Superior-quality and inferior-quality land, damages [are paid] from the superior-quality land, and [payments owed to a] creditor and [payments of] a woman’s marriage contract are made from the inferior-quality - by Torah law, a creditor [is paid] from inferior-quality land as is stated later on; it is the Rabbis who decreed that he [can collect from] intermediate-quality land, due to [the desire to prevent] "locking the door to borrowers". In a case where he does not have intermediate-quality land, the decree does not apply.

Let his intermediate-quality land be classified as superior-quality - since it is considered "excellent" [Exodus 22:4] as far as he is concerned.

And he sold it - after the loan. The intermediate-quality land came under lien to the creditor at the outset, when [the borrower] still held the superior-quality land.

Both this [baraita] and that [baraita concern cases] where [the borrower] did not have superior-quality - and everyone [that is, the authors of both baraitot] agrees that [the quality of the borrower's land] is evaluated with respect to the world at large.

And it is not difficult, etc. - that which was stated [in the first baraita] that a creditor and woman's marriage contract [are collected] from the inferior-quality land -- is because his intermediate-quality land is comparable to general superior-quality land.

Both this [baraita] and that [baraita] concern a case where his intermediate-quality land is equivalent to the intermediate-quality land of the world at large - and where he did not have any superior-quality land to begin with. It is with respect to this that they disagree: the tanna of the first baraita holds that [his lands] are evaluated against those of the world at large, and on account of this the creditor can collect from the intermediate-quality land, according to the [usual] law. The other [tanna] holds that [his land] is evaluated [only] with respect to [whatever other land] he owns.

They disagree with regard to Ulla - the tanna of the latter [baraita] does not hold of Ulla's decree, but rather goes according to the [original framework of] Scripture: even if he also owns superior-quality land, which means that he has bona-fide intermediate-quality land -- both with respect to his own [property] and with respect to the world-at-large -- nevertheless, [the tanna] rules that the creditor collects from the inferior-quality land.