שלוח הקן. אבל לא במקודשין –consecrated [birds] are found, for if they were non-holy, they would be liable for letting [the dam] go forth from the nest, such as the example where he had a bird and he consecrated it while it was in his domain for keeping the Temple in repair, but it escaped and he found it afterwards lying on the nest and he recognized it. Alternatively, such as the example when he consecrated pigeons of [his dove-cote] to the Altar for a free-will burnt offering, and afterwards when these pigeons grew up, they escaped and built a nest in another place, for at the outset, when he sanctified them, they were his, and sacred Temple property takes effect upon them, and now that he found them, they are not designated–at his disposal–captive but if they were profane, they would be נו

ואינו נוהג אלא בשאינו מזומן – as it is written (Deuteronomy 22:5): “[If, along the road,] you chance upon [a bird’s nest], excluding one that is at your disposal [in your courtyard](see Sifre Deuteronomy 227).

שקננו בפרדס – that they rebelled and went out from the house, and they don’t return to the house and they become belonging to the desert. And an orchard is not designated because they can flee–escape.

הרדסיות – for it is their manner to be raised with people and in the name of King Herod who was engaged in raising them, they are called, Herodian doves, by his name.

עוף טמא פטור מלשלח – as it is written (Deuteronomy 22:6): “a bird’s nest.” A “bird” implies whether pure or impure, a pure bird, not an impure one.

עוף טמא רובץ על ביצי עוף טהור – even though that this species of pigeons are ones that are sent out from the nest], he is exempt, for we require, “a bird’s nest” (Deuteronomy 22:5) that the mother who makes a nest is pure.

ועוף טהור הרבץ על ביצי עוף טמא – for Scripture states (Deuteronomy 22:7): “and take only the young,” for you, but not for your dogs.

קורא – In Arabic, we call him “Sonar,” and in the foreign language, “Pardiz,” for it is the manner of the male [bird] to lie down on the eggs like the female [bird], therefore, Rabbi Eliezer obligates to send away the male [bird], but with other birds, Rabbi Eliezer admits that the male is exempt, for the All Merciful stated, “mother” (Deuteronomy 22:7), and not the father, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Eliezer.

בזמן שכנפיה נוגעות בקן חייב לשלח – as Scripture states (Deuteronomy 22:6), “sitting over [the fledglings or the eggs]” but not flying. But since it is written, “sitting over,” and it didn’t write, “sitting,” we learn from it that if its wings touch the nest, she is liable to be sent away.

שנאמר שלח – and it implies, forever.

נטל את הבנים – for since he took the fledglings, he had a designated–captive nest.

לקה ואינו משלח – even though this Is a prohibition that after its violation is transformed into a positive commandment, flogging is not administered. Here this is the reason, as Rabbi Yehuda holds that sending away is implied from the outset, but what are you able to do when you find the nest? You send away the mother bird, and there is not here a negative prohibition that after its violation is transformed into a positive commandment, but rather, you have violated a positive commandment and a negative commandment, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yehuda.

אין לוקין עליה – if he fulfilled the positive commandment that is in it, but if he did not fulfill the positive commandment, such as when one takes the mother from the fledglings and slaughters it, it dies while under his control, he is flogged.

מצוה שהיא כאיסר – that there is no loss of money in it, other than a small amount.