And there is a difference between when it will speak about the name of a species (including the individuals of the species) without the letter ה (בקר וצאן הקריבו) and when it will speak with the letter ה and the word מן - (מן הבהמה מן הבקר ומן הצאן), that then it always comes to limit, because the letter מ means part of.

For instance, Leviticus 1:14 says,ואם מן העוף עלה קרבנו ליהוה והקריב מן התרים או מן בני היונה את קרבנו(And if his offering to the LORD be a burnt-offering of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtle-doves, or of young pigeons), using the language מן העוף for “of fowls” instead of עוף (fowl) This indicates that not all fowls are valid offerings. For instance, it comes to exclude any fowl that is missing a limb¹¹⁹.

footnotes: ¹¹⁹ Malbim, HaTorah v’HaMitzvah Vayikra 71.