-offering contained in the mixture] of the measure of leave of Terumah that is mixed in it, and does not forbid another piece unless there fell from the first a measure so large that there is in the leaven of Terumah that is combined in it in order to leave the later piece without combination of the unconsecrated produce that is combined with heave-offering.

ואין מים שאובים פוסלים את המקוה אלא לפי חשבון – A Mikveh/ritual bath that has in it twenty-one Seah of rain water, we will fill/draw on its shoulder nineteen [additional] Seah and let it run through a conducting channel/gutter into the Mikveh (see Tractate Temurah 12b) and they are pure, and even though three Seah of drawn waters disqualify a Mikveh, the drawn waters are kosher when it is through a conducting channel it was there that most of the measure of the Mikveh, which is twenty-one Seah of rain water, according to the calculation, for the drawn waters do not disqualify the Mikveh when they are going through a conducting channel unless there are twenty [Seah] of drawn water, for isn’t there the majority of the measure of the Mikveh from rain waters. And the Halakha is according to the Sages.

הגביהה – according to the law of heave-offering that is neutralized in one-and one-hundred.

הרי זו מותרת – and one needs to lift it up [out of the mixture].

עד שתרבה תרומה על החולין – that is, until there would fall there fifty-one [parts] of heave-offering/Terumah, but half by half is permitted.

עד שנפלה אחרת – another Seah of heave-offering/Terumah.

הרי זו אסורה – that it is like they fell at one time.

ור' שמעון מתיר – and it was known known to about first falling until it fell a second time, Rabbi Shimon admits that it is like the case when they fell at the same time. But he disputes where it was known to him in the meantime and he did not have the opportunity to lift it up until another fell, Rabbi Shimon holds that since he was about to lift it up is like something that has been lifted up, and he goes according to his reasoning , that he holds in general (Tractate Pesahim 13b; Tractate Bava Kamma 76b): He who is about to be sprinkled is considered as if it was sprinkled, but the Sages state that now, hoever, it was not lifted, and the Halakha is according to the Sages.

וטחנן – all of it [was grounded] at one time.

ופתחו – and we don’t say that unconsecrated produced lessened but not the heave-offering, and there isn’t one-and one-hundred [parts neutralizing it] and it is forbidden.

ואם ידוע שהחטים של חוליין יפות משל תרומה מותר -, and those of the unconsecrated produce increased [in amount] but those of heave-offering did not increase, and there is here one-and one-hundred, but even though that initially they were forbidden, they returned and became increased through grinding, and even ab initio, he is able to grind it in order to permit them.

ואם מזיד אסור – the Rabbis fined him because he nullified a prohibition ab initio, and the same law applies to all of the prohibitions in the Torah that were nullified willfully that are prohibited.